Print and Go Back ESPN.com: Dodger Thoughts [Print without images]

Thursday, October 27, 2011
The lame blame game


At the bottom of this morning's Ramona Shelburne news story for ESPNLosAngeles.com about the Bryan Stow situation, she quotes Jerome Jackson, a lawyer representing Frank McCourt, as follows:
... "What happened to Bryan Stow was a tragedy," he said. "The Dodgers have held fundraisers. The Dodgers have helped police in solving this case. That doesn't mean we're legally responsible for what happens here.

"What baffles me is that the level of public outrage at the Dodgers seems to be higher than the level of outrage at the people who inflicted the blows." ...

Here's what I'd say to that:

1) Let's be clear — whatever outrage exists isn't against the Dodgers, it's against McCourt. (Update: As Dodger Thoughts commenter Zissou_Steve points out, there was more outrage against Dodger fans than there was against McCourt when this incident occurred.)

2) Despite the anger against McCourt, I wouldn't say that when it comes specifically to the Stow beating, people are angrier at McCourt than they are at the assailants. People understand who the true villains are.

3) However, if you're trying to address public anger with McCourt, it sure doesn't help when you make statements such as these:
"I've been doing these cases for 23 years and I have never seen one yet in which it didn't take at least two people to tango," (Jackson) said, referring to the notion that jurors could decide Stow bears some liability in the attack. "So stay tuned and stand by."

Whatever the facts of the case are, when it comes to the question of "public outrage," that's an issue of public relations. Does this look like an example of good public relations?

* * *