Big East: Ryan Nassib
Syracuse is not at the Big East spring meetings, but I did have a chance to catch up with coach Doug Marrone at the ACC meetings on Amelia Island. One quick note before I get to the Q&A. I asked Marrone for an injury update, and he said he would provide one as fall practice gets closer. So still no answers on when many of his key players will be back. Stay tuned.
We have heard a lot this spring about Ashton Broyld. Describe what makes him so special.
Doug Marrone: He’s an outstanding athlete. In my time there, I haven’t had many players who have possessed that type of talent level. From that standpoint he’s going through his first spring. So we are looking to find ways to get him involved because he’s someone that can make plays and has that ability. We have to do a very good job of finding ways of making sure how we insert him into our offense moving forward. But it’s a good problem, not a bad problem.
He was listed as a running back on the depth chart. Will he stay there or be used in a variety of ways like receiver and quarterback?
DM: We’re open to all those plans, so again a lot of it is based on the type of productivity we can get from him in what areas or what positions or where it may be on the offense and how we progress him and how much he can or cannot handle. It’s a matter of what the other people are able to do at the positions around him to put him where it’s best needed for us to score more points.
One of the problems that has plagued you guys has been inconsistency on offense. How will you be better this season?
DM: We changed a lot of things offensively in what we’re doing and the reason why we’ve done that is to be able to create that type of consistency. When you look at it, we did a very good job in just one area of third down; we led the Big East in third-down conversions. Well why was that successful? Those are the questions we asked ourselves, and then trying to take that philosophy and putting it into what we do offensively to have that type of consistency. We’ve gone forward in looking to make some changes, to become a better football team and that’s what we did this spring.
What was the biggest thing you learned about the way last season went?
DM: I think obviously we’re all disappointed, being in a good position, at 5-2 and not being able to turn that around and creating more wins always leaves a bad taste not only for coaches and fans and administrators but players and everyone involved in the program. For us, it was to go ahead, create a level of expectations for us so we can remain and do a better job during the year. A lot about character is how you respond to that. We have to do a better job, starting with me. Responding to that adversity and being able to move forward.
Ryan Nassib took some steps forward last year. What does he need to do to become an elite quarterback?
DM: I just think we need him to do what we plan on him doing. We don’t need him to go the extra mile and push so hard on himself. He’s a very competitive person. We have to make sure we have the right people in place around him for us to be successful. You look at all the offenses, whether it’s the NFL or college football. There are other people around making plays. For us to succeed offensively, we have to make more plays. We’ve generated more yardage but not at a rate we would probably like to but we haven’t generated more yards per play and that’s what’s keeping us back. We’re hoping with some of the changes we’ve made that we’re able to open it up and do some things where we have from a percentage standpoint the ability to make bigger plays per play. We have to make more plays, whether that’s at the quarterback position, running back position, tight end, receiver. We have to generate more plays.
We have heard a lot this spring about Ashton Broyld. Describe what makes him so special.
[+] Enlarge
SportsAge/Icon SMIThe Orange are excited about the versatility Ashton Broyld can bring to the offense.
SportsAge/Icon SMIThe Orange are excited about the versatility Ashton Broyld can bring to the offense.He was listed as a running back on the depth chart. Will he stay there or be used in a variety of ways like receiver and quarterback?
DM: We’re open to all those plans, so again a lot of it is based on the type of productivity we can get from him in what areas or what positions or where it may be on the offense and how we progress him and how much he can or cannot handle. It’s a matter of what the other people are able to do at the positions around him to put him where it’s best needed for us to score more points.
One of the problems that has plagued you guys has been inconsistency on offense. How will you be better this season?
DM: We changed a lot of things offensively in what we’re doing and the reason why we’ve done that is to be able to create that type of consistency. When you look at it, we did a very good job in just one area of third down; we led the Big East in third-down conversions. Well why was that successful? Those are the questions we asked ourselves, and then trying to take that philosophy and putting it into what we do offensively to have that type of consistency. We’ve gone forward in looking to make some changes, to become a better football team and that’s what we did this spring.
What was the biggest thing you learned about the way last season went?
DM: I think obviously we’re all disappointed, being in a good position, at 5-2 and not being able to turn that around and creating more wins always leaves a bad taste not only for coaches and fans and administrators but players and everyone involved in the program. For us, it was to go ahead, create a level of expectations for us so we can remain and do a better job during the year. A lot about character is how you respond to that. We have to do a better job, starting with me. Responding to that adversity and being able to move forward.
Ryan Nassib took some steps forward last year. What does he need to do to become an elite quarterback?
DM: I just think we need him to do what we plan on him doing. We don’t need him to go the extra mile and push so hard on himself. He’s a very competitive person. We have to make sure we have the right people in place around him for us to be successful. You look at all the offenses, whether it’s the NFL or college football. There are other people around making plays. For us to succeed offensively, we have to make more plays. We’ve generated more yardage but not at a rate we would probably like to but we haven’t generated more yards per play and that’s what’s keeping us back. We’re hoping with some of the changes we’ve made that we’re able to open it up and do some things where we have from a percentage standpoint the ability to make bigger plays per play. We have to make more plays, whether that’s at the quarterback position, running back position, tight end, receiver. We have to generate more plays.
Time for my long-awaited post-spring power rankings. I made only a few changes from the pre-spring rankings. Here goes ...
1. Louisville: Quarterback Teddy Bridgewater looked better than ever this spring, giving me renewed confidence the Cardinals are going to be the preseason favorite in the league. The secondary should be exceptionally strong, and the offensive line should be better. Questions remain at running back and with depth in the front seven. But of all the teams in the league, I think the Cardinals have the most stability headed into the season. Plus, it hugely helps to have Charlie Strong entering Year 3.
2. USF: Big jump for the Bulls. I know I said I refused to buy into USF until the Bulls actually do something. But what they have returning is hard to ignore. Generally speaking, teams with 18 returning starters -- many of them seniors -- do really well. So do teams with veteran starting quarterbacks. While USF still has some major question marks on paper -- can B.J. Daniels develop, what happens at running back, where is the depth at linebacker -- the Bulls look like they have a shot.
3. Rutgers: At one time, I had Rutgers as my preseason favorite. But I am a little nervous about the situation at quarterback. I thought there would be a resolution this spring, but neither Chas Dodd nor Gary Nova did much to impress. Mohamed Sanu is gone, there are more shifts on the offensive line, and the running game has to prove something. I think the defense will be the best in the Big East. The offense is scaring me right now, which is why I moved the Scarlet Knights down.
4. Cincinnati: The Bearcats do return talent, and players who saw some significant action last season. But they also lose 21 seniors, including Big East Offensive Player of the Year Isaiah Pead and Big East Co-Defensive Player of the Year Derek Wolfe. I don't have any doubts that the Bearcats will have a good season. I just don't know if they will win another championship.
5. Pitt: If there is any team with "ifs" all over the roster, it is the Panthers. They have a new head coach. They are returning Tino Sunseri at quarterback. Nobody knows how Ray Graham is going to do after major knee surgery. The offensive line has to be better. There is not much depth on the defensive line. If all of these come together, the Panthers could be really good. If they don't, they could be really bad.
6. UConn: The Huskies will be good on defense. But what about quarterback? I feel like a broken record saying the same thing over again. Quarterback uncertainty always makes me hesitant to rank a team in the top half of the league. I was hesitant last year, and I am hesitant again this year.
7. Syracuse: I have said this before, but it bears repeating: I think Syracuse is the hardest team to gauge in the Big East. The Orange have to be more consistent on offense. They have to find a running game to help ease some of the burden off quarterback Ryan Nassib. Does Ashton Broyld give them enough to get them more explosive plays? The defense still has depth concerns in the front seven.
8. Temple: I worry about how the Owls will make the transition to the Big East in Year 1. I think Temple has a good team, but the Owls also lost a lot of their best players and have depth concerns on the offensive and defensive lines. That is enough to worry any coach in Year 1 in a major conference.
1. Louisville: Quarterback Teddy Bridgewater looked better than ever this spring, giving me renewed confidence the Cardinals are going to be the preseason favorite in the league. The secondary should be exceptionally strong, and the offensive line should be better. Questions remain at running back and with depth in the front seven. But of all the teams in the league, I think the Cardinals have the most stability headed into the season. Plus, it hugely helps to have Charlie Strong entering Year 3.
2. USF: Big jump for the Bulls. I know I said I refused to buy into USF until the Bulls actually do something. But what they have returning is hard to ignore. Generally speaking, teams with 18 returning starters -- many of them seniors -- do really well. So do teams with veteran starting quarterbacks. While USF still has some major question marks on paper -- can B.J. Daniels develop, what happens at running back, where is the depth at linebacker -- the Bulls look like they have a shot.
3. Rutgers: At one time, I had Rutgers as my preseason favorite. But I am a little nervous about the situation at quarterback. I thought there would be a resolution this spring, but neither Chas Dodd nor Gary Nova did much to impress. Mohamed Sanu is gone, there are more shifts on the offensive line, and the running game has to prove something. I think the defense will be the best in the Big East. The offense is scaring me right now, which is why I moved the Scarlet Knights down.
4. Cincinnati: The Bearcats do return talent, and players who saw some significant action last season. But they also lose 21 seniors, including Big East Offensive Player of the Year Isaiah Pead and Big East Co-Defensive Player of the Year Derek Wolfe. I don't have any doubts that the Bearcats will have a good season. I just don't know if they will win another championship.
5. Pitt: If there is any team with "ifs" all over the roster, it is the Panthers. They have a new head coach. They are returning Tino Sunseri at quarterback. Nobody knows how Ray Graham is going to do after major knee surgery. The offensive line has to be better. There is not much depth on the defensive line. If all of these come together, the Panthers could be really good. If they don't, they could be really bad.
6. UConn: The Huskies will be good on defense. But what about quarterback? I feel like a broken record saying the same thing over again. Quarterback uncertainty always makes me hesitant to rank a team in the top half of the league. I was hesitant last year, and I am hesitant again this year.
7. Syracuse: I have said this before, but it bears repeating: I think Syracuse is the hardest team to gauge in the Big East. The Orange have to be more consistent on offense. They have to find a running game to help ease some of the burden off quarterback Ryan Nassib. Does Ashton Broyld give them enough to get them more explosive plays? The defense still has depth concerns in the front seven.
8. Temple: I worry about how the Owls will make the transition to the Big East in Year 1. I think Temple has a good team, but the Owls also lost a lot of their best players and have depth concerns on the offensive and defensive lines. That is enough to worry any coach in Year 1 in a major conference.
2011 overall record: 5-7
2011 conference record: 1-6 (T-7)
Returning starters: Offense: 5; defense: 6; kicker/punter: 2
Top returners
QB Ryan Nassib, WR Alec Lemon, WR Marcus Sales OT Justin Pugh, LB Marquis Spruill, S Shamarko Thomas
Key losses
DE Chandler Jones, DE Mikhail Marinovich, RB Antwon Bailey, TE Nick Provo, S Phillip Thomas
2011 statistical leaders (*returners)
Rushing: Antwon Bailey (1,051 yards)
Passing: Ryan Nassib* (250-of-415 for 2,685 yards, 22 TDs, 9 INTs)
Receiving: Alec Lemon* (834 yards)
Tackles: Phillip Thomas (82)
Sacks: Chandler Jones (4.5)
Interceptions: Phillip Thomas (6)
Spring answers
1. Ryan Nassib at QB: Coach Doug Marrone hinted that he wanted some competition at quarterback, particularly with Ashton Broyld joning the team. But Nassib is the entrenched starter going into the fall. Though the offense didn't play well in the spring game, Syracuse is best served at having its most experienced offensive player taking the snaps. He will have the luxury of Marcus Sales returning. Now he needs some better protection up front.
2. Sales is back: With Lemon on the sideline because of an injury, Sales seized his opportunity to show what he can do after sitting out last season. He is listed as the starter at one of the receiver spots and had a solid spring, hoping to pick up his play from where he left off in the Pinstripe Bowl against Kansas State.
3. Inside presence: One of the more intriguing competitions in the spring was at nose tackle, after Deon Goggins was moved to defensive end in the spring. Cory Boatman is listed ahead of Eric Crume on the post-spring depth chart, although competition is expected to continue into the fall.
Fall questions
1. Injuries: Syracuse had a large number of players, particularly starters, either sit out the spring or get injured during practice. Marrone has not commented much on their availability for the fall. So now we wait and see whether Syracuse will have projected starters Alec Lemon, Justin Pugh, Marquis Spruill and Keon Lyn back in time for the start of practice.
2. Broyld's role: We saw only brief glimpses of how Syracuse plans to use the dynamic athlete during the spring. The bigger question is: What is his role going to be in the fall? He is listed at running back on the post-spring depth chart, but there should be opportunities for him as a Wildcat quarterback or to line up in the slot. Syracuse needs to use his athleticism to help improve its big plays.
3. Defensive line: Several junior college transfers are coming in the fall to help, but building depth and finding good replacements for Chandler Jones and Mikhail Marinovich on the defensive line remain a priority. Syracuse struggled mightily up front last season, an area that should be a point of emphasis this fall.
2011 conference record: 1-6 (T-7)
Returning starters: Offense: 5; defense: 6; kicker/punter: 2
Top returners
QB Ryan Nassib, WR Alec Lemon, WR Marcus Sales OT Justin Pugh, LB Marquis Spruill, S Shamarko Thomas
Key losses
DE Chandler Jones, DE Mikhail Marinovich, RB Antwon Bailey, TE Nick Provo, S Phillip Thomas
2011 statistical leaders (*returners)
Rushing: Antwon Bailey (1,051 yards)
Passing: Ryan Nassib* (250-of-415 for 2,685 yards, 22 TDs, 9 INTs)
Receiving: Alec Lemon* (834 yards)
Tackles: Phillip Thomas (82)
Sacks: Chandler Jones (4.5)
Interceptions: Phillip Thomas (6)
Spring answers
1. Ryan Nassib at QB: Coach Doug Marrone hinted that he wanted some competition at quarterback, particularly with Ashton Broyld joning the team. But Nassib is the entrenched starter going into the fall. Though the offense didn't play well in the spring game, Syracuse is best served at having its most experienced offensive player taking the snaps. He will have the luxury of Marcus Sales returning. Now he needs some better protection up front.
2. Sales is back: With Lemon on the sideline because of an injury, Sales seized his opportunity to show what he can do after sitting out last season. He is listed as the starter at one of the receiver spots and had a solid spring, hoping to pick up his play from where he left off in the Pinstripe Bowl against Kansas State.
3. Inside presence: One of the more intriguing competitions in the spring was at nose tackle, after Deon Goggins was moved to defensive end in the spring. Cory Boatman is listed ahead of Eric Crume on the post-spring depth chart, although competition is expected to continue into the fall.
Fall questions
1. Injuries: Syracuse had a large number of players, particularly starters, either sit out the spring or get injured during practice. Marrone has not commented much on their availability for the fall. So now we wait and see whether Syracuse will have projected starters Alec Lemon, Justin Pugh, Marquis Spruill and Keon Lyn back in time for the start of practice.
2. Broyld's role: We saw only brief glimpses of how Syracuse plans to use the dynamic athlete during the spring. The bigger question is: What is his role going to be in the fall? He is listed at running back on the post-spring depth chart, but there should be opportunities for him as a Wildcat quarterback or to line up in the slot. Syracuse needs to use his athleticism to help improve its big plays.
3. Defensive line: Several junior college transfers are coming in the fall to help, but building depth and finding good replacements for Chandler Jones and Mikhail Marinovich on the defensive line remain a priority. Syracuse struggled mightily up front last season, an area that should be a point of emphasis this fall.
Another Wednesday, another mailblog. Let's dig in.
Ken in Connecticut writes: AA, I know it was only the spring game, BUT how can Chandler Whitmer not be named the starting quarterback for UConn? The stats really speak for themselves. He had a good game, while (Johnny) McINTee looked about the same as he did last year and the other two that played had similarly poor stat lines with low completion percentages and lots of INTs. I think the quicker coach (Paul) Pasqualoni names a quarterback, the better this team will be. Your thoughts?
Andrea Adelson: Whitmer did have better numbers, but I am not sure he blew anybody away, either. So clearly Pasqualoni believes more competition throughout the summer will serve all the quarterbacks well. I am a proponent of having your starting quarterback named going into the offseason, so chemistry and rhythm can be built with receivers, trust can be earned and leadership can develop. But if Pasqualoni did not name his starter yet, then I am sure he has good reasons.
Dave H. in Millstone Township, N.J., writes: Hi Andrea - I'd like to hear your thoughts with regard to defenses outshining offenses in spring practice. Should fans really be concerned with poor offensive performance like we've seen around the Big East this spring, or is it normal for offenses to struggle at this time? Do traditionally offensive-minded conferences like the Pac-12 and WAC experience similar situations in their springs, where the defense continually dominates the offense? Is there any correlation to what materializes in the regular season?
Adelson: I think it is important to remember the Big East is primarily a defensive league. Seven of the eight teams in the league last season ranked in the top half of the nation in total defense. The strength of most every team in the Big East this season is going to be defense as well, when you take a look at teams like Rutgers, Louisville, UConn and USF to name four off the bat. Also, defenses do tend to be ahead of offenses during the spring and fall practice times. Be honest -- do any of the Big East offenses scare you right now? Didn't think so. Each one has major question marks and the potential for major shortcomings. So let's just say I wasn't surprised to see the results.
Aaron H. in RU Land writes: Andrea - As always great work... I totally agree with your column on how vastly underrated (Mohamed) Sanu is. I lost count last year how many big third-down catches he made for RU to get them big first downs. When he first made his intentions known to enter the draft, the draft experts had him as a late first rounder (ala Kenny Britt).. I wonder if the draft process tradition of scouts knocking down a player (because they want their team to draft him) is in play with SANU. Don't be shocked if the Patriots keep their first round pick at 31 they take Sanu, especially knowing that (Greg) Schiano will most definitely be looking at him with their second-round pick.
Adelson: Thanks, Aaron. I think the 40-time has hurt him, and maybe there is a bit of scouts knocking him down so they can pick him. In any case, I think he will be a great addition to the team that picks him.
Dave in Charlotte, N.C. writes: I agree with your article about the risk of the western school reneging if the Big East loses its AQ status. But I recall that you shut down this exact argument (numerous times in the chat room), saying regardless of AQ status, the Big East money is too good to pass up for San Diego State and Boise State. So which is it? Do you think this is a risk or not?
Adelson: You are right, I have shut down the argument. But just because I do not believe it will happen does not discount the potential risk. As I mentioned in that BCS post, losing San Diego State and Boise State is the worst-case nightmare scenario. I think the Big East has to be prepared for anything to happen, no matter how unlikely.
Dennis in Tampa writes: Hey AA, a little delayed on this topic. Anyways, when you visited USF was there any talk or urgency for an on-campus stadium? The options in the past were tear up the golf course and build it there, or tear down the University mall and build it there. Just curious if you heard any rumblings.
Adelson: There was no talk or urgency on the matter, Dennis. I think that is a long-term vision coach Skip Holtz has, but I think it is way, way into the future, if it happens at all.
Alex in Syracuse writes: Really, Tino Sunseri and UConn (as dark horses)? What about the Cuse and (Ryan) Nassib? He was second to Teddy Bridgewater in quarterback rating among Big East quarterbacks. He's got Marcus Sales back, who exploded in the 2010 Pinstripe Bowl, and Ashton Broyld can play QB/WR/DB/RB/TE (just call him a weapon). Might I also add a hopefully healthy Prince-Tyson Gulley at tailback, who will come in under the radar. To me, Syracuse's offense looks pretty stable, except I have no idea how to judge an offensive line. Do you know anything on Syracuse's o-line?
Adelson: Did you write in before or after the spring game? If it was after, then you are one really, really super positive fan. I try not to put too much stock into spring games, especially when there are so many injured players out. Syracuse was missing some key pieces, including tackle Justin Pugh. But I am not sure what happened offensively provides many glimmers of hope. I like Nassib fine, but the running game is a concern. Gulley has to stay healthy. The offensive line did not play well in the spring game, but that was not a surprise given some of the players out. The nonconference schedule is pretty brutal, too. Let's just say nothing that happened in the spring raised my hopes, not even the potential of Broyld.
Ken in Connecticut writes: AA, I know it was only the spring game, BUT how can Chandler Whitmer not be named the starting quarterback for UConn? The stats really speak for themselves. He had a good game, while (Johnny) McINTee looked about the same as he did last year and the other two that played had similarly poor stat lines with low completion percentages and lots of INTs. I think the quicker coach (Paul) Pasqualoni names a quarterback, the better this team will be. Your thoughts?
Andrea Adelson: Whitmer did have better numbers, but I am not sure he blew anybody away, either. So clearly Pasqualoni believes more competition throughout the summer will serve all the quarterbacks well. I am a proponent of having your starting quarterback named going into the offseason, so chemistry and rhythm can be built with receivers, trust can be earned and leadership can develop. But if Pasqualoni did not name his starter yet, then I am sure he has good reasons.
Dave H. in Millstone Township, N.J., writes: Hi Andrea - I'd like to hear your thoughts with regard to defenses outshining offenses in spring practice. Should fans really be concerned with poor offensive performance like we've seen around the Big East this spring, or is it normal for offenses to struggle at this time? Do traditionally offensive-minded conferences like the Pac-12 and WAC experience similar situations in their springs, where the defense continually dominates the offense? Is there any correlation to what materializes in the regular season?
Adelson: I think it is important to remember the Big East is primarily a defensive league. Seven of the eight teams in the league last season ranked in the top half of the nation in total defense. The strength of most every team in the Big East this season is going to be defense as well, when you take a look at teams like Rutgers, Louisville, UConn and USF to name four off the bat. Also, defenses do tend to be ahead of offenses during the spring and fall practice times. Be honest -- do any of the Big East offenses scare you right now? Didn't think so. Each one has major question marks and the potential for major shortcomings. So let's just say I wasn't surprised to see the results.
Aaron H. in RU Land writes: Andrea - As always great work... I totally agree with your column on how vastly underrated (Mohamed) Sanu is. I lost count last year how many big third-down catches he made for RU to get them big first downs. When he first made his intentions known to enter the draft, the draft experts had him as a late first rounder (ala Kenny Britt).. I wonder if the draft process tradition of scouts knocking down a player (because they want their team to draft him) is in play with SANU. Don't be shocked if the Patriots keep their first round pick at 31 they take Sanu, especially knowing that (Greg) Schiano will most definitely be looking at him with their second-round pick.
Adelson: Thanks, Aaron. I think the 40-time has hurt him, and maybe there is a bit of scouts knocking him down so they can pick him. In any case, I think he will be a great addition to the team that picks him.
Dave in Charlotte, N.C. writes: I agree with your article about the risk of the western school reneging if the Big East loses its AQ status. But I recall that you shut down this exact argument (numerous times in the chat room), saying regardless of AQ status, the Big East money is too good to pass up for San Diego State and Boise State. So which is it? Do you think this is a risk or not?
Adelson: You are right, I have shut down the argument. But just because I do not believe it will happen does not discount the potential risk. As I mentioned in that BCS post, losing San Diego State and Boise State is the worst-case nightmare scenario. I think the Big East has to be prepared for anything to happen, no matter how unlikely.
Dennis in Tampa writes: Hey AA, a little delayed on this topic. Anyways, when you visited USF was there any talk or urgency for an on-campus stadium? The options in the past were tear up the golf course and build it there, or tear down the University mall and build it there. Just curious if you heard any rumblings.
Adelson: There was no talk or urgency on the matter, Dennis. I think that is a long-term vision coach Skip Holtz has, but I think it is way, way into the future, if it happens at all.
Alex in Syracuse writes: Really, Tino Sunseri and UConn (as dark horses)? What about the Cuse and (Ryan) Nassib? He was second to Teddy Bridgewater in quarterback rating among Big East quarterbacks. He's got Marcus Sales back, who exploded in the 2010 Pinstripe Bowl, and Ashton Broyld can play QB/WR/DB/RB/TE (just call him a weapon). Might I also add a hopefully healthy Prince-Tyson Gulley at tailback, who will come in under the radar. To me, Syracuse's offense looks pretty stable, except I have no idea how to judge an offensive line. Do you know anything on Syracuse's o-line?
Adelson: Did you write in before or after the spring game? If it was after, then you are one really, really super positive fan. I try not to put too much stock into spring games, especially when there are so many injured players out. Syracuse was missing some key pieces, including tackle Justin Pugh. But I am not sure what happened offensively provides many glimmers of hope. I like Nassib fine, but the running game is a concern. Gulley has to stay healthy. The offensive line did not play well in the spring game, but that was not a surprise given some of the players out. The nonconference schedule is pretty brutal, too. Let's just say nothing that happened in the spring raised my hopes, not even the potential of Broyld.
Three Big East teams held their spring games this past weekend. Let's check in to see how they did.
Connecticut: Junior college transfer Chandler Whitmer had an outstanding performance in the Blue-White game, throwing two touchdown passes to lead his White team to the win. "I think that probably from a media standpoint, Chandler had a productive day,” coach Paul Pasqualoni said. "He really did. He made some good decisions. He threw fairly accurately to hit the open receiver. His team won, so I’m sure he’s feeling good right now."
But the competition to win the starting job will go on through fall camp -- the second year in a row the Huskies have more than three players vying to be named the starter.
“We’ll come back in four weeks to start their summer program. Then we get to start this process all over again,” Pasqualoni said. “We’ll start up, the quarterback competition will start all over again and once we get into preseason camp and it’s clear, then we’ll make a decision. We won’t make a decision right now.”
Defensively, senior tackle Ryan Wirth had a huge game, with 4 1/2 sacks.
USF: Speaking of defense, that unit dominated the spring game Saturday night for the Bulls, turning around a dismal performance in a scrimmage the previous week. Ryne Giddins had a terrific day, with three sacks.
"I was really pleased with the way the defense came out and the way they competed," coach Skip Holtz said. "There is some speed on this team. This team is physical and they can run."
That defense harassed quarterback B.J. Daniels all day. Daniels went 9-of-26 for 88 yards, and was called for intentional grounding in the end zone in the first half, resulting in a safety. Not exactly the stellar play fans want to see out of their returning starter. Running back Marcus Shaw probably had the most impressive showing for the offense, with two touchdown runs and 61 total yards.
Syracuse: Defense seemed to be the name of the game this entire weekend in the Big East. The Orange did not score a single point on offense in their spring game Saturday, as defensive tackle Jay Bromley had a hand in both defensive scores. Bromley had a sack in the end zone for a safety and a forced fumble that Brandon Sharpe returned for a touchdown.
Linebacker Siriki Diabate also had a good showing, with a tackle for loss, sack and interception.
Offensively, quarterback Ryan Nassib played the entire game and went 11-of-18 for 163 yards. Marcus Sales, returning from a one-year suspension, had two catches for 68 yards to lead all receivers. Ashton Broyld, expected to be a heavy contributor this season, played running back and receiver in the game. He did have a 44-yard catch from backup Charley Loeb that was one of the offensive highlights of the day.
Syracuse played this spring without several key contributors, including Alec Lemon, Marquis Spruill and Keon Lyn to name just a few. All Big-East tackle Justin Pugh also missed the spring game after sustaining an upper body injury a few weeks ago during practice. In all, 14 players missed the game because of injury.
Connecticut: Junior college transfer Chandler Whitmer had an outstanding performance in the Blue-White game, throwing two touchdown passes to lead his White team to the win. "I think that probably from a media standpoint, Chandler had a productive day,” coach Paul Pasqualoni said. "He really did. He made some good decisions. He threw fairly accurately to hit the open receiver. His team won, so I’m sure he’s feeling good right now."
But the competition to win the starting job will go on through fall camp -- the second year in a row the Huskies have more than three players vying to be named the starter.
“We’ll come back in four weeks to start their summer program. Then we get to start this process all over again,” Pasqualoni said. “We’ll start up, the quarterback competition will start all over again and once we get into preseason camp and it’s clear, then we’ll make a decision. We won’t make a decision right now.”
Defensively, senior tackle Ryan Wirth had a huge game, with 4 1/2 sacks.
USF: Speaking of defense, that unit dominated the spring game Saturday night for the Bulls, turning around a dismal performance in a scrimmage the previous week. Ryne Giddins had a terrific day, with three sacks.
"I was really pleased with the way the defense came out and the way they competed," coach Skip Holtz said. "There is some speed on this team. This team is physical and they can run."
That defense harassed quarterback B.J. Daniels all day. Daniels went 9-of-26 for 88 yards, and was called for intentional grounding in the end zone in the first half, resulting in a safety. Not exactly the stellar play fans want to see out of their returning starter. Running back Marcus Shaw probably had the most impressive showing for the offense, with two touchdown runs and 61 total yards.
Syracuse: Defense seemed to be the name of the game this entire weekend in the Big East. The Orange did not score a single point on offense in their spring game Saturday, as defensive tackle Jay Bromley had a hand in both defensive scores. Bromley had a sack in the end zone for a safety and a forced fumble that Brandon Sharpe returned for a touchdown.
Linebacker Siriki Diabate also had a good showing, with a tackle for loss, sack and interception.
Offensively, quarterback Ryan Nassib played the entire game and went 11-of-18 for 163 yards. Marcus Sales, returning from a one-year suspension, had two catches for 68 yards to lead all receivers. Ashton Broyld, expected to be a heavy contributor this season, played running back and receiver in the game. He did have a 44-yard catch from backup Charley Loeb that was one of the offensive highlights of the day.
Syracuse played this spring without several key contributors, including Alec Lemon, Marquis Spruill and Keon Lyn to name just a few. All Big-East tackle Justin Pugh also missed the spring game after sustaining an upper body injury a few weeks ago during practice. In all, 14 players missed the game because of injury.
I had a few complaints about all the USF coverage on the blog last week. Just as a quick explainer: When I head out on the road, there will be more posts on the teams I am there to see. So that means you can expect plenty of Temple and Rutgers posts and videos in the coming days. Yes, it tilts the coverage toward one team, but it is only temporary.
Now on to the questions.
Joel in Houston writes: Hi Andrea. With the Big East jumping up to either 12 or 14 members in 2013 (depending on Pitt/Syracuse leaving early), has there been any talk on whether the league will go to a nine-game conference schedule? Also, do you think they will start a Big East championship right away or wait until Navy is on board, as commissioner John Marinatto has said previously.
Andrea Adelson: The league has maintained it would stick with an eight-game schedule. As for a Big East championship game, I think the league would be willing to explore having one once it got up to 12 teams, but there is a lot to resolve. First and foremost is evaluating what would make the game most viable and successful. Does that mean playing at a neutral site in the Northeast, like New York? Or campus sites, which probably make the most logistical sense.
Alex in Syracuse writes: I have a feeling that this could be our year with Ryan Nassib, a senior. I feel like he's going to prove himself as a quarterback. He's shown sparks of greatness, and I know he's going to give it his all to carry the 'Cuse to at least a 7-5 record. Am I dead wrong?
Adelson: If you saw my schedule analysis for Syracuse, I listed its best-case scenario at 8-4, so no, I don't think you are dead wrong. Syracuse is a hard team to gauge right now because of all the question marks. Nassib is not among them, which is good news for Orange fans. But if coach Doug Marrone wants to have this revamped offense featuring more of a rushing quarterback, then how does that affect Nassib or the rhythm of the offense? What will the revamped offense look like? Who are the reliable running backs? How does the defensive line get rebuilt? How about the secondary? There are so many questions up and down. Then look at the nonconference schedule and you see why many believe it will be tough sledding for the Orange this season.
Brian in Fort Myers writes: Andrea, That was right on with where USF sits in the Big Four of Florida college football. I for one am so glad that we are even in the conversation as our program is so new and has had some success which makes me proud. Sometimes we think with Green and Gold, Blue and Orange, Garnet and Gold glasses, but reality sets in and overall the whole state is new to the success/traditions of football. Great time to be a Bull and the success will come with time. Keep up the good work.
Adelson: Thanks, Brian. Having lived in Florida for the majority of my life, I can honestly say keeping tabs on all the football programs here has given me some great joy. It is a definite measure of pride to come from a state with such outstanding tradition and to see young programs like USF and UCF try to work their way up to the top. But perspective is important, so looking at the success while writing the story was truly remarkable. All of this happened in the past 30 years! College football has been played for more than 100. We live in a society where we demand results right now. I understand that. But to see where USF has come in just a few short years should make all Bulls fans really proud.
Aaron H. in RU Land writes: Andrea... Welcome to the great state of NJ!!! Make sure to hit up one of the food trucks on College Ave.!!! Interested to see if you can get a good look at the new offensive line. I like what I am hearing about that group. (granted its only a couple of spring practices). Also, interested to see how (Kyle) Flood manages a practice. (Greg) Schiano was all over the place during practices working on fundamentals and I have always felt like that's the position coaches job not the head coaches!
Adelson: Hi Aaron. It is hard to get a good gauge on the offensive line with a few projected starters out in Kaleb Johnson and Betim Bujari. But I don't think it's an understatement to say Flood is excited about the group he has. There is definite competition going on at center right now, and Taj Alexander looks really huge. I think the big key is going to find guys at the positions that fit them best and keep them there. Flood doesn't want to keep shuffling guys around. As for what Flood does at practice, he definitely delegates more to his assistants. He is much more of an overseer, which is a departure. Not in a bad way.
Chad in Richmond, Ky., writes: Love the blog, AA.Charlie Strong rumors about Arkansas and being upset with lack of local media coverage of spring practice during the Final Four are hot and heavy. What say you AA?
Adelson: You know, Strong was a name I did not see on some of the initial lists. The focus from the Big East perspective has seemed to be on Skip Holtz. Now, obviously Strong played at Central Arkansas and coached in the SEC, so he is quite familiar with the league. But I don't know if that is a situation he would want to step in to. He has maintained he wants to stay at Louisville, even if it upsets him sometimes that football can be overshadowed at times.
Now on to the questions.
Joel in Houston writes: Hi Andrea. With the Big East jumping up to either 12 or 14 members in 2013 (depending on Pitt/Syracuse leaving early), has there been any talk on whether the league will go to a nine-game conference schedule? Also, do you think they will start a Big East championship right away or wait until Navy is on board, as commissioner John Marinatto has said previously.
Andrea Adelson: The league has maintained it would stick with an eight-game schedule. As for a Big East championship game, I think the league would be willing to explore having one once it got up to 12 teams, but there is a lot to resolve. First and foremost is evaluating what would make the game most viable and successful. Does that mean playing at a neutral site in the Northeast, like New York? Or campus sites, which probably make the most logistical sense.
Alex in Syracuse writes: I have a feeling that this could be our year with Ryan Nassib, a senior. I feel like he's going to prove himself as a quarterback. He's shown sparks of greatness, and I know he's going to give it his all to carry the 'Cuse to at least a 7-5 record. Am I dead wrong?
Adelson: If you saw my schedule analysis for Syracuse, I listed its best-case scenario at 8-4, so no, I don't think you are dead wrong. Syracuse is a hard team to gauge right now because of all the question marks. Nassib is not among them, which is good news for Orange fans. But if coach Doug Marrone wants to have this revamped offense featuring more of a rushing quarterback, then how does that affect Nassib or the rhythm of the offense? What will the revamped offense look like? Who are the reliable running backs? How does the defensive line get rebuilt? How about the secondary? There are so many questions up and down. Then look at the nonconference schedule and you see why many believe it will be tough sledding for the Orange this season.
Brian in Fort Myers writes: Andrea, That was right on with where USF sits in the Big Four of Florida college football. I for one am so glad that we are even in the conversation as our program is so new and has had some success which makes me proud. Sometimes we think with Green and Gold, Blue and Orange, Garnet and Gold glasses, but reality sets in and overall the whole state is new to the success/traditions of football. Great time to be a Bull and the success will come with time. Keep up the good work.
Adelson: Thanks, Brian. Having lived in Florida for the majority of my life, I can honestly say keeping tabs on all the football programs here has given me some great joy. It is a definite measure of pride to come from a state with such outstanding tradition and to see young programs like USF and UCF try to work their way up to the top. But perspective is important, so looking at the success while writing the story was truly remarkable. All of this happened in the past 30 years! College football has been played for more than 100. We live in a society where we demand results right now. I understand that. But to see where USF has come in just a few short years should make all Bulls fans really proud.
Aaron H. in RU Land writes: Andrea... Welcome to the great state of NJ!!! Make sure to hit up one of the food trucks on College Ave.!!! Interested to see if you can get a good look at the new offensive line. I like what I am hearing about that group. (granted its only a couple of spring practices). Also, interested to see how (Kyle) Flood manages a practice. (Greg) Schiano was all over the place during practices working on fundamentals and I have always felt like that's the position coaches job not the head coaches!
Adelson: Hi Aaron. It is hard to get a good gauge on the offensive line with a few projected starters out in Kaleb Johnson and Betim Bujari. But I don't think it's an understatement to say Flood is excited about the group he has. There is definite competition going on at center right now, and Taj Alexander looks really huge. I think the big key is going to find guys at the positions that fit them best and keep them there. Flood doesn't want to keep shuffling guys around. As for what Flood does at practice, he definitely delegates more to his assistants. He is much more of an overseer, which is a departure. Not in a bad way.
Chad in Richmond, Ky., writes: Love the blog, AA.Charlie Strong rumors about Arkansas and being upset with lack of local media coverage of spring practice during the Final Four are hot and heavy. What say you AA?
Adelson: You know, Strong was a name I did not see on some of the initial lists. The focus from the Big East perspective has seemed to be on Skip Holtz. Now, obviously Strong played at Central Arkansas and coached in the SEC, so he is quite familiar with the league. But I don't know if that is a situation he would want to step in to. He has maintained he wants to stay at Louisville, even if it upsets him sometimes that football can be overshadowed at times.
I put the question to you last week -- who will have the best offense in the Big East in 2012?
You responded in a big way, with over 2,200 votes. Rutgers won the poll, with 26 percent of the vote. USF was at No. 2, then Louisville and Cincinnati. I put an "other" category because I was curious to hear what you had to say about any other team with the potential to have a good offense. For those wondering, our polls only go up to five choices, which is why I did not include all eight.
Many of you made the case for Pitt. I understand Ray Graham is set to return, and that obviously is a huge plus. But until some major questions are answered at quarterback, offensive line and receiver, it is hard to envision the Panthers having the best offense in the Big East, as of today. Plus, there is going to be a change in scheme. I believe coach Paul Chryst will get this offense turned around, but I am not sure how quickly it happens in Year 1.
Overall, there are a lot of questions about every offense in the league. There are no superstar quarterbacks, and no superstar receivers. That talent is going to have to be developed. But the Big East has not really been an offensive league in recent history. Defense has dominated, and that may be the case again in 2012.
Now here are some of your comments:
anthonyphillips84: I see USF turning a corner this year. People have been saying that for a long time but I feel this team has a lot of potential with the amount of experience and talent that is coming back this year. It's always wait and see with USF but I think there is a lot of potential for success with OOC games with FSU, Miami, Nevada (away) I think they can go into conference play ranked once again and hopefully for the first time we can take that play into conference.
snubbed1: My vote is going to SU. Top returning receiver plus the return of (Marcus) Sales who is a legit deep threat, big play receiver. A capable QB who could have a break out season if he can get some pass protection. The running back position is up in the air, but (Adonis Ameen) Moore is a bull up the middle and Prince-Tyson Gulley has speed to get around the corner, but our line that couldn't protect (Ryan) Nassib, was able to open enough holes for (Antwon) Bailey to gain 1,000 yards, same thing again this year. Only 2 guys are gone from the O-line and that means the remaining guys have started together for the last 2 seasons, not saying they'll be great, but they should be bigger and somewhat better.
CardsFanTX: I had to vote "Other" on this one. The other = Pitt. With Ray Graham's return and some good backups and a serviceable OL, they will probably lead the league in rushing. And I think (Paul) Chryst will simplify the passing schemes enough to make (Tino) Sunseri more comfortable and successful. After Pitt, I think Louisville will emerge as a solid offense this year. Probably not stellar numbers because that's just not (Charlie) Strong's style, but consistently good. I definitely think offense is a concern for Cincy and Rutgers and USF.
RutgersBallHardU: If Rutgers; running game improves, if our QB is good, then RU will definitely have the best offense, because of the WRs we got, and with our D. Looking like a hard challenge to beat.
hail2pitt02: Leaving out the team with easily the best RB corp? Not to mention, a QB better than (B.J.) Daniels, and statistically better than either QB choice for Rutgers (based off of completion percentage and quarterback rating) and the early runner for Cincy's QB spot - Munchie (Legaux)- with his mighty 47 percent completion rate, and losing (Isaiah) Pead. Right. PITT will have a better offense than USF and Rutgers at the very least. In terms of points per game, it might not match Cincy, but in effectiveness it will surpass them easily. Immediately tossing out the best player in the Big East is a joke.
You responded in a big way, with over 2,200 votes. Rutgers won the poll, with 26 percent of the vote. USF was at No. 2, then Louisville and Cincinnati. I put an "other" category because I was curious to hear what you had to say about any other team with the potential to have a good offense. For those wondering, our polls only go up to five choices, which is why I did not include all eight.
Many of you made the case for Pitt. I understand Ray Graham is set to return, and that obviously is a huge plus. But until some major questions are answered at quarterback, offensive line and receiver, it is hard to envision the Panthers having the best offense in the Big East, as of today. Plus, there is going to be a change in scheme. I believe coach Paul Chryst will get this offense turned around, but I am not sure how quickly it happens in Year 1.
Overall, there are a lot of questions about every offense in the league. There are no superstar quarterbacks, and no superstar receivers. That talent is going to have to be developed. But the Big East has not really been an offensive league in recent history. Defense has dominated, and that may be the case again in 2012.
Now here are some of your comments:
anthonyphillips84: I see USF turning a corner this year. People have been saying that for a long time but I feel this team has a lot of potential with the amount of experience and talent that is coming back this year. It's always wait and see with USF but I think there is a lot of potential for success with OOC games with FSU, Miami, Nevada (away) I think they can go into conference play ranked once again and hopefully for the first time we can take that play into conference.
snubbed1: My vote is going to SU. Top returning receiver plus the return of (Marcus) Sales who is a legit deep threat, big play receiver. A capable QB who could have a break out season if he can get some pass protection. The running back position is up in the air, but (Adonis Ameen) Moore is a bull up the middle and Prince-Tyson Gulley has speed to get around the corner, but our line that couldn't protect (Ryan) Nassib, was able to open enough holes for (Antwon) Bailey to gain 1,000 yards, same thing again this year. Only 2 guys are gone from the O-line and that means the remaining guys have started together for the last 2 seasons, not saying they'll be great, but they should be bigger and somewhat better.
CardsFanTX: I had to vote "Other" on this one. The other = Pitt. With Ray Graham's return and some good backups and a serviceable OL, they will probably lead the league in rushing. And I think (Paul) Chryst will simplify the passing schemes enough to make (Tino) Sunseri more comfortable and successful. After Pitt, I think Louisville will emerge as a solid offense this year. Probably not stellar numbers because that's just not (Charlie) Strong's style, but consistently good. I definitely think offense is a concern for Cincy and Rutgers and USF.
RutgersBallHardU: If Rutgers; running game improves, if our QB is good, then RU will definitely have the best offense, because of the WRs we got, and with our D. Looking like a hard challenge to beat.
hail2pitt02: Leaving out the team with easily the best RB corp? Not to mention, a QB better than (B.J.) Daniels, and statistically better than either QB choice for Rutgers (based off of completion percentage and quarterback rating) and the early runner for Cincy's QB spot - Munchie (Legaux)- with his mighty 47 percent completion rate, and losing (Isaiah) Pead. Right. PITT will have a better offense than USF and Rutgers at the very least. In terms of points per game, it might not match Cincy, but in effectiveness it will surpass them easily. Immediately tossing out the best player in the Big East is a joke.
Vote: Who will have best offense in 2012?
March, 22, 2012
Mar 22
4:00
PM ET
By
Andrea Adelson | ESPN.com
Who will have the best offense in the Big East in 2012?
It is time to make your voices heard.
You see this handy dandy poll. You also see only four teams listed. Those are the teams I believe have the best shot at having the best offense for 2012. If you disagree, vote for "other" and send me a note to the mailbag or leave your comment below with your best argument for your team.
So how did I arrive at these four teams? Here is my quick explanation.
Cincinnati: The Bearcats run the type of offense that generally puts up some yards and points. Under Butch Jones, Cincinnati finished No. 1 in total offense in 2010 and No. 3 in 2011. Although Isaiah Pead and Zach Collaros are gone, I think the Bearcats have the potential to put up big numbers again, should Munchie Legaux develop in the pass game, and the running backs produce the way Pead did.
Louisville. Teddy Bridgewater returns for his sophomore season, along with some talented receivers in Michaelee Harris, Eli Rogers and DeVante Parker. There are some talented players at running back as well. That is where I think the Cardinals have to do better. They ranked No. 7 in total offense in 2011 without a consistent run game; they ranked No. 3 in 2010 with one.
Rutgers. Interesting choice, right? Rutgers ranked No. 6 in total offense last season, has a major question mark at quarterback and also loses Mohamed Sanu. But I am taking a guess that Gary Nova wins the starting job, and does much better in his second go-around. He has talented receivers to help live up to their potential. The offensive line will be an area of strength, and Savon Huggins and Jawan Jamison allow the Scarlet Knights a more consistent running game.
USF. The Bulls have too much talent not to be one of the best offenses in the league, with B.J. Daniels returning for his senior season, along with some really nice skill position players such as Sterling Griffin, Andre Davis, Deonte Welch, Terrence Mitchell and Chris Dunkley. When you look at the roster, you absolutely see the potential for this group to really have a breakout season.
If I had to pick a fifth team in the mix, it would be Syracuse. Ryan Nassib and Alec Lemon return, and Marcus Sales will be back. Instead of putting a fifth team in the poll, I figured it would be easier to have "other" as an option so that way all the fans on the blog can voice their opinions.
I am sure we will revisit this topic in the summer, but for now, discuss!
It is time to make your voices heard.
So how did I arrive at these four teams? Here is my quick explanation.
Cincinnati: The Bearcats run the type of offense that generally puts up some yards and points. Under Butch Jones, Cincinnati finished No. 1 in total offense in 2010 and No. 3 in 2011. Although Isaiah Pead and Zach Collaros are gone, I think the Bearcats have the potential to put up big numbers again, should Munchie Legaux develop in the pass game, and the running backs produce the way Pead did.
Louisville. Teddy Bridgewater returns for his sophomore season, along with some talented receivers in Michaelee Harris, Eli Rogers and DeVante Parker. There are some talented players at running back as well. That is where I think the Cardinals have to do better. They ranked No. 7 in total offense in 2011 without a consistent run game; they ranked No. 3 in 2010 with one.
Rutgers. Interesting choice, right? Rutgers ranked No. 6 in total offense last season, has a major question mark at quarterback and also loses Mohamed Sanu. But I am taking a guess that Gary Nova wins the starting job, and does much better in his second go-around. He has talented receivers to help live up to their potential. The offensive line will be an area of strength, and Savon Huggins and Jawan Jamison allow the Scarlet Knights a more consistent running game.
USF. The Bulls have too much talent not to be one of the best offenses in the league, with B.J. Daniels returning for his senior season, along with some really nice skill position players such as Sterling Griffin, Andre Davis, Deonte Welch, Terrence Mitchell and Chris Dunkley. When you look at the roster, you absolutely see the potential for this group to really have a breakout season.
If I had to pick a fifth team in the mix, it would be Syracuse. Ryan Nassib and Alec Lemon return, and Marcus Sales will be back. Instead of putting a fifth team in the poll, I figured it would be easier to have "other" as an option so that way all the fans on the blog can voice their opinions.
I am sure we will revisit this topic in the summer, but for now, discuss!
Geno Smith is gone, and so is Zach Collaros. So who is the best passer returning to the Big East?
Statistically speaking, that would be Syracuse quarterback Ryan Nassib, with 2,685 yards and 22 touchdown passes last season. With all due respect to Nassib, the title of best quarterback in the Big East is no doubt there for the taking.
Smith and Collaros, the two quarterbacks honored on the Big East all-conference teams, were the clear choices for the best in the league in 2011. Plenty of fuzzy area at the position going into the spring at every single school. And let's be honest -- the position needs a shot of excitement going into 2012. Everybody loves to watch a great quarterback throw; and most every team generates headlines when they have a superstar at quarterback.
There are no superstar quarterbacks in the Big East right now.
As you already know, several situations are unsettled going into the spring; and the veteran quarterbacks returning have yet to live up to expectations. There are a few quarterbacks who have an opportunity to go from good to great. If they do, their teams could easily get some much-needed national attention. Here are two I will have my eye on this spring.
B.J. Daniels, USF. Yes, Daniels is back. No, he is not 40. This is the last hurrah for Daniels, as he goes into his senior season with plenty to prove. Every year we have waited on him to take the next step. But every year there is a different reason he has not lived up to expectations. New coordinators, new systems, injuries to his skill players around him. It is time for Daniels to emerge as the No. 1 quarterback in the Big East. No more excuses. He has the talent to make it happen.
Teddy Bridgewater, Louisville. We saw all the potential in Bridgewater as a true freshman last season. Now the big key is to avoid a sophomore slump. What is a huge help is having Shawn Watson stay on as offensive coordinator. The two have developed a close relationship, and Watson calls the plays through Bridgewater's eyes. There will be more on Bridgewater's plate this year, as Watson plans to run the hurry-up offense at times. His development will determine how the Cardinals do in 2012.
Statistically speaking, that would be Syracuse quarterback Ryan Nassib, with 2,685 yards and 22 touchdown passes last season. With all due respect to Nassib, the title of best quarterback in the Big East is no doubt there for the taking.
Smith and Collaros, the two quarterbacks honored on the Big East all-conference teams, were the clear choices for the best in the league in 2011. Plenty of fuzzy area at the position going into the spring at every single school. And let's be honest -- the position needs a shot of excitement going into 2012. Everybody loves to watch a great quarterback throw; and most every team generates headlines when they have a superstar at quarterback.
There are no superstar quarterbacks in the Big East right now.
As you already know, several situations are unsettled going into the spring; and the veteran quarterbacks returning have yet to live up to expectations. There are a few quarterbacks who have an opportunity to go from good to great. If they do, their teams could easily get some much-needed national attention. Here are two I will have my eye on this spring.
B.J. Daniels, USF. Yes, Daniels is back. No, he is not 40. This is the last hurrah for Daniels, as he goes into his senior season with plenty to prove. Every year we have waited on him to take the next step. But every year there is a different reason he has not lived up to expectations. New coordinators, new systems, injuries to his skill players around him. It is time for Daniels to emerge as the No. 1 quarterback in the Big East. No more excuses. He has the talent to make it happen.
Teddy Bridgewater, Louisville. We saw all the potential in Bridgewater as a true freshman last season. Now the big key is to avoid a sophomore slump. What is a huge help is having Shawn Watson stay on as offensive coordinator. The two have developed a close relationship, and Watson calls the plays through Bridgewater's eyes. There will be more on Bridgewater's plate this year, as Watson plans to run the hurry-up offense at times. His development will determine how the Cardinals do in 2012.
Spring practice is right around the corner. Let's look at some quick snapshots of each team.
CINCINNATI
Spring practice start date: March 1
Spring game: April 14
What to watch:
UCONN
Spring practice start date: March 20
Spring game: April 21
What to watch:
LOUISVILLE
Spring practice start date: March 21
Spring game: April 14
What to watch:
PITT
Spring practice start date: March 15
Spring game: April 14
What to watch:
RUTGERS
Spring practice start date: March 27
Spring game: April 28
What to watch:
USF
Spring practice start date: March 21
Spring game: April 7 and 14
What to watch:
SYRACUSE
Spring practice start date: March 20
Spring game: April 21
What to watch:
CINCINNATI
Spring practice start date: March 1
Spring game: April 14
What to watch:
- Replacing Pead. The biggest position battle looming might be at running back, where Isaiah Pead is gone, leaving a big hole in the offense. Pead won Big East Offensive Player of the Year honors and was the MVP of the Bearcats this past season. Pead and quarterback Zach Collaros combined for 64 percent of the carries and 64 percent of the rushing yards. Cincinnati might go with much more of a rotation this year. George Winn, Jameel Poteat, Ralph David Abernathy IV and a promising group of freshmen all figure to be in the mix.
- Quarterbacks. Collaros is gone, but at least Munchie Legaux and Jordan Luallen have game experience. Coach Butch Jones says the competition is wide-open in the spring, but you can bet that getting timing down with receivers has to be at the top of the agenda for all the quarterbacks. That was really lacking this past season.
- Man in the middle. Linebacker J.K. Schaffer has been the heart of this defense for the past three seasons, getting more than 100 tackles in each of those three campaigns. So who fills his shoes? That is one of the biggest position battles to watch for the Bearcats. Dwight Jackson, Greg Blair, Solomon Tentman and Kevin Hyland are all in the mix this spring.
UCONN
Spring practice start date: March 20
Spring game: April 21
What to watch:
- Quarterbacks. We finally get to see how highly touted freshman Casey Cochran looks when he takes his first snaps under center for the Huskies. He is the man many are tabbing as the starter for 2012, so his development beginning in the spring will be huge for the team's prospects in the fall.
- Offensive line. The Huskies have to replace Moe Petrus, who started the past three seasons at center, and Mike Ryan, who's as solid as they come at tackle. Coach Paul Pasqualoni decided to shift coaching responsibilities for the line to offensive coordinator George DeLeone in order to boost this unit. DeLeone's background is primarily in coaching the offensive line, so this move could pay off nicely for the Huskies.
- Improving pass defense. Perhaps more than finding a replacement for Kendall Reyes, improving the pass defense has to be priority No. 1 this spring. The Huskies are losing starting safety Jerome Junior, but there are young players capable of taking over. Having Blidi Wreh-Wilson healthy is obviously huge, but I am guessing that technique, fundamentals and coverages will be emphasized this spring.
LOUISVILLE
Spring practice start date: March 21
Spring game: April 14
What to watch:
- Growing up. Gaining maturity has been a big theme since the season ended. It is only spring practice, but I think coach Charlie Strong wants to get a good sense from his players about their focus. How committed are they to getting to a BCS bowl game? To starting the season as a preseason Top 25 team? To going undefeated? All coaches say championships are won starting in January.
- Young linebackers. Louisville has to find a replacement for Dexter Heyman and gain some depth at the position. So it will be intriguing to see how early-enrollee linebackers Keith Brown and James Burgess do during spring practice and whether they can emerge to be contributors in 2012.
- Kicker/punter. With Chris Philpott gone, there isn’t anyone on the roster with game experience at punter or kicker, so expect a wide-open competition in the spring. Redshirt freshman kicker John Wallace may have an edge, if only because he is on scholarship. Walk-ons Andrew Fletcher and Matthew Nakatani also will get long looks. Ryan Johnson is probably the leader at punter. Incoming freshman Joshua Appleby is talented and will compete when he arrives on campus.
PITT
Spring practice start date: March 15
Spring game: April 14
What to watch:
- Quarterback. At some point, we all must put Tino Sunseri's 2011 season behind him. That has to begin in the spring, when coach Paul Chryst anticipates getting a good look at all his quarterbacks, including Mark Myers and Trey Anderson. This will be the third system in three seasons for Sunseri; can he turn the corner?
- New coaches. How will the Panthers adjust to their new coaches and new scheme? This is Chryst's first head-coaching job, and he's already had to deal with staff reshuffling because two guys he brought in changed their minds and moved on elsewhere. How equipped are he and his new coordinators to handle their roles, and how well do the players buy into their system?
- Offensive line. Bigger problem area -- quarterback or offensive line? The two go hand in hand, and this is one position that clearly has to be addressed. The good news is some young players got experience, and they will leave the spread hurry-up that was not so friendly to the line. The bad news -- still not much in the way of depth or options. We'll see whether the Chryst system that worked so well at Wisconsin works with a group that clearly underachieved in 2011.
RUTGERS
Spring practice start date: March 27
Spring game: April 28
What to watch:
- New staff. Just like Pitt, Rutgers goes into the spring with a new head coach and new offensive coordinator. But there should be much more familiarity for the Scarlet Knights. For one, they are going to continue running a pro-style set, even with a new coordinator. For another, assistant Robb Smith has been elevated to defensive coordinator and will employ the same aggressive 4-3 scheme that Greg Schiano used. Still, Kyle Flood is a first-time head coach and is going to need to get his bearings, to put his own stamp on this program.
- Quarterbacks: Chas Dodd and Gary Nova go into the spring in a competition to earn the starting job. Neither was spectacular last season, but there are those who believe Nova has more room for improvement because he has a stronger arm. He just needs to cut down on his mistakes.
- Receivers stepping up. Last spring might as well have been a coming-out party for receiver Brandon Coleman. But he was virtually silent during the season, as Mohamed Sanu got all the headlines and the catches. With Sanu gone, there remains talent in the receiving corps with guys like Coleman, Mark Harrison and Quron Pratt returning and a group of up-and-coming redshirt freshmen as well. Who is going to step up?
USF
Spring practice start date: March 21
Spring game: April 7 and 14
What to watch:
- Rebound. USF is always a team that looks good on paper and in the early season. But then the usual collapse ensues. What has coach Skip Holtz learned in his first two seasons on the job that will allow him to fix what has continually plagued this team, and how can that be worked on during the spring? Folks will pay attention more than ever because USF has one of the most talented and experienced teams returning.
- New DC. Chris Cosh takes over as defensive coordinator, and one of his first orders of business is making sure he molds his group into a much more passionate but disciplined unit. This group needs a beating heart, and DeDe Lattimore might be the perfect player to step into that role. The bigger question is how these players will adapt to their third coordinator in four years.
- Depth in secondary. The Bulls need to work on depth in the secondary, especially after losing starting safety Jerrell Young and starting cornerback Quenton Washington. That departure in particular means all eyes are going to be on early enrollee Chris Bivins, a four-star cornerback out of Gainesville, Fla. Spring will give him time to really work on bulking up -- he was listed at 166 pounds out of high school.
SYRACUSE
Spring practice start date: March 20
Spring game: April 21
What to watch:
- Receivers. There is plenty of opportunity for this group to get better and have somebody emerge this spring. With Alec Lemon sidelined, plenty of young players should be getting reps and a chance to get some rhythm with Ryan Nassib. Watch for Keenan Hale, Kyle Foster and Jarrod West. Still no word on whether Marcus Sales will be reinstated in time for the spring.
- Quarterback. Not necessarily Nassib, but early enrollee Ashton Broyld, a dual-threat QB who played last season at Milford Academy. Coach Doug Marrone already has talked about potentially getting Broyld reps in games as a change-of-pace quarterback, and there are plenty of Orange fans who want to finally see what it is that Broyld can do.
- Defensive line. One area that has to improve is along the defensive front, where Syracuse struggled to get a consistent pass rush. Their best two players are gone in Chandler Jones and Mikhail Marinovich, leaving guys like Micah Robinson and Brandon Sharpe as likely first-teamers in the spring. More help comes in this summer in the form of junior college transfers Zian Jones and Markus Pierce-Brewster.
We continue on with our 2011 postseason position rankings with quarterback. There should not be too many surprises on this list. For me, it was hardest to separate Syracuse-USF-Rutgers in the middle of the pack. You could also make the case to flop Pitt and UConn.
1. West Virginia. Geno Smith went about shattering school, Big East and Orange Bowl records during his career year for the Mountaineers, throwing for 4,385 yards, 31 touchdown passes and seven interceptions. His development under Dana Holgorsen was about what we expected. Preseason ranking: 1.
2. Cincinnati. Zach Collaros' worth to the team was illustrated when he got hurt against West Virginia. The Bearcats lost their grip atop the Big East and ended up sharing the league title. Munchie Legaux was not great, but Collaros was. Cincinnati may have relied more on the run this year, but I thought Collaros and Isaiah Pead complemented each other perfectly. Preseason ranking: 2.
3. Louisville. True freshman Teddy Bridgewater really helped anchor this team once he replaced Will Stein in the starting lineup. He set a school freshman passing record with 2,129 yards and won Big East Newcomer of the Year honors. Without Bridgewater, I'm not sure this team wins a share of the Big East title. He showed poise and maturity beyond his years. Preseason ranking: 7.
4. Syracuse. Ryan Nassib had a career year for the Orange, setting highs for completions, attempts, yards, completion percentage and touchdown passes. There is no doubt he made some significant strides for Syracuse, but the biggest knock is that he never really was able to make the plays to get his team in position to win just one game in the final stretch of the season. Preseason ranking: 6.
5. USF. Coach Skip Holtz rightfully points out that the Bulls offense was improved in 2011 vs. 2010. But I think most of us were waiting on B.J. Daniels to take that next step and become an elite quarterback in the Big East. We are still waiting. He barely improved his completion percentage and threw just 13 touchdown passes -- though he did have a career-high with 601 yards rushing. What sticks out most are critical mistakes against UConn and West Virginia that cost his team wins. Preseason ranking: 4.
6. Rutgers. Greg Schiano went with musical quarterbacks again, switching back and forth and then back again from Chas Dodd to Gary Nova to Dodd. Neither was particularly effective, and both had a penchant for making bad mistakes. It's a true credit to receiver Mohamed Sanu that he was able to have such a great year with such inconsistent quarterback play. Preseason ranking: 5.
7. Pitt. How much more can be said about the way Tino Sunseri played this season? The further removed we are from the year, the more I'm convinced that his coaches let him down. Still, he was not very good in 2011 -- 38 yards passing against Utah was the low point. It was a disaster of a season. Preseason ranking: 3 (Gulp!)
8. UConn. Three quarterbacks in contention, but the Huskies really had no true quarterbacks. Johnny McEntee ended up winning the right to start, but he was completely overmatched. Scott McCummings came in for Wildcat duties and Michael Nebrich was an afterthought. No surprise that this was the worst passing offense in the Big East. Preseason ranking: 8.
1. West Virginia. Geno Smith went about shattering school, Big East and Orange Bowl records during his career year for the Mountaineers, throwing for 4,385 yards, 31 touchdown passes and seven interceptions. His development under Dana Holgorsen was about what we expected. Preseason ranking: 1.
[+] Enlarge
Andrew Weber/US PresswireWest Virginia's Geno Smith passed for 4,385 yards and 31 touchdowns under new coach Dana Holgorsen.
Andrew Weber/US PresswireWest Virginia's Geno Smith passed for 4,385 yards and 31 touchdowns under new coach Dana Holgorsen.3. Louisville. True freshman Teddy Bridgewater really helped anchor this team once he replaced Will Stein in the starting lineup. He set a school freshman passing record with 2,129 yards and won Big East Newcomer of the Year honors. Without Bridgewater, I'm not sure this team wins a share of the Big East title. He showed poise and maturity beyond his years. Preseason ranking: 7.
4. Syracuse. Ryan Nassib had a career year for the Orange, setting highs for completions, attempts, yards, completion percentage and touchdown passes. There is no doubt he made some significant strides for Syracuse, but the biggest knock is that he never really was able to make the plays to get his team in position to win just one game in the final stretch of the season. Preseason ranking: 6.
5. USF. Coach Skip Holtz rightfully points out that the Bulls offense was improved in 2011 vs. 2010. But I think most of us were waiting on B.J. Daniels to take that next step and become an elite quarterback in the Big East. We are still waiting. He barely improved his completion percentage and threw just 13 touchdown passes -- though he did have a career-high with 601 yards rushing. What sticks out most are critical mistakes against UConn and West Virginia that cost his team wins. Preseason ranking: 4.
6. Rutgers. Greg Schiano went with musical quarterbacks again, switching back and forth and then back again from Chas Dodd to Gary Nova to Dodd. Neither was particularly effective, and both had a penchant for making bad mistakes. It's a true credit to receiver Mohamed Sanu that he was able to have such a great year with such inconsistent quarterback play. Preseason ranking: 5.
7. Pitt. How much more can be said about the way Tino Sunseri played this season? The further removed we are from the year, the more I'm convinced that his coaches let him down. Still, he was not very good in 2011 -- 38 yards passing against Utah was the low point. It was a disaster of a season. Preseason ranking: 3 (Gulp!)
8. UConn. Three quarterbacks in contention, but the Huskies really had no true quarterbacks. Johnny McEntee ended up winning the right to start, but he was completely overmatched. Scott McCummings came in for Wildcat duties and Michael Nebrich was an afterthought. No surprise that this was the worst passing offense in the Big East. Preseason ranking: 8.
Fittingly, the Big East and West Virginia have broken up on Valentine's Day.
- New UConn AD Warde Manuel has a lot to offer.
- Pitt has picked up Ohio State transfer David Durham, a fullback who will have to sit out a year per NCAA rules.
- New Rutgers offensive coordinator Dave Brock will stick with a pro-style offense.
- Should Ryan Nassib start for Syracuse next year?
- Could USF be a match for Maryland transfer Danny O'Brien?
- West Virginia has offered a scholarship to top running back Ryan Switzer.
It is time to take a last look back at how each Big East team fared in 2011 with season-ending report cards.
Up today: Syracuse.
Offense: Syracuse was slightly better on offense this past season than it was in 2010, averaging about 20 more yards a game. But that was not enough to get the Orange out of the bottom half of the national rankings. They finished ranked No. 90 in total offense and struggled running the ball -- down over 20 yards a game from last season. Antwon Bailey still was a first-team selection and went over 1,000 yards but there was never real consistency in the ground game or the offense as a whole. Ryan Nassib and Alec Lemon had career years, but a lot of that was a function of struggling in the run game and being behind in several games this season. Syracuse did have four players make the Big East first-team but in seven losses this season, Syracuse averaged 16.2 points per game and hit the 20-point mark just twice.
Grade: C.
Defense: This was a much more inexperienced group compared to a season ago, and it showed. What compounded that were injuries to key players, most notably defensive end Chandler Jones. Syracuse went from No. 3 in the league in scoring defense (19.3 pgg) to last (28.5); from No. 2 in total defense (301.5 ypg) to last (386.4); from No. 1 in pass defense (165.3 ypg) to sixth (258.2 ypg). Pass defense was the biggest area of weakness, though Syracuse got better in that area as the season wore on. The Orange got a boost when Jones returned, but there were key breakdowns at various times in most every game this season. Syracuse gave up fewer than 28 points just four times this past season.
Grade: D.
Overall: Syracuse went into the season hoping to build on the moment of 2010, when it ended a long drought and made it back to a bowl game. After a surprise win over West Virginia got Syracuse to a 5-2 start, most everybody expected those hopes would become a reality. But Syracuse ended the season on a five-game losing streak, and that victory over the Mountaineers proved to be their only one in Big East play. That win was their only real convincing one of the season. They needed a comeback over Wake Forest; had to hold off FCS Rhode Island; had a controversial finish against Toledo; and a mad scramble to beat Tulane. This was not the step coach Doug Marrone envisioned for his team this season.
Grade: D.
Previously featured:
Up today: Syracuse.
Offense: Syracuse was slightly better on offense this past season than it was in 2010, averaging about 20 more yards a game. But that was not enough to get the Orange out of the bottom half of the national rankings. They finished ranked No. 90 in total offense and struggled running the ball -- down over 20 yards a game from last season. Antwon Bailey still was a first-team selection and went over 1,000 yards but there was never real consistency in the ground game or the offense as a whole. Ryan Nassib and Alec Lemon had career years, but a lot of that was a function of struggling in the run game and being behind in several games this season. Syracuse did have four players make the Big East first-team but in seven losses this season, Syracuse averaged 16.2 points per game and hit the 20-point mark just twice.
Grade: C.
Defense: This was a much more inexperienced group compared to a season ago, and it showed. What compounded that were injuries to key players, most notably defensive end Chandler Jones. Syracuse went from No. 3 in the league in scoring defense (19.3 pgg) to last (28.5); from No. 2 in total defense (301.5 ypg) to last (386.4); from No. 1 in pass defense (165.3 ypg) to sixth (258.2 ypg). Pass defense was the biggest area of weakness, though Syracuse got better in that area as the season wore on. The Orange got a boost when Jones returned, but there were key breakdowns at various times in most every game this season. Syracuse gave up fewer than 28 points just four times this past season.
Grade: D.
Overall: Syracuse went into the season hoping to build on the moment of 2010, when it ended a long drought and made it back to a bowl game. After a surprise win over West Virginia got Syracuse to a 5-2 start, most everybody expected those hopes would become a reality. But Syracuse ended the season on a five-game losing streak, and that victory over the Mountaineers proved to be their only one in Big East play. That win was their only real convincing one of the season. They needed a comeback over Wake Forest; had to hold off FCS Rhode Island; had a controversial finish against Toledo; and a mad scramble to beat Tulane. This was not the step coach Doug Marrone envisioned for his team this season.
Grade: D.
Previously featured:
Come one, come all for your midweek Big East mailblog.
Jackson Fiske in Cincinnati writes: Do you believe that the moves the Big East has made toward expansion have been beneficial? Obviously it is important to maintain a certain number of teams, but it seems like the conference is going after quantity and not quality. Conferences like the Big Ten, SEC, and Pac-12 would never consider adding some of these choices.
Andrea Adelson: I think the Big East did the best it could do under the circumstances. The truth is that the Big East simply does not have the cache to be able to go and raid other conferences. No team from the ACC or Big Ten, for example, is leaving its secure conference home to join one that has been teetering on the brink. So given that, the Big East did what needed to be done to survive. It added the most successful non-AQ teams out there which also expands its television footprint and national reach. The Big East was not going to sit there and fold. Bringing in these schools had to be done.
Mike in Orlando writes: Andrea, It opens up quite a few possibilities with Navy joining the Big East in football only, the most obvious one being its effect on Air Force and Army in negotiations. What I've wondered, and what I've heard whispered in the darker corners of the forum Internet is the effect this move will have on BYU and Notre Dame. Do you think it is a pipe dream or a possibility that we see the addition of (best case scenario, in my opinion) of AFA, ND, and BYU by 2015, making a 14-team (and very powerful, market-wise) conference?
Adelson: I think Notre Dame is a pipe dream. I will not rule out the other two even though they said no for right now. Market forces can change minds, especially if independence does not work out for BYU (Although the Big 12 could be an option as well). Notre Dame will wait until the very last moment to join a conference. If and win that does happen, I just don't think the Big East will be the big winner.
John in Roanoke, Va., writes: Andrea, your question about the Big East Offensive MVP is interesting. However, I think you (and others) have missed an important angle when comparing Smith vs. Austin vs. Pead. Who was most VALUABLE to their team? In other words, how many more games would their respective teams have lost if they went down with a season-ending injury on the first play of game one? Without Austin, WVU might have lost an extra game or two -- the team would have lost explosiveness at the slot position, but there are other weapons at the receiver position. Without Pead, Cincy simply relies more heavily on a proven quarterback in (Zach) Collaros, but I'll admit they still might have lost another game or two. Without Geno, WVU relies on a true freshman quarterback, mostly unrecruited and certainly unproven. WVU would have been lucky to go 6-6.
Adelson: John, you bring up a logical point. I think I addressed the idea of who was most valuable in the blog. I believe the award went to Pead because coaches believed he was most valuable, especially once Collaros went down. How would Cincinnati have done without Collaros AND Pead? Based on your reasoning, Smith should have been the MVP of his own team. But he was not. That honor went to Austin, which I thought was very interesting and the whole reason I revisited the topic.
Grant in NYC writes: Hi AA. As an alum and die-hard 'Cuse football fan, I find it hard to believe that Doug Marrone has not changed or announced any coaching changes. The last two years we have had the same offensive coordinator and the offense has been horrible. We were the only team in the Big East not to play at all two quarterbacks. (Ryan) Nassib played the whole year. Not one other quarterback got a chance to show what they can do. I would like to see Doug Marrone go with a dual-threat like a Ashton Broyld or another mobile quarterback. What do you think? I do like coach (Scot) Shafer as the DC. We just didn't have the man-power last year as the year before, which you will agree. Also we lose a lot this year due to players leaving early, kicked off the team and what not. Do you see 'Cuse getting any better this season? The recruiting seems to be OK at best, but no studs or four-stars. I know we don't always get the best players, but Doug Marrone seems to know what he is doing and I do like coach Marone. I just wish we can get a big fish one of these days.
Adelson: I agree wholeheartedly with your defensive assessment. However, I am not of the same mind about pulling Nassib. I understand the frustrations over the offense not really making strides this year over last year, but what would putting in an inexperienced quarterback have done? Nassib did end up having a career year, and he improved in virtually every statistical category even if it didn't feel that way. He gives Syracuse the best chance to win. Broyld is totally unproven, and so are the other guys on the roster. I don't think Cincinnati or USF would have played their backups if given a choice. Would you rather play three like UConn? I don't think so. Syracuse has just got to find a way to be more consistent with Nassib leading the charge. As for recruiting, your complaints are understood. But again, it is all about developing the talent you bring in. I have always believed this star rating system is a crock because nobody really knows how these kids are going to turn out. Florida has consistently signed Top 5 recruiting classes filled with four and five star players and went 7-6 last season. It's all about getting as much as you can out of these kids once they arrive.
Kris in Hollidaysburg, Pa., writes: Andrea, There were a lot of people on the chat last week speculating that the ACC is having buyer's remorse over Pitt and Syracuse, and I tend to agree. Of the teams that will no longer be in the Big East, who will get the most TV money: ACC schools Pitt and Cuse, or Big 12 schools WVU and TCU? What about a few years down the road? Thanks.
Adelson: Well if you are splitting a pie 10 ways versus splitting it 14 ways, then I go with the Big 12 schools. I think the ACC is going to renegotiate with Syracuse and Pitt on board and will be lucky to get an incremental increase per school as part of the new deal. Any conference with Texas and Oklahoma in it would probably get more television dollars in my best estimation.
Jackson Fiske in Cincinnati writes: Do you believe that the moves the Big East has made toward expansion have been beneficial? Obviously it is important to maintain a certain number of teams, but it seems like the conference is going after quantity and not quality. Conferences like the Big Ten, SEC, and Pac-12 would never consider adding some of these choices.
Andrea Adelson: I think the Big East did the best it could do under the circumstances. The truth is that the Big East simply does not have the cache to be able to go and raid other conferences. No team from the ACC or Big Ten, for example, is leaving its secure conference home to join one that has been teetering on the brink. So given that, the Big East did what needed to be done to survive. It added the most successful non-AQ teams out there which also expands its television footprint and national reach. The Big East was not going to sit there and fold. Bringing in these schools had to be done.
Mike in Orlando writes: Andrea, It opens up quite a few possibilities with Navy joining the Big East in football only, the most obvious one being its effect on Air Force and Army in negotiations. What I've wondered, and what I've heard whispered in the darker corners of the forum Internet is the effect this move will have on BYU and Notre Dame. Do you think it is a pipe dream or a possibility that we see the addition of (best case scenario, in my opinion) of AFA, ND, and BYU by 2015, making a 14-team (and very powerful, market-wise) conference?
Adelson: I think Notre Dame is a pipe dream. I will not rule out the other two even though they said no for right now. Market forces can change minds, especially if independence does not work out for BYU (Although the Big 12 could be an option as well). Notre Dame will wait until the very last moment to join a conference. If and win that does happen, I just don't think the Big East will be the big winner.
John in Roanoke, Va., writes: Andrea, your question about the Big East Offensive MVP is interesting. However, I think you (and others) have missed an important angle when comparing Smith vs. Austin vs. Pead. Who was most VALUABLE to their team? In other words, how many more games would their respective teams have lost if they went down with a season-ending injury on the first play of game one? Without Austin, WVU might have lost an extra game or two -- the team would have lost explosiveness at the slot position, but there are other weapons at the receiver position. Without Pead, Cincy simply relies more heavily on a proven quarterback in (Zach) Collaros, but I'll admit they still might have lost another game or two. Without Geno, WVU relies on a true freshman quarterback, mostly unrecruited and certainly unproven. WVU would have been lucky to go 6-6.
Adelson: John, you bring up a logical point. I think I addressed the idea of who was most valuable in the blog. I believe the award went to Pead because coaches believed he was most valuable, especially once Collaros went down. How would Cincinnati have done without Collaros AND Pead? Based on your reasoning, Smith should have been the MVP of his own team. But he was not. That honor went to Austin, which I thought was very interesting and the whole reason I revisited the topic.
Grant in NYC writes: Hi AA. As an alum and die-hard 'Cuse football fan, I find it hard to believe that Doug Marrone has not changed or announced any coaching changes. The last two years we have had the same offensive coordinator and the offense has been horrible. We were the only team in the Big East not to play at all two quarterbacks. (Ryan) Nassib played the whole year. Not one other quarterback got a chance to show what they can do. I would like to see Doug Marrone go with a dual-threat like a Ashton Broyld or another mobile quarterback. What do you think? I do like coach (Scot) Shafer as the DC. We just didn't have the man-power last year as the year before, which you will agree. Also we lose a lot this year due to players leaving early, kicked off the team and what not. Do you see 'Cuse getting any better this season? The recruiting seems to be OK at best, but no studs or four-stars. I know we don't always get the best players, but Doug Marrone seems to know what he is doing and I do like coach Marone. I just wish we can get a big fish one of these days.
Adelson: I agree wholeheartedly with your defensive assessment. However, I am not of the same mind about pulling Nassib. I understand the frustrations over the offense not really making strides this year over last year, but what would putting in an inexperienced quarterback have done? Nassib did end up having a career year, and he improved in virtually every statistical category even if it didn't feel that way. He gives Syracuse the best chance to win. Broyld is totally unproven, and so are the other guys on the roster. I don't think Cincinnati or USF would have played their backups if given a choice. Would you rather play three like UConn? I don't think so. Syracuse has just got to find a way to be more consistent with Nassib leading the charge. As for recruiting, your complaints are understood. But again, it is all about developing the talent you bring in. I have always believed this star rating system is a crock because nobody really knows how these kids are going to turn out. Florida has consistently signed Top 5 recruiting classes filled with four and five star players and went 7-6 last season. It's all about getting as much as you can out of these kids once they arrive.
Kris in Hollidaysburg, Pa., writes: Andrea, There were a lot of people on the chat last week speculating that the ACC is having buyer's remorse over Pitt and Syracuse, and I tend to agree. Of the teams that will no longer be in the Big East, who will get the most TV money: ACC schools Pitt and Cuse, or Big 12 schools WVU and TCU? What about a few years down the road? Thanks.
Adelson: Well if you are splitting a pie 10 ways versus splitting it 14 ways, then I go with the Big 12 schools. I think the ACC is going to renegotiate with Syracuse and Pitt on board and will be lucky to get an incremental increase per school as part of the new deal. Any conference with Texas and Oklahoma in it would probably get more television dollars in my best estimation.
Every team has plenty to do in the offseason. Today, I present to you my top priorities for each Big East program headed into the 2012 season.
Cincinnati
UConn
Louisville
Pitt
Rutgers
USF
Syracuse
West Virginia
Cincinnati
- Settle on a quarterback. If 2011 was any indication, then Munchie Legaux seems a sure bet to start next season. He showed flashes, but he needs to spend the bulk of his offseason developing a nice rhythm and chemistry with his receivers. That was one of the biggest roadblocks for him when he took over for Zach Collaros. Cincinnati has some good talent at receiver -- with Anthony McClung, Kenbrell Thompkins and Alex Chisum coming back -- so this must be a top priority.
- Develop senior leadership. The Bearcats are losing the best senior class in school history, filled with leaders left and right. With guys such as Collaros, Isaiah Pead and JK Schaffer gone, who is going to take the responsibility of leading this team? That is something that must be worked on throughout the offseason.
UConn
- Find a quarterback. Sounds the same as last season, right? The Huskies never really found one in 2011 and that is a big reason why they struggled. Spring practice has the potential to have five different quarterbacks taking reps in Johnny McEntee, Scott McCummings, Michael Nebrich, Chandler Whitmer and Casey Cochran. Somebody has to emerge to take a hold of this offense.
- Work on improving the secondary. The weakest part of this team last season ranked No. 113 in the nation, so this is a clear area that has to get better. The Huskies were hurt when starting cornerback Blidi Wreh-Wilson missed a good chunk of the season with a knee injury, and they also had to rely on freshmen in Byron Jones and Ty-Meer Brown. This group will be much more experienced, so you have to hope they will be much better, too.
Louisville
- Mature. The Cardinals were one of the youngest teams in the nation last season, and their immaturity showed at times. But now they enter the offseason with exceedingly high expectations. Many preseason lists have them ranked in the Top 25 and challenging for the Big East title. This team will still be young in 2012, so it will be imperative for coach Charlie Strong to help get this group to mature quickly and stay focused.
- Work on the run game. Strong wants the run game to be the bread-and-butter of the offense, and this was an area that took a step back in 2011 with Bilal Powell gone. Louisville went from being ranked No. 1 in the Big East to No. 5 in the Big East, averaging 121.5 yards per game. That is down over 50 yards per game. Dominique Brown and Jeremy Wright are back, but they have to be consistent and the Cardinals probably need somebody else to emerge.
Pitt
- New identity. A new coach means a new identity, so it will be interesting to see how the Panthers look under Paul Chryst and his new staff. We will find out when spring practice opens in March. There is plenty of talent on the roster, but the big question is how will the talent be utilized?
- Is Tino the man? This is starting to sound like a trend, right? The Panthers have quarterback issues as well after Tino Sunseri had a season to forget. Much of his performance can probably be laid at the feet of former coach Todd Graham, who stubbornly tried to run an offensive system that was not suited for the players he had. You can be sure Chryst will open up the quarterback competition to see who emerges.
Rutgers
- Handle expectations. The Scarlet Knights have not been so good in the past when the pressure is on. All you have to do is look back at what happened this season, with a shot to win a share of the Big East title. Now they are getting some preseason love and probably have their best team since 2006. So coach Greg Schiano is going to have to do a good job of managing preparation and focus because expectations were raised off a successful 2011 campaign.
- Quarterback derby. Yet another Big East team with a quarterback question mark. Chas Dodd and Gary Nova ended up splitting the starts this past season. Now there is the possibility that former quarterback Tom Savage transfers back in. I don't know if Schiano can afford to keep playing musical chairs with his quarterbacks every season.
USF
- Re-focus. The Bulls have to put 2011 behind them and focus on the future. This is still a team that has the talent to win. Coach Skip Holtz has to find a way to get that done. This is going to be a veteran team that has been through good times and bad. He needs leaders who will their teammates to victory, who know how to win close games and are determined to get this team back on top. Who are they?
- New defense. USF brings in new defensive coordinator Chris Cosh from Kansas State, its third different coordinator in the past four years. Getting the players adapted to his scheme as soon as possible has to be a point of emphasis in the spring and throughout the offseason.
Syracuse
- More offensive consistency. To be sure, Ryan Nassib and Alec Lemon both had career years and made strides for the Orange. But a lot of that was because the run game was inconsistent, and Syracuse found itself trailing late in several games. This team has to find a way to sustain drives and score -- Syracuse was No. 7 in the Big East in scoring offense (24.2 ppg).
- Shore up the defense. The Orange lose some of their best players on the defensive line, and have to get better in the secondary, which was a major problem for most of the year. Syracuse ranked No. 98 in the nation in pass defense, and they lose some key contributors. Shamarko Thomas is really going to have to step up and take control of this group.
West Virginia
- Big 12 or Big East? The Mountaineers are bent on leaving for the Big 12, regardless of any court outcomes. On-field issues have nothing on trying to figure out where you are going to be playing. And who you are going to be playing.
- Defense. Coach Dana Holgorsen has hired a few defensive assistants, but still no word yet on who is going to run the show. That, of course, will determine the future course of this defense. It appears an inevitability that they will no longer use the 3-3-5 that former coordinator Jeff Casteel ran. Plus, players such as Keith Tandy, Najee Goode, Bruce Irvin and Julian Miller are gone. Shoring up this unit has to be tops on Holgorsen's list.
ABOUT THIS BLOG
Andrea Adelson
Adelson joined ESPN.com in 2010 after spending time as a college football columnist at The Orlando Sentinel. She has covered college football since her days as a University of Florida student, and lives in Orlando, Fla.
