NFC West: Jeff Saturday

Around the NFC West: 'A cheap shot'

August, 28, 2013

The hits keep coming for San Francisco 49ers backup guard Joe Looney after his low block left Minnesota Vikings defensive tackle Kevin Williams with an injured knee.

We discussed the block Monday and I concluded that Looney did not violate playing rules when he struck Williams in the knee during the third quarter of an exhibition game Sunday night. There was no penalty flag on the play. The NFL has no plans to fine Looney.

The question was whether Looney had violated unwritten rules. Williams' teammates are predictably standing up for their guy. Looney is predictably saying he meant no harm. I give more credence to what retired offensive lineman Jeff Saturday said while serving in his role as NFL analyst for ESPN. We might normally expect one offensive lineman to stand up for another, but Saturday did not do that in this situation.

"It's definitely a cheap shot," Saturday said. "There was no reason to go low on a guy whose back is turned toward you. ... I've pulled off many a day on a cut block or when you think it's even questionable. You just don't do it. Everybody knows we're here to earn a living for our families and represent more than barbaric play on the field. As a player and as a man you have to have higher principles than even sometimes the rules."

49ers coach Jim Harbaugh used the word "unfortunate" to describe the play.

"I don't think it was a dirty play, don't think it was intentional, don't think there is any malice in the heart of Joe Looney," Harbaugh told reporters.

Williams suffered a hyperextended knee with a bone bruise and postular capsular strain, but no ligament damage. It's not yet clear how quickly he might return.

How NFC West stacks up with Colts

February, 7, 2010
MIAMI -- Let's stretch our imaginations and pretend, for the sake of discussion, that each NFC West team had advanced to face the Colts in the Super Bowl.

If the Rams made it here, for example, the big story might be Peyton Manning vs. Keith Null.

(Please hold your laughter until the end.)

I've broken out the Colts' offensive starters and compared them to those for the Cardinals, 49ers, Seahawks and Rams. In the Rams' case, I wasn't sure who would start at left guard after Roger Allen suffered a serious knee injury in Week 17, so I've brought back usual starter Jacob Bell from injured reserve.

Putting together something similar for the defenses would be tough because the 49ers and Cardinals play 3-4 schemes, so the positions would not line up.

Enjoy the imaginary games.

Posted by's Mike Sando

Josh from North Carolina writes: The Cardinals aren't offering Kurt Warner the same money as other Top QBs, and are clearly not intent on re-signing Anquan Boldin. Are they really about to put their stock in Matt Leinart and Steve Breaston as opposed to the guys who got them to a Super Bowl? Maybe we're about to see why the Cardinals have not been a successful organization.

Mike Sando: Life in Arizona would indeed become interesting if Kurt Warner signed with another team in free agency. The assumption has been that Warner wants to stay in Arizona and that he would probably take less money from the Cardinals before he would uproot his family and play elsewhere.

What if that assumption were false? What if Warner decided the Cardinals weren't showing him the respect he had earned by carrying that offense and taking all those hits while playing under a relatively modest contract? What if Warner hit the market, took a visit, liked what he heard and signed a contract without looking back?

With or without Warner, the 2009 Cardinals will be measured against the way they finished the 2008 season. That will be unrealistic -- 2008 was a special season -- but it will be reality. If the Cardinals were to fall off dramatically with Matt Leinart at quarterback and Warner in another uniform, the organization would surely hear about it.

The Cardinals still have time to get a deal done. I've felt all along a deal would get done to keep Warner in Arizona.

As for Anquan Boldin, his situation is a little different because he has two years remaining on his deal and the team did offer him a contract before re-signing Larry Fitzgerald.

Paco from Hermosillo, Mexico writes: Hello Sando, very intersting article, as a Cardinals fan I love what Kurt Warner has done for our team, however, this negotiation has deteriorated some his image, he said that it wasn't about the money, and I don't think he will act like Randy Jhonson, yet his agent is asking for a lot of money, as much as the Cardinals need Warner in my opinion Warner needs the Cardinals more.

He gets to play with a very talented group of receivers that help him hide his deficiencies. He is really slow with his feet and his arm is not that strong, he likes to take sometimes unnecessary risks and sometimes holds to the ball too long. He is very accurate and makes excellent reads, but I think Mat Leinart's time is coming soon, and I completely agree that no other place would be a good fit. Minnesota sounds the most interesting, but they don't have the talent at WR to exploit Kurt's abilities and it won't be easy for him to start over in a new offense this late in his career (see Brett Favre).

Of course, I want him back, and I am sure he will be back, but I don't like his agent's position. As good as he is, he is too old to receive the money he is asking for. His arm strength is not what it used to be and it will be very difficult for him to stay healthy for the whole season (even more difficult for the 2 years he is asking for). Bring him back but for the right price so that we can take care of other need we have as a team.

Mike Sando: The Cardinals have enough salary-cap space to pay Warner top dollar and still fill their other needs. I can see both sides in this negotiation. It's all good if Warner re-signs with Arizona. If he leaves and Arizona struggles without him, the Cardinals will have a hard time explaining what went wrong. What are the odds of that happening? Only Warner knows.

(Read full post)

NFC West needs healthy centers

August, 28, 2008

Posted by's Mike Sando

A good veteran center can ease the mind of any NFL quarterback by reading defenses and adjusting blocking schemes. As the Colts deal with Jeff Saturday's injury, three of the four NFC West teams also face the possibility of life without an established starting center.

  • Arizona: A knee injury will likely sideline starter Al Johnson into the regular season. Johnson, 29, has 45 starts over the last four seasons. His replacement, 24-year-old Lyle Sendlein, has two starts, both last season. A sore knee has slowed Sendlein recently, leaving Pat Ross to man the position.
  • St. Louis: A hand injury has sidelined projected starter Brett Romberg recently. Romberg, 28, has 12 starts over the last two seasons. His replacement, 26-year-old Nick Leckey, might represent an upgrade. Leckey has 22 starts over the last four seasons. He might keep the job. Guard Richie Incognito has also worked at center this summer.
  • Seattle: A back injury sidelined incumbent starter Chris Spencer until this week. Spencer, 26, was a first-round draft choice in 2005. He has started 29 games over the last two seasons. Replacement Steve Vallos, 24, has never started a regular-season game. Vallos has played better than expected this summer, easing concerns.

The 49ers have no such issues. Eric Heitmann has brought stability to the position. The Cardinals should be able to weather Johnson's injury if Sendlein is available. Going with Ross would present more challenges. I was watching the Cardinals-Raiders game Saturday night when Ross suddenly went flying backward. Big No. 90 for the Raiders, Terdell Sands, simply overpowered him.