Posted by ESPN.com’s Kevin Seifert
For the final word on Chicago’s lack of interest in receiver Chris Chambers -- and, for that matter, any veteran wideout -- we defer to Bears general manager Jerry Angelo. As we noted earlier Wednesday, the Bears did not put in a claim on Chambers, who ended up with Kansas City.
In an interview with the Bears’ Web site, here’s what Angelo said:
I agree with most of those points, although it’s not unusual to dress five receivers for a game. I think what Angelo meant is the Bears rarely use a formation that requires more than three receivers on the field.
Otherwise, it wouldn’t have been a surprise if the Bears had tried to claim Chambers. They weren’t interested in a veteran receiver before Bennett and Knox emerged as reliable options. So why would they be now?
For the final word on Chicago’s lack of interest in receiver Chris Chambers -- and, for that matter, any veteran wideout -- we defer to Bears general manager Jerry Angelo. As we noted earlier Wednesday, the Bears did not put in a claim on Chambers, who ended up with Kansas City.
In an interview with the Bears’ Web site, here’s what Angelo said:
“We like our receivers. When you bring a veteran like Chambers in, you have to have an immediate plan for him. We only dress four receivers as a rule on game day, and Rashied Davis is our fourth who does a great job for us as a special-teamer. Now, who are we going to sit: Earl [Bennett], Devin [Hester] or Johnny [Knox]? It doesn’t make sense to sit them because of their play and continued development also. In most cases, a player you bring in at this point is not going to have the familiarity they need with your system to help your football team right now.”
I agree with most of those points, although it’s not unusual to dress five receivers for a game. I think what Angelo meant is the Bears rarely use a formation that requires more than three receivers on the field.
Otherwise, it wouldn’t have been a surprise if the Bears had tried to claim Chambers. They weren’t interested in a veteran receiver before Bennett and Knox emerged as reliable options. So why would they be now?
Sort comments by: Most Recent | First Posted
Comments that include profanity, or personal attacks, or antisocial behavior such as "spamming" or "trolling," or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. We will take steps to block users who violate any of our terms of use. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.