Bowl Championship Series - Full Rankings Chart

Bowl Championship Series
2002-2003 Standings
(BCS Standings as of Nov. 11)

	Team	AP	ESPN/ USA Today	Poll Avg.	Anderson & Hester	Richard Billingsley	Colley Matrix	Kenneth Massey	NY Times	Jeff Sagarin	Peter Wolfe	Computer Avg.	Schedule Strength	Schedule Rank	Losses	Sub Total	Quality Wins	Total
1	Ohio State	2	2	2	1	2	1	2	1	2	1	1.33	22	0.88	0	4.21	-0.8	3.41
2	Miami (Fla.)	1	1	1	2	1	2	1	2	1	2	1.50	40	1.60	0	4.10		4.10
3	Washington St.	3	4	3.5	3	7	5	4	4	3	3	3.67	20	0.80	1	8.97	-0.2	8.77
4	Oklahoma	4.5	6	5.25	4	3	6	3	6	4	4	4.00	10	0.40	1	10.65	-0.6	10.05
5	Texas	4.5	3	3.75	7	4	7	6	9	5	6	5.83	23	0.92	1	11.50		11.50
6	Georgia	7	7	7	6	5	4	7	7	7	7	6.00	12	0.48	1	14.48		14.48
7	Notre Dame	9	9	9	5	6	3	5	5	6	5	4.83	5	0.20	1	15.03	-0.1	14.93
8	Iowa	6	5	5.5	8	8	9	9	8	8	8	8.17	36	1.44	1	16.11	-0.1	16.01
9	USC	8	8	8	9	10	8	8	3	9	9	7.67	1	0.04	2	17.71		17.71
10	Michigan	12	10	11	10	15	10	10	10	13	10	10.50	13	0.52	2	24.02		24.02
11	Florida State	15	15	15	12	27	12	11	19	10	11	12.50	2	0.08	3	30.58		30.58
12	Kansas State	11	11	11	23	20	20	13	20	12	13	16.33	51	2.04	2	31.37	-0.2	31.17
13	LSU	14	12	13	15	17	15	19	21	18	19	17.17	32	1.28	2	33.45		33.45
14	Florida	20	14	17	13	16	16	16	15	17	16	15.33	7	0.28	3	35.61	-0.5	35.11
15	Penn State	16	16	16	14	25	18	17	17.5	20	17	17.25	4	0.16	3	36.41		36.41

College Football on ESPN.com

OTHER RANKINGS:
Associated Press
ESPN/USA Today

The National Football Foundation and College Hall of Fame is responsible for the weekly tabulation and release of the Bowl Championship Series Standings.

Previous 2002 standings
BCS standings - Oct. 21
BCS standings - Oct. 28
BCS standings - Nov. 4

EXPLANATION:
Poll Average - Average of ESPN/USA Today Coaches and AP Media Polls. Others receiving votes calculated in order received.

Computer Average - Average of Anderson & Hester, Richard Billingsley, Colley Matrix, Kenneth Massey, New York Times, Jeff Sagarin's USA Today and the Peter Wolfe rankings. The computer component will be determined by averaging six of the seven rankings. The lowest (worst) computer ranking will be disregarded.

Schedule Rank - Rank of schedule strength compared to other Division I-A teams of actual games played divided by 25. This component is calculated by determining the cumulative won/loss records of the team's opponent (66.6 percent) and the cumulative won/loss records of the teams' opponents opponents (33.3 percent).

Losses - One point for each loss during the season.

Quality Win Component - The quality win component will reward to varying degrees teams that defeat opponents ranked among the top 10 in the weekly standings. The bonus point scale will range from a high of 1.0 points for a win over the top ranked team to a low of 0.1 for a victory over the 10th-ranked BCS team. The BCS Standings at the end of the season will determine final quality win points. If a team registers a victory over a team more than once during the regular season, quality points will be awarded just once. Quality win points are based on the standings determined by the subtotal. The final standings are reconfigured to reflect the quality win point deduction.

Notes: 1. Teams on NCAA probation (i.e. not eligible for postseason competition) are not listed in the BCS Standings. Teams with victories over teams on probation will receive appropriate quality win points. 2. The Tostitos Fiesta Bowl on January 3, 2003, will host the BCS National Championship Game and determine which team will be presented The National Football Foundation and College Hall of Fame's MacArthur Trophy.