Print and Go Back ESPN.com: Dodger Thoughts [Print without images]

Thursday, September 2, 2010
Potential appeal could keep Dodgers in McCourt hands for years


There's an angle of the McCourt divorce trial that I think has been underplayed. From The Days and Tweets of Molly Knight:
To sum up (if Frank is losing): either Frank pays Jamie off and keeps team--which would be the sane thing--or Jamie wins and Frank spends 2 years appealing.

And also:
Whoever loses on MPA is likely to appeal. With the logjam in CA courts now, that could take up to 36 months, I'm told. Worst case, obvs.

It could be a while just to get a decision on this trial from Judge Scott Gordon, if there is no settlement.
Judge will have 90 days AFTER trial ends in late September to make his decision on MPA. So we night not know until Christmas. 

After this week, the trial takes a break, not scheduled to resume until Sept. 20.

* * *

Whenever I told people that the divorce wasn't to blame for the current state of the Dodger finances, I tried to emphasize that it was because the finances would have been what they were even if the McCourts remained happily married. Bill Shaikin's piece in the Times underscores that point.

The divorce didn't cause the Dodgers' financial problems. It's what brought those problems up to the surface.

* * *

Other links:
“That first night kind of set us up in a bad spot for the doubleheader (Tuesday) and then tonight," Wallach added, referring to the Isotopes' 20-9 loss on Monday that saw them use six relievers.