NFC West: Pat Bowlen

There was a time, when John Elway wore a helmet at work instead of a tie, when the Denver Broncos and Seattle Seahawks were division rivals.

From 1977 to 2001, the two teams did their football business together in the AFC West and now these former division rivals, who have gone their separate ways since -- through good times and bad -- now arrive to Super Bowl XLVIII as the matchup many wanted to see.

The Broncos' league-leading scoring offense -- which produced an NFL record 606 points with Peyton Manning at quarterback -- against Seattle's league-leading defense (14.4 points per game), a physical, brash group that led the league in scoring defense, total defense, pass defense and interceptions.

It is the first time the league's No. 1 offense and No. 1 defense have met in the Super Bowl since 1990, when the Buffalo Bills and New York Giants authored a classic, a 20-19 Giants win decided when Scott Norwood's kick drifted wide right. Seahawks reporter Terry Blount and Broncos reporter Jeff Legwold discuss Sunday's game:

Legwold: Terry, in your mind, what are some of the major decisions John Schneider and Pete Carroll have made to put the Seahawks in this position?

Blount: Jeff, first and foremost, the one decision that almost everyone will point to is selecting Russell Wilson with a third-round draft choice two years ago when so many experts felt Wilson was too short to be an effective starter in today's NFL. That led to another big decision when Carroll named Wilson the starter after the team had signed Matt Flynn to a big-money deal -- a brave move, to say the least. But pointing to one move doesn't begin to tell the story of a team that Schneider and Carroll completely revamped over the past four seasons. Only four players remain from the team they inherited in 2010. Schneider and Carroll's strengths are their trust in each other and their ability to make stars, or at least quality starters, out of players that other teams overlooked such as cornerback Richard Sherman (a fifth-round pick), slot receiver Doug Baldwin (undrafted) and guard J.R. Sweezy (a seventh-round pick). They also made one of the best trades in team history, acquiring Marshawn Lynch from Buffalo in 2010. It's an example of how Schneider and Carroll are willing to take chances on players who might have had off-the-field issues.

Let me ask you a similar question, Jeff. Elway gets huge props for convincing Manning that Denver was the place for him to end his career, but obviously, it took more than one move to get the Broncos to the Super Bowl. Aside from Manning, what has made Elway's tenure so successful?

Legwold: Elway's mission, for owner Pat Bowlen, when he took the job, wasn't just to make the team competitive as quickly as possible after the 4-12 finish in 2010, but to fix the cracks in the foundation. This meant addressing the personnel and salary-cap issues that needed to be dealt with if the team was going to succeed over the long term. Elway always says people talk to him about a "win-now philosophy," but he wants the team to win from now on.

Elway and the Broncos' front office cleaned up the cap a bit, and though Elway is a former quarterback, he thinks big picture. They've drafted plenty of defensive players -- 11 of 23 picks under Elway -- and they've made finding the guy they want more important than simply making big-ticket splashes in free agency, other than Manning of course. Signing players to one-year deals with little or no signing bonuses, such as Shaun Phillips (10 sacks), Paris Lenon and Quentin Jammer (two starters and a situational player in the defense), have made it go. Starting center Manny Ramirez was released by the Lions at one point. John Fox, hand-picked by Elway, and his staff also have gotten more from players who were holdovers such as Knowshon Moreno and Demaryius Thomas. Toss in some big-time draft hits -- Von Miller and Julius Thomas -- and you have back-to-back 13-3 finishes.

For their part, the Seahawks have played quality defense all season long. Terry, how do you think they will attack Manning?

Blount: They will line up and say, 'This is who were are and what we do. Beat us if you can.' I honestly don't think they'll change a thing. Whether it's a rookie calling the signals or one of the all-time greats such as Manning, the Seahawks don't believe anyone can outperform their defense. They are as talented a group as I've seen. Two things set them apart: incredible overall speed, especially at the linebacker spots, and a physical approach that borders on all-out violence and intimidation. Calling for crossing patterns over the middle against this bunch is asking for punishment. The one thing defensive coordinator Dan Quinn said they will do is change the wording and signals on their calls. And what they must do in this game is get a push up the middle on the defensive front and force Manning to move in the pocket. Defensive tackles Brandon Mebane, Tony McDaniel and Clinton McDonald have to outmuscle Denver interior linemen in this game.

Seattle's Legion of Boom secondary is an extraordinarily talented group that includes three players who were voted into the Pro Bowl. They play a lot of press coverage and almost dare a quarterback to try to beat them.

Jeff, does man-to-man coverage help or hurt Manning and his receivers?

Legwold: Man coverage almost never hurts Manning, unless those defensive backs consistently knock the Broncos' receivers off their routes, or Mother Nature brings a windy night. And not just a breeze, but something on the order of the 40-mph gusts the team faced on a frigid night at New England this season. But even then Manning was sharp and aggressive on a late drive to tie the game at 31-31. Where some defenses have had some success this season -- Indianapolis, New England and to a certain extent Jacksonville -- was when they essentially tossed aside the idea of adding pressure to try to get Manning, because he gets the ball out too quickly, and play as physically as possible against the Broncos' receivers to disrupt their routes and disrupt the offense's timing. That said, Manning still threw for 386 yards and three touchdowns against the Colts to go with 295 yards and two touchdowns against the Jaguars. And while the Patriots held him to a season-low 150 yards on Nov. 24, Manning still looked sharp late, throwing the ball in a game in which the Broncos rushed for 280 yards because New England often left six-man fronts after dropping so many players into coverage. In the AFC Championship Game against the Patriots, who used much the same philosophy as in November, Manning threw for 400 yards and two touchdowns. The mix for some kind of defensive success is usually to get the Broncos receivers out of sorts and find a way to pressure Manning in the middle of the field so he can't step into the throws.

Staying at quarterback, Terry, how do you think Wilson, certainly well-known for his poise and maturity, will handle his first Super Bowl behind center?

Blount: I realize it's a lot to ask of any second-year quarterback to enter this setting and not have it effect his performance, but Wilson is an extraordinary young man. I've said all season that he has the unusual quality of being at his best when things appear to be at their worst. He thrives on the big stage. I've never seen him rattled, and when he does make a mistake (such as fumbling on the first play in the NFC Championship Game), he acts like it never happened. And I've never seen any athlete who prepares with the time and detail that Wilson prepares. You can't fool him. People often compare him to Fran Tarkenton because of his scrambling ability, which is true. But in some ways, I see him more of a Bart Starr-type quarterback, a man who had the ultimate respect of his teammates, understood the skills of the men around him and made them better. Wilson said his goal every game is to be the calm in the storm and stay in the moment. Well, there's no moment like this one. It's cliché to say, but I think he truly believes he was born for this moment.

Jeff, there has been a lot of talk about how extreme weather conditions could benefit the Seahawks and hinder Manning's ability to throw the football the way he normally would. Do you think that's overblown?

Legwold: There may be no more overblown idea circulating around than Manning's ability to play in the cold. The cold-weather stats are always tossed around, but there are at least two of those games in some of the totals people are using when Manning played only one series because the Colts had their playoff position wrapped up. One of those was in Denver to close out the 2004 regular season (32 degrees at kickoff; Manning threw two passes in the game). The wind has been a far-bigger deal for Manning. Post-surgery, he has had to make some adjustments to his game because of some grip issues in his right hand. He wears a glove on his throwing hand in a variety of temperatures now. This season, he wore it in New England (22 degrees, wind chill of 6 degrees), against Tennessee (18 degrees), as well as in Houston (kickoff temperature was 58 degrees) and at Oakland in the regular-season finale, when the kickoff temperature was 70. And with the glove on his throwing hand in 10 games this season, including both of the Broncos' playoff wins, Manning has thrown 33 touchdown passes to go with five interceptions. He's had four 400-yard games and six games when he attempted at least 40 passes. People have scrutinized every wobble of every pass this season, but somehow he threw for 5,477 yards and 55 touchdowns. And wobbles or not, Manning has not been sacked and the Broncos have punted only once in this postseason.

In the Seahawks' defense, Terry, how big of an impact did signing Cliff Avril and Michael Bennett in free agency have on that group?

Blount: It's this simple: The Seahawks would not be playing in the Super Bowl without them. Seattle's big weakness last year was the lack of a consistent pass rush and a lack of depth on the defensive line. Not anymore. Along with those two, Seattle also signed veteran defensive tackle Tony McDaniel, a mountain of a guy who has been a disruptive force inside. Bennett may be the most underrated defensive linemen in the NFL. He has been everything the Seahawks hoped for as a hybrid down linemen who can play end or tackle effectively. He is a relentless, high-motor guy who never takes a play off. Avril is a gifted speed-rusher whose claim to fame is his uncanny ability to knock the ball out of a quarterback's hands and force a fumble, something he has done five times this season and 13 times over the past three years.

Jeff, everyone talks about the matchup between the Seahawks' No. 1 defense against the Broncos' No. 1 offense, but how do you think Denver's defense matches up against Seattle's offense and its power-running game with Lynch?

Legwold: Since Champ Bailey's full return from a left foot injury he originally suffered against the Seahawks in the preseason -- Bailey played in just five games in the regular season and was shut down for several weeks after a failed return in early December -- the team has played far better. It's surrendered 17 or fewer points in each of the past four games, including both playoff wins. And while Denver's numbers, as well as its play at times for that matter, haven't always been pretty, the Broncos do play better out of their base defense.

They will be in their base defense against the Seahawks if Seattle chooses to pound Lynch out of a two-tight-end or two-back set. They inserted a veteran, Lenon, into the middle linebacker spot down the stretch in the base to add some bulk. With Lenon, Nate Irving and Danny Trevathan at linebacker, they have speed to the ball if their defensive end can consistently set the edge. Against some of the power teams they have faced this season, including those with some read-option things in the offense such as Washington and Oakland, the Broncos showed a little more of a 3-4 look on early downs. It will be intriguing if the Seahawks -- seeing the Broncos have done far better in the heavier looks -- try to run against the nickel and dime packages and how the Broncos respond.

Terry, if the Seahawks win, what players beyond Wilson will have had the biggest roles to make it happen?

Blount: Probably the defensive linemen we mentioned earlier: Bennent, Avril and the defensive tackles getting pressure on Manning. If they do, the Legion of Boom will shine and come up with an interception or two that could change the outcome. No matter how well this rugged defense performs, it won't matter unless Wilson can throw effectively. Having receiver Percy Harvin on the field could help, but it really comes down to the same story all season. If Lynch has a punishing day running the ball, someone will be open for a big play in the passing game.

Jeff, if you had to pick one thing that Denver must do to win this game what would it be?

Legwold: Overall, they have to manage the moment. Teams don't win the Super Bowl as they go through all the build-up, but plenty have lost it when they got distracted by the bright lights and attention only to forget why they were in the Super Bowl city in the first place. As Phillips put it: "If guys want to party in New York, New York will still be there next week." But on the field, they have to keep Manning clean, give him some space to work in the pocket and with that their receivers have to play with an edge, fight for both their real estate and the ball.

Thoughts on the recent Orange County Register story mentioning the St. Louis Rams as a potential candidate for relocation to Los Angeles:

  • Having Los Angeles as a potential option gives the Rams leverage with St. Louis as they seek an improved stadium situation for the long term. In response to the Register's story, the Rams told the St. Louis Post-Dispatch they remain "focused on working on a lease" with St. Louis. The Rams have not said anything that would limit their options or diminish their leverage, however.
  • The leader of the Los Angeles group, Philip Anschutz, is reportedly "prepared" to acquire a majority ownership stake in a team for the purposes of bringing it to Southern California. I doubt the Rams' new majority owner, Stan Kroenke, would be looking to sell the team so shortly after buying out former majority owner Chip Rosenbloom. He could always try to move the team on his own if he could get a better stadium deal elsewhere.
  • The Register's story says the Los Angeles group has "spoken" with five current NFL teams, including the Rams. Anschutz's group likely initiated the discussions with Minnesota, San Diego, Oakland, Jacksonville and the Rams. There is nothing to suggest the Rams are pursuing a move. But Kroenke has no reason to discourage Los Angeles' interest, either.
  • The Rams' lease with the Edward Jones Dome gives them an out after the 2014 season. The Los Angeles group hopes to have its stadium ready for the 2016 season.
  • Kroenke should be fully versed on the situation in Los Angeles. As of March 2010, the NFL lists him as part of its eight-member Los Angeles Stadium Working Group. The others: Jeffrey Lurie (chairman), Pat Bowlen, Woody Johnson, Jerry Jones, Bob McNair, Steve Ross and Steve Tisch.

These sorts of stories aren't going away until the NFL has a team in Los Angeles. The Rams will remain a perceived candidate to move there until their own stadium situation firms up. For the time being, however, nothing appears to have changed.

49ers, Rams have right to feel cheated

November, 27, 2010
So, the San Francisco 49ers were unwitting victims of a Spygate-style taping scheme before their recent London game against the Denver Broncos.

My thoughts:
  • Steve Scarnecchia, the person responsible for the illicit taping earlier this month, worked for New England when the Patriots allegedly taped St. Louis Rams practices before Super Bowl XXXVI in 2002. As a result, I'm more comfortable removing the word "allegedly" from the previous sentence. The Patriots employed cheaters. Scarnecchia's father, Dante, still works for the Patriots.
  • The fact that a former Patriots employee would confess to spearheading similar efforts for the Broncos even after the massive Spygate fallout reveals a level of arrogance bordering on unfathomable. The NCAA phrase "lack of institutional control" comes to mind. Why would the Broncos hire Steve Scarnecchia in the first place if another Spygate-style scandal were even remotely possible?
  • Josh McDaniels' run as Broncos coach was already unfortunate on numerous fronts even though Jay Cutler and Brandon Marshall weren't blameless in their handling of events leading to their departures. I mean, what would the team's McDaniels-led leadership do differently if their primary job were to embarrass team owner Pat Bowlen? This videotaping fiasco leaves Bowlen with even more egg on his face.
  • I realize NFC West teams can be intimidating -- wink, wink -- but what's so special about their walk-through practices? I'm sure a sharp coach could pick up some helpful information, but at what cost? Again, the level of arrogance astounds.
  • McDaniels said he never watched the illicitly taped walk-through practice. We should not automatically trust him. The 49ers won the game, so the competitive-advantage angle isn't relevant. The Broncos are fortunate on that front. Any concerns the Rams might have had stemming from Spygate seem more credible following this repeat performance.

Niners coach Mike Singletary declined to discuss the incident when speaking with reporters following practice Saturday. He said he learned of the situation only Saturday and had not yet heard from McDaniels. The team issued a statement declining comment.

Kroenke and L.A. stadium group

April, 16, 2010
Stan Kroenke's participation on the Los Angeles Stadium Working Group is a juicy nugget begging for context.

It appears Kroenke, currently seeking to become the Rams' majority owner, began serving on the working group in time for the 2007 league meetings.

Kroenke already owns 40 percent of the team, which moved from Los Angeles for the 1995 season.

The Rams' pending ownership change has renewed questions about the Rams' long-term future in St. Louis. Rams fans in St. Louis have reason to perk up when they hear rumors linking Kroenke or the Rams to Los Angeles. It's important for fans in St. Louis to know what Kroenke thinks on the matter, particularly amid concerns that Kroenke hasn't said anything about keeping the team put.

It appears as though Kroenke replaced Seahawks owner Paul Allen on the working group between 2006 and 2007.

A Los Angeles Times story showed Allen joining an expanded working group in 2006.
The original committee included (Paul) Tagliabue, New England's Robert Kraft, Miami's Wayne Huizenga, Carolina's Jerry Richardson, Kansas City's Lamar Hunt and Pittsburgh's Dan Rooney. The new members of the committee are Steve Tisch of the New York Giants, Pat Bowlen of Denver, Jeff Lurie of Philadelphia, Jerry Jones of Dallas and Paul Allen of Seattle.

A 2007 NFL document on committee members showed Kroenke on the working group with Jones, Bowlen, Bob McNair, Tisch, Johnson and Lurie, the chairman.

I'll provide context as I figure out more. Committees and working groups meet periodically, but often nothing happens. As the Sports Business Journal noted from the NFL's spring meetings in 2008, "Lurie, chairman of the Los Angeles Stadium Working Group, said nothing is happening on the league’s seemingly endless quest, now on 13 years, to return football to Los Angeles. No Los Angeles newspaper even sent a reporter to the meeting here."

Holmgren claims victory with name in news

November, 8, 2009
Posted by's Mike Sando

Mike Holmgren might be out of football for the time being, but he can claim a victory Sunday with news that the Browns want him to run their franchise.

It's far too early to figure out where Holmgren might land and in what capacity once he returns to the NFL in 2010, as he has said he hopes to do. The important thing for Holmgren is to keep his name in the conversation.

One of the biggest fears for an older coach on hiatus would be for the league to move on without him. We've seen owners hire head coaches with relatively little experience. We've seen owners pay these coaches much less than a coach with Holmgren's credentials would normally command. We've seen owners such as the Broncos' Pat Bowlen win big after replacing a proven winner (Mike Shanahan) with an unproven youngster (Josh McDaniels).

It doesn't matter whether the Broncos or other teams with newbie coaches would have enjoyed success without making changes at the top. Perceptions are what matters. For Holmgren, it's important that those perceptions recognize and reward what he has accomplished.

Holmgren wants options. If the Browns are indeed an option, that might give Holmgren some leverage with other teams. He could face competition from Shanahan, Jon Gruden and other established former coaches if he wants to return in a sideline capacity.

Before last season, I was convinced Holmgren was focused on landing a Bill Parcells-type job. He still might be. The question now is whether finishing 4-12 in his final season as Seahawks coach left Holmgren feeling as though he has unfinished business as a head coach.

Power rankings revisited: Week 5

October, 12, 2009

Posted by's Mike Sando

Week 4 Rank Team Mike Sando John Clayton Paul Kuharsky Jeff Chadiha
1 IND 1 1 2 3
2 NYG 3 3 1 1
3 MIN 2 2 4 4
4 NO 4 4 3 2
5 NYJ 5 6 5 5
6 NE 6 7 6 6
7 BAL 7 8 7 7
8 DEN 8 5 10 8
9 ATL 10 9 8 12
10 PHI 9 10 12 11
11 CIN 11 11 13 9
12 SF 14 14 9 10
13 GB 12 15 11 15
14 CHI 13 13 14 13
15 PIT 15 12 15 14
16 SD 16 16 16 16
17 DAL 20 17 17 17
18 JAC 18 19 19 19
19 ARI 17 18 18 23
20 HOU 19 20 20 18
21 MIA 21 22 22 21
22 WAS 27 21 21 20
23 BUF 22 24 24 22
24 SEA 25 23 23 24
25 TEN 23 25 25 25
26 CAR 24 26 26 26
27 DET 26 28 27 27
28 OAK 28 27 28 28
29 CLE 29 29 31 29
30 KC 30 30 29 31
31 TB 31 31 30 30
32 STL 32 32 32 32

The Broncos almost have to assume a spot among the top five in's next power rankings, right?

Yes, in theory, but the reality might be different. The top three teams in the Week 5 rankings won convincingly, the fourth team had a bye (New Orleans) and the fifth team could win Monday night (Miami).

I might move the Broncos into the fifth spot even if the Jets beat the Dolphins. There's no arguing with 5-0.

Here's another issue for debate: Should Broncos quarterback Kyle Orton land a spot in the next MVP Watch after completing 35 of 48 passes for 330 yards in outdueling Tom Brady? You tell me.

And now, the power rankings revisited (chart shows rankings entering Week 5, with losing teams in red) ...

The reckoning: Five games featured lower-ranked teams defeating higher-ranked teams:
  • (8) Denver 20, (6) New England 17. There's no use trying to explain the Broncos this season. How many people had Josh McDaniels listed as a leading candidate for coach of the year? Not even owner Pat Bowlen could have known.
  • (11) Cincinnati 17, (7) Baltimore 14. The Bengals held Joe Flacco to a 70.1 rating with two interceptions. Against all previous form, Cincinnati is suddenly a gritty team that knows how to win.
  • (24) Seattle 41, (18) Jacksonville 0. The Jaguars should be ashamed. They managed one sack against a team playing its fourth-string left tackle and third-string left guard (counting Mike Wahle as the projected starter heading into training camp).
  • (26) Carolina 20, (22) Washington 17. More evidence I was right in ranking the Redskins 27th. This is a bad team, folks.
  • (29) Cleveland 6, (23) Buffalo 3. Nobody calls out Trent Edwards and gets away with it. Well, Rob Ryan does.
Still to play: (5) New York Jets at (21) Miami Dolphins on "Monday Night Football."

Welcome to Loserville: The Jaguars, Raiders, Bucs, Rams, 49ers and Titans lost by a combined score of 232-50. Should be an electric atmosphere in Jacksonville when the Rams visit the Jaguars in Week 6.

Doing 120 in the southbound lane: Jacksonville, San Francisco, Washington. The 49ers went from 35-point winners to 35-point losers. Mike Singletary deserves an extra defeat on his resume after losing his cool and jawing with Falcons guard Harvey Dahl. We want winners, Mike, not whiners.

Northbound in a hurry: Denver, Atlanta, Seattle. We'll be adding Matt Ryan to the MVP Watch list this week. The 49ers' defense had no chance against him.

My early favorite for the No. 1 spot: Indianapolis, again, and it's non-negotiable.

Posted by's Mike Sando

News that the NFL is temporarily changing rules to accommodate the Cowboys' stadium design flaws raised a question: What if, say, the Cardinals had made a similar design mistake?

The jokes and slights would be flowing. "Only the Cardinals ..."

But when you think about it, the Cardinals aren't suffering from such problems. While they play on a state-of-the-art retractable field in a beautiful stadium, the flagship Steelers have waded around in muck after high schools use their field regularly each week.

While the Cardinals have managed bruised egos, advancing to the Super Bowl despite Anquan Boldin's complaints, the Broncos, led by esteemed owner Pat Bowlen, lost a Pro Bowl quarterback in his prime. Almost before the door could hit Jay Cutler on the way out, the Broncos transitioned into crisis mode with their best remaining offensive player, Brandon Marshall.

A couple years ago, it was the Eagles, another front-line organization, asking star player Brian Westbrook to return a few million bucks after an accounting error paid him twice.

Imagine if the Cardinals entered into an eight-month naming-rights deal with Jimmy Buffett. The Dolphins, another premiere organization, did just that.

Only the Cardinals? Not so fast.