Big Ten: Bobby Petrino
Thanks to those who sent in opinions on the Joe Paterno stadium/field naming issue at Penn State. I've included several at the bottom of the mailblog.
Let's get going.
Bill T. from Ottawa, Ill., writes: As a Purdue Alumnus I have watched in agony over the past several seasons as Purdue fell short of all our fans' expectations. I find it absolutely frustrating that Danny Hope claims he is going to use Terbush and Marve this upcoming season...again. Don't you think that it destroys the momentum of the team offensively and also shatters the confidence of both quarterbacks? Additionally I have read all the buzz about how we are a sleeper team in the Big Ten. I would really like to express that we have traditionally struggled against Penn State, Wisconsin, Michigan, and Ohio State (even at the height of the program at the turn of the century). What makes you guys think this year is going to be different? We have returned a ton of starters before and sputtered (2004 and 2005). Do we really deserve sleeper status?
Adam Rittenberg: Bill, I certainly understand the philosophy that two quarterbacks equals no quarterbacks. That said, I'm interested to see how Hope employs his signal-callers when all three, including Rob Henry, are healthy. He always has had a lot of confidence in Robert Marve, and Marve hasn't been healthy during his time at Purdue. If Marve plays to his capabilities at 100 percent, I'd imagine Purdue will stick with him at quarterback. The wild card in my mind is Henry, who had an excellent offseason in 2011 and would have been the starter if not for his own knee injury. As for the sleeper status, the Leaders division is wide open and Purdue returns nine starters on both sides of the ball. Purdue also has shown flashes of taking the next step, particularly with its two victories against Ohio State under Hope. Now I'm hardly sold on the Boilers, who make too many major mistakes in all three phases to consistently win against upper-tier teams. But if Purdue can get more consistent in its play, it can do some damage. Talent doesn't seem to be the issue in West Lafayette.
Adam from East Lansing, Mich., writes: As a Michigan State fan, when I heard JLS was hired at Arkansas I was in shock. This is the last person I would ever hire to drive a top 10 team to an SEC title. JLS has been known to blow it with good teams and although he gave MSU a pulse and hope to start a season, we would always blow it in some fashion. From the biggest comeback ever (at NW) to the Ohio State FG and Notre Dame night game collapse, JLS has proven he is not a steady coach. I guarantee you this though, they will beat Alabama or LSU at home for a program victory (but then somehow lose to Vanderbilt at home the following week). Do you think JLS can finally be a steady coach?
Adam Rittenberg: Adam, you bring up some excellent points here. While I understand why Arkansas went with John L. Smith, who brings years of head-coaching experience not found among the remaining assistants, I completely agree with you about the unsteadiness of his personality. He's a treat to cover and always provides great sound bytes, but his colorful personality has reflected in his team's play, at least at Michigan State. Now John L. had success elsewhere, namely Louisville, but the fragility of his teams at Michigan State cannot be overlooked. Arkansas is an extremely talented team with some veteran leaders, but the players have been on an emotional roller-coaster after the Petrino scandal. I would think they'd be better served by a coach known for his steady demeanor, rather than one best remembered for slapping himself and going ballistic during a halftime interview at Ohio State.
Michael from St. Louis writes: Nebraska just received a verbal from a kid named Courtney Love. How long before the Hole/Nirvana jokes get really old?
Adam Rittenberg: It will be a tough call between Courtney Love and Taco Charlton for the captain of our all-name recruit team for 2013. It's too bad both Courtney Love and recent Wisconsin recruit Hugs Etienne both play defense. That would be a fun matchup. Oh well, whatever, never mind.
Samuel from Iowa City, Iowa, writes: Adam, just started reading your post on Gene Smith and Urban Meyer and I had to stop to get a question in. Smith ONLY attended three practices this spring? Smith will be a fixture on the sidelines in August? Am I only the only who isn't very comfortable with an AD spending so much time on, let alone being so CLOSE to, one of his programs? I realize football is the cash machine, so it consumes most of his time. But it seems to me a heathy distance from the football program is necessary for an AD to be an objective chief executive officer.
Adam Rittenberg: Sam, while I see what you're saying, I don't think Gene Smith is too involved with the football team by attending practices. Keep in mind he's a former football player himself, so he has a unique connection to the game and to the players. I agree that ADs must be careful not to micromanage or be too involved in one of their programs, even if it's their most important sport. But I don't think Smith is crossing that line. It's also important that he keeps tabs on things after the NCAA situation, something he and Ohio State never want to go through again. There definitely have been instances of ADs meddling with football, even in the Big Ten, but I don't think Smith is overstepping his bounds.
Mike from Superior, Wis., writes: Hey Adam, when I'm reading this blog and I see schools like Ohio State, Michigan, Michigan State, even Minnesota, scheduling high profile, or at least higher profile non-conference games against really good opponents, it makes me wonder why does a school like Wisconsin fail to do the same with it's non-conference schedule? I don't understand why they wouldn't want to do the same to increase their exposure more and have a shot at getting some serious quality wins. Thoughts?
Adam Rittenberg: Mike, this isn't a new issue for Wisconsin fans, but it remains a point of contention in Badger Land. I don't get the sense Barry Alvarez is going to dramatically upgrade the Badgers' non-league schedule as long as he's AD. Wisconsin got a bit unlucky with teams like Oregon State, which has been pretty decent until recently, but you don't see the "wow" games nearly enough with the Badgers. I do like that Wisconsin recently added a home-and-home series with Washington, part of the Big Ten-Pac-12 partnership. But it'd be nice to see more. We've heard about potential games with teams like TCU and Notre Dame in recent years, but they haven't come to fruition. While Wisconsin isn't exactly struggling for exposure, it could certainly benefit from a few more showcase opportunities.
John from Prince William County writes: Adam, while the Big Ten clearly has underperformed since 2000 as opposed to the pre-BCS years when it was indisputably the top conference in the country every year from 1992 to 2000, you exaggerate the fall off. While not as dominant as it was, the Big Ten has been the best conference in the country during the BCS era just as it was prior to and is the nation's top conference more often than not.
Adam Rittenberg: Wow, John, and I thought your Penn State comments were insane. How is the Big Ten the nation's best conference in the BCS era? One national title and three Rose Bowl wins in 14 years. How is that exaggerating the drop-off? Those are the facts. The Big Ten isn't the nation's worst major conference by any means, and there are some inherent disadvantages the Big Ten faces regarding bowl locations, etc. But c'mon. The Big Ten isn't the league it was in the mid to late 1990s. The Big Ten is typically a top-3 conference with the SEC and Big 12 or Pac-12. But it will take several national titles for the Big Ten to claim to be the nation's top league again.
Now for some thoughts on Joe Paterno and Beaver Stadium ...
Bernie from Princeton, N.J.: If the university wants to do the right thing in honoring Joe Paterno they will name the field or stadium after him WITHOUT the family signing off on the gesture. The university, specifically the Board of Trustees, acted in a tremendously dishonorable fashion during a very difficult time, but that does not proclude them from being held responsible by the Paterno family if they choose to take some sort of legal action at a later date. The university is trying to save face with the alumni and Paterno family rather than doing the right thing.
Alex from Henry, Ill.: Adam, I may be a UT Longhorn fan, but i am a constant reader of all the blogs here on ESPN.com. Joe Paterno was the face of Penn State up until his dismissal from the university. I think that Beaver Stadium should eventually be named Joe Paterno Stadium, but it should not be for a reason as silly as to avoid a law suit. It should be named after him because of the forty-five years that he was the head football coach and not to mention the fifteen more he was an assistant. Sixty years at the same university is unheard of in this day. It should be because of the 409 wins including 24 bowl wins. If you aren't going to rename it because of his achievements on the field, do it for his achievements off the field. He donated A LOT of money to the university.
Mike from Allentown, Pa.: Hi Adam,Regarding the Stadium/Field naming. As a Penn State Alumni I think the idea of "Paterno Field at Beaver Stadium" is a bit outlandish. Nobody will remember that as the full name, and if you need evidence just ask a Florida State fan. How many times to you hear "Bobby Bowden Field at Doak Walker Stadium"? Hardly ever. I think the library having his name is good, but maybe they could add another building possiblye one frequented by English majors? That, or they just rename the whole stadium, like Alabama, to Beaver-Paterno Stadium. However, if they do not rename any buildings/stadiums, I don't think it that takes away from everything Joe did for 62 years. His name is on the library, and really he cared more about books than wins.
Howard from New York: Joe Paterno did so much more for Penn State than just create a college football brand. He was about education, charity and then football. Look at the former players that have come to his defense. Not a single bad word mentioned from any former coach or player. The stadium should be named after Joe for the fans who loved him. That would be the library and the stadium..that's a first. Enough said.
Jerry from Kelayres, Pa.: I don't know about renaming Beaver Stadium. If the fans want it, fine. But for the board to use this offer to ameliorate the family for slandering JoePa, is just buying the Paterno family favor.The facts are on Paterno's side. He was unjustly associated with somehow enabling Sandusky to do what he is accused of. A clear view of the facts show JoePa is innocent and could harm no one let alone innocent young boys.JoePa's reputation must be clear first before they do anything to justly honor JoePa.
Let's get going.
Bill T. from Ottawa, Ill., writes: As a Purdue Alumnus I have watched in agony over the past several seasons as Purdue fell short of all our fans' expectations. I find it absolutely frustrating that Danny Hope claims he is going to use Terbush and Marve this upcoming season...again. Don't you think that it destroys the momentum of the team offensively and also shatters the confidence of both quarterbacks? Additionally I have read all the buzz about how we are a sleeper team in the Big Ten. I would really like to express that we have traditionally struggled against Penn State, Wisconsin, Michigan, and Ohio State (even at the height of the program at the turn of the century). What makes you guys think this year is going to be different? We have returned a ton of starters before and sputtered (2004 and 2005). Do we really deserve sleeper status?
Adam Rittenberg: Bill, I certainly understand the philosophy that two quarterbacks equals no quarterbacks. That said, I'm interested to see how Hope employs his signal-callers when all three, including Rob Henry, are healthy. He always has had a lot of confidence in Robert Marve, and Marve hasn't been healthy during his time at Purdue. If Marve plays to his capabilities at 100 percent, I'd imagine Purdue will stick with him at quarterback. The wild card in my mind is Henry, who had an excellent offseason in 2011 and would have been the starter if not for his own knee injury. As for the sleeper status, the Leaders division is wide open and Purdue returns nine starters on both sides of the ball. Purdue also has shown flashes of taking the next step, particularly with its two victories against Ohio State under Hope. Now I'm hardly sold on the Boilers, who make too many major mistakes in all three phases to consistently win against upper-tier teams. But if Purdue can get more consistent in its play, it can do some damage. Talent doesn't seem to be the issue in West Lafayette.
Adam from East Lansing, Mich., writes: As a Michigan State fan, when I heard JLS was hired at Arkansas I was in shock. This is the last person I would ever hire to drive a top 10 team to an SEC title. JLS has been known to blow it with good teams and although he gave MSU a pulse and hope to start a season, we would always blow it in some fashion. From the biggest comeback ever (at NW) to the Ohio State FG and Notre Dame night game collapse, JLS has proven he is not a steady coach. I guarantee you this though, they will beat Alabama or LSU at home for a program victory (but then somehow lose to Vanderbilt at home the following week). Do you think JLS can finally be a steady coach?
Adam Rittenberg: Adam, you bring up some excellent points here. While I understand why Arkansas went with John L. Smith, who brings years of head-coaching experience not found among the remaining assistants, I completely agree with you about the unsteadiness of his personality. He's a treat to cover and always provides great sound bytes, but his colorful personality has reflected in his team's play, at least at Michigan State. Now John L. had success elsewhere, namely Louisville, but the fragility of his teams at Michigan State cannot be overlooked. Arkansas is an extremely talented team with some veteran leaders, but the players have been on an emotional roller-coaster after the Petrino scandal. I would think they'd be better served by a coach known for his steady demeanor, rather than one best remembered for slapping himself and going ballistic during a halftime interview at Ohio State.
Michael from St. Louis writes: Nebraska just received a verbal from a kid named Courtney Love. How long before the Hole/Nirvana jokes get really old?
Adam Rittenberg: It will be a tough call between Courtney Love and Taco Charlton for the captain of our all-name recruit team for 2013. It's too bad both Courtney Love and recent Wisconsin recruit Hugs Etienne both play defense. That would be a fun matchup. Oh well, whatever, never mind.
Samuel from Iowa City, Iowa, writes: Adam, just started reading your post on Gene Smith and Urban Meyer and I had to stop to get a question in. Smith ONLY attended three practices this spring? Smith will be a fixture on the sidelines in August? Am I only the only who isn't very comfortable with an AD spending so much time on, let alone being so CLOSE to, one of his programs? I realize football is the cash machine, so it consumes most of his time. But it seems to me a heathy distance from the football program is necessary for an AD to be an objective chief executive officer.
Adam Rittenberg: Sam, while I see what you're saying, I don't think Gene Smith is too involved with the football team by attending practices. Keep in mind he's a former football player himself, so he has a unique connection to the game and to the players. I agree that ADs must be careful not to micromanage or be too involved in one of their programs, even if it's their most important sport. But I don't think Smith is crossing that line. It's also important that he keeps tabs on things after the NCAA situation, something he and Ohio State never want to go through again. There definitely have been instances of ADs meddling with football, even in the Big Ten, but I don't think Smith is overstepping his bounds.
Mike from Superior, Wis., writes: Hey Adam, when I'm reading this blog and I see schools like Ohio State, Michigan, Michigan State, even Minnesota, scheduling high profile, or at least higher profile non-conference games against really good opponents, it makes me wonder why does a school like Wisconsin fail to do the same with it's non-conference schedule? I don't understand why they wouldn't want to do the same to increase their exposure more and have a shot at getting some serious quality wins. Thoughts?
Adam Rittenberg: Mike, this isn't a new issue for Wisconsin fans, but it remains a point of contention in Badger Land. I don't get the sense Barry Alvarez is going to dramatically upgrade the Badgers' non-league schedule as long as he's AD. Wisconsin got a bit unlucky with teams like Oregon State, which has been pretty decent until recently, but you don't see the "wow" games nearly enough with the Badgers. I do like that Wisconsin recently added a home-and-home series with Washington, part of the Big Ten-Pac-12 partnership. But it'd be nice to see more. We've heard about potential games with teams like TCU and Notre Dame in recent years, but they haven't come to fruition. While Wisconsin isn't exactly struggling for exposure, it could certainly benefit from a few more showcase opportunities.
John from Prince William County writes: Adam, while the Big Ten clearly has underperformed since 2000 as opposed to the pre-BCS years when it was indisputably the top conference in the country every year from 1992 to 2000, you exaggerate the fall off. While not as dominant as it was, the Big Ten has been the best conference in the country during the BCS era just as it was prior to and is the nation's top conference more often than not.
Adam Rittenberg: Wow, John, and I thought your Penn State comments were insane. How is the Big Ten the nation's best conference in the BCS era? One national title and three Rose Bowl wins in 14 years. How is that exaggerating the drop-off? Those are the facts. The Big Ten isn't the nation's worst major conference by any means, and there are some inherent disadvantages the Big Ten faces regarding bowl locations, etc. But c'mon. The Big Ten isn't the league it was in the mid to late 1990s. The Big Ten is typically a top-3 conference with the SEC and Big 12 or Pac-12. But it will take several national titles for the Big Ten to claim to be the nation's top league again.
Now for some thoughts on Joe Paterno and Beaver Stadium ...
Bernie from Princeton, N.J.: If the university wants to do the right thing in honoring Joe Paterno they will name the field or stadium after him WITHOUT the family signing off on the gesture. The university, specifically the Board of Trustees, acted in a tremendously dishonorable fashion during a very difficult time, but that does not proclude them from being held responsible by the Paterno family if they choose to take some sort of legal action at a later date. The university is trying to save face with the alumni and Paterno family rather than doing the right thing.
Alex from Henry, Ill.: Adam, I may be a UT Longhorn fan, but i am a constant reader of all the blogs here on ESPN.com. Joe Paterno was the face of Penn State up until his dismissal from the university. I think that Beaver Stadium should eventually be named Joe Paterno Stadium, but it should not be for a reason as silly as to avoid a law suit. It should be named after him because of the forty-five years that he was the head football coach and not to mention the fifteen more he was an assistant. Sixty years at the same university is unheard of in this day. It should be because of the 409 wins including 24 bowl wins. If you aren't going to rename it because of his achievements on the field, do it for his achievements off the field. He donated A LOT of money to the university.
Mike from Allentown, Pa.: Hi Adam,Regarding the Stadium/Field naming. As a Penn State Alumni I think the idea of "Paterno Field at Beaver Stadium" is a bit outlandish. Nobody will remember that as the full name, and if you need evidence just ask a Florida State fan. How many times to you hear "Bobby Bowden Field at Doak Walker Stadium"? Hardly ever. I think the library having his name is good, but maybe they could add another building possiblye one frequented by English majors? That, or they just rename the whole stadium, like Alabama, to Beaver-Paterno Stadium. However, if they do not rename any buildings/stadiums, I don't think it that takes away from everything Joe did for 62 years. His name is on the library, and really he cared more about books than wins.
Howard from New York: Joe Paterno did so much more for Penn State than just create a college football brand. He was about education, charity and then football. Look at the former players that have come to his defense. Not a single bad word mentioned from any former coach or player. The stadium should be named after Joe for the fans who loved him. That would be the library and the stadium..that's a first. Enough said.
Jerry from Kelayres, Pa.: I don't know about renaming Beaver Stadium. If the fans want it, fine. But for the board to use this offer to ameliorate the family for slandering JoePa, is just buying the Paterno family favor.The facts are on Paterno's side. He was unjustly associated with somehow enabling Sandusky to do what he is accused of. A clear view of the facts show JoePa is innocent and could harm no one let alone innocent young boys.JoePa's reputation must be clear first before they do anything to justly honor JoePa.
Ex-MSU coach to take over at Arkansas
April, 23, 2012
4/23/12
5:30
PM ET
By
Adam Rittenberg | ESPN.com
Slap yourselves, Spartans fans: John L. Smith is expected to become the new interim head coach at Arkansas.
Colleague Joe Schad reports that Smith, fired from Michigan State in November 2006, will be introduced Tuesday in Fayetteville as the surprising choice to take over for Bobby Petrino with the Razorbacks. He agreed to a 10-month contract with Arkansas, where he served as special-teams coach the past three seasons before leaving for the top job at Weber State. Coincidentally, Petrino succeeded Smith at Louisville after Smith left for the Michigan State job. The circumstances are very different now, but still notable.
Former Ohio State assistant Taver Johnson had been serving as Arkansas' head coach since Petrino's firing earlier this month.
Smith went 22-26 at Michigan State. He won Big Ten Coach of the Year honors during his first season in 2003, but he oversaw midseason collapses in both 2005 and 2006 that sealed his fate at the school. His most memorable moments: slapping himself in a news conference after a loss to Illinois and a halftime meltdown at Ohio State, when Smith famously told ABC's Jack Arute, "The kids are playing their tails off, and the coaches are screwing it up!"
Smith remains one of the more colorful characters in coaching. I'll never forget seeing him playfully shove the Lansing State Journal's Joe Rexrode after a win at Notre Dame. He also has climbed Mount Kilimanjaro in Africa, has run with the bulls in Spain and has skydived over Indiana.
I'm guessing Michigan State fans, thrilled with their current coach Mark Dantonio, had a few laughs today when they heard about the John L. news.
How do you think he'll fare in Fayetteville? He inherits an extremely good team.
Who knows? Maybe we'll see Michigan State and Arkansas matched up in a BCS bowl game this year. That'd be fun.
Colleague Joe Schad reports that Smith, fired from Michigan State in November 2006, will be introduced Tuesday in Fayetteville as the surprising choice to take over for Bobby Petrino with the Razorbacks. He agreed to a 10-month contract with Arkansas, where he served as special-teams coach the past three seasons before leaving for the top job at Weber State. Coincidentally, Petrino succeeded Smith at Louisville after Smith left for the Michigan State job. The circumstances are very different now, but still notable.
Former Ohio State assistant Taver Johnson had been serving as Arkansas' head coach since Petrino's firing earlier this month.
Smith went 22-26 at Michigan State. He won Big Ten Coach of the Year honors during his first season in 2003, but he oversaw midseason collapses in both 2005 and 2006 that sealed his fate at the school. His most memorable moments: slapping himself in a news conference after a loss to Illinois and a halftime meltdown at Ohio State, when Smith famously told ABC's Jack Arute, "The kids are playing their tails off, and the coaches are screwing it up!"
Smith remains one of the more colorful characters in coaching. I'll never forget seeing him playfully shove the Lansing State Journal's Joe Rexrode after a win at Notre Dame. He also has climbed Mount Kilimanjaro in Africa, has run with the bulls in Spain and has skydived over Indiana.
I'm guessing Michigan State fans, thrilled with their current coach Mark Dantonio, had a few laughs today when they heard about the John L. news.
How do you think he'll fare in Fayetteville? He inherits an extremely good team.
Who knows? Maybe we'll see Michigan State and Arkansas matched up in a BCS bowl game this year. That'd be fun.
Fickell: Arkansas assistants ready for storm
April, 19, 2012
4/19/12
6:45
PM ET
By
Adam Rittenberg | ESPN.com
COLUMBUS, Ohio -- Paul Haynes and Taver Johnson were among the coaches entrusted to guide Ohio State through a storm 2011.
The last thing the two men could have expected at their next coaching stop was another tempest. And, in many ways, a more damaging one.
Haynes and Johnson are part of an Arkansas staff left to pick up the pieces from the Bobby Petrino scandal. Johnson, the Razorbacks' assistant head coach/linebackers coach, is in charge until a head coach is named, while Haynes serves as the Hogs' defensive coordinator after leaving Ohio State in December. Johnson had a chance to remain with Ohio State but left to join Hayes in Fayetteville.
Ohio State defensive coordinator Luke Fickell, who served as the Buckeyes' head coach last season after Jim Tressel's departure, has been in touch with Haynes since the Petrino scandal broke.
"A very, very difficult situation," Fickell told ESPN.com on Thursday. "Different in a lot of ways, but similar in some ways, too. Everybody learned from last year, whether they were an administrator here, whether they were an intern, a defensive coordinator or a head coach, you learn a lot of different things, and it's going to help them in the long run."
Fickell and Haynes are close friends and remain in regular contact, as do their wives. Fickell hasn't spoken as often with Johnson, but he's confident the two men don't need his advice despite another difficult situation.
"Hell, they were here, they know what happened," Fickell said. "Now if the situation [at Arkansas] stays the way it is, before they start a season, I'm sure just like I had, they'll have an opportunity to communicate with some different people and pick some brains. Right now, they're probably just trying to keep the whole ship afloat."
Through some very choppy waters.
The last thing the two men could have expected at their next coaching stop was another tempest. And, in many ways, a more damaging one.
Haynes and Johnson are part of an Arkansas staff left to pick up the pieces from the Bobby Petrino scandal. Johnson, the Razorbacks' assistant head coach/linebackers coach, is in charge until a head coach is named, while Haynes serves as the Hogs' defensive coordinator after leaving Ohio State in December. Johnson had a chance to remain with Ohio State but left to join Hayes in Fayetteville.
Ohio State defensive coordinator Luke Fickell, who served as the Buckeyes' head coach last season after Jim Tressel's departure, has been in touch with Haynes since the Petrino scandal broke.
"A very, very difficult situation," Fickell told ESPN.com on Thursday. "Different in a lot of ways, but similar in some ways, too. Everybody learned from last year, whether they were an administrator here, whether they were an intern, a defensive coordinator or a head coach, you learn a lot of different things, and it's going to help them in the long run."
Fickell and Haynes are close friends and remain in regular contact, as do their wives. Fickell hasn't spoken as often with Johnson, but he's confident the two men don't need his advice despite another difficult situation.
"Hell, they were here, they know what happened," Fickell said. "Now if the situation [at Arkansas] stays the way it is, before they start a season, I'm sure just like I had, they'll have an opportunity to communicate with some different people and pick some brains. Right now, they're probably just trying to keep the whole ship afloat."
Through some very choppy waters.
Bo Pelini's name seems to come up often whenever there's a high-profile coaching vacancy.
That's in part because of Pelini's success at Nebraska, in part because of the very low buyout clause in his contract and in part because of the assumption by some -- though never voiced by Pelini himself -- that he might be tiring of the pressure of living up to Cornhuskers fans' high expectations.
So it's little surprise that Pelini's name has been mentioned prominently for the brand new opening at Arkansas. But the Nebraska head coach told reporters Wednesday night that he intends to remain the Nebraska head coach.
"Actually, I didn't even know my name got thrown around," he said, when asked about the Arkansas opening. "I don't even know how that stuff happens. I'm here and I'm happy to be here."
The fifth-year Huskers coach called Nebraska "a destination job" and said his sole intention was to try and bring a championship to Lincoln. He said all other speculation linking him to Arkansas is "kind of ludicrous."
Pelini wouldn't be the first coach to say he has no interest in a job and turn around a few days later and take that gig. Heck, he wouldn't even be the 100th coach to do that. Arkansas can certainly throw some money around, and the Hogs are desperate to clean up the Bobby Petrino mess. Pelini doesn't have any of the character issues that plagued Petrino.
But Pelini shot this down just as strongly as he denied rumors that he'd interviewed with Ohio State last November. Truth is, he's got a good situation at Nebraska, and if he ever privately thinks things are crazy in Husker Nation, what would he make of the dysfunctional Hogs family and the SEC West madness?
At this point, when Pelini says he's staying, we should take him at his word. After all, he's not Bobby Petrino.
That's in part because of Pelini's success at Nebraska, in part because of the very low buyout clause in his contract and in part because of the assumption by some -- though never voiced by Pelini himself -- that he might be tiring of the pressure of living up to Cornhuskers fans' high expectations.
So it's little surprise that Pelini's name has been mentioned prominently for the brand new opening at Arkansas. But the Nebraska head coach told reporters Wednesday night that he intends to remain the Nebraska head coach.
"Actually, I didn't even know my name got thrown around," he said, when asked about the Arkansas opening. "I don't even know how that stuff happens. I'm here and I'm happy to be here."
The fifth-year Huskers coach called Nebraska "a destination job" and said his sole intention was to try and bring a championship to Lincoln. He said all other speculation linking him to Arkansas is "kind of ludicrous."
Pelini wouldn't be the first coach to say he has no interest in a job and turn around a few days later and take that gig. Heck, he wouldn't even be the 100th coach to do that. Arkansas can certainly throw some money around, and the Hogs are desperate to clean up the Bobby Petrino mess. Pelini doesn't have any of the character issues that plagued Petrino.
But Pelini shot this down just as strongly as he denied rumors that he'd interviewed with Ohio State last November. Truth is, he's got a good situation at Nebraska, and if he ever privately thinks things are crazy in Husker Nation, what would he make of the dysfunctional Hogs family and the SEC West madness?
At this point, when Pelini says he's staying, we should take him at his word. After all, he's not Bobby Petrino.
Coming at you a day later than normal, but better than never.
Ryan from Grand Rapids, Mich., writes: Hey Adam, How much of a true telling of Michigan's season is the Alabama game going to be? The more that I think about it, the more I begin to sense there are too many unknown factors on both teams for people to make automatic judgments for both Michigan and Alabama teams. That being said, do you feel that a Michigan victory would be a solid sign for another 11 or 12 win season?
Adam Rittenberg: Ryan, I agree that the first game doesn't answer every question about a particular team, and both squads undoubtedly will be improved later in the season. But teams can make national statements in Week 1, like LSU did last season against Oregon in the opener. A Michigan win would be absolutely huge for the program and for the Big Ten, which has struggled to beat the SEC's elite. I haven't hid my feelings about Alabama. In my view, it's the best college program in America and boasts the best college coach in Nick Saban. Any victory against the Tide, no matter what year or how many starters they've lost or where the game is played, resonates in my book. While Alabama certainly won't be Michigan's last major test in 2012, a Wolverines victory would be extremely significant.
Michael from Happy Valley, Pa., writes: hi Adam, you may have already answered this but after your visit to PSU these past two days I have a new and refreshing question about none other than the QB race. What do you think the chances are that Paul Jones, with no game-time experience, is named the starter come september 1st? It sounds like a longshot, but from what I've been hearing around campus and other websites, PJ has been on fire in practice and seems like the real deal when it comes to quarterback. Did he stand out to you at the practice you attended moreso than McGloin (bolden's name shouldn't even be thought of in the QB face ever again or I lose faith in humanity)
Adam Rittenberg: Michael, while Jones remains very much in the mix for the starting job, I think Penn State fans should pump the brakes a bit on all the hype surrounding him. From what I saw this week, he still has some strides to make in a very complex offense, although he clearly has some excellent skills. Granted, I only saw one practice, but he didn't stand out above the others. I realize most PSU fans are sick of Bolden, but it would surprise me if he's not in the final two for the starting job after spring ball. He's a confounding player in many respects, as I saw him make some tremendous, NFL-type throws, but also some head-scratching mistakes. Consistency remains the big key, but I wouldn't write him off despite his struggles in games.
Sam from Iowa City, Iowa, writes: Adam, you quoted KF: "Bottom line is we're 4-4 the last two years in conference play," he said. "If that's the best we can do, then that's fine. But we felt like we've left something out there."If thats the best they can do, thats fine? Two questions for you regarding that. First, is than an opinion that permeates the program (from the AD to the players) as far as you can tell from your time in Iowa City. And second, as a professional sports writer, do you think that is a fair of Iowa as a program, with or without KF?
Adam Rittenberg: Sam, I think Kirk's point is that sometimes, a team maxes out at 4-4. Some teams simply aren't better than 5-7. But Iowa has been better than that, in his mind, the past few seasons and has fallen short. When Ferentz first came to Iowa, the team's maximum output was lower than it has been in recent years. Ferentz has built his program on maximizing talent. In some years, the max is 10 or 11 wins. In other years, it's seven or eight wins. I don't think Iowa will have a team, talent wise, that would call a six-win season satisfactory. I also don't think Ferentz's quote means that the team has an attitude that 4-4 is OK. Players and coaches have bigger goals, like reaching the Rose Bowl and winning a Big Ten title. Ferentz's point is that Iowa must max out its ability, which means better than 4-4 in most years.
Chris from Chicago writes: Every year we hear a lot of complimentary things about teams in spring/summer practice -- improved competition, "swagger," guys playing/looking hungry. And then the season starts, and many times this hunger/improvement/swagger is nowhere to be seen. When Adam/Brian visit a spring/summer practice, what do you look for to see if a team is actually looking better than it did the previous year?
Adam Rittenberg: Chris, good point about the optimistic nature of spring ball. I've yet to visit a spring practice where the team lacks confidence or expects to lose nine or 10 games. But I do look at body language, and when I'm allowed to see practices, I look for players who look different and play different than they did the previous season. At Penn State, for example, I wasn't closely studying players like Silas Redd and Gerald Hodges (both of whom looked great, by the way). I know they can play at an All-Big Ten level. I was looking for the up-and-comers, and also which position groups are showing greater depth. I also look to see how fluid a practice is, whether there are big plays on both sides of the ball and how many breakdowns occur. But you can tell a lot from meeting with players and coaches, listening to how they say things and how confident they sound about their team.
Brian from Indianapolis writes: Call me ignorant, but what does "Silverstone the links" mean? Is it an inside joke, or something?
Adam Rittenberg: Wish it were, Brian. No, it refers to how Alicia Silverstone feeds her son. Click the link at your own risk.
Tom from Lakeland, Fla., writes: Going into 2012 it appears that Danny Hope is the only coach on the hot seat. Any thought that Bobby Petrino could end up at Purdue?
Adam Rittenberg: Wow, that didn't take long, did it? I'll say this: Bobby Petrino will have opportunities in 2013. He's too good of a football coach, and there will be those willing to overlook his lying and transgressions because he can win football games. I don't get the sense Purdue would go that route, and AD Morgan Burke remains supportive of Hope, who he tabbed to succeed Joe Tiller. I also don't know if Purdue could pay Petrino what he'd likely demand.
Jake M. from Chicago writes: Hi Adam. What makes you and Brian so sure that Urban Meyer will succeed with Ohio St.? While he was highly successful at Florida, he also had the opportunity to win with arguably one of the best college players ever (Tebow). It just seems as if OSU has already won a national championship with Meyer before he has even coached a game.
Adam Rittenberg: Jake, there's certainly a group that wonders how Meyer's Florida tenure would have gone had Tebow not been there. And it's fair to wonder whether he's receiving too much praise too early in his Ohio State tenure. My feeling about Ohio State is the program is set up to compete at the highest level and did for most of Jim Tressel's tenure. The damage from the NCAA investigation appears minimal, in part because of what Meyer did on the recruiting trail following his hiring in late December. There's almost a sense that Ohio State is too big to fail. That doesn't mean Meyer and his staff will have it easy this year. They have work to do, particularly with an offense that has underperformed in recent years and needs playmakers to emerge at the wide receiver spot. I like the young defenders returning, and Ohio State should make strides on that side of the ball. It's not as if Ohio State has been far away from winning another national title. Meyer's presence as an elite recruiter, and the more innovative offense he'll bring could be what puts the Buckeyes over the top. But they'll still have to earn it and win what is becoming a deeper Big Ten.
Ryan from Grand Rapids, Mich., writes: Hey Adam, How much of a true telling of Michigan's season is the Alabama game going to be? The more that I think about it, the more I begin to sense there are too many unknown factors on both teams for people to make automatic judgments for both Michigan and Alabama teams. That being said, do you feel that a Michigan victory would be a solid sign for another 11 or 12 win season?
Adam Rittenberg: Ryan, I agree that the first game doesn't answer every question about a particular team, and both squads undoubtedly will be improved later in the season. But teams can make national statements in Week 1, like LSU did last season against Oregon in the opener. A Michigan win would be absolutely huge for the program and for the Big Ten, which has struggled to beat the SEC's elite. I haven't hid my feelings about Alabama. In my view, it's the best college program in America and boasts the best college coach in Nick Saban. Any victory against the Tide, no matter what year or how many starters they've lost or where the game is played, resonates in my book. While Alabama certainly won't be Michigan's last major test in 2012, a Wolverines victory would be extremely significant.
Michael from Happy Valley, Pa., writes: hi Adam, you may have already answered this but after your visit to PSU these past two days I have a new and refreshing question about none other than the QB race. What do you think the chances are that Paul Jones, with no game-time experience, is named the starter come september 1st? It sounds like a longshot, but from what I've been hearing around campus and other websites, PJ has been on fire in practice and seems like the real deal when it comes to quarterback. Did he stand out to you at the practice you attended moreso than McGloin (bolden's name shouldn't even be thought of in the QB face ever again or I lose faith in humanity)
Adam Rittenberg: Michael, while Jones remains very much in the mix for the starting job, I think Penn State fans should pump the brakes a bit on all the hype surrounding him. From what I saw this week, he still has some strides to make in a very complex offense, although he clearly has some excellent skills. Granted, I only saw one practice, but he didn't stand out above the others. I realize most PSU fans are sick of Bolden, but it would surprise me if he's not in the final two for the starting job after spring ball. He's a confounding player in many respects, as I saw him make some tremendous, NFL-type throws, but also some head-scratching mistakes. Consistency remains the big key, but I wouldn't write him off despite his struggles in games.
Sam from Iowa City, Iowa, writes: Adam, you quoted KF: "Bottom line is we're 4-4 the last two years in conference play," he said. "If that's the best we can do, then that's fine. But we felt like we've left something out there."If thats the best they can do, thats fine? Two questions for you regarding that. First, is than an opinion that permeates the program (from the AD to the players) as far as you can tell from your time in Iowa City. And second, as a professional sports writer, do you think that is a fair of Iowa as a program, with or without KF?
Adam Rittenberg: Sam, I think Kirk's point is that sometimes, a team maxes out at 4-4. Some teams simply aren't better than 5-7. But Iowa has been better than that, in his mind, the past few seasons and has fallen short. When Ferentz first came to Iowa, the team's maximum output was lower than it has been in recent years. Ferentz has built his program on maximizing talent. In some years, the max is 10 or 11 wins. In other years, it's seven or eight wins. I don't think Iowa will have a team, talent wise, that would call a six-win season satisfactory. I also don't think Ferentz's quote means that the team has an attitude that 4-4 is OK. Players and coaches have bigger goals, like reaching the Rose Bowl and winning a Big Ten title. Ferentz's point is that Iowa must max out its ability, which means better than 4-4 in most years.
Chris from Chicago writes: Every year we hear a lot of complimentary things about teams in spring/summer practice -- improved competition, "swagger," guys playing/looking hungry. And then the season starts, and many times this hunger/improvement/swagger is nowhere to be seen. When Adam/Brian visit a spring/summer practice, what do you look for to see if a team is actually looking better than it did the previous year?
Adam Rittenberg: Chris, good point about the optimistic nature of spring ball. I've yet to visit a spring practice where the team lacks confidence or expects to lose nine or 10 games. But I do look at body language, and when I'm allowed to see practices, I look for players who look different and play different than they did the previous season. At Penn State, for example, I wasn't closely studying players like Silas Redd and Gerald Hodges (both of whom looked great, by the way). I know they can play at an All-Big Ten level. I was looking for the up-and-comers, and also which position groups are showing greater depth. I also look to see how fluid a practice is, whether there are big plays on both sides of the ball and how many breakdowns occur. But you can tell a lot from meeting with players and coaches, listening to how they say things and how confident they sound about their team.
Brian from Indianapolis writes: Call me ignorant, but what does "Silverstone the links" mean? Is it an inside joke, or something?
Adam Rittenberg: Wish it were, Brian. No, it refers to how Alicia Silverstone feeds her son. Click the link at your own risk.
Tom from Lakeland, Fla., writes: Going into 2012 it appears that Danny Hope is the only coach on the hot seat. Any thought that Bobby Petrino could end up at Purdue?
Adam Rittenberg: Wow, that didn't take long, did it? I'll say this: Bobby Petrino will have opportunities in 2013. He's too good of a football coach, and there will be those willing to overlook his lying and transgressions because he can win football games. I don't get the sense Purdue would go that route, and AD Morgan Burke remains supportive of Hope, who he tabbed to succeed Joe Tiller. I also don't know if Purdue could pay Petrino what he'd likely demand.
Jake M. from Chicago writes: Hi Adam. What makes you and Brian so sure that Urban Meyer will succeed with Ohio St.? While he was highly successful at Florida, he also had the opportunity to win with arguably one of the best college players ever (Tebow). It just seems as if OSU has already won a national championship with Meyer before he has even coached a game.
Adam Rittenberg: Jake, there's certainly a group that wonders how Meyer's Florida tenure would have gone had Tebow not been there. And it's fair to wonder whether he's receiving too much praise too early in his Ohio State tenure. My feeling about Ohio State is the program is set up to compete at the highest level and did for most of Jim Tressel's tenure. The damage from the NCAA investigation appears minimal, in part because of what Meyer did on the recruiting trail following his hiring in late December. There's almost a sense that Ohio State is too big to fail. That doesn't mean Meyer and his staff will have it easy this year. They have work to do, particularly with an offense that has underperformed in recent years and needs playmakers to emerge at the wide receiver spot. I like the young defenders returning, and Ohio State should make strides on that side of the ball. It's not as if Ohio State has been far away from winning another national title. Meyer's presence as an elite recruiter, and the more innovative offense he'll bring could be what puts the Buckeyes over the top. But they'll still have to earn it and win what is becoming a deeper Big Ten.
You're still here! You didn't go to the store for milk and heroin and then never come back.
- Thanks to Bobby Petrino's troubles, former Ohio State assistant Taver Johnson is now serving as Arkansas' head coach.
- Penn State's Silas Redd has looked impressive at spring practice. Lions center Matt Stankiewitch discusses the new strength program and other topics in this Q&A.
- Michigan is experimenting with Devin Gardner at receiver, but Gardner remains primarily the team's backup quarterback. Former Michigan star LaMarr Woodley thinks Denard Robinson will be a good NFL wide receiver.
- Minnesota's walking wounded are excited to get back on the field for spring ball. Gophers quarterback MarQueis Gray, part of the search committee for a new athletic director, wants the new AD to be accessible to athletes.
- Ohio State receiver Chris Fields denies rumors he quit the team. After being suspended for the Gator Bowl, Buckeyes receiver T.Y. Williams has looked good in spring practice.
- The NCAA should do the right thing and grant Michigan State's DeAnthony Arnett his waiver. Spartans running back Le'Veon Bell needed some extra motivation this spring.
- The middle Watt brother (Derek) is making his own impression at Wisconsin.
- Nebraska's Rex Burkhead is fine-tuning his game. Eric Martin could give the Huskers' defensive line a big boost.
- Northwestern's secondary goes by a new nickname: the Sky Team.
- Purdue quarterback Rob Henry stays busy off of the field.
- Indiana's strength coach has started the rebuilding process (subscription required).
- New Illinois coach Tim Beckman is on the lookout for playmakers. Illini quarterbacks Nathan Scheelhaase and Reilly O'Toole are splitting reps with the top offense.
- Iowa picks up its first recruit for the 2013 class. Despite recent attrition, Iowa's RBs aren't shying away from contact this spring.
Purdue has hired veteran assistant Kevin Wolthausen as its new defensive line coach, the school announced Wednesday. That completes Danny Hope's staff for the 2012 season.
Wolthausen comes to the Boilermakers the Las Vegas Locomotives in the United Football League, where he served as the defensive line coach. Before going to the UFL, he served as associate head coach and linebackers coach at Eastern Michigan.
Wolthausen spent four seasons at Louisville, where he coached future NFL star Elvis Dumervil. He then followed Bobby Petrino to the Atlanta Falcons for the 2007 season. Other stops in his career include Arizona, USC, Oklahoma and Arizona State.
At Purdue, Wolthausen will try to get the most out of star defensive tackle Kawann Short and improve the team's pass rush off the edge with players like rising sophomore Ryan Russell.
Wolthausen comes to the Boilermakers the Las Vegas Locomotives in the United Football League, where he served as the defensive line coach. Before going to the UFL, he served as associate head coach and linebackers coach at Eastern Michigan.
Wolthausen spent four seasons at Louisville, where he coached future NFL star Elvis Dumervil. He then followed Bobby Petrino to the Atlanta Falcons for the 2007 season. Other stops in his career include Arizona, USC, Oklahoma and Arizona State.
At Purdue, Wolthausen will try to get the most out of star defensive tackle Kawann Short and improve the team's pass rush off the edge with players like rising sophomore Ryan Russell.
How we voted in latest ESPN.com rankings
November, 28, 2011
11/28/11
11:00
AM ET
By
Adam Rittenberg | ESPN.com
In the interest of transparency -- and really, what do we have to hide? -- let's look at the latest ESPN.com power rankings ballots Brian and I turned in Sunday.
Brian Bennett's ballot
1. LSU
2. Alabama
3. Oklahoma State
4. Stanford
5. Virginia Tech
6. Arkansas
7. Boise State
8. Oregon
9. Michigan State
10. Houston
11. Wisconsin
12. USC
13. South Carolina
14. Oklahoma
15. Georgia
16. Michigan
17. Kansas State
18. TCU
19. Baylor
20. Nebraska
21. Clemson
22. Penn State
23. West Virginia
24. Florida State
25. Cincinnati
Adam Rittenberg's ballot
1. LSU
2. Alabama
3. Oklahoma State
4. Virginia Tech
5. Stanford
6. Oregon
7. Boise State
8. Arkansas
9. Michigan State
10. Wisconsin
11. Houston
12. USC
13. Oklahoma
14. South Carolina
15. Michigan
16. Georgia
17. Kansas State
18. TCU
19. Baylor
20. Nebraska
21. West Virginia
22. Clemson
23. Penn State
24. Texas
25. Southern Miss
We have the same top three teams but differ on No. 4, as Bennett goes with Stanford and I have surging Virginia Tech. I like Oregon a bit more than Bennett does, and he's higher on the Hogs from Arkansas than I am after LSU gave Bobby Petrino's boys a bayou beatdown on Saturday. Both of us have Legends Division champion Michigan State at No. 9, and I have Wisconsin at No. 10, while Bennett has the Badgers one spot lower. Bennett has Michigan at No. 16, while I have the Wolverines one spot higher but still not in the top 14. (The Wolverines must finish in the top 14 of the BCS standings to earn an at-large berth.) Nebraska appears at No. 20 on both of our ballots, while Penn State falls to No. 22 on Bennett's and No. 23 on mine. We differ on the final two spots, as Bennett went with Florida State and Cincinnati, while I have Texas and Southern Miss.
Brian Bennett's ballot
1. LSU
2. Alabama
3. Oklahoma State
4. Stanford
5. Virginia Tech
6. Arkansas
7. Boise State
8. Oregon
9. Michigan State
10. Houston
11. Wisconsin
12. USC
13. South Carolina
14. Oklahoma
15. Georgia
16. Michigan
17. Kansas State
18. TCU
19. Baylor
20. Nebraska
21. Clemson
22. Penn State
23. West Virginia
24. Florida State
25. Cincinnati
Adam Rittenberg's ballot
1. LSU
2. Alabama
3. Oklahoma State
4. Virginia Tech
5. Stanford
6. Oregon
7. Boise State
8. Arkansas
9. Michigan State
10. Wisconsin
11. Houston
12. USC
13. Oklahoma
14. South Carolina
15. Michigan
16. Georgia
17. Kansas State
18. TCU
19. Baylor
20. Nebraska
21. West Virginia
22. Clemson
23. Penn State
24. Texas
25. Southern Miss
We have the same top three teams but differ on No. 4, as Bennett goes with Stanford and I have surging Virginia Tech. I like Oregon a bit more than Bennett does, and he's higher on the Hogs from Arkansas than I am after LSU gave Bobby Petrino's boys a bayou beatdown on Saturday. Both of us have Legends Division champion Michigan State at No. 9, and I have Wisconsin at No. 10, while Bennett has the Badgers one spot lower. Bennett has Michigan at No. 16, while I have the Wolverines one spot higher but still not in the top 14. (The Wolverines must finish in the top 14 of the BCS standings to earn an at-large berth.) Nebraska appears at No. 20 on both of our ballots, while Penn State falls to No. 22 on Bennett's and No. 23 on mine. We differ on the final two spots, as Bennett went with Florida State and Cincinnati, while I have Texas and Southern Miss.
Sorry it's a day late, but I didn't forget you guys. Be sure and send in more questions and comments for another mailblog later this week.
Let's get to it ...
JC from Columbus, Ohio, writes: The players/future recruits love him, but would it at all be a possibility, Adam, that Luke Fickell stays at Ohio State and works as Defensive Coordinator even if he doesn't get the permanent head coach job? Why would he stay? If he isn't handed the job now, isn't that a sign that he'll never get the job and it's time to move on (which would be a shame)?
Adam Rittenberg: Totally disagree with your last point, JC. Fickell absolutely would have a chance to land the Ohio State job down the line even if he doesn't get the permanent gig after the 2011 season. Let's say he doesn't get the job and goes out and proves himself as a head coach elsewhere. The guy is only 37. He'd definitely have another shot to coach in Columbus, and his credentials as a Buckeye player and coach would help him. Whether he would stay on as an assistant for the next OSU coach is an interesting debate. I doubt he would because it would be a new regime and Fickell needs to become a head coach sooner rather than later, but you never know. He has roots in Columbus and a ton of passion for Ohio State.
Shannon from Texarkana, Texas, writes: When did Petrino change lanes? He never said he would have liked to play Ohio St. without the aforementioned players, he stands by wanting to play Ohio St. with their best players. What Petrino is pointing to is the NCAA loophole that allowed them to play, that's all. And like you said, many agree with Petrino.
Adam Rittenberg: Shannon, it still sounds like two viewpoints to me. If you want to take issue with the NCAA loophole, that's fine. Run with it. Hammer the NCAA, the Sugar Bowl and the Big Ten because all parties deserve it. But don't keep talking about wanting to face Ohio State's best team as well. We all know Arkansas would have faced a shell of the Buckeyes squad had Terrelle Pryor and the others been suspended. I'm fine with Bobby Petrino making the argument against the loophole. But if he does, stop talking about wanting to face the best Buckeyes team.
Devin from East Lansing, Mich., writes: Hey Adam,Great blog. I've got a question as a Michigan State student and fan (and I'm sure fans out there from other schools have the same question)-- How do you see MSU's chances of a Big Ten championship change (or Iowa's, Nebraska's, Wisconsin's, etc.) with the exit of Tressel and the possibility of further sanctions and such for OSU?
Adam Rittenberg: Overall, Michigan State's chances would improve if Ohio State can't compete for a Big Ten title. The same goes for the other 10 squads in the league. I would point out, however, that divisional play really changes how you should look at your team's chances for league championships, BCS bowls, etc. Michigan State must first worry about winning the Legends division, which doesn't include Ohio State. I'd say any penalties for Ohio State impact Leaders division teams more than they do Legends division teams.
Andrew L. from Columbus, Ohio, writes: Adam, I have been following your coverage of the Tressel collapse (I refuse to say enjoying but it is well done). One point I have noticed several commentators making is that Gee and Smith need to go as well. I can understand the calls for Smith to go but calling for Gee's head over this ignores the University part of The Ohio State University. Ohio State has over 64,000 students, most of whom are not on the football team, and a budget bigger than Delaware's. Gordon Gee has done great things for the school and I am much more concerned with the university as a whole than I am with the football team. President Gee has made some mistakes in handling this, but that is why he has Gene Smith. I frankly, hope he keeps paying more attention to Ohio State as a university that has a football team (along with any other student organization you can imagine - ie the Scrabble Club) than as a football team that is attached to a university.
Adam Rittenberg: Andrew, a university president should be evaluated on more than his somewhat indirect handling of the football program or the football coach. I agree that Gene Smith will face greater scrutiny here because football/Tressel falls directly under his responsibilities. That said, E. Gordon Gee certainly can be criticized for his foolish remark at the March 8 news conference. You could also take issue with how long it took Ohio State to part ways with Tressel. Ohio State football is a huge part of The Ohio State University, but it's not the only part. Gee should be evaluated accordingly.
Craig from Fort Wayne, Ind., writes: Adam, long time Boilermaker fan here and I just wanted to get your perspective on the program. Do you think Purdue football is dead for at least the near future? It seems as though the hiring of Danny Hope has not gone as planned and after 3 consecutive losing seasons (2 under Hope, 1 of those with a blown up roster), all the momentum from the Tiller era has been lost. I understand the schedule is set up for a bowl run this year, but is making a low tier bowl really going to revitalize the program? My beloved Boilers seem to have little in the way of a legitimate down field threat and are going to have to rely on their defense to win games this season. That paired with the fact that after this year the Boilers schedule seems to take a turn for the difficult in the coming seasons and it just appears to be a recipe for spinning tires. What does Purdue have to do to get back on the right track and if Hope doesn't work out has the AD burnt up to much good collateral from the Tiller era to attract a decent coach?
Adam Rittenberg: Craig, I realize it has been a tough time for Purdue fans and there seems to be little to no buzz around that program right now. That said, the 2011 team boasts some talented players on both sides of the ball. I'm really excited about guys like receiver Antavian Edison and cornerback Ricardo Allen. You also have players like running back Ralph Bolden returning to the fold. So there's hope for better things this season. It's hard to evaluate Hope right now, but this is undoubtedly a big season for him. He needs to show Purdue is headed in the right direction and can start making bowl games again. If Purdue falls short of the postseason, we could see a change.
Colin from Atlanta writes: Hey Adam long time reader first time writer.I felt this way before this Jim Tressel mess but especially with whats going down at Ohio State aren't the next 2-3 years really important for the Wisconsin football program to really take the next step and become a true power in the Big Ten?
Adam Rittenberg: Colin, I'm not the first person to write this, but Wisconsin could stand to gain the most from Ohio State potentially taking a step back during the next few years. The Badgers have been competitive with the Buckeyes, although Wisconsin hasn't been the Big Ten's top dog until the late 1990s. The fact that Wisconsin plays in the same division (Leaders) as Ohio State is extremely significant, and the Badgers could really move into a powerhouse position if they were to repeat as Big Ten champions this fall. While other teams could benefit as well, Wisconsin might be the most direct beneficiary.
Michael from San Francisco writes: Adam-In regards to Feldman's article, why would a big name be more interested in the OSU position that they were in the Michigan position? Michigan had difficulty (twice) getting the candidates they wanted, not to mention being unable to draw high profile names like Gruden, Stoops, etc. Why is OSU going to be so much more successful while they are under severe NCAA sanctions (or at least the threat of severe sanctions)? Wouldn't the big names wait for the Penn State or Texas positions?
Adam Rittenberg: It's hard to say, Michael. Ohio State has a lot of positives, and the program has been more dominant in recent years than either Michigan or Penn State. I also would disagree Michigan struggled to attract top candidates after Lloyd Carr's resignation. Les Miles was interested for a time, and Rich Rodriguez came to Michigan as a pretty big name. It's hard to tell how big-name candidates will view Ohio State without knowing what type of penalties the Buckeyes program could be facing. My colleague Ivan Maisel thinks big-time candidates will stay away from Ohio State, while I'm more optimistic there will be interest. We'll have to see.
Let's get to it ...
JC from Columbus, Ohio, writes: The players/future recruits love him, but would it at all be a possibility, Adam, that Luke Fickell stays at Ohio State and works as Defensive Coordinator even if he doesn't get the permanent head coach job? Why would he stay? If he isn't handed the job now, isn't that a sign that he'll never get the job and it's time to move on (which would be a shame)?
Adam Rittenberg: Totally disagree with your last point, JC. Fickell absolutely would have a chance to land the Ohio State job down the line even if he doesn't get the permanent gig after the 2011 season. Let's say he doesn't get the job and goes out and proves himself as a head coach elsewhere. The guy is only 37. He'd definitely have another shot to coach in Columbus, and his credentials as a Buckeye player and coach would help him. Whether he would stay on as an assistant for the next OSU coach is an interesting debate. I doubt he would because it would be a new regime and Fickell needs to become a head coach sooner rather than later, but you never know. He has roots in Columbus and a ton of passion for Ohio State.
Shannon from Texarkana, Texas, writes: When did Petrino change lanes? He never said he would have liked to play Ohio St. without the aforementioned players, he stands by wanting to play Ohio St. with their best players. What Petrino is pointing to is the NCAA loophole that allowed them to play, that's all. And like you said, many agree with Petrino.
Adam Rittenberg: Shannon, it still sounds like two viewpoints to me. If you want to take issue with the NCAA loophole, that's fine. Run with it. Hammer the NCAA, the Sugar Bowl and the Big Ten because all parties deserve it. But don't keep talking about wanting to face Ohio State's best team as well. We all know Arkansas would have faced a shell of the Buckeyes squad had Terrelle Pryor and the others been suspended. I'm fine with Bobby Petrino making the argument against the loophole. But if he does, stop talking about wanting to face the best Buckeyes team.
Devin from East Lansing, Mich., writes: Hey Adam,Great blog. I've got a question as a Michigan State student and fan (and I'm sure fans out there from other schools have the same question)-- How do you see MSU's chances of a Big Ten championship change (or Iowa's, Nebraska's, Wisconsin's, etc.) with the exit of Tressel and the possibility of further sanctions and such for OSU?
Adam Rittenberg: Overall, Michigan State's chances would improve if Ohio State can't compete for a Big Ten title. The same goes for the other 10 squads in the league. I would point out, however, that divisional play really changes how you should look at your team's chances for league championships, BCS bowls, etc. Michigan State must first worry about winning the Legends division, which doesn't include Ohio State. I'd say any penalties for Ohio State impact Leaders division teams more than they do Legends division teams.
Andrew L. from Columbus, Ohio, writes: Adam, I have been following your coverage of the Tressel collapse (I refuse to say enjoying but it is well done). One point I have noticed several commentators making is that Gee and Smith need to go as well. I can understand the calls for Smith to go but calling for Gee's head over this ignores the University part of The Ohio State University. Ohio State has over 64,000 students, most of whom are not on the football team, and a budget bigger than Delaware's. Gordon Gee has done great things for the school and I am much more concerned with the university as a whole than I am with the football team. President Gee has made some mistakes in handling this, but that is why he has Gene Smith. I frankly, hope he keeps paying more attention to Ohio State as a university that has a football team (along with any other student organization you can imagine - ie the Scrabble Club) than as a football team that is attached to a university.
Adam Rittenberg: Andrew, a university president should be evaluated on more than his somewhat indirect handling of the football program or the football coach. I agree that Gene Smith will face greater scrutiny here because football/Tressel falls directly under his responsibilities. That said, E. Gordon Gee certainly can be criticized for his foolish remark at the March 8 news conference. You could also take issue with how long it took Ohio State to part ways with Tressel. Ohio State football is a huge part of The Ohio State University, but it's not the only part. Gee should be evaluated accordingly.
Craig from Fort Wayne, Ind., writes: Adam, long time Boilermaker fan here and I just wanted to get your perspective on the program. Do you think Purdue football is dead for at least the near future? It seems as though the hiring of Danny Hope has not gone as planned and after 3 consecutive losing seasons (2 under Hope, 1 of those with a blown up roster), all the momentum from the Tiller era has been lost. I understand the schedule is set up for a bowl run this year, but is making a low tier bowl really going to revitalize the program? My beloved Boilers seem to have little in the way of a legitimate down field threat and are going to have to rely on their defense to win games this season. That paired with the fact that after this year the Boilers schedule seems to take a turn for the difficult in the coming seasons and it just appears to be a recipe for spinning tires. What does Purdue have to do to get back on the right track and if Hope doesn't work out has the AD burnt up to much good collateral from the Tiller era to attract a decent coach?
Adam Rittenberg: Craig, I realize it has been a tough time for Purdue fans and there seems to be little to no buzz around that program right now. That said, the 2011 team boasts some talented players on both sides of the ball. I'm really excited about guys like receiver Antavian Edison and cornerback Ricardo Allen. You also have players like running back Ralph Bolden returning to the fold. So there's hope for better things this season. It's hard to evaluate Hope right now, but this is undoubtedly a big season for him. He needs to show Purdue is headed in the right direction and can start making bowl games again. If Purdue falls short of the postseason, we could see a change.
Colin from Atlanta writes: Hey Adam long time reader first time writer.I felt this way before this Jim Tressel mess but especially with whats going down at Ohio State aren't the next 2-3 years really important for the Wisconsin football program to really take the next step and become a true power in the Big Ten?
Adam Rittenberg: Colin, I'm not the first person to write this, but Wisconsin could stand to gain the most from Ohio State potentially taking a step back during the next few years. The Badgers have been competitive with the Buckeyes, although Wisconsin hasn't been the Big Ten's top dog until the late 1990s. The fact that Wisconsin plays in the same division (Leaders) as Ohio State is extremely significant, and the Badgers could really move into a powerhouse position if they were to repeat as Big Ten champions this fall. While other teams could benefit as well, Wisconsin might be the most direct beneficiary.
Michael from San Francisco writes: Adam-In regards to Feldman's article, why would a big name be more interested in the OSU position that they were in the Michigan position? Michigan had difficulty (twice) getting the candidates they wanted, not to mention being unable to draw high profile names like Gruden, Stoops, etc. Why is OSU going to be so much more successful while they are under severe NCAA sanctions (or at least the threat of severe sanctions)? Wouldn't the big names wait for the Penn State or Texas positions?
Adam Rittenberg: It's hard to say, Michael. Ohio State has a lot of positives, and the program has been more dominant in recent years than either Michigan or Penn State. I also would disagree Michigan struggled to attract top candidates after Lloyd Carr's resignation. Les Miles was interested for a time, and Rich Rodriguez came to Michigan as a pretty big name. It's hard to tell how big-name candidates will view Ohio State without knowing what type of penalties the Buckeyes program could be facing. My colleague Ivan Maisel thinks big-time candidates will stay away from Ohio State, while I'm more optimistic there will be interest. We'll have to see.
Petrino needs to pick a lane with Ohio St.
June, 1, 2011
6/01/11
10:06
AM ET
By
Adam Rittenberg | ESPN.com
Arkansas coach Bobby Petrino has every right to question why Terrelle Pryor and four other Ohio State players were allowed to play in the Sugar Bowl.
The deferred punishment reeked of hypocrisy. Pryor and the others had violated NCAA rules for selling memorabilia items, rendering them ineligible. But an NCAA loophole allowed them to take the field in New Orleans.
"There’s no question that I don't understand how they were eligible to play in the game," Petrino told reporters Tuesday at the SEC spring meetings. "I just don't, and I never will. ... They [the NCAA] kind of changed the rules for that bowl game."
Petrino is right, and he's certainly not alone in this opinion.
But in practically the same breath, Petrino repeated the line he said leading up to the Sugar Bowl.
"We wanted to play their best players," he said. "When you have a year like we had and you're able to win six games down the stretch and get to a BCS bowl game you want to play their best players. That's what you want to do."
Sorry, coach, you can't have it both ways. You can't change lanes.
If you wanted to play Ohio State's best, you got it. And you lost. Deal with it.
Had Arkansas played an Ohio State team without its starting quarterback, its starting running back, its starting left tackle, a starting receiver and a defensive lineman (Solomon Thomas) who happened to make the deciding play in the Sugar Bowl, it would hardly qualify as facing the Buckeyes at their best. Not even close.
And fair or unfair, Arkansas victory against a depleted Ohio State team would have been branded with a qualifier because of the suspended players.
Again, Petrino has a legitimate gripe about why the Tat-5 were allowed to play. And if that's his argument, stick to it.
But if he truly wanted to see Ohio State's best product in New Orleans, he got what he wanted.
The deferred punishment reeked of hypocrisy. Pryor and the others had violated NCAA rules for selling memorabilia items, rendering them ineligible. But an NCAA loophole allowed them to take the field in New Orleans.
"There’s no question that I don't understand how they were eligible to play in the game," Petrino told reporters Tuesday at the SEC spring meetings. "I just don't, and I never will. ... They [the NCAA] kind of changed the rules for that bowl game."
Petrino is right, and he's certainly not alone in this opinion.
But in practically the same breath, Petrino repeated the line he said leading up to the Sugar Bowl.
"We wanted to play their best players," he said. "When you have a year like we had and you're able to win six games down the stretch and get to a BCS bowl game you want to play their best players. That's what you want to do."
Sorry, coach, you can't have it both ways. You can't change lanes.
If you wanted to play Ohio State's best, you got it. And you lost. Deal with it.
Had Arkansas played an Ohio State team without its starting quarterback, its starting running back, its starting left tackle, a starting receiver and a defensive lineman (Solomon Thomas) who happened to make the deciding play in the Sugar Bowl, it would hardly qualify as facing the Buckeyes at their best. Not even close.
And fair or unfair, Arkansas victory against a depleted Ohio State team would have been branded with a qualifier because of the suspended players.
Again, Petrino has a legitimate gripe about why the Tat-5 were allowed to play. And if that's his argument, stick to it.
But if he truly wanted to see Ohio State's best product in New Orleans, he got what he wanted.
I'll be compiling Friday's mailblog a little earlier than usual, so send me those questions and comments ASAP! Thanks for your continued participation.
Bryan from Kansas City, Mo., writes: Hey Adam, as a Nebraska fan I just recently started following your blog. Impressive! Thanks for all the coverage so far and for all your different vehicles to tell the stories. As a new Big 10 fan, I need to be made more aware of some of the gritty rivalries that are present, as well as which venues are some of the most daunting to play in. What would your top 3 "must see in person" matchups be for this upcoming season?
Adam Rittenberg: Thanks for reading, Bryan. Ohio State-Nebraska on Oct. 8 certainly jumps out to me. It has to be among the top five must-see games nationally entering the season, given the Big Ten/BCS implications and the return of Buckeyes coach Jim Tressel and the five suspended players, including quarterback Terrelle Pryor. Memorial Stadium will be electric that day/night. I'd also list the Nebraska-Wisconsin game on Oct. 1 in my must-see group. Although the Big Ten's primetime schedule hasn't been announced, it's a good bet the Huskers will play their first game as a Big Ten member under the lights. Camp Randall is awesome for night games. My third choice likely would be a nonconference game on Sept. 10: Alabama-Penn State or Notre Dame-Michigan (first night game at the Big House).
Matt from Farmington Hills, Mich., writes: Adam, If Rich Rod knew what the Michigan-Ohio State game really meant, he would not have fielded three of the worst defenses in Michigan history in embarrassing fashion each November. No toughness, poor tackling, lackluster effort. That is simply not Michigan's brand of football. THAT is why Michigan fans relentlessly insisted that Rodriguez just didn't get it. He created a kind of football foreign to the Wolverines and to the Great Rivalry.
Adam Rittenberg: Matt, you're not the only Michigan fan who feels this way. Rodriguez had won big with the spread offense and the 3-3-5 defense in the past, but it didn't work out for him at Michigan for a variety of reasons. His defenses displayed better fundamentals at West Virginia, and those units also had more experience. It's hard for coaches to go away from systems that have worked for them in the past, but Rodriguez could have been more flexible. Would things have turned out differently if Rodriguez had run a system similar to Greg Mattison's? Hard to tell. You need the players and you need coaches who can develop them. Rodriguez seemed to be lacking in both areas.
John from Norwalk, Iowa, writes: Hey Adam, do you think that there's any correlation between spring game performance and performance in the upcoming season? It makes you feel good about your team to read about how players stepped up in their respective spring games, but how often does that translate to on-field performance in the fall?
Adam Rittenberg: Great question, John. I know it's hard for fans because the spring game is usually all they see, but it's important to have perspective when judging a glorified scrimmage. I've seen too many players light it up in spring games and then do nothing on fall Saturdays. That's not to say a spring game performance like, say, Jamal Turner's at Nebraska doesn't suggest big things ahead, but it's important to see the spring games for what they are -- one of 15 spring practice sessions. I put a lot more stock in what coaches tell me about players' performances throughout spring ball.
Adam from Baltimore writes: Hey Adam, Question regarding Roushar's idea of trying to be more vertical with the passing game. I love the idea of them going deep, but the biggest problem I see is (especially after their first scrimmage) the QB needs a lot of time (3-4 secs) to wait for those receivers to get down field to really exploit that dimension and I worry that this new O-line is too young to give even a QB as good as Cousins enough time. I know the running game will also help that, but I just question how feasible this new plan really will be with such a young O-line.
Adam Rittenberg: You make an excellent point, Adam. Michigan State's offensive line has to be an area of concern with all the youth right now. The coaches feel there's more athleticism up front, but the line is really one area where you can't substitute for experience. I also wouldn't expect Dan Roushar to become Bobby Petrino overnight. Roushar knows the run game has to be a focal point, and I expect the Spartans to run the ball more this fall. You'll see some shots down the field, but more out of the play-action, which Kirk Cousins executes well.
David from Omaha writes: Adam, As a Nebraska fan im new to your blog and maybe its just the contrast with Ubben, but do you not hold weekly chats? They are one of the things I look forward tot hem most. Ubben used to hold his chat the same day of every week unless he needed to reschedule. And I say this with all due respect, but Ubben always made a point to communicate with his readers when the chat will be each week. Again, not wanting to offend as someone new to your chats, but I have yet to see any reference to your chats other than, here is today's chat. Id like to plan to read your chats as I have found ESPN buries them on the site the day after they happen. So my rather long-winded question is, do you hold a chat every week. And if so, when is said chat? A specific day or whenever you feel like it. I would be grateful If you would update us on when there will be chats and if there is any sort of schedule, formula or logic utilized in scheduling them. Thanks!
Adam Rittenberg: David, I'll chalk this up to you being new to the blog, as I typically list chat reminders every week on the day of the chat and also in the lunch links that day. Although the schedule has been a little crazy lately because of my vacation and my spring trips, the Big Ten chats take place every Wednesday at noon ET (1 p.m. CT). We might change the time during the season, but for now, plan to join me then. I'll post a reminder Wednesday morning.
Josh from Iowa City, Iowa, writes: Adam, this is a fairly specific question but hopefully you can lend your insight. Even with Marcus Coker's outstanding performance last year in the Iowa's bowl game, the Hawks will not feature a lot of proven-depth at the RB position. Even with veterans like Marvin McNutt on the team other guys are going to have to step up. Which Iowa offensive players do you think will grab this opportunity. Keenan Davis was the first that crossed my mind, a big receiver with good hands who has worked under some of the best receivers Iowa has seen. Your thoughts?
Adam Rittenberg: Davis definitely comes to mind for me, too. He had a good spring by most accounts and looked very good in Iowa's spring scrimmage Saturday. It's important Davis takes hold of that No. 2 wideout spot. I also look at the tight ends, Brad Herman and C.J. Fiedorowicz, to play bigger roles in the offense. Herman has worked behind several NFL tight ends at Iowa, and Fiedorowicz boasts the physical gifts to really be special. One of the big keys is who steps up behind Coker. Will it be Jason White or De'Andre Johnson or an incoming freshman? You typically need at least two backs in the Big Ten.
Jeff from Lorain, Ohio, writes: Does Hoke know that meeechigan plays Ohio State and not Ohio Univ. at the end of the season? Can he be that stupid?
Adam Rittenberg: I think Hoke knows exactly what he's doing, Jeff. And from the looks of my inbox, he has tweaked quite a few Buckeyes fans with his "Ohio" references. It's all by design.
Oliver from Columbus, Ohio, writes: Adam, would the Ohio State coaching staff being doing a disservice to the team if they didn't put the best candidate/player at quarterback during the five-game suspension that gives the team the best chance for success? This means putting someone at QB which would create a simple transition to Terrelle Pryor in Game 6. Thanks.
Adam Rittenberg: Yes, the staff would be doing a disservice by not playing the best player. I don't see why they wouldn't in this situation. I'm guessing you think a guy like Kenny Guiton or Braxton Miller would create the easiest transition to Pryor because of their mobility in the pocket. Joe Bauserman moves around better than people think, though, and he has operated in this system for several years. I guess I'm not as concerned about having a similar quarterback to Pryor. The bigger question is how Pryor responds to his first game situation, a very difficult one in Lincoln.
Bryan from Kansas City, Mo., writes: Hey Adam, as a Nebraska fan I just recently started following your blog. Impressive! Thanks for all the coverage so far and for all your different vehicles to tell the stories. As a new Big 10 fan, I need to be made more aware of some of the gritty rivalries that are present, as well as which venues are some of the most daunting to play in. What would your top 3 "must see in person" matchups be for this upcoming season?
Adam Rittenberg: Thanks for reading, Bryan. Ohio State-Nebraska on Oct. 8 certainly jumps out to me. It has to be among the top five must-see games nationally entering the season, given the Big Ten/BCS implications and the return of Buckeyes coach Jim Tressel and the five suspended players, including quarterback Terrelle Pryor. Memorial Stadium will be electric that day/night. I'd also list the Nebraska-Wisconsin game on Oct. 1 in my must-see group. Although the Big Ten's primetime schedule hasn't been announced, it's a good bet the Huskers will play their first game as a Big Ten member under the lights. Camp Randall is awesome for night games. My third choice likely would be a nonconference game on Sept. 10: Alabama-Penn State or Notre Dame-Michigan (first night game at the Big House).
Matt from Farmington Hills, Mich., writes: Adam, If Rich Rod knew what the Michigan-Ohio State game really meant, he would not have fielded three of the worst defenses in Michigan history in embarrassing fashion each November. No toughness, poor tackling, lackluster effort. That is simply not Michigan's brand of football. THAT is why Michigan fans relentlessly insisted that Rodriguez just didn't get it. He created a kind of football foreign to the Wolverines and to the Great Rivalry.
Adam Rittenberg: Matt, you're not the only Michigan fan who feels this way. Rodriguez had won big with the spread offense and the 3-3-5 defense in the past, but it didn't work out for him at Michigan for a variety of reasons. His defenses displayed better fundamentals at West Virginia, and those units also had more experience. It's hard for coaches to go away from systems that have worked for them in the past, but Rodriguez could have been more flexible. Would things have turned out differently if Rodriguez had run a system similar to Greg Mattison's? Hard to tell. You need the players and you need coaches who can develop them. Rodriguez seemed to be lacking in both areas.
John from Norwalk, Iowa, writes: Hey Adam, do you think that there's any correlation between spring game performance and performance in the upcoming season? It makes you feel good about your team to read about how players stepped up in their respective spring games, but how often does that translate to on-field performance in the fall?
Adam Rittenberg: Great question, John. I know it's hard for fans because the spring game is usually all they see, but it's important to have perspective when judging a glorified scrimmage. I've seen too many players light it up in spring games and then do nothing on fall Saturdays. That's not to say a spring game performance like, say, Jamal Turner's at Nebraska doesn't suggest big things ahead, but it's important to see the spring games for what they are -- one of 15 spring practice sessions. I put a lot more stock in what coaches tell me about players' performances throughout spring ball.
Adam from Baltimore writes: Hey Adam, Question regarding Roushar's idea of trying to be more vertical with the passing game. I love the idea of them going deep, but the biggest problem I see is (especially after their first scrimmage) the QB needs a lot of time (3-4 secs) to wait for those receivers to get down field to really exploit that dimension and I worry that this new O-line is too young to give even a QB as good as Cousins enough time. I know the running game will also help that, but I just question how feasible this new plan really will be with such a young O-line.
Adam Rittenberg: You make an excellent point, Adam. Michigan State's offensive line has to be an area of concern with all the youth right now. The coaches feel there's more athleticism up front, but the line is really one area where you can't substitute for experience. I also wouldn't expect Dan Roushar to become Bobby Petrino overnight. Roushar knows the run game has to be a focal point, and I expect the Spartans to run the ball more this fall. You'll see some shots down the field, but more out of the play-action, which Kirk Cousins executes well.
David from Omaha writes: Adam, As a Nebraska fan im new to your blog and maybe its just the contrast with Ubben, but do you not hold weekly chats? They are one of the things I look forward tot hem most. Ubben used to hold his chat the same day of every week unless he needed to reschedule. And I say this with all due respect, but Ubben always made a point to communicate with his readers when the chat will be each week. Again, not wanting to offend as someone new to your chats, but I have yet to see any reference to your chats other than, here is today's chat. Id like to plan to read your chats as I have found ESPN buries them on the site the day after they happen. So my rather long-winded question is, do you hold a chat every week. And if so, when is said chat? A specific day or whenever you feel like it. I would be grateful If you would update us on when there will be chats and if there is any sort of schedule, formula or logic utilized in scheduling them. Thanks!
Adam Rittenberg: David, I'll chalk this up to you being new to the blog, as I typically list chat reminders every week on the day of the chat and also in the lunch links that day. Although the schedule has been a little crazy lately because of my vacation and my spring trips, the Big Ten chats take place every Wednesday at noon ET (1 p.m. CT). We might change the time during the season, but for now, plan to join me then. I'll post a reminder Wednesday morning.
Josh from Iowa City, Iowa, writes: Adam, this is a fairly specific question but hopefully you can lend your insight. Even with Marcus Coker's outstanding performance last year in the Iowa's bowl game, the Hawks will not feature a lot of proven-depth at the RB position. Even with veterans like Marvin McNutt on the team other guys are going to have to step up. Which Iowa offensive players do you think will grab this opportunity. Keenan Davis was the first that crossed my mind, a big receiver with good hands who has worked under some of the best receivers Iowa has seen. Your thoughts?
Adam Rittenberg: Davis definitely comes to mind for me, too. He had a good spring by most accounts and looked very good in Iowa's spring scrimmage Saturday. It's important Davis takes hold of that No. 2 wideout spot. I also look at the tight ends, Brad Herman and C.J. Fiedorowicz, to play bigger roles in the offense. Herman has worked behind several NFL tight ends at Iowa, and Fiedorowicz boasts the physical gifts to really be special. One of the big keys is who steps up behind Coker. Will it be Jason White or De'Andre Johnson or an incoming freshman? You typically need at least two backs in the Big Ten.
Jeff from Lorain, Ohio, writes: Does Hoke know that meeechigan plays Ohio State and not Ohio Univ. at the end of the season? Can he be that stupid?
Adam Rittenberg: I think Hoke knows exactly what he's doing, Jeff. And from the looks of my inbox, he has tweaked quite a few Buckeyes fans with his "Ohio" references. It's all by design.
Oliver from Columbus, Ohio, writes: Adam, would the Ohio State coaching staff being doing a disservice to the team if they didn't put the best candidate/player at quarterback during the five-game suspension that gives the team the best chance for success? This means putting someone at QB which would create a simple transition to Terrelle Pryor in Game 6. Thanks.
Adam Rittenberg: Yes, the staff would be doing a disservice by not playing the best player. I don't see why they wouldn't in this situation. I'm guessing you think a guy like Kenny Guiton or Braxton Miller would create the easiest transition to Pryor because of their mobility in the pocket. Joe Bauserman moves around better than people think, though, and he has operated in this system for several years. I guess I'm not as concerned about having a similar quarterback to Pryor. The bigger question is how Pryor responds to his first game situation, a very difficult one in Lincoln.
Instant analysis: Ohio State 31, Arkansas 26
January, 5, 2011
1/05/11
12:28
AM ET
By
Adam Rittenberg | ESPN.com
NEW ORLEANS -- Ohio State found a way to hold on and end its slide against the SEC in bowl games. There were some tense moments, but the Buckeyes can finally breathe easy in the Big Easy.
Let's take a look at the Allstate Sugar Bowl.
How the game was won: Ohio State's defense kept Arkansas out of the end zone and held off a furious Razorbacks rally in the second half. Cameron Heyward and the Buckeyes' defensive line put enough pressure on Hogs star quarterback Ryan Mallett, who seemed a bit off at times and got no help from his stone-handed receivers. Solomon Thomas sealed things with a clutch interception in the closing seconds. The Buckeyes had a terrific offensive first half, racking up 28 points behind Terrelle Pryor's precision passing, Dane Sanzenbacher's heroics and some dominant offensive line play. Ohio State's suspended players stepped up and the team maintained focus in the face of adversity.
Turning point: After Arkansas blocked an Ohio State punt and took over in the Buckeyes' red zone, Thomas, one of five juniors suspended for the first five games of 2011, picked off a short Mallett pass. The Buckeyes then ran out the clock.
Stat of the game: Ohio State converted 6 of 8 third down opportunities in the first half but didn't move the chains on its first four opportunities after halftime until Pryor picked up a huge first down on a scramble. Arkansas showed why it is one of the nation's top third down defenses in the second half.
Player of the game: Ohio State's Heyward. Pryor came up big as well, but Heyward was all over the field and really disrupted Arkansas' offensive rhythm at times. The son of the late Craig "Ironhead" Heyward turned in a dominant effort in his dad's old stomping ground. Pryor also deserves a lot of credit after racking up 222 pass yards and 115 rush yards.
Second guessing: Arkansas had a chance to take on seven points at the end of the first half, but Bobby Petrino took a page from Jim Tressel's book and kicked a short field goal as time expired. Although the Hogs still had a chance to win, a touchdown right before halftime would have made things a lot easier.
What it means: Ohio State no longer has to hear about the SEC struggles or its inability to make plays in the clutch on big stages. A lot of folks will point to the controversial decision to allow the suspended players to participate, but the players stepped up and the team never fragmented. Ohio State now has won back-to-back BCS bowls and should no longer hear about the failures in the national title game. This was one that Tressel, Pryor, Buckeye Nation and the Big Ten really needed, and Ohio State came through.
Let's take a look at the Allstate Sugar Bowl.
How the game was won: Ohio State's defense kept Arkansas out of the end zone and held off a furious Razorbacks rally in the second half. Cameron Heyward and the Buckeyes' defensive line put enough pressure on Hogs star quarterback Ryan Mallett, who seemed a bit off at times and got no help from his stone-handed receivers. Solomon Thomas sealed things with a clutch interception in the closing seconds. The Buckeyes had a terrific offensive first half, racking up 28 points behind Terrelle Pryor's precision passing, Dane Sanzenbacher's heroics and some dominant offensive line play. Ohio State's suspended players stepped up and the team maintained focus in the face of adversity.
Turning point: After Arkansas blocked an Ohio State punt and took over in the Buckeyes' red zone, Thomas, one of five juniors suspended for the first five games of 2011, picked off a short Mallett pass. The Buckeyes then ran out the clock.
Stat of the game: Ohio State converted 6 of 8 third down opportunities in the first half but didn't move the chains on its first four opportunities after halftime until Pryor picked up a huge first down on a scramble. Arkansas showed why it is one of the nation's top third down defenses in the second half.
Player of the game: Ohio State's Heyward. Pryor came up big as well, but Heyward was all over the field and really disrupted Arkansas' offensive rhythm at times. The son of the late Craig "Ironhead" Heyward turned in a dominant effort in his dad's old stomping ground. Pryor also deserves a lot of credit after racking up 222 pass yards and 115 rush yards.
Second guessing: Arkansas had a chance to take on seven points at the end of the first half, but Bobby Petrino took a page from Jim Tressel's book and kicked a short field goal as time expired. Although the Hogs still had a chance to win, a touchdown right before halftime would have made things a lot easier.
What it means: Ohio State no longer has to hear about the SEC struggles or its inability to make plays in the clutch on big stages. A lot of folks will point to the controversial decision to allow the suspended players to participate, but the players stepped up and the team never fragmented. Ohio State now has won back-to-back BCS bowls and should no longer hear about the failures in the national title game. This was one that Tressel, Pryor, Buckeye Nation and the Big Ten really needed, and Ohio State came through.
Allstate Sugar Bowl: Ohio State (11-1) vs. Arkansas (10-2)
January, 3, 2011
1/03/11
8:00
AM ET
By
Adam Rittenberg | ESPN.com
The Big Ten's final chance at redemption arrives in the Big Easy, as Ohio State takes on Arkansas in the Allstate Sugar Bowl.
Let's take a quick look at the matchup.
WHO TO WATCH: Ohio State's five suspended players who will participate in the bowl, particularly starting quarterback Terrelle Pryor, starting running back Dan Herron, starting left tackle Mike Adams and starting receiver DeVier Posey. They created a major distraction for the program, and all have vowed to make things right not only in the bowl game but by returning for their senior seasons. It will be interesting to see the mental states of players like Pryor, no stranger to scrutiny and a guy who stepped up in the 2010 Rose Bowl. Ohio State needs a strong showing from its offense, and Pryor and his teammates will be in the spotlight.
WHAT TO WATCH: Ohio State's secondary vs. Arkansas' pass-catchers. Despite several season-ending injuries, the Buckeyes' defensive backs have more than held their own, helping Ohio State rank sixth nationally in pass defense (156.3 ypg allowed). But the Buckeyes' secondary faces its toughest challenge of the season with Arkansas, which boasts five players with 500 receiving yards or more and four with 600 receiving yards or more. First-team All-Big Ten selections Chimdi Chekwa and Jermale Hines need strong performances against Ryan Mallett and his many targets.
WHY TO WATCH: The Buckeyes' suspension and the controversy surrounding the penalties certainly adds interest to this game. Will Ohio State have a united locker room as it tries to beat an SEC foe in a bowl game for the first time in 10 tries? The Buckeyes' decorated senior class needs to bring the team together for a critical game before the program enters an uncertain 2011 season. If you like exciting offense and polished defense, this is the game for you as expert playcaller Bobby Petrino tries to find holes in Ohio State's D. The Big Ten's disastrous New Year's Day performance also adds intrigue, as Ohio State tries to redeem its league a bit.
PREDICTION: Ohio State 24, Arkansas 21. It certainly could go the other way, but I expect Ohio State's seniors to bring the team together and go out with a victory despite all of the controversy. Pryor makes enough plays when it counts and Herron provides a lift in the run game. Mallett moves Arkansas between the 20s but Ohio State limits the Hogs' scoring opportunities. Expect a big game from Cameron Heyward as Ohio State ends its bowl slide against the SEC.
Let's take a quick look at the matchup.
WHO TO WATCH: Ohio State's five suspended players who will participate in the bowl, particularly starting quarterback Terrelle Pryor, starting running back Dan Herron, starting left tackle Mike Adams and starting receiver DeVier Posey. They created a major distraction for the program, and all have vowed to make things right not only in the bowl game but by returning for their senior seasons. It will be interesting to see the mental states of players like Pryor, no stranger to scrutiny and a guy who stepped up in the 2010 Rose Bowl. Ohio State needs a strong showing from its offense, and Pryor and his teammates will be in the spotlight.
WHAT TO WATCH: Ohio State's secondary vs. Arkansas' pass-catchers. Despite several season-ending injuries, the Buckeyes' defensive backs have more than held their own, helping Ohio State rank sixth nationally in pass defense (156.3 ypg allowed). But the Buckeyes' secondary faces its toughest challenge of the season with Arkansas, which boasts five players with 500 receiving yards or more and four with 600 receiving yards or more. First-team All-Big Ten selections Chimdi Chekwa and Jermale Hines need strong performances against Ryan Mallett and his many targets.
WHY TO WATCH: The Buckeyes' suspension and the controversy surrounding the penalties certainly adds interest to this game. Will Ohio State have a united locker room as it tries to beat an SEC foe in a bowl game for the first time in 10 tries? The Buckeyes' decorated senior class needs to bring the team together for a critical game before the program enters an uncertain 2011 season. If you like exciting offense and polished defense, this is the game for you as expert playcaller Bobby Petrino tries to find holes in Ohio State's D. The Big Ten's disastrous New Year's Day performance also adds intrigue, as Ohio State tries to redeem its league a bit.
PREDICTION: Ohio State 24, Arkansas 21. It certainly could go the other way, but I expect Ohio State's seniors to bring the team together and go out with a victory despite all of the controversy. Pryor makes enough plays when it counts and Herron provides a lift in the run game. Mallett moves Arkansas between the 20s but Ohio State limits the Hogs' scoring opportunities. Expect a big game from Cameron Heyward as Ohio State ends its bowl slide against the SEC.
AllState Sugar Bowl
December, 6, 2010
12/06/10
1:42
AM ET
By
Chris Low and
Adam Rittenberg | ESPN.com
Arkansas Razorbacks (10-2) vs. Ohio State Buckeyes (11-1)
Jan. 4, 8:30 p.m. ET (ESPN)
Arkansas take by SEC blogger Chris Low: Arkansas’ Bobby Petrino joins two of his SEC colleagues (Nick Saban and Urban Meyer) in becoming only the third coach to take two different schools to BCS bowl games. Petrino led Louisville to a victory in the 2007 Orange Bowl.
The Hogs (10-2) charge into their Allstate Sugar Bowl matchup with Ohio State playing their best football of the season. They’ve won their past six games and are averaging 42.5 points in those six contests.
Arkansas’ résumé is equally impressive. The Hogs own four wins over teams ranked in the top 25 of the final BCS standings. They’re the only team in the country with a quarterback (Ryan Mallett) who has passed for 3,000 yards, a running back (Knile Davis) who has rushed for 1,000 yards and five receivers (Greg Childs, Joe Adams, Cobi Hamilton, Jarius Wright and D.J. Williams) who have at least 500 receiving yards.
While known for its explosive offense, Arkansas’ defensive improvement has been the real story to its success. The Hogs were 89th in the country in total defense a year ago, but enter the bowl game ranked 34th nationally this season.
This is a team playing with a lot of confidence right now and a team that showed a lot of resilience after losing a close game at home to Alabama in September and then getting toasted in the fourth quarter by Auburn a month later.
Ohio State take by Big Ten blogger Adam Rittenberg: Ohio State ended its three-game slide in BCS bowls last January in Pasadena. Now the Buckeyes’ take aim at snapping a more sobering streak.
Most Buckeyes fans know what 0-9 means, and if they don’t, SEC fans will happily remind them. Ohio State is 0-9 against SEC teams in bowl games, including back-to-back losses in the BCS title games in 2007 and 2008 that continue to blotch the Buckeyes’ national reputation. Jim Tressel’s crew will try to overcome its SEC blues in the Allstate Sugar Bowl against Arkansas.
Ohio State has been a slow-starting, strong-finishing team, both in games and throughout the season. The Buckeyes’ early stumbles against Wisconsin led to their only loss, but they won their final five regular-season games, all but one contest by 24 points or more.
Aside from the Wisconsin setback, Ohio State’s defense allowed no more than 17 points in a conference game and overcame some key injuries, particularly in the secondary. Containing Mallett is clearly Ohio State’s top priority, and the Buckeyes boast a top 10 pass defense led by cornerback Chimdi Chekwa and safety Jermale Hines.
Buckeyes quarterback Terrelle Pryor took a major step forward in the Rose Bowl and looks for another big performance on the big stage. Pryor’s mobility could be key against an Arkansas defense that applies a lot of pressure.
Jan. 4, 8:30 p.m. ET (ESPN)
Arkansas take by SEC blogger Chris Low: Arkansas’ Bobby Petrino joins two of his SEC colleagues (Nick Saban and Urban Meyer) in becoming only the third coach to take two different schools to BCS bowl games. Petrino led Louisville to a victory in the 2007 Orange Bowl.
The Hogs (10-2) charge into their Allstate Sugar Bowl matchup with Ohio State playing their best football of the season. They’ve won their past six games and are averaging 42.5 points in those six contests.
Arkansas’ résumé is equally impressive. The Hogs own four wins over teams ranked in the top 25 of the final BCS standings. They’re the only team in the country with a quarterback (Ryan Mallett) who has passed for 3,000 yards, a running back (Knile Davis) who has rushed for 1,000 yards and five receivers (Greg Childs, Joe Adams, Cobi Hamilton, Jarius Wright and D.J. Williams) who have at least 500 receiving yards.
While known for its explosive offense, Arkansas’ defensive improvement has been the real story to its success. The Hogs were 89th in the country in total defense a year ago, but enter the bowl game ranked 34th nationally this season.
This is a team playing with a lot of confidence right now and a team that showed a lot of resilience after losing a close game at home to Alabama in September and then getting toasted in the fourth quarter by Auburn a month later.
Ohio State take by Big Ten blogger Adam Rittenberg: Ohio State ended its three-game slide in BCS bowls last January in Pasadena. Now the Buckeyes’ take aim at snapping a more sobering streak.
Most Buckeyes fans know what 0-9 means, and if they don’t, SEC fans will happily remind them. Ohio State is 0-9 against SEC teams in bowl games, including back-to-back losses in the BCS title games in 2007 and 2008 that continue to blotch the Buckeyes’ national reputation. Jim Tressel’s crew will try to overcome its SEC blues in the Allstate Sugar Bowl against Arkansas.
Ohio State has been a slow-starting, strong-finishing team, both in games and throughout the season. The Buckeyes’ early stumbles against Wisconsin led to their only loss, but they won their final five regular-season games, all but one contest by 24 points or more.
Aside from the Wisconsin setback, Ohio State’s defense allowed no more than 17 points in a conference game and overcame some key injuries, particularly in the secondary. Containing Mallett is clearly Ohio State’s top priority, and the Buckeyes boast a top 10 pass defense led by cornerback Chimdi Chekwa and safety Jermale Hines.
Buckeyes quarterback Terrelle Pryor took a major step forward in the Rose Bowl and looks for another big performance on the big stage. Pryor’s mobility could be key against an Arkansas defense that applies a lot of pressure.
Illinois officially names Koenning as DC
December, 18, 2009
12/18/09
2:20
PM ET
By
Adam Rittenberg | ESPN.com
After a wild night of rumors and negotiations, Illinois got the man it wanted to run its defense.
Illinois officially named Vic Koenning its new defensive coordinator at a news conference today in Champaign. Koenning, who previously served as Kansas State's co-defensive coordinator, replaces Dan Disch and Curt Mallory, who were demoted to position coaches.
"I’m ready to jump in there with coach [Ron] Zook, start to watch some recruiting tape, start to watch some games and get going," Koenning said Friday. "I couldn’t be more excited to be here. In so many things in life, timing is everything, and the timing has worked out fantastic."
Illinois' hiring of Koenning had been expected for several days, but things got interesting Thursday night as Georgia re-entered the mix for his services. Koenning recalled how Kansas State head coach Bill Snyder came into his office several days ago and asked where Koenning was headed.
Ultimately, Koenning settled on Illinois, calling it a "much-needed change."
"There was some dialogue [with Georgia]," Koenning said. "It made for an interesting last 16, 18 hours, but when push comes to shove, the character and the drive and the enthusiasm that coach Zook exhibited made sure there was no doubt in the outcome."
A week after dismissing four assistant coaches and demoting two others, Zook has filled all four positions and has his staff in place for a make-or-break 2010 season. We can certainly debate whether Zook should still be at Illinois and whether the fired assistants were scapegoats for a miserable season, but you've got to give the team credit for its bold approach to finding replacements.
Time will tell if these hires can turn things around, but the early returns are favorable.
New offensive coordinator Paul Petrino has been around great offenses for some time, and he seems excited about the chance to break away from his brother Bobby and call his own plays. Petrino and new offensive assistants Jeff Brohm (quarterbacks) and Greg Nord (tight ends) were all at Louisville when the Cardinals lit up the scoreboard from 2003-06.
Koenning spent only one year at Kansas State, which ranks 40th nationally in total defense and 16th against the run. He built his reputation as a strong defensive coordinator at Clemson, which finished in the top 25 nationally in scoring, total defense, and pass efficiency defense in each of his four seasons there (2005-08).
Koenning had never been to Champaign and arrived "in the dark of night" early Friday.
"There may be some dark circles under my eyes," he said. "But you have an adrenaline rush when you come into a place like this. We're ready to go."
[+] Enlarge
Todd Kirkland/Icon SMIVic Koenning left Kansas State to take a similar position at Illinois.
"I’m ready to jump in there with coach [Ron] Zook, start to watch some recruiting tape, start to watch some games and get going," Koenning said Friday. "I couldn’t be more excited to be here. In so many things in life, timing is everything, and the timing has worked out fantastic."
Illinois' hiring of Koenning had been expected for several days, but things got interesting Thursday night as Georgia re-entered the mix for his services. Koenning recalled how Kansas State head coach Bill Snyder came into his office several days ago and asked where Koenning was headed.
Ultimately, Koenning settled on Illinois, calling it a "much-needed change."
"There was some dialogue [with Georgia]," Koenning said. "It made for an interesting last 16, 18 hours, but when push comes to shove, the character and the drive and the enthusiasm that coach Zook exhibited made sure there was no doubt in the outcome."
A week after dismissing four assistant coaches and demoting two others, Zook has filled all four positions and has his staff in place for a make-or-break 2010 season. We can certainly debate whether Zook should still be at Illinois and whether the fired assistants were scapegoats for a miserable season, but you've got to give the team credit for its bold approach to finding replacements.
Time will tell if these hires can turn things around, but the early returns are favorable.
New offensive coordinator Paul Petrino has been around great offenses for some time, and he seems excited about the chance to break away from his brother Bobby and call his own plays. Petrino and new offensive assistants Jeff Brohm (quarterbacks) and Greg Nord (tight ends) were all at Louisville when the Cardinals lit up the scoreboard from 2003-06.
Koenning spent only one year at Kansas State, which ranks 40th nationally in total defense and 16th against the run. He built his reputation as a strong defensive coordinator at Clemson, which finished in the top 25 nationally in scoring, total defense, and pass efficiency defense in each of his four seasons there (2005-08).
Koenning had never been to Champaign and arrived "in the dark of night" early Friday.
"There may be some dark circles under my eyes," he said. "But you have an adrenaline rush when you come into a place like this. We're ready to go."
ABOUT THIS BLOG
Adam Rittenberg
Rittenberg joined ESPN.com in 2008 after four years at the Arlington Heights (Ill.) Daily Herald, where he covered sports at Notre Dame, Northwestern, DePaul and several other colleges. He lives in Chicago.
Brian Bennett
Bennett joined ESPN.com in August 2008 after nine years at The Courier-Journal in Louisville, Ky., where he covered college sports and the University of Louisville beat. He lives in Louisville.
BIG TEN TEAM COVERAGE
RECRUITING NATION
Michigan: WolverineNation
Follow everything Michigan at WolverineNation: Michigan Wolverines football, basketball, news, recruiting and more.
RECRUITING NATION
Ohio State: BuckeyeNation
Follow everything Ohio State at BuckeyeNation: Ohio State Buckeyes football, basketball, news, recruiting and more.
