Dan Rafael: International Boxing Hall of Fame

How I voted on 2014 HOF class

December, 4, 2013
12/04/13
1:47
PM ET
The International Boxing Hall of Fame class of 2014 was announced Wednesday, with the 25th annual induction ceremony set for June 8 at the Canastota, N.Y., shrine.

Inductees were voted on in five categories: modern, old-timer, pioneer, nonparticipant and observer. As a full member of the Boxing Writers Association of America, I vote in the "modern" category (for fighters whose last bout came no earlier than 1943). I am here to unveil my ballot, which I cast shortly after receiving it in early October.

Each year, only three new names are added to the 45-man ballot to replace the three elected the previous year, although voters are allowed to vote for up to 10 candidates. (I have my issues with the lack of deserving names added, but that's a gripe for another day.)

This year was an exceptionally easy ballot to vote on. I voted for four candidates, including all three newcomers -- Oscar De La Hoya, Felix Trinidad and Joe Calzaghe -- and one holdover -- Prince Naseem Hamed -- whom for years I have steadfastly been voting for and making the case to anyone who will listen that he deserves to be in the HOF.

Voting for the three newcomers was a no-brainer.

De La Hoya (39-6, 30 KOs) won an Olympic gold medal in 1992 and 10 professional world titles in a then-record six weight divisions during his career from 1992 to 2008. For most of that stretch, he was the face of boxing. He was exciting, one of the pound-for-pound best and easily boxing's biggest star.

He didn't win all of his big fights -- including getting ripped off against Trinidad when they met as undefeated welterweight champions in 1999 (in a pay-per-view that, at the time, set the record for a non-heavyweight fight at 1.4 million buys) -- but "The Golden Boy" from East Los Angeles accomplished a lot.

De La Hoya won world titles at 130, 135, 140, 147, 154 and 160 pounds and faced a who's who, including Hall of Famers Julio Cesar Chavez Sr. (twice), Pernell Whitaker and Arturo Gatti, all of whom he beat. He also defeated Ike Quartey, Fernando Vargas, Javier Castillejo, Ricardo Mayorga, Felix Sturm, Hector Camacho Sr., Miguel Angel Gonzalez, Genaro Hernandez, James Leija, Rafael Ruelas and John Molina.

And when De La Hoya lost, it was only to the best: Trinidad, Bernard Hopkins, Floyd Mayweather Jr. (in the best-selling fight in history, nearly 2.5 million PPVs), Manny Pacquiao and Shane Mosley (whom he was robbed against in their rematch).

Even if you think Trinidad (42-3, 35 KOs) got a gift against De La Hoya, he's still a slam-dunk HOFer and one of the best in Puerto Rican history. He won five world titles in three divisions (welterweight, junior middleweight and middleweight) and thrilled fans with electrifying punching power throughout his 1990 to 2008 career, which included two retirements before he walked away for good following a decision loss to Roy Jones Jr. in a meeting of two superstars well past their prime.

Trinidad was just 20 when he pulverized Maurice Blocker to win a welterweight title in 1993 and made 15 defenses before moving up in weight after the De La Hoya fight. "Tito" also beat Whitaker, Vargas (in an epic 2000 junior middleweight unification fight), Camacho, David Reid, William Joppy and Mayorga.

His three losses came in his final five fights, to Hopkins for the undisputed middleweight title in 2001 and decisions to Winky Wright (2005) and Jones at 170 pounds.

Calzaghe (46-0, 32 KOs) is the best fighter to come out of Wales and is the rare fighter to retire undefeated after a career from 1993 to 2008 in which he unified super middleweight titles and won the lineal light heavyweight championship.

He won a vacant super middleweight title against British great Chris Eubank in 1997 and defended it 21 times, including unifying titles against Jeff Lacy in 2006 and Mikkel Kessler in 2007 in one of the biggest 168-pound fights in history.

Then Calzaghe came to the United States and outpointed Hopkins to win the lineal light heavyweight championship and defended it once, easily outpointing Jones and then retiring despite big money offers for other bouts.

I think the case for England's Hamed (36-1, 31 KOs) to be voted in is an easy one also. I explained my reasoning on a 2011 column in which I wrote this:

He was flashy and rubbed a lot of people the wrong way with his outlandish trash talk and arrogant attitude.

Sometimes I think people let that get in the way of the fact that, yes, he could fight, even if his technique was flawed and relied too much on his massive one-punch power. He also only fought for only 10 years (1992 to 2002) and lost his biggest fight, a clear decision in a showdown with future Hall of Famer Marco Antonio Barrera in 2001, after which he only fought once more. I also dock him points for blatantly ducking Juan Manuel Marquez.

However, a fighter must be judged on whom he did fight and Hamed fought everyone else. When he was active, he brought excitement like nobody else and should be respected for many accomplishments.

Not only did Hamed have massive power and a strong resume, he gets points from me for changing the economics of the smaller divisions. Before Hamed, featherweights -- and fighters even smaller -- making seven-figure purses was almost unheard of. After the Hamed era, it became the norm for the smaller superstars.

Hamed was, for years, considered the best featherweight in the world, ranked on the pound-for-pound list and, in an era of watered down titles and four major belts, should have held all four simultaneously but for boxing's politics, which actively work against that. He defeated alphabet titleholders Steve Robinson (TKO8), Tom Johnson (TKO8) and Cesar Soto (W12) to claim belts. He also beat Wilfredo Vazquez (TKO7), who had been stripped of his version of the title for facing Hamed.

Other notable names Hamed beat: Kevin Kelley (their 1997 fight was one of the most exciting fights of the decade), Wayne McCullough, Paul Ingle, Vuyani Bungu and Manuel Medina. Overall, Hamed defended his WBO version of the title 15 times and held the lineal 126-pound championship for three years, all while bringing extraordinary excitement and showmanship to a small weight class that had never seen the infusion of money it enjoyed during Hamed's heyday.

How I voted on the 2012 HOF class

December, 6, 2011
12/06/11
5:17
PM ET
Tommy HearnsAP Photo/Kathy WillensThomas "Hitman" Hearns won titles in five weight divisions and helped carry boxing in the 1980s.
On Tuesday the 2012 International Boxing Hall of Fame class was announced, with the induction ceremony at the Canastota, N.Y., shrine set for June 10.

As a full member of the Boxing Writers Association of America, I've been voting in the "modern" fighter category (meaning, for eligible boxers whose last fight was no earlier than 1943) for about a decade. I don't vote in the categories for observers, nonparticipants, pioneers and old-timers. They are voted on by the Hall of Fame's board of directors and historians selected by the Hall.

There were 45 names on the ballot for modern fighters this year, and electors could vote for up to 10, with only three to be elected. (If there is a tie, there could be more.)

I voted for five candidates, including the three newcomers to the ballot: Thomas Hearns, Mark "Too Sharp" Johnson and Dariusz Michalczewski. I also voted for a pair of holdovers whom I have been voting for in recent years, former featherweight champion Naseem Hamed and former junior flyweight champion Myung Woo Yuh.

Detroit's Hearns (61-5-1, 48 KOs) -- known as the "Hitman" and "Motor City Cobra" -- was a no-brainer in his first year on the ballot. He fought from 1977 to 2006. He should have been elected years ago, but he'd go a few years without fighting and then take a fight, which started his eligibility clock over. He was a five-division champion and one of the most popular fighters of his generation, and he had one of the greatest right hands ever. He also was part of the legendary foursome that included Sugar Ray Leonard, Marvelous Marvin Hagler and Roberto Duran, whose round-robin of megafights from welterweight to super middleweight carried boxing in the 1980s. Hearns won titles at welterweight, junior middleweight, middleweight, super middleweight and light heavyweight (twice) and electrified fans with numerous action fights.

I'm not going to recite his résumé, but it's extensive and memorable. Even though Hearns lost arguably the two biggest fights of his career -- a 1981 welterweight unification fight with Leonard, who stopped Hearns in the 14th round in one of the biggest fights in boxing history, and his third-round knockout loss to Hagler challenging for the middleweight championship in 1985 in what some consider the greatest action fight ever -- the HOF shouldn't exist if he isn't in it.

Johnson (44-5, 28 KOs) was perhaps the finest pure boxer of his generation, maybe the best fighter to ever come out of Washington, D.C., and won titles at flyweight and junior bantamweight.

Unfortunately, Johnson, a southpaw with speed and power, never had big paydays or great television exposure because he was in a small weight class and couldn't lure the biggest names of his era in and around his division into the ring, meaning Johnny Tapia, Danny Romero, Michael Carbajal and Ricardo Lopez. For the record, I would have picked Johnson over each of them except Lopez. The insiders and hard-core fans know how great Johnson was, which is why he was a pound-for-pound list stalwart during the prime of his career, from 1990 to 2006.

Poland's Michalczewski (48-2, 38 KOs) -- "The Tiger" -- fought most of his career in Germany, won 48 consecutive fights to start his career and claimed titles in two weight classes (light heavyweight and cruiserweight). But he is best known for his historical run at light heavyweight, where he made 23 defenses during his 1994-to-2003 reign, several years of which were spent as the lineal champion. In 1997, he outpointed Virgil Hill (a reasonable bet to make the HOF when he becomes eligible) to add two alphabet belts to his one and claim the lineal championship.

Unfortunately, there are two marks against Michalczewski, which is why some won't vote for him. Admittedly, he doesn't have a lot of big names on his record. Besides Hill, his best wins were probably against Graciano Rocchigiani and Montell Griffin. Also, he was never considered the best fighter at 175 pounds because he was a contemporary of Roy Jones Jr., who was the No. 1 fighter in the division and in all of boxing during Michalczewski's reign. They never fought, and both sides are to blame. It will go down as one of the most significant fights in history that never happened. But I voted for him because he was an outstanding fighter and because being No. 2 for all those years at 175 shouldn't be held against him just because the No. 1 guy was also No. 1 in the whole sport by a mile.

England's Hamed (36-1, 31 KOs) was flashy and rubbed a lot of people the wrong way with his outlandish trash talk and arrogant attitude. Sometimes I think people let that get in the way of the fact that, yes, he could fight, even if his technique was flawed and he relied too much on his massive, one-punch power. He also fought for only 10 years (1992 to 2002) and lost his biggest fight, a clear decision in a showdown with future Hall of Famer Marco Antonio Barrera in 2001, after which he fought only once more. I also dock him points for blatantly ducking Juan Manuel Marquez. However, a fighter must be judged on whom he did fight, and Hamed fought everyone else. When he was active, he brought excitement like nobody else and should be respected for his many accomplishments.

Not only did Hamed have massive power and a strong résumé, he gets points from me for changing the economics of the smaller divisions. Before Hamed, featherweights -- and even smaller fighters -- making seven-figure purses was almost unheard of. After the Hamed era, it became the norm for the smaller superstars.

Hamed was for years considered the best featherweight in the world, ranked on the pound-for-pound list, and in an era of watered-down titles and four major belts, he should have held all four simultaneously but for boxing's politics, which actively work against that. He defeated alphabet titleholders Steve Robinson (TKO8), Tom Johnson (TKO8) and Cesar Soto (W12) to claim belts. He also beat Wilfredo Vazquez (TKO7), who had been stripped of his version of the title for facing Hamed. Other notable names Hamed beat: Kevin Kelley (their 1997 fight was one of the most exciting fights of the decade), Wayne McCullough, Paul Ingle, Vuyani Bungu and Manuel Medina. Overall, Hamed defended his WBO version of the title 15 times and held the lineal 126-pound championship for three years, all while bringing extraordinary excitement and showmanship to a small weight class that had never before seen the infusion of money it enjoyed during Hamed's heyday.

South Korea's Yuh (38-1, 14 KOs) seems destined to be lost forever among voters, but I will keep checking off his name each year. He fought from 1982 to 1993, twice held versions of the junior flyweight title, went 7-1 against other titleholders and retired at age 29. He made a division-record 17 defenses during his first reign, which lasted six years, before losing to Hiroki Ioka via split decision. But Yuh regained the title in the immediate rematch, made one defense and then retired. I previously had voted for Yuh's countryman Jung-Koo Chang, who also was a junior flyweight champion and was elected to the HOF in 2010. They arguably are the two best fighters to come out of South Korea. It makes no sense that Chang has been elected but not Yuh. They were contemporaries with incredibly similar résumés. You can't have one in without the other, even if they both deserve points docked for never having fought each other.

SPONSORED HEADLINES