Print and Go Back ESPN.com: Big 12 [Print without images]

Friday, August 20, 2010
Is Nebraska overrated?

By ESPN.com staff
ESPN.com

I don't think so, and neither does Bruce Feldman, who lays out a good case for why Nebraska is a preseason top 10 team after winning 10 games a year ago:

From Feldman's post today:
@pleasehammer am I crazy or are the Nebraska Cornhuskers way overranked? Terrible offense. Lost best DE in ages. Pretty good rest of defense does not equal top 15, right?
Crazy? Nah. A little off? Yeah, I'll go with that. They're going to be very good up front on D even without Ndamukong Suh. DT Jared Crick is a stud and they also have two very good corners. Also, I wouldn't call their offense terrible by any stretch. They're going to be very strong on the O-line with four starters back and they have some capable RBs led by Roy Helu Jr., who is coming off a season where he ran for 1,147 yards. I'm not sold on the QB play being good enough to be a top-five team, but we'll see. They do also return their top three returning receivers.

I hear complaints from opposing fans like "pleasehammer" all the time about the Huskers, and to follow up on what Bruce wrote, I also point doubters to Nebraska's schedule last season. There's no excusing the 31-10 loss to Texas Tech in Lincoln. That was a bona fide butt-kicking.

But the Huskers were a few more plays away from finishing 13-1.
Yeah, coulda, woulda, shoulda. I get that.

But Nebraska easily could have won more than 10 games last season, especially the pair over very good teams. Replacing the lost starters on the nation's best defense won't be a given, but the Huskers coaches feel confident in the players who are stepping in. It might not be as good, but like Bruce writes, if the offense is better than it was last year -- and it should be -- the defense won't need to keep offenses in the single digits as often as they did a season ago.