What's the matter with Kansas? Nothing, as far as the Big East is concerned.
The expected breakup of the Big 12 offers the Big East a rare and valuable opportunity. For the past couple of years, league officials have known they needed to expand in football. Yet there weren't any obvious candidates out there who would have made the conference stronger right away.
Now, assuming Texas and most of the rest of the Big 12 South bolt for the Pac-10 (or Pac-16 or whatever it will be called), such teams as Kansas, Missouri, Kansas State and Iowa State will be left as BCS orphans. And the Big East would be wise to adopt them as quickly as possible.
The geography, of course, is a problem. But not that big of a problem for a league that's already in Chicago and Milwaukee. Here are some distances to consider:
Lawrence, Kan., to Louisville: 560 miles
Lawrence to Cincinnati: 632 miles
Columbia, Mo., to Morgantown: 738 miles
Ames, Iowa to Pittsburgh: 802 miles
Tampa to Syracuse: 1,304 miles
Louisville to East Hartford, Conn.: 876 miles
So, really, the travel is not all that different than it is now, and the former Big 12 teams form natural rivals with each other. The Big East could form East and West Divisions, stage a championship game and have a legitimate 12-team conference that would keep its BCS tie-in. A Pittsburgh-Kansas State title game might not capture the nation's imagination, but it's a start.
The league should act fast, because the Mountain West is eyeing these same teams, which is a major reason why that conference delayed a vote on adding Boise State earlier this week. Maybe the Big 12 leftovers fit well with teams like TCU and Colorado State, but the geography becomes even more troublesome when you start talking about the far western teams in that league like San Diego State and New Mexico.
And while we know basketball is taking a backseat in expansion -- actually, hoops is in locked in the trunk right now -- we also realize that Kansas is a basketball school that takes great pride in its hardwood tradition. Do you think the Jayhawks would rather play basketball against the likes of Wyoming and Air Force or go toe to toe every week against Connecticut, Georgetown, Louisville, Syracuse, etc.?
The Big East can't yet offer the dollars that the Big 12 was paying out. But the league is exploring its own TV network, and think about the raised interest level in basketball games alone with the Big 12 schools on board. The Big East could also add St. Louis and Kansas City to its list of major metropolitan markets.
Adding four more schools would make the basketball alignment even more unwieldy, but as I've said before, the league should be willing to throw schools like DePaul, Seton Hall and (gasp!) Providence overboard if it means saving the conference in the bigger picture.
Bringing those four Big 12 teams on board would be a bold move. But now is the time for bold moves.
The expected breakup of the Big 12 offers the Big East a rare and valuable opportunity. For the past couple of years, league officials have known they needed to expand in football. Yet there weren't any obvious candidates out there who would have made the conference stronger right away.
Now, assuming Texas and most of the rest of the Big 12 South bolt for the Pac-10 (or Pac-16 or whatever it will be called), such teams as Kansas, Missouri, Kansas State and Iowa State will be left as BCS orphans. And the Big East would be wise to adopt them as quickly as possible.
The geography, of course, is a problem. But not that big of a problem for a league that's already in Chicago and Milwaukee. Here are some distances to consider:
Lawrence, Kan., to Louisville: 560 miles
Lawrence to Cincinnati: 632 miles
Columbia, Mo., to Morgantown: 738 miles
Ames, Iowa to Pittsburgh: 802 miles
Tampa to Syracuse: 1,304 miles
Louisville to East Hartford, Conn.: 876 miles
So, really, the travel is not all that different than it is now, and the former Big 12 teams form natural rivals with each other. The Big East could form East and West Divisions, stage a championship game and have a legitimate 12-team conference that would keep its BCS tie-in. A Pittsburgh-Kansas State title game might not capture the nation's imagination, but it's a start.
The league should act fast, because the Mountain West is eyeing these same teams, which is a major reason why that conference delayed a vote on adding Boise State earlier this week. Maybe the Big 12 leftovers fit well with teams like TCU and Colorado State, but the geography becomes even more troublesome when you start talking about the far western teams in that league like San Diego State and New Mexico.
And while we know basketball is taking a backseat in expansion -- actually, hoops is in locked in the trunk right now -- we also realize that Kansas is a basketball school that takes great pride in its hardwood tradition. Do you think the Jayhawks would rather play basketball against the likes of Wyoming and Air Force or go toe to toe every week against Connecticut, Georgetown, Louisville, Syracuse, etc.?
The Big East can't yet offer the dollars that the Big 12 was paying out. But the league is exploring its own TV network, and think about the raised interest level in basketball games alone with the Big 12 schools on board. The Big East could also add St. Louis and Kansas City to its list of major metropolitan markets.
Adding four more schools would make the basketball alignment even more unwieldy, but as I've said before, the league should be willing to throw schools like DePaul, Seton Hall and (gasp!) Providence overboard if it means saving the conference in the bigger picture.
Bringing those four Big 12 teams on board would be a bold move. But now is the time for bold moves.
TOP 25 SCOREBOARD
Saturday, 12/17
Final Temple 37 Wyoming 15 Final Ohio 24 Utah State 23 Final San Diego State 30 Louisiana-Lafayette 32
Tuesday, 12/20
Wednesday, 12/21
Final 18 TCU 31 Louisiana Tech 24
Thursday, 12/22
Saturday, 12/24
Final Nevada 17 21 Southern Miss 24
Monday, 12/26
Tuesday, 12/27
Final Western Michigan 32 Purdue 37 Final Louisville 24 North Carolina State 31
Wednesday, 12/28
Final Toledo 42 Air Force 41 Final California 10 24 Texas 21
Thursday, 12/29
Final Florida State 18 Notre Dame 14 Final Washington 56 12 Baylor 67
Friday, 12/30
Final Brigham Young 24 Tulsa 21 Final Rutgers 27 Iowa State 13 Final Mississippi State 23 Wake Forest 17 Final Iowa 14 14 Oklahoma 31
Saturday, 12/31
Final Texas A&M 33 Northwestern 22 Final/OT Georgia Tech 27 Utah 30 Final Illinois 20 UCLA 14 Final Cincinnati 31 Vanderbilt 24 Final Virginia 24 25 Auburn 43
Monday, 1/2
Final 19 Houston 30 22 Penn State 14 Final Ohio State 17 Florida 24 Final/3OT 17 Michigan State 33 16 Georgia 30 Final 20 Nebraska 13 9 South Carolina 30 Final 10 Wisconsin 38 5 Oregon 45 Final/OT 4 Stanford 38 3 Oklahoma State 41
Tuesday, 1/3
Final/OT 13 Michigan 23 11 Virginia Tech 20
Wednesday, 1/4
Final 23 West Virginia 70 15 Clemson 33
Friday, 1/6
Final 8 Kansas State 16 6 Arkansas 29
Saturday, 1/7
Sunday, 1/8
Monday, 1/9
TOP PERFORMERS

- G. Smith West Virginia - QB
- 32-43, 407 yds, 6 tds
- @ CLEM | Final

- T. Ganaway Baylor - RB
- 21 car, 200 yds, 5 tds
- vs UW | Final

- J. White W Michigan - WR
- 13 rec, 265 yds, 1 td
- @ PU | Final



You must be signed in to post a comment