Carolina Panthers: Arizona Cardinals

A weekly examination of the Panthers’ ESPN.com Power Ranking:

Preseason: 23 | Last Week: 5 | ESPN.com Power Ranking since 2002

Maybe wide receiver Steve Smith was right after a Week 1 loss to Seattle. Maybe the Carolina Panthers and Seahawks will meet again deep in January.

They certainly are on a collision course in ESPN.com's weekly Power Rankings.

The Panthers (9-3) moved up two spots to third after their eighth straight victory, a 27-6 win against Tampa Bay. They trail only the Seahawks (11-1) and Denver Broncos (10-2) in the rankings.

They have a chance to make an even bigger impression on the voters in Sunday night's game at No. 5 New Orleans (9-3), the first of two against the Saints in a three-week period that will go a long way in deciding the NFC South.

That the Panthers have a chance to win the division and possibly face Seattle in the playoffs were unlikely scenarios when they were 1-3 and ranked No. 26.

In my Power Rankings story that week, I actually said this was not a good team and debated whether Carolina, Tampa Bay and Atlanta were turning the NFC South into the worst division in the NFL.

I should have listened to Smith when he said the Panthers were a playoff team after a 12-7 loss to Seattle.

In case you forgot, here's exactly what Smith said: "I stand on this: I think we're going to see them again deep in January. If we continue to play like we're playing, eliminate some of the penalties, eliminate some of the mistakes ... for us to have played that team that is considered by all accounts the best team in the NFL ... if that's the best team, we came down to the [final minutes] and it was a well-fought game.''

The Panthers had a chance to beat the Seahawks (who dismantled New Orleans 34-7 on Monday night) until DeAngelo Williams fumbled at the Seattle 8-yard line late in the fourth quarter.

"Our season is not over,'' Smith said that day. "If that means the season is over, I'm not sure what kind of football y'all are used to around here. That's not a quitting team.''

Asked if Carolina was a playoff team, Smith responded, "I didn't stutter. There was no slur in my speech.''

Hearing you loud and clear now.
Cam Newton, Larry FitzgeraldGetty ImagesPanthers QB Cam Newton, Cardinals WR Larry Fitzgerald aren't to blame for teams' mediocre starts.

Sunday will be a trip down memory lane for Carolina Panthers quarterback Cam Newton, who made his NFL debut at University of Phoenix Stadium in 2011, throwing for 422 yards and two touchdowns.

A confident Newton brings a 1-2 Panthers squad to the desert off a big win over the New York Giants to take on a 2-2 Arizona Cardinals squad that’s facing a bit of turmoil. Its offense is sputtering, and the team made a significant move on the offensive line, trading left tackle Levi Brown to the Pittsburgh Steelers on Wednesday.

Cardinals reporter Josh Weinfuss and Panthers reporter David Newton talk about Sunday’s game.

Weinfuss: In his third season, has Newton matured into the type of quarterback the Panthers hoped he’d be? If he hasn’t, what else needs to change?

Newton: Josh, that seems to be the question on a lot of people's minds when Carolina comes to town. I have noticed a difference this season, whether you want to call it maturity or confidence or just growing into the position. Honestly, I think too much is made of his maturity and leadership. Winning is what is missing, and being surrounded by enough talent to do that is what needs to change. Newton still has only one receiver (Steve Smith) who would start on most NFL teams, and he's been missing a key weapon in running back Jonathan Stewart for most of the past year. And remember, he helped the offense score enough points to go into the fourth quarter with the lead in the first two games and the defense didn't come through. This team easily could be 3-0 with one or two fourth-quarter plays going the other way and people would be talking about Newton as a great leader. But it is true, as left tackle Jordan Gross said after the win over the Giants, that when Newton is hot, the Panthers are hot.

Since we're talking about quarterbacks, is Carson Palmer really the answer in Arizona?

Weinfuss: Palmer is the short-term answer for a long-term issue plaguing the Cardinals’ franchise. He’s here, and he’s the guy Arizona has to work with. He’s a vast improvement from every quarterback the Cardinals have had since Kurt Warner, which doesn’t say a whole lot but, at the same time, gives Palmer enough credibility in the locker room. He throws a pretty ball when he has time, and he has been able to fit it into areas to Larry Fitzgerald & Co. that haven’t been seen here since, well, Kurt Warner. Palmer gets compared with Warner because he’s most likely on his last stop. Palmer has some issues to work through and tends to rush his reads and get off his game after getting hit. The past two games, even though Arizona won one, have been frustrating for the receivers. If he doesn’t improve soon, I fear a repeat of last year could be in the works.

Let me ask you about the Panthers defense. Is this front seven as good as the stats and rankings signify?

Newton: Before the 38-0 victory over the Giants, former Carolina general manager and current ESPN analyst Bill Polian called this one of the best front sevens nobody knows. If these players keep playing like they have been, they won't be unknown for long. The front four is stout, with rookie defensive tackle Star Lotulelei already looking like a star. Teams that bypassed him in the first round have to be second-guessing themselves. He's really a disruptive force in the middle. Greg Hardy, who had three sacks against New York and earned the NFC Defensive Player of the Week award, is versatile enough to play end or tackle. What makes this unit so strong is that it gets pressure on the quarterback without having a lot of exotic blitz packages. The weakest link has been Pro Bowl linebacker Jon Beason, coming off microfracture knee surgery. Were it not for the lost step that kept him from making a couple of critical plays in the first two games, the Panthers might be 3-0. He was replaced by Chase Blackburn against New York and might have a hard time getting his job back. There's really not another weak link, and the depth is solid, as well.

Having said that, the Cardinals rank second in the NFL in rush defense. Will Carolina, ranked No. 3 in rushing, be able to run against them?

Weinfuss: It depends on how well Carolina does two things: getting Cam out in space to run on his own and stretching the linebackers with the passing game. If the Panthers can do those two things, they’ll gain some yards. If they can’t, expect the Cardinals to make it a long day for Carolina’s running game. Under new defensive coordinator Todd Bowles, the defensive line has become re-energized. Bowles eliminated the multi-gap scheme from last season and made it a one-gap system, basically letting these guys get a full head of speed and just do what they need to do to get to the quarterback without thinking. That has allowed the linebackers to get through the line and slow down running games. However, this game presents a couple of new challenges. If Cam starts running, I wouldn’t be surprised if Daryl Washington -- fresh off his four-game suspension -- shadows him, which eliminates one linebacker. If the Panthers can stretch the field and force the Cardinals to go nickel or dime often, that’s fewer guys up front, which will give the running game more room.

Will the bye week help Carolina, especially having to travel across the country, or did it slow any momentum after the big Giants win?

Newton: The bye actually came at a good time for Carolina. The depleted secondary should be back to full strength with starting left cornerback Josh Thomas (concussion) now cleared and starting safety Quintin Mikell (ankle) potentially back. Starting defensive tackle Dwan Edwards (hamstring) also has a chance to return, so that front seven you asked about could be stronger and deeper. Rookie running back Kenjon Barner also is healthy now, so DeAngelo Williams will have somebody to spell him. You get the feeling coach Ron Rivera also needed the break after a week of speculation before the win over the Giants that he could be fired if Carolina started 0-3. This team appears hungry, so I don't see an interruption in momentum.

My last question for you: Are the Cardinals really "putrid" on offense, as coach Bruce Arian says?

Weinfuss: Putrid might be a bit of an exaggeration, but, yes, it’s bad. The offense is more complex than most of these players have seen, and they’re simply not picking it up quickly enough. Actually, Arians has never seen a team take this long to learn his scheme. And what the players do know of it, they simply can’t execute. Palmer gets rattled quickly, so, when he gets hit, the entire offense goes into quick mode and he doesn’t allow it to open up as it should. Some of the lack of productivity comes from having to learn a huge playbook -- which is evident when you see Fitzgerald and Andre Roberts confused on where to line up -- and some comes from inexperience. Too many plays are coming up a yard short of a first down, if they get completed at all. Arizona can’t seem to find the first-down marker on third down, converting just 14 of 48. And it’s mainly because of that problem that the offense stalls more often than it should.

.

SPONSORED HEADLINES