Dreamland: A Super Bowl in Chicago?

May, 31, 2012
5/31/12
6:30
PM ET
Dan Pompei of the Chicago Tribune has been covering the NFL and the city of Chicago for a lot longer than me. So first I'll pass along his analysis of commissioner Roger Goodell's suggestion that the door could open to hold a Super Bowl at Soldier Field: "Chances of a having Super Bowl in Chicago are roughly the same as having a Super Bowl on Jupiter."

I applaud mayor Rahm Emanuel for pressing Goodell on this issue during a meeting Thursday. After all, the Super Bowl will be played in New York's cold-weather environment in two years. If New York can have one, why not Chicago?

Well, for a couple reasons. First, the primary reason the Super Bowl will be in New York is to reward the region for building the $1.6 billion Metlife Stadium. I could be wrong, but I've always assumed that to be a unique and singular situation that won't be the start of a trend. Generally speaking, Super Bowls will continue to be played in warm-weather markets or in stadiums with roofs.

Second, Chicago didn't really build a new stadium and thus doesn't have a "reward" coming. Soldier Field was renovated for $365 million in 2003 and has the NFL's smallest seating capacity at 61,500.

Sure, it's always possible that the NFL could make a dramatic shift in its Super Bowl bid process. But that's what it would take for the league's marquee game to end up in Chicago.

SPONSORED HEADLINES

Comments

You must be signed in to post a comment

Already have an account?

NFC NORTH SCOREBOARD

Thursday, 10/2
Sunday, 10/5