Power rankings: How the voters voted

October, 20, 2009
Oct 20
1:00
PM ET
Print
By Mike Sando
Posted by ESPN.com's Mike Sando
Rank Team Mike Sando John Clayton Matt Williamson Jeff Chadiha
1 IND 1 1 2 2
2 NO 2 3 1 1
3 MIN 3 2 3 3
4 DEN 4 4 7 4
5 NYG 5 5 5 5
6 NE 6 9 4 7
7 ATL 7 6 8 6
8 PIT 9 8 6 9
9 CIN 8 7 13 8
10 CHI 12 10 9 12
11 BAL 10 13 10 11
12 PHI 13 11 11 10
13 GB 11 12 19 13
14 SD 14 18 14 16
15 SF 17 16 16 14
16 ARI 15 17 15 18
17 HOU 16 21 12 19
18 NYJ 19 14 20 15
19 DAL 20 15 18 17
20 MIA 18 19 17 20
21 JAC 23 20 22 21
22 CAR 22 22 23 23
23 SEA 24 24 21 22
24 BUF 21 23 24 24
25 OAK 25 25 26 26
26 DET 27 29 25 27
27 WAS 29 27 29 25
28 KC 28 26 28 29
29 CLE 26 28 27 31
30 TEN 32 30 31 28
31 TB 30 31 30 32
32 STL 31 32 32 30

ESPN's NFL power rankings have a slightly different look for Week 7.

The Colts remained in the top spot and the Rams stayed No. 32. But if you check those ugly mugs atop the how-we-voted chart, you'll see Matt Williamson of Scouts Inc. filling in for 2009 father-of-the-year candidate Paul Kuharsky.

Williamson's participation while the Kuharsky family welcomes its newest member arms the rest of us with a needed scapegoat.

Don't like where your team stands in the rankings this week? Hey, blame Williamson.

Thanks, Matt!

The chart shows my votes in column one, with votes from John Clayton, Williamson and Jeffri Chadiha thereafter.

The Saints charged into the second spot overall, leaping past the previously No. 2 Giants and still No. 3 Vikings, although the feeling wasn't unanimous. Clayton left the Vikings second overall, with the Saints third. I considered doing the same before moving the Saints into the second spot.

The Chargers actually moved up a couple of spots from last week despite their defeat Monday night.

As much as I'd like to blame Williamson for that one, some of that is on me. I wasn't necessarily going to knock them down significantly for losing to the Broncos, a top-5 team, in a hard-fought game. Also, the rankings are relative, not absolute. Teams immediately behind the Chargers on my ballot didn't quite seem ready to move up the board significantly.

A look inside the rankings ...

Rising: The Steelers and Texans rose five spots apiece. The Patriots and Raiders each jumped four spots. The Cardinals rose three. The Saints, Bears, Chiefs and Chargers each rose two spots. The Broncos, Falcons, Packers, Panthers and Bills jumped one spot apiece.

Falling: The Jets dropped nine spots. The Eagles fell five. The Titans, Redskins, Seahawks, Bengals and Giants each dropped three places. The Dolphins and Cowboys fell two. The Browns dropped one.

Unchanged: Rankings for the Colts, Vikings, Ravens, 49ers, Jaguars, Lions, Bucs and Rams did not change.

Deadlocked: We broke one tie this week. The Texans prevailed over the Jets for the 17th spot because they won in Week 6.

Groupthink: All four panelists voted the Giants fifth. Three voted the Broncos third.

Agree to disagree: The Texans generated the widest gap between highest and lowest votes -- nine spots -- following their victory over the Bengals. Six other teams generated disparities of at least five spots:
  • Texans (9): Williamson ranked them 12th, higher than any other voter ranked them. Clayton ranked them 21st, lower than any other voter ranked them.
  • Packers (8): Sando 11th, Williamson 19th.
  • Bengals (6): Clayton seventh, Williamson 13th.
  • Jets (6): Clayton 14th, Williamson 20th.
  • Patriots (5): Kuharsky fourth, Clayton ninth.
  • Cowboys (5): Clayton 15th, Sando 20th.
  • Browns (5): Sando 26th, Chadiha 31st.
Power rankings histories: Check out these colorful layered graphs showing where each NFL team has ranked every week since the 2002 season.

Ranking the divisions: Teams from the NFC North and AFC North ended the NFC East's long run as the highest-rated division on average. Blame the Redskins for that one, NFC East fans. The chart below shows how each voter ranked each division on average. Highest votes in red. Lowest votes in blue.
Breakdown By Division
Voter AFC
East
AFC
North
AFC
South
AFC
West
NFC
East
NFC
North
NFC
South
NFC
West
Mike Sando 16 13.25 18 17.75 16.75 13.25 15.25 21.75
John Clayton 16.25 14 18 18.25 14.5 13.25 15.5 22.25
Matt Williamson 16.25 14 16.75 18.75 15.75 14 15.5 21
Jeff Chadiha 16.5 14.75 17.5 18.75 14.25 13.75 15.5 21
Average 16.3 14.0 17.6 18.4 15.3 13.6 15.4 21.5
Rank 5 2 6 7 3 1 4 8

A voter-by-voter look at changes of at least four spots since the Week 6 rankings:

Sando: Texans (+7), Bills (+6), Steelers (+5), Raiders (+4), Seahawks (-5), Eagles (-6), Titans (-8), Jets (-11)

Clayton: Chiefs (+4), Patriots (+4), Eagles (-4), Seahawks (-4)

Williamson: first time voting

Chadiha: Steelers (+4), Giants (-4), Redskins (-4), Jets (-6)

For download: An Excel file -- available here or here -- showing how each voter voted this week and in past weeks.

The file includes a "powerflaws" sheet pointing out potential flaws in voters' thinking by showing how many higher-ranked opponents each team has defeated. For example, the Bengals ranked one spot below the Steelers even though Cincinnati defeated Pittsburgh earlier in the season.

A quick primer on the "powerflaws" sheet:
  • Column Y features team rankings.
  • Column Z shows how many times a team has defeated higher-ranked teams.
  • Change the rankings in column Y as you see fit.
  • Re-sort column Y in ascending order (1 to 32) using the standard Excel pull-down menu atop the column.
  • The information in column Z, which reflects potential ranking errors, will change (with the adjusted total highlighted in yellow atop the column).
  • The lower the figure in that yellow box, the fewer conflicts.

Sort comments by: Most Recent | First Posted