Let's dig into the mailbag.
rtXC in Denison, Texas, writes: Hey AA, love the blog! After the SEC's "groundbreaking" announcement to stay at eight conference games and have each of its teams play one team from the Power 5, would you like to see the other conferences band together and make a stand? Other than certain SEC-ACC rivalries and current contracts for future games, how about the four conferences band together and abstain from scheduling SEC teams in the future? That'd surely solve things, eh?
Andrea Adelson: Thanks for reading! I think you make some good points here, but it is also a double-edged sword to avoid scheduling SEC teams. Many teams in the other four conferences want the strength-of-schedule boost that would come from playing a marquee SEC team. Others just want the national boost that would come from playing an SEC team. Case in point, Indiana tweeted out the number to its football offices in reply to a tweet that read, "Don't everyone call Indiana all at once, SEC schools." I do not think blocking out SEC scheduling will force the SEC to change. Right now, the SEC has no incentive to change. It has been the strongest conference playing only eight games and has played in eight straight national championship games using this formula. The reason to change is .... what exactly? The SEC has no reason to "even the playing field," so to speak. In my opinion, the only true incentive to change is if the league starts to miss out on slots in the College Football Playoff because its strength of schedule is not tough enough.
Gullatte Hunter in Auburn, Ala., writes: Will the running game for the Miami Hurricanes be primed for a good year with RB Duke Johnson coming back, former RB Dallas Crawford switching to defensive back and incoming freshman Joe Yearby also recovering from an injury?
Adelson writes: Miami HAS to run the football given the uncertainty at the quarterback position. I never have any doubts about Johnson's ability. He is one of the best running backs in the country, and I believe he will be even better this year because he has become physically stronger. Yearby should be healthy for the fall. Al Golden was also pleased with the way Gus Edwards and Walter Tucker ran this spring, saying one of the biggest areas of improvement was depth at running back. Miami would not have moved Crawford if it did not believe it would be fine without him. I think the Canes will be -- but Johnson has to stay healthy.
Jeff in Buffalo, Minn., writes: Thoughts on the new uniforms for the Canes?
Adelson writes: Love 'em! My two favorite looks are the all orange, and believe it or not, the gray unis with the orange helmet. I had always been against gray uniforms because green and orange are so identifiable with the U. But this look is just sharp!
Patrick Patti writes: Andrea, Hello! I have been reading your blog for a pretty long time. I had a couple questions for you regarding your take on reporting injuries in sports. When you get breaking news about an injury during a football game or practice, how do you go about reporting that and who do you get that information from? With HIPAA laws in effect, it must be extremely difficult to cover sports injuries and there must be stipulations at hand, so I was interested to see how reporting injuries goes about.
Adelson writes: We are at the mercy of what schools release to us. The ACC requires schools to put out a weekly injury report for conference games that lists players and their status (out, doubtful, questionable, probable), with a brief description of what is ailing them, such as head, knee, wrist. That has been helpful. It is up to the players and their parents if they want to go into more detail about injuries.
Sean Stephens in Louisville, Ky., writes: Hello, Andrea. Regarding the ACC and the divisions, do you see a potential shake-up in the divisions to create a more competitive conference? It seems that with the Atlantic having FSU, Clemson and now Louisville, it far outstrips the Coastal in terms of potential. What are the chances that Louisville ends up in the Coastal in order to help balance the divisions, seeing as they are the "new kid?"
Adelson: There is no momentum for division realignment. I think there might be more impetus to get rid of divisions all together, however. That is a topic that will be under discussion at the upcoming ACC spring meetings. Getting rid of divisions means not being tied to the same six divisional games, opening up opportunities for teams to play each other more often. It also means the ACC can put its top two teams into the championship game. Remember, the ACC has petitioned the NCAA to loosen restrictions to the championship game format.
Scott Cowitt in Jacksonville, Fla., writes: I agree with you in that Cuse will not win their division. It will take several more years, at least. Then they also have to learn to beat FSU and Clemson. I do think the program is heading in the right direction. Do you think Terrel Hunt is the right QB to lead the Orange?
Adelson: At this point, I do. He grew up in the last month of the season and impressed coaches with his leadership and maturity this spring. In fact, offensive coordinator George McDonald told me Hunt was playing at a different level and was able to do things this spring he could not a year ago. He was named the team's MVP for last season, so these are all positive signs for Hunt moving forward.
Ben in San Diego writes: Do you think the ACC should institute a rule to not play any FCS teams in order to increase the conference's strength of schedule?
Adelson: This was a topic of discussion last year at the spring meetings, and most coaches and athletic directors were against the idea. I think it is fine if you have an eight-game league schedule and your other three nonconference games are challenging. But if the ACC moves to a nine-game conference schedule, given how strength of schedule will be a major factor in the College Football Playoff, it would be much smarter to stay away from the FCS games.