What's next for Cowboys, Dez Bryant?

March, 2, 2015
Mar 2
IRVING, Texas -- Now that the Dallas Cowboys have placed the franchise tag on Dez Bryant, what’s next?

One of Bryant’s agents, Tom Condon, laid out several scenarios without offering up which direction they will go while speaking on SiriusXM NFL Radio on Monday.

Unless Bryant signs the tender, which is worth $12.823 million, then he does not have to show up to anything. While extremely unlikely it is possible Bryant could skip the first 10 games of the season, play the final six and still get an accrued season to his credit.

The offseason workout program is voluntary, as are the organized team activities. If Bryant does not sign the tender, he would not be required to show up for the mandatory June minicamp, either, because he would not be under contract.

“There’s a lot of different options,” Condon said. “There’s a substantial number of moving parts.”

Condon was asked what his advice to Bryant will be.

“I probably shouldn’t disclose the plan, don’t you think?” he said.

Condon also wondered whether a team would be willing to give up two first-round draft picks for Bryant should the Cowboys not match an offer sheet.

“He’s a special player, so if you’re picking late in the first round, let’s say you’re in the last 4-5 picks of the first round, and you know that Dez Bryant is a superstar, do you give up a very late pick in the first round this year and a very late pick in the round next year to ensure that you’re competing for the Super Bowl for the next several years?” Condon said. “That part of it is pretty interesting.”

The Cowboys did just that for Joey Galloway in 2000 after the Seattle Seahawks placed the franchise tag on the wide receiver. The Cowboys gave Galloway a seven-year, $42 million deal and the Seahawks turned those draft picks to select running back Shaun Alexander and Koren Robinson.

Galloway tore his anterior cruciate ligament in his first game, Troy Aikman retired after the season and the Cowboys went through three straight 5-11 finishes.

The Cowboys’ hope with Bryant is to sign him to a long-term deal by July 15. They had their first face-to-face meetings with Condon and Kim Miale last week with the promise of more discussions in the future. At the NFL scouting combine owner and general manager Jerry Jones said he hopes the tag is a “placeholder” until a multi-year agreement is reached.

“The Cowboys have given us every indication that they don’t want to lose the player,” Condon said, “and that they value him very much.”

Cowboys franchise Dez Bryant

March, 2, 2015
Mar 2

IRVING, Texas -- What has been known for some time is now official: The Dallas Cowboys have placed the franchise tag on wide receiver Dez Bryant.

While the tag all but secures Bryant's rights for 2015, the Cowboys hope they can work out a long-term deal before the July 15 deadline. If they don't, then Bryant will play the season on the tag for $12.823 million, the tender amount for franchised wide receivers in 2015 as part of the salary cap being set at $143.28 million.

Cowboys executive vice president Stephen Jones had said Friday that the team had informed Bryant's agent that he would receive the tender. The Cowboys did not use the exclusive franchise tag on Bryant, but a team would have to give up two first-round picks if Dallas chooses not to match an offer sheet.

While the Cowboys have mapped out their plan for Bryant, they appear ready to allow the NFL's rushing champ, DeMarco Murray, to hit the open market. At the scouting combine, Jones said if Murray did not sign before free agency began it would not preclude his return, citing Darren Woodson and Jay Novacek as past examples.

The Cowboys thought they were close to a multiyear deal with Bryant last season, but he eventually changed agents from Eugene Parker to Kim Miale of Roc Nation and Tom Condon of CAA. The Cowboys had their first face-to-face meetings with Condon and Miale last week.

(Read full post)

Do Cowboys have replacements ready?

March, 2, 2015
Mar 2
IRVING, Texas -- Last week ESPN Insider Field Yates offered up a view at how the San Francisco 49ers, Denver Broncos, Cincinnati Bengals, Indianapolis Colts and Baltimore Ravens have some in-house replacements for their top free agents. Insider

On a local view, how would the Dallas Cowboys replace some of their free agents should they sign elsewhere?

One player the Cowboys won’t have to worry about replacing is Dez Bryant once they place the franchise tag on the All-Pro wide receiver today.

But they have several other free agents they could need to find fill-ins for.

DeMarco Murray: The only current choices would be Joseph Randle or Ryan Williams. Randle's off-field issues hardly guarantee him a roster spot. Williams spent the year on the practice squad. Randle had just 51 carries in 2014 but he had 343 yards and three touchdowns. If the Cowboys can’t keep Murray, they must find another running back either in the draft or in free agency to replace the NFL’s reigning rushing champ.

Rolando McClain: He is facing a four-game fine for violating the NFL’s substance abuse policy, according to sources, so the market could be slow for him with teams knowing he is one more violation away from being suspended for four games. But the Cowboys not only have a replacement for McClain, they have a better player in Sean Lee. He missed last season with a torn anterior cruciate ligament but will be ready for the offseason program. The Cowboys might hope to pair McClain and Lee at linebacker, but they at least have Lee ready.

Justin Durant/Bruce Carter: The chances of Durant returning are better than Carter, but if they lose both, then Anthony Hitchens would be the replacement at weak-side or strong-side linebacker. Hitchens is more of a weak-side linebacker. The coaches credited him with 100 tackles to go with three tackles for loss, two quarterback pressures, one interception and four pass deflections. Kyle Wilber could be a strong-side candidate.

George Selvie: He started 29 of the last 32 games at left defensive end, picking up 10 sacks and doing more than the Cowboys ever could have imagined when he signed during training camp in 2013. But the Cowboys can move Jeremy Mincey, who played right defensive end in 2014 and led the team with six sacks, to left defensive end and have DeMarcus Lawrence start on the right side.

Nick Hayden: He is a replaceable part but he is more valuable than people think. The Cowboys have Josh Brent under contract for another year and can hope a full offseason of work can help get him in better condition. Terrell McClain would be another option, but he might be better suited to play the three technique than nose tackle.

Doug Free/Jermey Parnell: The Cowboys can’t afford to lose both of them because there is no ready-made replacement on the roster. Parnell is expected to garner a lot of attention on the open market. Free is coming off surgery that could limit his services. If the Cowboys lose both, then they would be looking at Darrion Weems or Donald Hawkins as on-the-roster possibilities, which could prompt them to take a fourth offensive lineman in the first round in the last five years.

Cowboys' free-agent needs: Quarterback

March, 2, 2015
Mar 2
With free agency starting March 10, it is time to break down the Dallas Cowboys' needs and wants. Teams can start talking with players on Saturday.


What they have: Tony Romo ($17 million base salary), Brandon Weeden ($660,000), Dustin Vaughan ($510,000).

The position: Until 2014, the Cowboys have used a high-priced veteran as Romo’s backup from Brad Johnson to Jon Kitna to Kyle Orton. In 2012, the Cowboys gave Orton a $5 million signing bonus.

Last year the Cowboys rolled with Weeden as Romo’s backup and paid him just $570,000 without a signing bonus. This year, Weeden will make $660,000.

Weeden played in four games in 2014 and finished with three touchdown passes and two interceptions. In his one start against the Arizona Cardinals, he completed 18 of 33 passes for 183 yards with one touchdown and two interceptions in a 28-17 loss.

As much as they like Weeden, they will look to improve if possible.

“We know that the backup is key,” owner and general manager Jerry Jones said. “We played a good team in Arizona, we played a good team. But if we’d been better at backup quarterback, who knows? We might have been able to get that game. But let’s give Arizona the credit they’re due. When I look back at the backup quarterback -- where we messed up relative to backup quarterback, I’ll second guess that. On the other hand, you can just go so far with that line of thinking. So when you ask me where we are, what I’m thinking at quarterback, I do think we need to improve what we do if Tony is not in there.”

The Cowboys like Vaughan's development, but he remains a prospect -- not an adequate backup for Romo.

Best available: Ryan Mallett. He is young and showed at least a little promise after his trade to the Houston Texans. At this point in his career, Mallett will want a chance to start, so remaining with Houston is his best bet.

Best Cowboys fit: If the Cowboys want to dip back into their history books, then Matt Moore would be the best option. He signed with the Cowboys as an undrafted free agent in 2007 and had an impressive preseason but the Cowboys were unable to sneak him through waivers. He has spent the last four seasons with the Miami Dolphins.

What they will do: With Romo set to count $27.773 million against the salary cap and more important needs elsewhere, it’s difficult to see the Cowboys making a second financial investment at the quarterback spot. They’ll stick with Weeden.
IRVING, Texas -- When the Dallas Cowboys decided to release DeMarcus Ware last year, they left the negotiations on a new deal open with their all-time leader in sacks as he hit the market without ever making an offer.

They did not want to submit something Ware would sniff at and feel insulted.

A day later, Ware signed a three-year deal with the Denver Broncos that guaranteed him $20 million, which was a figure the Cowboys never would have come close to matching.

This year the Cowboys are preparing to let DeMarco Murray, their single-season rushing leader, hit the open market with the hope he allows for a chance to match an offer from another team.

Are the Cowboys unwilling to make an offer to Murray because they don’t want to offend the NFL’s reigning rushing champion, as they were with Ware last year?

It sure seems that way.

While owner and general manager Jerry Jones said at the NFL scouting combine he has some flexibility in the parameters of a deal for Murray, it might not be close to what the running back can get on the open market.

There have not been detailed negotiations between the two sides, despite the publicly stated positions by the Cowboys and Murray that both sides want to continue the relationship for the long term. Coincidentally, Ware and Murray are represented by the same agency.

Murray has said money will not be the only factor in his decision. Winning will matter. The Indianapolis Colts went to the AFC Championship Game this past season and have more than $40 million in cap space. The Atlanta Falcons struggled badly last season but have a core in place that can turn things around quickly and have roughly $23 million in cap space available. The Arizona Cardinals can create enough cap space to make a deal for Murray more than possible.

And so can the Cowboys, even with the impending franchise tag of Dez Bryant.

The possible -- or impending -- departure of Murray will be about the Cowboys not wanting to spend big on a running back, not about a lack of salary-cap space.

Stephen Jones said at the combine that if Murray hits the market it would not preclude his return, in the same way Darren Woodson and Jay Novacek hit the market in the past but eventually returned.

It’s a risky strategy.

Murray will be under no requirement to offer the Cowboys a chance to match or come close to an offer before signing elsewhere.

And the Cowboys will be under no requirement to wait for Murray to bring them an offer. They will be able to peruse the free-agent market to find a potential replacement at a cheaper price.

It all makes you wonder if the Murray saga will end the same way as the Ware saga.

IRVING, Texas -- Adrian Peterson, if you listen to him, sounds like a man who no longer wants to play for the Minnesota Vikings.

Before you get too excited, that doesn't mean he's playing for the Dallas Cowboys in 2015.

You're certainly entitled to dream about it. And feel free to drop to your knees and pray about it too. Consult a psychic, if you want.

It ain't happening.

Way too many things would have to fall perfectly into place for Peterson to play for the Cowboys next season.

First, DeMarco Murray has to leave, which is hardly a given. Yes, the Cowboys have given him permission to seek his fortune elsewhere, which really means the Cowboys want to know the best offer he can get from another franchise so they can negotiate off that number.

Murray wants to win, and he wants to play here. He'll be 27 when the season starts, and he's coming off a season in which he carried the ball 392 times in the regular season. History suggests he will never, ever be the same runner. No one knows whether history will be correct, but no team wants to get stuck with a huge contract and runner with diminishing skills, so it seems unlikely he'll be blown away by an offer.

Murray wants to be here, and the Cowboys keep saying they want him. Ultimately, you figure they'll find a way to get a deal done. Unless, of course, the Cowboys insult him with an offer -- always a possibility, given the way they do business these days.

If Murray does leave, the Cowboys aren't trading anything to Minnesota for Peterson. If they do, it means they have to accept his current contract, which is supposed to pay him $12.75 million this season.

(Read full post)

Cowboys to franchise Dez Bryant

February, 28, 2015
Feb 28

IRVING, Texas -- The Dallas Cowboys informed the agent for Dez Bryant on Friday that they will place the franchise tag on the All-Pro wide receiver by Monday's deadline, executive vice president Stephen Jones confirmed.

The Cowboys have to notify the league of the move by 4 p.m. ET Monday, which will guarantee Bryant roughly $13 million in 2015. The Cowboys will not use the exclusive franchise tag on Bryant, but a team would have to give up two first-round picks if Dallas chooses not to match an offer sheet.

At the NFL scouting combine earlier this month in Indianapolis, owner and general manager Jerry Jones said he hoped the tag would be a "placeholder" until the two sides can work out a long-term deal with Bryant. Jerry and Stephen Jones had their first face-to-face meetings with Bryant's new agents, Tom Condon of CAA and Kim Miale of Roc Nation, last Tuesday.

During the season, Bryant said he would be "highly disappointed" if he was given the tag.

It will be the fifth time in team history the Cowboys have used the franchise tag. The others were Flozell Adams (2002), Ken Hamlin (2008) and Anthony Spencer (2012, '13).

Bryant changed agents last November after the Cowboys thought they were close to a multiyear agreement with the wideout. They had only a couple of conversations with his new reps during the season and did not meet with them at the combine.

Since joining the Cowboys as a first-round pick in 2010, Bryant has been one of the NFL's most dynamic receivers.

In five seasons with the Cowboys, Bryant has caught 381 passes for 5,424 yards and 56 touchdowns. No player in team history has more catches, yards or touchdowns than Bryant in the first five years of his career.

(Read full post)

Dallas Cowboys Twitter mailbag, Part 2

February, 28, 2015
Feb 28
IRVING, Texas -- Part 2 of the Dallas Cowboys' Twitter mailbag is ready. In it we discuss:
  • The financials at running back
  • The quarterback-wide receiver relationship
  • Dorial Beckham-Green
  • Brandon Carr
  • Incentives
  • If you want to see Part 1, click here. Away we go:

    @toddarcher: Without a doubt it would be drafting a Melvin Gordon or Todd Gurley or whoever than re-signing DeMarco Murray. Last year's No. 27 pick received a four-year deal worth $7.7 million. Murray should earn more than that in 2015 alone on a free-agent deal. But can you guarantee a rookie running back can step right in and be a huge contributor? You can't, and that's another one of the million factors or so that go into keeping Murray. If the Cowboys don't keep Murray and miss on a potential first-rounder in the draft, then they face the real possibility of wasting the final few years of Tony Romo's career. As much as everybody think the Murray decision is an easy one, to me it's not. The Cowboys can only be wrong. Either they pay him and he doesn't produce or they let him walk and can't replace him. We're not going to give them a lot of credit if Murray stays and plays well.

    @toddarcher: Not really. I think Dez Bryant would be a great receiver if I played quarterback. Well, maybe not, but you have to be careful to not take away credit from Bryant in his development. We always want to credit this coach or that coach or the quarterback while sometimes failing to give the player credit for improving. Now, I think Tony Romo has made some receivers better and made them a lot of money in other spots. Put Laurent Robinson's name at the top of the list. Romo has shown he can make role-playing receivers look better than they really are, but Bryant would be a star anywhere.

    @toddarcher: We hear Jason Garrett talk all the time about the "right kind of guy," and oftentimes it's misinterpreted to mean, "I only want Boy Scouts." That's just not the case. Dorial Green-Beckham might be the best receiver in the draft, but that doesn't mean he will be the first receiver selected. He had issues at Missouri involved with arrests for marijuana and an alleged assault. I'm sure the Cowboys will have a handle on all of that by the time it comes to the draft and will feel comfortable taking him or keeping his name off the board. But there's also a need. I understand the "best player available" theory, but, to me, it's just that: a theory. Need has to be factored in. Dez Bryant isn't going anywhere. Terrance Williams isn't going anywhere. The Cowboys like what they're getting from Cole Beasley. They believe Devin Street can develop. If you're drafting Green-Beckham in the first two rounds, he would be expected to contribute right away. Would that happen here? I understand the Cowboys drafted Bryant when they just had Roy Williams and Miles Austin but they knew they would be moving away from Williams quickly and would have the chance to play Bryant right away.

    @toddarcher: Brandon Carr's agent met with the Cowboys at the combine so there's at least been discussions, but he does have leverage. Well, at least a little because the Cowboys need him. They aren't sure about Morris Claiborne's health. They don't know if Sterling Moore will be back. They aren't sure what awaits in the draft. But I would say that leverage -- as little as it is -- will disappear the longer it goes. The Cowboys can just wait this out and then hold the threat of his release over his head at a point where the money will be dried up for a cornerback that did not have an interception in 2014.

    @toddarcher: Some of them count against the cap immediately whether a player hits it or not. If they don't, then you get a credit. But I want to take this to incentives in general and avoid some of the cap minutiae when it comes to them. I've gone back and forth on how they might encourage performance and protect the team. There are those at Valley Ranch who believe Henry Melton was looking more for his sixth sack than doing what he was supposed to do in the scheme because he would've earned an extra $250,000 with six sacks on the year. So that's a situation where individual incentives can affect the team. 
    IRVING, Texas -- By 4 p.m. ET Monday, the Dallas Cowboys will likely place the franchise tag on wide receiver Dez Bryant.

    It will mark just the fifth time the Cowboys have used the tag since its inception. Bryant will join Flozell Adams (2002), Ken Hamlin (2008) and Anthony Spencer, who was tagged in 2012 and '13, as the only Cowboys’ tagged. Hamlin never played under the tag having reached a six-year, $39 million deal.

    During the 2014 season, Bryant said he would be “highly disappointed” if the Cowboys used the franchise tag. Players largely view the tag as a hindrance, not a financial boon. It effectively keeps them off the open market because other teams are unlikely to give up two first-round picks as compensation.

    [+] EnlargeDez Bryant
    Elsa/Getty ImagesIf the Cowboys apply the franchise tag to Dez Bryant, they'll have until July 15 to work out a long-term deal.
    They want the security of a long-term deal with heavy guaranteed money, but they have few options.

    They can sit out the voluntary offseason program, skip the mandatory June minicamp, which would subject them to fines, or sit out of training camp and games in protest. But they won’t be getting paid.

    Several executives asked at the NFL scouting combine said the player’s reaction to the tag is not weighed when making the decision. Green Bay Packers general manager Ted Thompson had a succinct answer when asked the questions: “Uh, no.”

    “The player has no choice in the matter,” Pittsburgh Steelers general manager Kevin Colbert said. “It’s something that we agree on that’s been collectively bargained.”

    As much as the players don’t like it, it’s not a tool teams enjoy using much because of the amount of cap space it eats up. While it will not prevent the Cowboys from being active in free agency, tagging Bryant would force them to move money around in ways that could hurt their cap in the future.

    On a long-term deal, the player’s first-year cap number is relatively low.

    “For some players there’s a negative reaction to it but that’s not the case with all players,” Houston Texans general manager Rick Smith said. “For the team, it’s a tool to continue to try to keep good players.”

    Jerry Jones, Stephen Jones and Jason Garrett said they would not be worried about Bryant’s reaction to the tag, even though there has been heavy speculation that Bryant will stay away from the team in the offseason without a long-term deal.

    When the Cowboys tagged Spencer in 2012 and ‘13, he wasted little time in signing the tender.

    “If you sign it right away, it’s automatically guaranteed,” Spencer’s Dallas-based agent, Jordan Woy said. “You can still negotiate to get a long-term deal. But I don’t see the benefit in not signing it because if I don’t sign it, it’s not guaranteed, No. 1. The team could take it away and if you wait too long other things can happen (like teams not having cap space). Or people could change their mind. I think it’s better signing it and having the guaranteed money sitting there.”

    The likelihood of the Cowboys pulling the tender from Bryant, however, is slim. Another agent said for a player of Bryant’s caliber teams will always create cap space to get a deal done.

    “I’ve never seen anybody just pout to the extent that they wouldn’t do it over this kind of money,” Jerry Jones said. “That usually is not realistic. It’s just too much money. And consequently it’s not set up or packaged the way that parties might want -- and I want to emphasize again – it’s not really set up in our best interest at all. There’s a much better way for our future and our cap this year if we didn’t franchise, but this is here when you don’t have your meeting of the minds about how you want to structure something long term. And so if anything it’s in the right situation, it’s a placeholder for addressing it as you move through the future.”

    Spencer made $19.4 million in the two years he was tagged, and he played in just one game in 2013 because of a knee injury. Had he signed a longer-term deal, he might not have been able to make the same amount of money.

    If the Cowboys are unable to reach a long-term deal on Bryant, then they could always use the franchise tag on him in 2016, which could bring his two-year total up to $28 million. And if they so desired, they could use it in 2017, according to league rules, and likely have to pay him the quarterback tender.

    Perhaps Hamlin could serve as the template for the tagging of Bryant.

    The Cowboys put the $4.396 million tag on Hamlin in 2008 but reached a six-year, $39 million deal in July that included a $9 million signing bonus. Hamlin, however, lasted just two more years. The Cowboys never got the value they were expecting.

    Monday is the deadline to put the tag on Bryant, but the next deadline is July 15, which is when a long-term deal needs to be finalized or the receiver would play the year under the franchise tag.

    By then we’ll know if the tag is a “placeholder,” or the deal.

    Running back moves show part of Cowboys' dilemma

    February, 27, 2015
    Feb 27
    AM ET
    IRVING, Texas -- The dilemma the Dallas Cowboys are facing in trying to re-sign DeMarco Murray is playing out at different spots across the league.

    Over the past few days running backs such as DeAngelo Williams, Reggie Bush, Chris Johnson and Peyton Hillis have been released. Steven Jackson will officially be added to the list Friday.

    [+] EnlargeDeMarco Murray
    Joe Nicholson/USA TODAY SportsAt age 27, one has to wonder how many years of high-level production are remaining for DeMarco Murray.
    Those names get added to the running back market in free agency, which gets added to a fairly decent crop of runners available, including a deep NFL draft class.

    In the laws of supply and demand, there’s more supply, so the prices might be lower. Now, all it takes is for one team to make an extremely lucrative offer to alter the marketplace, but the Cowboys and any team looking for a running back will have to ask how much more will they get from a younger Murray coming off an incredible season than they would from one of these more veteran backs at a cheaper price.

    And this doesn’t take into account whether Adrian Peterson will be available.

    But the point of this post isn’t to make running back-to-running back comparisons between Murray and those backs. It’s to point out the nature of the position. When it ends, it ends.

    In 2011, the Carolina Panthers signed Williams to a five-year, $43 million deal that included a $16 million bonus. In 2013 they extended his deal another two years, guaranteeing him more money while lowering his cap value.

    Jackson signed a three-year, $12 million deal with the Atlanta Falcons in 2013. The Detroit Lions signed Bush to a four-year, $16 million deal in 2013. They didn’t play out their contracts.

    As I’ve said before with Murray, what will matter most will be the money in the first three years. At 27, it’s reasonable to expect he has another three years left in him to play at a high level. What’s not reasonable to expect is another 1,845-yard season because that had never been done before in franchise history.

    What the Cowboys -- or any team that might sign Murray should he hit the open market -- can expect is three years of quality production. The design of the contract will be for more years and more money but that’s only for cap purposes to help the team and make the deal seem larger than it really is.

    In reality, most free-agent deals are designed to be three years. After the third year, teams want to have a get out of jail free card, which means when they cut a player they create cap room. The Falcons will get $3.75 million in room from Jackson. The Lions gained $1.7 million by cutting Bush.

    Wherever and whenever Murray signs, there will come a day when he will be like Jackson, Bush, Williams, Johnson and Hillis -- former stars with diminishing skills.

    Dallas Cowboys Twitter mailbag, Part 1

    February, 27, 2015
    Feb 27
    AM ET
    IRVING, Texas – Part 1 of the Dallas Cowboys’ Twitter mailbag is ready.

    In it we discuss:
    Away we go:
    @toddarcher: As of today, I think Dez Bryant will play the 2015 season on the franchise tag. I'm well aware of all of the talk out there regarding Bryant over the last week, including a 2011 police report that NFL.com reported on Thursday, but Jerry Jones said there are no off-field issues pertaining to any player that would prevent the Cowboys from a new contract. That being said, there haven't been any real negotiations lately, so the tag is the best bet right now. Once he is tagged, then the Cowboys would have until July 15 to sign him to a long-term deal. Maybe that would get both sides on the phone to talk about a new deal but the Monday deadline to use the tag has not put any giddy-up in the talks.

    @toddarcher: Who says they aren't looking at a defensive back at No. 27? It's quite possible they go that route. But I would caution you with the term "defensive back." Unless it's Landon Collins, I don't see another safety worth a first-round pick at this point. Cornerback is a real possibility, however, because of all the things they don't have at the position: quality and depth. Brandon Carr's status is up in the air. Morris Claiborne's health is in question. They might not tender Sterling Moore a contract. Orlando Scandrick is the only given. They like Tyler Patmon, but he's viewed more as a sub-package corner than a potential starter in the future. The problem at No. 27 is that the top corners will be gone by then, too. Somehow, the Cowboys need to get a quality corner early in the draft.

    @toddarcher: As a general rule when it comes to Jerry Jones and the draft, I would say never say never to anything. But you're asking about what I potentially see and I just don't see it. It costs too much. The Cowboys have said over and over that they want to build a team the right way and they're not one player away. They would have to give up way too much to get into the top 10 to select a pass rusher. I don't see them moving up inside the top 20, either. But if a player they covet is there at Nos 23, 24, 25, then I can see them making a flip to get up there. Like free agency, I don't see the Cowboys making any drastic moves in the draft.

    @toddarcher: Before the revelation of McClain's impending four-game fine for violating the NFL's substance abuse policy, I didn't know how the Cowboys or any team could come up with the right salary number for the linebacker. It was tricky before the fine and it will be trickier now because one more failed test results in a four-game suspension. That said, I believe the Cowboys have the best chance to keep him, based on the relationships he developed with Jason Garrett, Rod Marinelli and Matt Eberflus in 2014. He has people in place that are in his corner. If he had to go to another team, he would be starting all over again.

    @toddarcher: Honestly, I don't. Finding a starter in the later rounds is next to impossible. And I don't see the Cowboys using an early pick on a quarterback until the Tony Romo era ends. But you brought up an interesting name and it's not Bryce Petty, though I do like him. It's Sean Mannion. Who was his offensive coordinator last year at Oregon State? Former Cowboys tight ends coach John Garrett, Jason's older brother. The Cowboys will know everything they need to know about Mannion because of that. I'm not going to pretend to know when Mannion should be drafted, but if it gets to the third day and he's there, maybe the Cowboys take a chance.
    IRVING, Texas -- For his second straight mock draft, ESPN Insider Todd McShay has the Dallas Cowboys sticking with Wisconsin running back Melvin Gordon in the first round.

    It is a perfectly sound pick if the Cowboys lose DeMarco Murray to free agency. While a running back has not been picked in the first round the last two years, Gordon would give the Cowboys the ability to continue their run-first, run-often mentality that worked so well in 2014.

    But it's not the ideal pick for a team that needs an influx of defensive help.

    What McShay's mock draft does indicate is the possibility that the Cowboys are in a never-never land when it comes to landing a pass-rusher or cornerback. Eight defensive ends and three cornerbacks were among McShay's first 26 picks.

    Even the offensive tackle position was well picked over.

    While you can never ignore the Cowboys trading up to make sure they land a valued pass rusher or cornerback, which I can't name just yet because it is early in the process to know who the Cowboys love, like or loathe, giving up early round picks does not help build the base of a team.

    As much as the Cowboys needed to land DeMarcus Lawrence in the second round last year, giving up their third rounder to get him was costly.

    If the projections continue down the same path, the Cowboys' best hope is to find a team willing to trade up to No. 27 so they can acquire multiple picks in the top three rounds.

    With a deep running back field, you might feel better getting one in the second or third rounds than in the first.