Print and Go Back ESPN.com: Los Angeles Lakers [Print without images]

Wednesday, June 27, 2012
What L.A. wants for Gasol (today, at least), and a trade rumor that makes sense!

By Brian Kamenetzky

ESPN.com's Marc Stein and Chad Ford report the Lakers are (surprise!) shopping Pau Gasol around the league "in an effort to acquire a top-10 pick in Thursday's draft. The Lakers also are seeking an established player along with the pick if they're to part with Gasol," they write.

No deal is imminent, says the report.

As noted yesterday, while a great young chip might do great stuff for the franchise's future, acquiring a high lottery selection for Gasol while still improving the team for next season is a difficult proposition. In the scenario described above, the "established player" is monumentally important. (Or, if you prefer, the Lakers could try to flip that high pick to another team for a guy more likely to contribute at a high level immediately. One more theory to throw at the wall about 24 hours before the first pick.)

Metta World Peace, they note, is also being shopped aggressively. Good luck with that.

In other news, Stein reports the Clippers are kicking the tires on Lamar Odom, discussing trade options with the Mavericks for the former Sixth Man of Year in scenarios possibly containing a Lakers-related wrinkle. Writes Stein:
"Yet the deal, sources said, could hinge on the willingness of a third team to take on the contract of Clippers veteran guard Mo Williams, which would allow the Dallas Mavericks to send Odom to the Clippers with no significant money coming back to the Mavericks."

One team expressing interest in Williams is the Lakers, who could absorb Williams' $8.5 million salary into the trade exception created by shipping Odom to the Mavs last year. Unlike most trade rumors, this one actually makes sense on a few levels.

For example:


It's not a perfect arrangement. Williams scores, but his shot selection has always been questionable. Defensively, he's average at best (the Clippers were five points better without him on the floor than with last season). Durability is a concern. Frankly the difference between the two won't make or break the Lakers, but given a choice between Sessions and Williams, an argument can be made for Sessions. Having both, though, would definitely constitute an upgrade, giving the Lakers more firepower and flexibility than available last season. Williams is better than anyone they'd find in the free-agent market, and about as good a player as can be had with an exception.

In the end, I doubt it happens. But at least as the NBA dives into the deep end of the silly season pool, Lakers fans can for a change bat about a scenario making some sense.