In mulling the Brad Childress-Brett Favre skirmish this week, I kept returning to what we know is Childress’ ideal offensive approach: Power running with a passing game that capitalizes on play action.
As we discussed last week, the Air and Space division has supported a significant uptick in passing attempts with the influx of Favre, Chicago’s Jay Cutler and Detroit’s Matthew Stafford. No longer are we the Black and Blue division.
This week, however, I wondered about the relationship between the running game and play-action passes. Have the NFC North’s best running teams capitalized proportionally on play action, helping to elevate their passing numbers?
First, let’s take a look at the chart below, which ranks our four primary quarterbacks based on their passer rating on play-action passes. (As always, the numbers come courtesy of ESPN’s Stats & Information.) I’ve also given you each team’s league ranking in the run game.
For the most part, the chart bears out what we would probably conclude intuitively: The bigger the threat of your running game, the more successful you’ll be in play action. That’s especially true for the Vikings, who can draw multiple defenders on a fake to Adrian Peterson, and in Chicago -- where few opponents have feared a Matt Forte run.
The anomaly has come in Detroit, where Matthew Stafford had disproportionate success relative to the Lions’ running game. Stafford completed 62.3 percent of his play-action passes this season for five touchdowns while throwing only one interception. That performance points to two possible factors: 1.) Exceptional skills in carrying out the fake, and 2.) Prescient playcalling from offensive coordinator Scott Linehan.
Meanwhile, I found it interesting that Packers quarterback Aaron Rodgers has thrown four of his seven interceptions on play-action passes. Looked at another way, Rodgers has four interceptions in 69 play-action attempts but only three in 248 more traditional dropbacks.
So there’s your early Christmas present here in the NFC North: The knowledge that the running game (usually) promotes successful play-action passing.
As we discussed last week, the Air and Space division has supported a significant uptick in passing attempts with the influx of Favre, Chicago’s Jay Cutler and Detroit’s Matthew Stafford. No longer are we the Black and Blue division.
This week, however, I wondered about the relationship between the running game and play-action passes. Have the NFC North’s best running teams capitalized proportionally on play action, helping to elevate their passing numbers?
First, let’s take a look at the chart below, which ranks our four primary quarterbacks based on their passer rating on play-action passes. (As always, the numbers come courtesy of ESPN’s Stats & Information.) I’ve also given you each team’s league ranking in the run game.
For the most part, the chart bears out what we would probably conclude intuitively: The bigger the threat of your running game, the more successful you’ll be in play action. That’s especially true for the Vikings, who can draw multiple defenders on a fake to Adrian Peterson, and in Chicago -- where few opponents have feared a Matt Forte run.
The anomaly has come in Detroit, where Matthew Stafford had disproportionate success relative to the Lions’ running game. Stafford completed 62.3 percent of his play-action passes this season for five touchdowns while throwing only one interception. That performance points to two possible factors: 1.) Exceptional skills in carrying out the fake, and 2.) Prescient playcalling from offensive coordinator Scott Linehan.
Meanwhile, I found it interesting that Packers quarterback Aaron Rodgers has thrown four of his seven interceptions on play-action passes. Looked at another way, Rodgers has four interceptions in 69 play-action attempts but only three in 248 more traditional dropbacks.
So there’s your early Christmas present here in the NFC North: The knowledge that the running game (usually) promotes successful play-action passing.




You must be signed in to post a comment