AFC North: Cutler rift

Should Cleveland go after Cutler?

March, 17, 2009

Posted by's James Walker

Shelley from Washington, DC writes: Hey James, love the Blog. I'm a longtime Steeler and I've gotten a little obsessed with the ongoing Cutler-Broncos drama, but people have started suggesting that the Broncos trade Cutler to the Browns for Quinn. Now, as a Steeler fan, I think that would be the worst news for us this offseason--we already have Carson Palmer and an up-and-coming Flacco to deal with and the thought of another top-notch quarterback in the division is frightening. So my question is, is this sort of deal (Cutler for Quinn) something the Browns/Mangini would actually go for? Thanks!
  Doug Pensinger/Getty Images
  Could Cleveland be a possible destination for Broncos quarterback Jay Cutler?

The Cleveland Browns are extremely tight-lipped about their offseason plans. But there is enough smoke to link them as a possible destination for disgruntled Denver Broncos quarterback Jay Cutler.

Let's examine the pros and cons to making such a move.


1. The Browns have two QBs available

The Browns can offer Denver what no team interested in Cutler can: a starting-caliber quarterback. Not only that, Cleveland has two young signal-callers in Brady Quinn and Derek Anderson.

2. Cleveland drafts high

Cleveland owns the fifth pick in the first round. Because a straight-up trade is not beneficial to the Broncos, draft picks are very important. Any package involving Cutler likely would include a pick or two. And compared to possible destinations such as Tampa Bay and Minnesota, Cleveland has higher picks in most rounds. The Browns also own two second-round picks -- their own and Tampa Bay's -- because of the Kellen Winslow Jr. trade. Second-rounders are extremely valuable to teams because the contracts are not as expensive as first-rounders.

3. Eric Mangini isn't tied to Quinn or Anderson

New head coach Eric Mangini is not particularly set on either quarterback, and it's evident when he says he could open a quarterback competition if both players remain on the roster. Reading between the lines, that means neither signal-caller impressed Mangini when he turned on the game tape from last season. Part of the problem with the previous regime is that the front office and ownership wanted Quinn to play, while the coaching staff tried to stay loyal to Anderson, who earned 10 wins in 2007 and went to the Pro Bowl. This created division from within. With Mangini there is a clean slate, no favorites, and the potential to move either player regardless of pedigree.

(Read full post)