NFL Nation: Richard Seymour
The “Patriots Way” is a popular saying in Foxborough. It means several things, such as no distractions, establishing a strong football culture, and playing consistent and smart football.
The Patriots, more than any NFL franchise, are machine-like in their approach. New England is a team which rarely beats itself. That explains why the Patriots have an NFL-high five Super Bowl appearances since 2001.
But unfortunately for Patriots’ players, New England’s approach to doing things spills into the front office. The Patriots are emotionless with roster decisions and not afraid to swiftly cut bait. The most recent example was New England cutting starting defensive tackle Kyle Love this week soon after learning he has diabetes. Love obviously was not happy with the decision and vented after being claimed on waivers by the lowly Jacksonville Jaguars.
That leads into quarterback Tom Brady’s comments Thursday that he wasn’t surprised New England let go of leading receiver Wes Welker. The Patriots low-balled Welker this offseason, and he eventually signed with the rival Denver Broncos. New England responded by signing Danny Amendola to a five-year, $31 million contract.
"That's what happens. This is a, like I said, it's a very tough, competitive business, and nobody appreciated Wes more than I did and what he was able to accomplish for our team,” Brady told WEEI radio station in Boston. “He's moved on; he's in a good situation with another great team and a great quarterback. We always kind of kept in touch, we always will. He's one of my best friends."
Brady understands all that goes on around him in New England. However, he is the one player immune to the “Patriot Way.”
New England never thought of letting go of Brady or playing hardball in contract negotiations, like it did with other stars like Welker. The Patriots never considered trading Brady to another team before he got too old, like it did with Randy Moss and Richard Seymour. Brady is so valuable that New England’s usual way of doing business doesn't apply. The Patriots recently worked out a three-year extension that will keep Brady in New England until he’s 40, which is unheard of with the Patriots under head coach Bill Belichick.
You would think a player as productive as Welker, who had five 100-catch seasons in New England and 118 receptions in 2012, would be treated better. But the Patriots proved again that they believe every player is easily replaceable with the exception of Brady.
It’s hard to argue with New England’s results the past dozen years. But you wonder if the Patriots’ harsh way of doing business will eventually catch up to them. Will it be easy to run the team the same once Brady is no longer the quarterback?
Brady has seen many good players come and go in New England, but rest assured the Welker decision impacted him. The two are very good friends and had tremendous chemistry together on the field. However, Brady says his focus is on being the best player he can be in 2013.
"Of course I have feelings, but those feelings are very personal to me," Brady explained. "I used to get caught up in anger and disappointment, but I don't make the decisions. These things aren't up to me. At some point you've got to realize the things that are out of your control, you've just got to let go, focus on my job and what I need to do. The game moves on, the team moves on, there's only so long you can dwell on the past, and at some point you've got to move forward.”
The Patriots, more than any NFL franchise, are machine-like in their approach. New England is a team which rarely beats itself. That explains why the Patriots have an NFL-high five Super Bowl appearances since 2001.
[+] Enlarge
Jessica Rinaldi/REUTERSQB Tom Brady has a three-year extension that will keep him in New England until he's 40, unheard of under head coach Bill Belichick.
That leads into quarterback Tom Brady’s comments Thursday that he wasn’t surprised New England let go of leading receiver Wes Welker. The Patriots low-balled Welker this offseason, and he eventually signed with the rival Denver Broncos. New England responded by signing Danny Amendola to a five-year, $31 million contract.
"That's what happens. This is a, like I said, it's a very tough, competitive business, and nobody appreciated Wes more than I did and what he was able to accomplish for our team,” Brady told WEEI radio station in Boston. “He's moved on; he's in a good situation with another great team and a great quarterback. We always kind of kept in touch, we always will. He's one of my best friends."
Brady understands all that goes on around him in New England. However, he is the one player immune to the “Patriot Way.”
New England never thought of letting go of Brady or playing hardball in contract negotiations, like it did with other stars like Welker. The Patriots never considered trading Brady to another team before he got too old, like it did with Randy Moss and Richard Seymour. Brady is so valuable that New England’s usual way of doing business doesn't apply. The Patriots recently worked out a three-year extension that will keep Brady in New England until he’s 40, which is unheard of with the Patriots under head coach Bill Belichick.
You would think a player as productive as Welker, who had five 100-catch seasons in New England and 118 receptions in 2012, would be treated better. But the Patriots proved again that they believe every player is easily replaceable with the exception of Brady.
It’s hard to argue with New England’s results the past dozen years. But you wonder if the Patriots’ harsh way of doing business will eventually catch up to them. Will it be easy to run the team the same once Brady is no longer the quarterback?
Brady has seen many good players come and go in New England, but rest assured the Welker decision impacted him. The two are very good friends and had tremendous chemistry together on the field. However, Brady says his focus is on being the best player he can be in 2013.
"Of course I have feelings, but those feelings are very personal to me," Brady explained. "I used to get caught up in anger and disappointment, but I don't make the decisions. These things aren't up to me. At some point you've got to realize the things that are out of your control, you've just got to let go, focus on my job and what I need to do. The game moves on, the team moves on, there's only so long you can dwell on the past, and at some point you've got to move forward.”
During free agency, there were reports that Oakland free-agent defensive lineman Richard Seymour was only interested in playing for a big-dollar contract.
However, the NFL Network reports that Seymour is highly interested in continuing to play. There is very little money out there at this point, so Seymour will not be looking at big money. He has to know that, so it appears Seymour is willing to play for what will be offered. Seymour will likely command a decent salary (for this time of the year) on a short-term deal.
Seymour is 33, his play has declined, and he has dealt with a lot of injuries in recent seasons. Still, the word around the league is he might be able to help a contender in a limited role. Seymour play in multiple schemes, and can play defensive end and defensive tackle. So, he could be attractive for a team looking for a veteran to play 20-25 snaps a game.
Denver was previously mentioned as a possible landing spot for Seymour. Yet, the Broncos have added to their defensive line in free agency and in the draft, so there is no pressing need there.
Could Seymour return to Oakland? I think Seymour would like to play for a contender. But he often said how much he enjoyed playing in Oakland after his 2009 trade from New England.
Oakland general manager Reggie McKenzie has not shown much interest in bringing back players from the former regime. But Oakland does have some holes on the defensive line, and perhaps if the price is right, the sides could come to agreement. But as of now, I think the odds are Seymour plays elsewhere.
However, the NFL Network reports that Seymour is highly interested in continuing to play. There is very little money out there at this point, so Seymour will not be looking at big money. He has to know that, so it appears Seymour is willing to play for what will be offered. Seymour will likely command a decent salary (for this time of the year) on a short-term deal.
Seymour is 33, his play has declined, and he has dealt with a lot of injuries in recent seasons. Still, the word around the league is he might be able to help a contender in a limited role. Seymour play in multiple schemes, and can play defensive end and defensive tackle. So, he could be attractive for a team looking for a veteran to play 20-25 snaps a game.
Denver was previously mentioned as a possible landing spot for Seymour. Yet, the Broncos have added to their defensive line in free agency and in the draft, so there is no pressing need there.
Could Seymour return to Oakland? I think Seymour would like to play for a contender. But he often said how much he enjoyed playing in Oakland after his 2009 trade from New England.
Oakland general manager Reggie McKenzie has not shown much interest in bringing back players from the former regime. But Oakland does have some holes on the defensive line, and perhaps if the price is right, the sides could come to agreement. But as of now, I think the odds are Seymour plays elsewhere.
At this moment, the Atlanta Falcons don’t have enough salary-cap room to sign their draft picks.
They’re only $2.183 million under the cap. But there is help, which a lot of people have forgotten about, on the way.
When the Falcons released veteran right tackle Tyson Clabo earlier this offseason, they set themselves up for a boost in cap space by designating him as a June 1 cut. For a few more weeks, the Falcons have to carry what would have been Clabo’s full cap figure ($6.05 million).
But, after June 1, the game changes. At that point, the Falcons will be off the hook for Clabo’s $4.5 million base salary. He’ll still count $1.55 million against this year’s cap and he’ll count $3.1 million against the 2014 cap.
Still, that $4.5 million in June will be big for the Falcons. It will give them more than enough money to sign their rookie draft picks. It could leave them enough to bring in someone like veteran defensive tackle Richard Seymour or maybe an experienced linebacker.
The Falcons also are likely to get a contract extension done with quarterback Matt Ryan sometime this offseason. If structured properly, and I’m sure it will be, a new deal for Ryan could free up additional cap space.
I’m not predicting a big summer surge of signings by the Falcons. But, after June 1, they’ll have enough cap room to make a strategic strike or two.
They’re only $2.183 million under the cap. But there is help, which a lot of people have forgotten about, on the way.
When the Falcons released veteran right tackle Tyson Clabo earlier this offseason, they set themselves up for a boost in cap space by designating him as a June 1 cut. For a few more weeks, the Falcons have to carry what would have been Clabo’s full cap figure ($6.05 million).
But, after June 1, the game changes. At that point, the Falcons will be off the hook for Clabo’s $4.5 million base salary. He’ll still count $1.55 million against this year’s cap and he’ll count $3.1 million against the 2014 cap.
Still, that $4.5 million in June will be big for the Falcons. It will give them more than enough money to sign their rookie draft picks. It could leave them enough to bring in someone like veteran defensive tackle Richard Seymour or maybe an experienced linebacker.
The Falcons also are likely to get a contract extension done with quarterback Matt Ryan sometime this offseason. If structured properly, and I’m sure it will be, a new deal for Ryan could free up additional cap space.
I’m not predicting a big summer surge of signings by the Falcons. But, after June 1, they’ll have enough cap room to make a strategic strike or two.
Reggie McKenzie finally able to do his job
April, 26, 2013
Apr 26
12:17
AM ET
By
Bill Williamson | ESPN.com
Bob Levey/Getty ImagesTaking Houston cornerback D.J. Hayden was something of a risky move for Oakland.Reggie McKenzie is finally on the clock.
Welcome to the world of NFL decision-making, sir.
No man in the NFL has been more handcuffed in recent league history than McKenzie has been the past the 15 months.
McKenzie, a career lifer in the front office in Green Bay, got the daunting opportunity to be in charge of the post-Al Davis Oakland Raiders in January 2012, three months after the legendary Oakland owner died at the age of 82. Hand-picked by several of Davis’ former lieutenants, McKenzie, a former Raiders linebacker, has vowed to bring the struggling franchise back to relevancy.
Thursday, McKenzie was finally able to put his general manager's hat on and start the rebuilding process in earnest. Until Thursday night, McKenzie’s job has consisted mostly of cutting players, signing inexperienced players to inexpensive, short contracts and hoping for a better future.
Last year, McKenzie didn’t make his first NFL draft pick until the end of the third round when he had a compensatory pick. The Raiders, who went 4-12 in McKenzie’s first season in charge, didn’t have a first-round pick in the past two years because of trades for Richard Seymour and Carson Palmer, two players who are no longer with the team.
McKenzie delayed his first first-round pick Thursday when he dealt the No. 3 pick to Miami for the No. 12 pick and the No. 42 pick. The Raiders used the No. 12 selection on Houston cornerback D.J. Hayden.
The Hayden pick has its risks (he nearly died after suffering a major heart injury in practice last season), but he can become a good player, and the Raiders have a big need at cornerback. Most teams had Hayden ranked in the bottom half of the first round. I’m fine with the Raiders making the pick; if they think he can be special, take him.
2013 NFL Draft -- First-Round Coverage
Rd. 2-3: April 26, 7 p.m. ET
Rd. 4-7: April 27, noon ET
Radio City Music Hall
New York City
Draft order | Draft home
• Seifert: High drama in Minnesota
• Sando: Rams not scared to move up
• Graziano: NFC East adds beef
• Kuharsky: Warmack won over Titans
• Walker: Marrone, Manuel bound
• Graziano: Dallas has odd first round
• Williamson: Raiders GM uncuffed
• Hensley: Browns send message
• Yasinskas: Panthers plug middle
• First-round Twitter reaction
• Photo gallery | Draft Machine
Talent is needed.
I thought the deal with Miami left too much on the table. It's great Oakland received a solid second-round pick, and another solid player will be added to the team on Friday.
But, overall, I think Oakland needed to get more. Consider what Buffalo got from St. Louis later in the draft. The Bills sent No. 8 and No. 71 for No. 16, No, 46, No. 78 and No. 222. Plus, New England got No. 52, No. 83, No. 102 and No. 229 from Minnesota for No. 29.
Compare those caches to the Oakland deal, and you have to wonder if the Raiders didn’t simply settle just to get a second-round pick. The No. 3 overall pick holds more power than that.
The trade could stem from the fact McKenzie has been so hamstrung. He had to find a way to get more, and he probably figured No. 42 was better than nothing.
Things will get better for McKenzie. The Raiders, after years of being in salary-cap jail, will have a ton of salary cap room next year -- somewhere in the $70 million range (figures subject to change).
McKenzie has already said the extra room doesn’t mean he will revisit wild spending days of the past for the Silver and Black. McKenzie will stick to his Green Bay roots. He will build through the draft, and he will try to keep his best players with extensions. Free agency will be used as a complement and not a focal point.
Things will get better for Oakland. It will take awhile, and the Raiders probably won’t see a quick fix in a league that has been accustomed to microwave improvement.
But the process began Thursday with the addition of a potential dynamic cornerback and the acquisition of a second-round pick with which McKenzie will take the best player available.
Could McKenzie have done better Thursday night? Sure, but for a personnel man finally able to do his job, he has to be happy just to be able to finally act like an NFL general manager.
Raiders healing process starts for real in '14
April, 4, 2013
Apr 4
8:00
AM ET
By
Bill Williamson | ESPN.com
The Oakland Raiders’ salary-cap troubles have been well documented.
But after paying the price for years of wild spending, the Raiders will be paroled from salary-cap jail. Next year, after shedding several contracts and being unable to build their program by keeping their own coveted free agents, the Raiders will be in better shape.
ESPN’s John Clayton has a strong grasp on the salary cap and figures that Oakland will have about $69 million in cap space for 2014. That number will likely change based on several things, but it is clear that Oakland will have an abundance of cap room next year as it continues to rebuild its roster. For the first time since Reggie McKenzie took over as general manager in 2012, Oakland will not have to cut players to get under the cap.
Before you start fantasizing about a Pro Bowl stable of free agents coming to the East Bay, a surplus of cap room doesn’t automatically mean that team can sign all the best players. Many teams have cap space good enough to do what they wish; some don’t use their surplus just because they have it. Jacksonville, for example, still has more than $25 million remaining in cap room for this season but has completed virtually all its significant spending.
I expect McKenzie to take a measured approach next year with his newfound salary-cap good fortune. He cut his teeth in Green Bay under Ted Thompson -- who built Green Bay into an elite team by not pursuing outside free agents and keeping his best players.
That’s how McKenzie aims to operate.
So there's no reason to think that good homegrown players will leave the Raiders after the 2013 season. They don’t have a ton of core players, but there are some. Defensive lineman Lamarr Houston, offensive lineman Jared Veldheer and Stefen Wisniewski and receiver Denarius Moore are among the players who should be in line for long-term contracts as the Raiders build from within. Running back Darren McFadden is entering the final season of his contract and if he can stay healthy, Oakland will likely be interested in keeping him.
Once the Raiders identify these types of players and lock them up, Oakland will complement the roster with some outside purchases. But it starts from within for McKenzie.
Two things have hurt Oakland: past wild spending on veterans and poor first-round drafting. We’ve seen that with the departures of such players as Richard Seymour, Tommy Kelly, Carson Palmer, Darrius Heyward-Bey and the likely release of Rolando McClain. Had those players not crippled Oakland’s cap, the Raiders would have been able to keep solid players such as Philip Wheeler, Desmond Bryant and Brandon Myers in free agency this year.
This nasty process has depleted Oakland’s roster. The healing begins next year, when Oakland won't be motivated by pure financial necessity and can start making prudent decisions to build the franchise the right way.
But after paying the price for years of wild spending, the Raiders will be paroled from salary-cap jail. Next year, after shedding several contracts and being unable to build their program by keeping their own coveted free agents, the Raiders will be in better shape.
ESPN’s John Clayton has a strong grasp on the salary cap and figures that Oakland will have about $69 million in cap space for 2014. That number will likely change based on several things, but it is clear that Oakland will have an abundance of cap room next year as it continues to rebuild its roster. For the first time since Reggie McKenzie took over as general manager in 2012, Oakland will not have to cut players to get under the cap.
Before you start fantasizing about a Pro Bowl stable of free agents coming to the East Bay, a surplus of cap room doesn’t automatically mean that team can sign all the best players. Many teams have cap space good enough to do what they wish; some don’t use their surplus just because they have it. Jacksonville, for example, still has more than $25 million remaining in cap room for this season but has completed virtually all its significant spending.
I expect McKenzie to take a measured approach next year with his newfound salary-cap good fortune. He cut his teeth in Green Bay under Ted Thompson -- who built Green Bay into an elite team by not pursuing outside free agents and keeping his best players.
That’s how McKenzie aims to operate.
So there's no reason to think that good homegrown players will leave the Raiders after the 2013 season. They don’t have a ton of core players, but there are some. Defensive lineman Lamarr Houston, offensive lineman Jared Veldheer and Stefen Wisniewski and receiver Denarius Moore are among the players who should be in line for long-term contracts as the Raiders build from within. Running back Darren McFadden is entering the final season of his contract and if he can stay healthy, Oakland will likely be interested in keeping him.
Once the Raiders identify these types of players and lock them up, Oakland will complement the roster with some outside purchases. But it starts from within for McKenzie.
Two things have hurt Oakland: past wild spending on veterans and poor first-round drafting. We’ve seen that with the departures of such players as Richard Seymour, Tommy Kelly, Carson Palmer, Darrius Heyward-Bey and the likely release of Rolando McClain. Had those players not crippled Oakland’s cap, the Raiders would have been able to keep solid players such as Philip Wheeler, Desmond Bryant and Brandon Myers in free agency this year.
This nasty process has depleted Oakland’s roster. The healing begins next year, when Oakland won't be motivated by pure financial necessity and can start making prudent decisions to build the franchise the right way.
In the aftermath of the Great Elvis Dumervil Fax Machine Debacle, the Denver Broncos and Dumervil's agent, Marty Magid, have been playing the blame game.
John Elway even released this very pointed, detailed statement.
The bottom line is this wasn’t the first deadline deal in the history of the NFL. Deadline deals happen all the time and they usually finish cleanly. The truth is the ball was in the agent’s hands at the buzzer and it was his final responsibility.
But all either side can do now is move on and solve the issue. Let’s look at options for both sides:
Dumervil: The deal that was left on the fax machine was for $8 million this year. That has been the top dollar this year for a pass-rusher. I doubt Dumervil will command that on the open market. He can shop for the best offer and take it and hope to get as close to the money he gave up as possible. It may be difficult. He can also re-open the line of communication and try to get the best deal possible from the Broncos. A few hours ago, Dumervil felt that was his best option. Perhaps he still feels that way.
Broncos: In a lot of ways the ball is now in their court. They are mad. Once they cool down, they could re-visit signing Dumervil. They must realize the mistake was not with the player. Because of dead money, about four million, it is unlikely Denver will be able to give Dumervil $8 million again. But they if they can get creative, they should think abut. Obviously, Denver felt keeping Dumervil was its best option.
Passing on Dumervil means looking for another pass-rusher. The first player to come to mind is Dwight Freeney. John Abraham and Richard Seymour are also options. Dumervil is probably better than those players, but he might be more expensive.
Whatever happens, Dumervil needs a job and Denver need a pass-rusher. And we all thought this one was over.
John Elway even released this very pointed, detailed statement.
The bottom line is this wasn’t the first deadline deal in the history of the NFL. Deadline deals happen all the time and they usually finish cleanly. The truth is the ball was in the agent’s hands at the buzzer and it was his final responsibility.
But all either side can do now is move on and solve the issue. Let’s look at options for both sides:
Dumervil: The deal that was left on the fax machine was for $8 million this year. That has been the top dollar this year for a pass-rusher. I doubt Dumervil will command that on the open market. He can shop for the best offer and take it and hope to get as close to the money he gave up as possible. It may be difficult. He can also re-open the line of communication and try to get the best deal possible from the Broncos. A few hours ago, Dumervil felt that was his best option. Perhaps he still feels that way.
Broncos: In a lot of ways the ball is now in their court. They are mad. Once they cool down, they could re-visit signing Dumervil. They must realize the mistake was not with the player. Because of dead money, about four million, it is unlikely Denver will be able to give Dumervil $8 million again. But they if they can get creative, they should think abut. Obviously, Denver felt keeping Dumervil was its best option.
Passing on Dumervil means looking for another pass-rusher. The first player to come to mind is Dwight Freeney. John Abraham and Richard Seymour are also options. Dumervil is probably better than those players, but he might be more expensive.
Whatever happens, Dumervil needs a job and Denver need a pass-rusher. And we all thought this one was over.
Broncos may not be done in free agency
March, 14, 2013
Mar 14
12:46
PM ET
By
Bill Williamson | ESPN.com
CBS Sports reports the Denver Broncos are still monitoring pass-rushers.
The report mentions Dwight Freeney and Richard Seymour, who have been previously connected to Denver. The report adds Houston’s Connor Barwin to the mix. The free-agent market for pass-rushers has been soft. There was a report Wednesday that Seymour is only interested in playing for big money.
Denver’s interest in pass-rushers may hinge on the Elvis Dumervil situation. If he doesn’t take a pay cut by Friday, he will be released. Because of the shrinking market, Dumervil could decide to settle for Denver’s offer.
The busy Broncos, who have been adding several key players, also may look for a safety.
The report mentions Dwight Freeney and Richard Seymour, who have been previously connected to Denver. The report adds Houston’s Connor Barwin to the mix. The free-agent market for pass-rushers has been soft. There was a report Wednesday that Seymour is only interested in playing for big money.
Denver’s interest in pass-rushers may hinge on the Elvis Dumervil situation. If he doesn’t take a pay cut by Friday, he will be released. Because of the shrinking market, Dumervil could decide to settle for Denver’s offer.
The busy Broncos, who have been adding several key players, also may look for a safety.
Could Dimitroff find depth from his past?
March, 13, 2013
Mar 13
1:32
PM ET
By
Pat Yasinskas | ESPN.com
Atlanta general manager Thomas Dimitroff may be reaching into his past to find some defensive line depth.
The Falcons are showing interest in free agent defensive tackle Richard Seymour, according to Jason LaCanfora.
Seymour, 33, began his career with the New England Patriots before spending the last four seasons in Oakland. Dimitroff worked in New England’s personnel office before joining the Falcons in 2008.
Atlanta could use some depth to go with Jonathan Babineaux and Corey Peters, especially if free agent Vance Walker isn’t re-signed. Seymour, who appeared in only eight games due to injuries last season, should be very affordable.
The Falcons might be able to get him for somewhere close to the veteran minimum. Seymour also has the ability to slide outside and play defensive end, although I think the Falcons would only consider that as a situational role.
The Falcons are showing interest in free agent defensive tackle Richard Seymour, according to Jason LaCanfora.
Seymour, 33, began his career with the New England Patriots before spending the last four seasons in Oakland. Dimitroff worked in New England’s personnel office before joining the Falcons in 2008.
Atlanta could use some depth to go with Jonathan Babineaux and Corey Peters, especially if free agent Vance Walker isn’t re-signed. Seymour, who appeared in only eight games due to injuries last season, should be very affordable.
The Falcons might be able to get him for somewhere close to the veteran minimum. Seymour also has the ability to slide outside and play defensive end, although I think the Falcons would only consider that as a situational role.
CBSSports.com is reporting Kansas City is visiting with receiver Donnie Avery. He had 60 catches for the Colts last season.
Yahoo! Sports reports Oakland defensive tackle Richard Seymour may retire if he doesn’t get a big deal. Denver is reportedly interested. Seymour is 33, injury-prone and on the decline. I’m not sure he will command a big contract.
ESPN’s Andrew Brandt reports the Raiders are operating with more than $30 million in dead money, thus their actual salary cap is more in the $90 million range. Brutal.
The Raiders reportedly have re-signed cornerback Coye Francies. He is a bottom-of-the-roster type.
San Diego cornerback Antoine Cason may be out of the mix in Detroit now that the Lions have re-signed Chris Houston.
There were reports Tuesday that Kansas City running back Peyton Hillis was visiting the Packers. Now those reports are being disputed. I don’t think he’s much of a priority for the Chiefs.
The Giants are reportedly interested in defensive end Dave Tollefson. He was cut by Oakland on Tuesday. He left the Giants to sign with Oakland last year.
Yahoo! Sports reports Oakland defensive tackle Richard Seymour may retire if he doesn’t get a big deal. Denver is reportedly interested. Seymour is 33, injury-prone and on the decline. I’m not sure he will command a big contract.
ESPN’s Andrew Brandt reports the Raiders are operating with more than $30 million in dead money, thus their actual salary cap is more in the $90 million range. Brutal.
The Raiders reportedly have re-signed cornerback Coye Francies. He is a bottom-of-the-roster type.
San Diego cornerback Antoine Cason may be out of the mix in Detroit now that the Lions have re-signed Chris Houston.
There were reports Tuesday that Kansas City running back Peyton Hillis was visiting the Packers. Now those reports are being disputed. I don’t think he’s much of a priority for the Chiefs.
The Giants are reportedly interested in defensive end Dave Tollefson. He was cut by Oakland on Tuesday. He left the Giants to sign with Oakland last year.
The San Diego Chargers signed tackle King Dunlap.
He is massive at 6-foot-9, 330 pounds. He started 12 games last season for the Eagles. He can play both left and right tackle. The Chargers have massive needs on the offensive line.
I think Dunlap will be given a chance to earn a spot at either right tackle or as a key backup, perhaps with the latter being the most likely scenario. This very likely doesn’t mean the Chargers are done looking for a starting left tackle. That is currently the spot where the team is expected to use the No. 11 pick.
In other AFC West news:
It has been reported the Raiders are interested in Jets’ guard Matt Slauson. He played under new Oakland offensive line coach Tony Sparano in 2012.
The NFL Network reports Denver pass-rusher Elvis Dumervil is now open to taking a pay cut with Denver. That probably means he doesn’t think his market would be great in free agency.
The Broncos are visiting with defensive tackle Terrance Knighton. He is sought after. He played for Denver defensive coordinator Jack Del Rio with the Jaguars. CBS Sports is reporting Denver is interested in Oakland defensive tackle Richard Seymour. He could help a contender on a limited basis.
The Raiders are reportedly interested in Cleveland linebacker Kaluka Maiava. The USC product started 13 games on the weakside for the Browns.
He is massive at 6-foot-9, 330 pounds. He started 12 games last season for the Eagles. He can play both left and right tackle. The Chargers have massive needs on the offensive line.
I think Dunlap will be given a chance to earn a spot at either right tackle or as a key backup, perhaps with the latter being the most likely scenario. This very likely doesn’t mean the Chargers are done looking for a starting left tackle. That is currently the spot where the team is expected to use the No. 11 pick.
In other AFC West news:
It has been reported the Raiders are interested in Jets’ guard Matt Slauson. He played under new Oakland offensive line coach Tony Sparano in 2012.
The NFL Network reports Denver pass-rusher Elvis Dumervil is now open to taking a pay cut with Denver. That probably means he doesn’t think his market would be great in free agency.
The Broncos are visiting with defensive tackle Terrance Knighton. He is sought after. He played for Denver defensive coordinator Jack Del Rio with the Jaguars. CBS Sports is reporting Denver is interested in Oakland defensive tackle Richard Seymour. He could help a contender on a limited basis.
The Raiders are reportedly interested in Cleveland linebacker Kaluka Maiava. The USC product started 13 games on the weakside for the Browns.
Eight in the Box: Top offseason targets
March, 8, 2013
Mar 8
12:00
PM ET
By
Matt Williamson | ESPN.com
» NFC Eight in the Box: East | West | North | South » AFC: East | West | North | South
Welcome to Eight in the Box, an NFL Nation feature that will appear each Friday during the offseason. This week's topic: Who should be the primary target (including trades) for each team when free agency begins?
Buffalo Bills: Buffalo has quite a bit of money to spend in free agency and few of its own players should be top priorities, with the exception of franchised safety Jairus Byrd and guard Andy Levitre, who should be the most sought-after free agent at his position. Bringing Levitre back should be a focus, and Buffalo could use more pieces on defense, but the Bills really need to add offensive weapons (especially if they plan to select a quarterback early in the 2013 draft). There are a lot of tight ends on the market and in the upcoming draft class, but free-agent wideout Greg Jennings would be my No. 1 target. Jennings is an established receiver who could legitimize the passing attack. The presence of Jennings would also allow Steve Johnson to see more favorable coverage matchups.
Miami Dolphins: The Dolphins have a lot of money to work with and should be one of the most active teams in free agency. On defense, cornerback and an edge pass-rusher are areas of need, but this offseason needs to be all about building around second-year franchise quarterback Ryan Tannehill. That would put Jennings in play here, too, but Steelers wideout Mike Wallace is younger and his fantastic speed would complement Davone Bess and Brian Hartline, who has reportedly agreed to a five-year contract to stay in Miami. Wallace also would allow Tannehill to show off his big arm downfield and help create room for Miami’s running game. And with Anthony Fasano also a free agent, Miami needs to address the tight end spot as well.
New England Patriots: The Patriots have plenty of cap room to be aggressive in free agency and improve an already-stacked roster, but they also have major contributors of their own whose contracts are up. The Tom Brady/Bill Belichick window could be closing in the near future, so expect the Pats to go all-in to upgrade their roster, which could possibly include trading backup quarterback Ryan Mallett for more draft picks that could further improve New England’s young core. The Pats’ roster could look much different next season, but former New England standout defensive lineman Richard Seymour would be a great guy to pursue. Seymour is familiar with how Belichick does things and the defense as a whole. He is getting on in age, but maybe the Patriots can get him at a slight discount. Because of the defensive tackles they presently have on the roster, New England would not have to play Seymour a high number of snaps, which could appeal to the veteran and allow him to stay fresh throughout the season. Seymour’s interior pass-rush skills would help a defense that lacks consistent interior push.
New York Jets: Considering their salary-cap situation, it is possible the Jets will be without cornerbacks Darrelle Revis and Antonio Cromartie next season, which opens up yet another hole on a roster that needs a lot of work. On offense, the Jets needs to improve at the skill positions, and bringing back stalwart guard Brandon Moore also would be wise for this run-first team. Quarterback is a massive need, but there isn't an obvious name to meet that need right now. However, Rex Ryan's brother, Rob, coached outside linebacker Victor Butler in Dallas. Although Butler was a backup to DeMarcus Ware and Anthony Spencer in Dallas' 3-4 scheme, he was very productive when called upon. Butler is young, the arrow is pointing up and the Jets' pass rush desperately needs a boost from the outside linebacker position. With the Jets' cap constraints, Butler would be the perfect option to fill that need at a reasonable price.
Welcome to Eight in the Box, an NFL Nation feature that will appear each Friday during the offseason. This week's topic: Who should be the primary target (including trades) for each team when free agency begins?
Buffalo Bills: Buffalo has quite a bit of money to spend in free agency and few of its own players should be top priorities, with the exception of franchised safety Jairus Byrd and guard Andy Levitre, who should be the most sought-after free agent at his position. Bringing Levitre back should be a focus, and Buffalo could use more pieces on defense, but the Bills really need to add offensive weapons (especially if they plan to select a quarterback early in the 2013 draft). There are a lot of tight ends on the market and in the upcoming draft class, but free-agent wideout Greg Jennings would be my No. 1 target. Jennings is an established receiver who could legitimize the passing attack. The presence of Jennings would also allow Steve Johnson to see more favorable coverage matchups.
Miami Dolphins: The Dolphins have a lot of money to work with and should be one of the most active teams in free agency. On defense, cornerback and an edge pass-rusher are areas of need, but this offseason needs to be all about building around second-year franchise quarterback Ryan Tannehill. That would put Jennings in play here, too, but Steelers wideout Mike Wallace is younger and his fantastic speed would complement Davone Bess and Brian Hartline, who has reportedly agreed to a five-year contract to stay in Miami. Wallace also would allow Tannehill to show off his big arm downfield and help create room for Miami’s running game. And with Anthony Fasano also a free agent, Miami needs to address the tight end spot as well.
New England Patriots: The Patriots have plenty of cap room to be aggressive in free agency and improve an already-stacked roster, but they also have major contributors of their own whose contracts are up. The Tom Brady/Bill Belichick window could be closing in the near future, so expect the Pats to go all-in to upgrade their roster, which could possibly include trading backup quarterback Ryan Mallett for more draft picks that could further improve New England’s young core. The Pats’ roster could look much different next season, but former New England standout defensive lineman Richard Seymour would be a great guy to pursue. Seymour is familiar with how Belichick does things and the defense as a whole. He is getting on in age, but maybe the Patriots can get him at a slight discount. Because of the defensive tackles they presently have on the roster, New England would not have to play Seymour a high number of snaps, which could appeal to the veteran and allow him to stay fresh throughout the season. Seymour’s interior pass-rush skills would help a defense that lacks consistent interior push.
New York Jets: Considering their salary-cap situation, it is possible the Jets will be without cornerbacks Darrelle Revis and Antonio Cromartie next season, which opens up yet another hole on a roster that needs a lot of work. On offense, the Jets needs to improve at the skill positions, and bringing back stalwart guard Brandon Moore also would be wise for this run-first team. Quarterback is a massive need, but there isn't an obvious name to meet that need right now. However, Rex Ryan's brother, Rob, coached outside linebacker Victor Butler in Dallas. Although Butler was a backup to DeMarcus Ware and Anthony Spencer in Dallas' 3-4 scheme, he was very productive when called upon. Butler is young, the arrow is pointing up and the Jets' pass rush desperately needs a boost from the outside linebacker position. With the Jets' cap constraints, Butler would be the perfect option to fill that need at a reasonable price.
» NFC Eight in the Box: East | West | North | South » AFC: East | West | North | South
Welcome to Eight in the Box, an NFL Nation feature that will appear each Friday during the offseason. This week's topic: Who should be the primary target (including trades) for each team when free agency begins?
Arizona Cardinals: This was a tough assignment because I'm not of the mind that teams should rush out to sign free agents at inflated prices. In most cases, NFC West teams should let the market settle before striking. My first inclination for Arizona would have the Cardinals seeking to stabilize the quarterback position. Much depends upon whether Kevin Kolb remains in the picture. Kolb is due to receive a $2 million roster bonus March 17. Free agency begins five days earlier, potentially giving Arizona some time to decide upon its course. Indianapolis' Drew Stanton is a free agent and would come to Arizona already knowing the offense coach Bruce Arians is installing. Miami's Matt Moore was someone I thought might project as a solid backup with the potential to start if needed, but he re-signed with the Dolphins. Not that Stanton or Moore would excite anyone, but after watching John Skelton and Ryan Lindley struggle last season, the Cardinals need to get better at quarterback as soon as possible. They need options.
St. Louis Rams: The Rams would be well served finding a right tackle in free agency, knocking off a clear need before the draft. The big question, as usual, is whether the price would make sense. But after using 16 starters on the offensive line over the past two seasons, St. Louis could justify the investment. New England's Sebastian Vollmer or Minnesota's Phil Loadholt would give the Rams an imposing presence on that side of the line. Both are proven and young, an ideal combination. Last offseason, the Rams spent big for veteran center Scott Wells, with underwhelming results. Wells was 31 years old at the time. He struggled getting and staying healthy. He had played 111 regular-season games when St. Louis signed him. Vollmer (51) and Loadholt (63) have played 114 games between them. They've got fewer miles. In looking through the available tackles, I also noticed Sam Baker, who played left tackle for Atlanta when Rams line coach Paul Boudreau was with the Falcons. Baker has been hurt, however.
San Francisco 49ers: The 49ers could use depth along their defensive line and insurance for Justin Smith while the All-Pro end recovers from arm surgery. Oakland's Richard Seymour has the experience, versatility and talent to instantly upgrade the 49ers' rotation. Signing Seymour to a short-term deal would be the goal here. San Francisco could address the line further by re-signing its own free agents and targeting a future starter in the draft. Signing Seymour would be a shorter-term proposition as the 49ers attempt to maximize their championship window. The team would be buying time to acquire and develop longer-term solutions along the line. General manager Trent Baalke did recently say he thinks the team has adequate depth along its line. He suggested that coaching philosophy explained why the 49ers used such a limited rotation last season. Whatever the case, San Francisco could stand to add defensive linemen. I can't endorse signing Seymour to a lucrative deal, but if the 49ers could get good value, the move could make sense.
Seattle Seahawks: Again, there's no urgency to overspend early in the signing process. Seattle mostly needs to continue building through the draft. Targeting 49ers tight end Delanie Walker should appeal on a couple of levels, however. It would give the Seahawks a chance to weaken a division rival while helping their own offense and special teams. Walker matched or set career highs in receiving yards (344), receiving touchdowns (three) and yards per reception (16.4) last season. He's 28 years old and possesses versatility Seattle could use as the team continues to diversify its offense. Seattle has more pressing needs, of course. Defensive end is a position for the Seahawks to address while Chris Clemons recovers from knee surgery. I'm not sure the team should rush out to sign one of the older pass-rushing veterans such as John Abraham or Dwight Freeney. But if Seattle targeted a veteran pass-rusher early in the process, that would be defensible, too.
Welcome to Eight in the Box, an NFL Nation feature that will appear each Friday during the offseason. This week's topic: Who should be the primary target (including trades) for each team when free agency begins?
Arizona Cardinals: This was a tough assignment because I'm not of the mind that teams should rush out to sign free agents at inflated prices. In most cases, NFC West teams should let the market settle before striking. My first inclination for Arizona would have the Cardinals seeking to stabilize the quarterback position. Much depends upon whether Kevin Kolb remains in the picture. Kolb is due to receive a $2 million roster bonus March 17. Free agency begins five days earlier, potentially giving Arizona some time to decide upon its course. Indianapolis' Drew Stanton is a free agent and would come to Arizona already knowing the offense coach Bruce Arians is installing. Miami's Matt Moore was someone I thought might project as a solid backup with the potential to start if needed, but he re-signed with the Dolphins. Not that Stanton or Moore would excite anyone, but after watching John Skelton and Ryan Lindley struggle last season, the Cardinals need to get better at quarterback as soon as possible. They need options.
St. Louis Rams: The Rams would be well served finding a right tackle in free agency, knocking off a clear need before the draft. The big question, as usual, is whether the price would make sense. But after using 16 starters on the offensive line over the past two seasons, St. Louis could justify the investment. New England's Sebastian Vollmer or Minnesota's Phil Loadholt would give the Rams an imposing presence on that side of the line. Both are proven and young, an ideal combination. Last offseason, the Rams spent big for veteran center Scott Wells, with underwhelming results. Wells was 31 years old at the time. He struggled getting and staying healthy. He had played 111 regular-season games when St. Louis signed him. Vollmer (51) and Loadholt (63) have played 114 games between them. They've got fewer miles. In looking through the available tackles, I also noticed Sam Baker, who played left tackle for Atlanta when Rams line coach Paul Boudreau was with the Falcons. Baker has been hurt, however.
San Francisco 49ers: The 49ers could use depth along their defensive line and insurance for Justin Smith while the All-Pro end recovers from arm surgery. Oakland's Richard Seymour has the experience, versatility and talent to instantly upgrade the 49ers' rotation. Signing Seymour to a short-term deal would be the goal here. San Francisco could address the line further by re-signing its own free agents and targeting a future starter in the draft. Signing Seymour would be a shorter-term proposition as the 49ers attempt to maximize their championship window. The team would be buying time to acquire and develop longer-term solutions along the line. General manager Trent Baalke did recently say he thinks the team has adequate depth along its line. He suggested that coaching philosophy explained why the 49ers used such a limited rotation last season. Whatever the case, San Francisco could stand to add defensive linemen. I can't endorse signing Seymour to a lucrative deal, but if the 49ers could get good value, the move could make sense.
Seattle Seahawks: Again, there's no urgency to overspend early in the signing process. Seattle mostly needs to continue building through the draft. Targeting 49ers tight end Delanie Walker should appeal on a couple of levels, however. It would give the Seahawks a chance to weaken a division rival while helping their own offense and special teams. Walker matched or set career highs in receiving yards (344), receiving touchdowns (three) and yards per reception (16.4) last season. He's 28 years old and possesses versatility Seattle could use as the team continues to diversify its offense. Seattle has more pressing needs, of course. Defensive end is a position for the Seahawks to address while Chris Clemons recovers from knee surgery. I'm not sure the team should rush out to sign one of the older pass-rushing veterans such as John Abraham or Dwight Freeney. But if Seattle targeted a veteran pass-rusher early in the process, that would be defensible, too.
Now that Gary Horton and Field Yates have completed their "Offseason Playbook" series for NFC West teams, I wanted to pull them together in one place.
These are detailed looks at each team with sections on offensive and defensive philosophies, team needs and suggested free-agent additions.
For example, the section on the Rams' offensive philosophy gets into the types of routes the team likes to run and which ones they're interested in improving the most.
With that in mind, let's take a quick run through these Insider playbooks:
Arizona Cardinals
The playbook
What struck me: Horton and Yates don't necessarily see a quick solution at quarterback. They do think the Cardinals might be wise to consider offensive tackle Jake Long in free agency. "Long's physical attributes have not diminished to the point where he can no longer be effective," they write, "and a change of scenery could help to rejuvenate his previously stellar career." Drafting a tackle would be cheaper. Signing Long and still drafting for the line would fulfill promises from general manager Steve Keim to make the offensive line a top priority. Levi Brown is still part of the equation. His five-year contract, signed less than one year ago and carrying $1.4 million in annual bonus proration, is scheduled to count $6.4 million against the cap. Brown has played right tackle in the past. Trying him at guard might be another option.
St. Louis Rams
The playbook
What struck me: Horton and Yates list wide receiver over offensive line as the top team needs. The point they made about Chris Givens and Austin Pettis resonated. Givens became a big-play threat early last season. He showed an ability to catch a wider variety of passes as the season progressed and the team played without Danny Amendola. Pettis showed up in the red zone. But as Horton and Yates point out, "They are young guys who can't be counted on every down." I think the Rams were wise to withhold the franchise designation from Amendola because the $10 million-plus price tag was too high. It's tough to envision another team paying more for Amendola than the Rams would be willing to pay for him, namely because Amendola has been injured lately. So, if the Rams can re-sign Amendola, draft another wideout and continue to develop their younger options, including Brian Quick, they can make progress at the position.
San Francisco 49ers
The playbook
What struck me: While there's broad consensus the 49ers will want to use the draft to supplement their defensive line, Horton and Yates see former Oakland and New England defensive lineman Richard Seymour as a good fit in free agency. Seymour is coming off a hamstring injury. That could lower his price on the market, which would be important. The 49ers already have $8 million in 2013 cap space committed to Justin Smith. How much could the team justify allocating to Seymour, possibly as a rotational player? Seymour had been playing better than 75 percent of the defensive snaps when healthy in recent seasons. He's 33 years old, same as Smith. The contract Seymour signed with Oakland is voiding, making him a free agent. His cap number was $8.8 million last season. It was scheduled to hit $19.1 million in 2013, but all parties had to know the Raiders would let the deal void before assuming that kind of charge.
Seattle Seahawks
The playbook
What struck me: Horton and Yates, while noting that Seattle plans to use multiple tight ends frequently, did not list tight end among team needs this offseason. While Zach Miller has played well for Seattle, I think the team could use a second tight end to use in tandem. I wouldn't be surprised if the Seahawks drafted for the position relatively early, even with the 25th, 56th or 87th choices. Adding weapons for quarterback Russell Wilson makes sense. Miller's production as a receiver in the playoffs -- 12 receptions for 190 yards and a touchdown -- reinforced his status as a player the team should feature as Wilson continues to grow. While Miller has a $6.8 million salary and $11 million cap figure for the 2013 season -- big numbers for a player with 75 catches over three seasons -- Seattle has the flexibility to carry those charges. Miller's contract, like the one for receiver Sidney Rice, becomes easier on the cap in 2014.
These are detailed looks at each team with sections on offensive and defensive philosophies, team needs and suggested free-agent additions.
For example, the section on the Rams' offensive philosophy gets into the types of routes the team likes to run and which ones they're interested in improving the most.
With that in mind, let's take a quick run through these Insider playbooks:
Arizona Cardinals
The playbook
What struck me: Horton and Yates don't necessarily see a quick solution at quarterback. They do think the Cardinals might be wise to consider offensive tackle Jake Long in free agency. "Long's physical attributes have not diminished to the point where he can no longer be effective," they write, "and a change of scenery could help to rejuvenate his previously stellar career." Drafting a tackle would be cheaper. Signing Long and still drafting for the line would fulfill promises from general manager Steve Keim to make the offensive line a top priority. Levi Brown is still part of the equation. His five-year contract, signed less than one year ago and carrying $1.4 million in annual bonus proration, is scheduled to count $6.4 million against the cap. Brown has played right tackle in the past. Trying him at guard might be another option.
St. Louis Rams
The playbook
What struck me: Horton and Yates list wide receiver over offensive line as the top team needs. The point they made about Chris Givens and Austin Pettis resonated. Givens became a big-play threat early last season. He showed an ability to catch a wider variety of passes as the season progressed and the team played without Danny Amendola. Pettis showed up in the red zone. But as Horton and Yates point out, "They are young guys who can't be counted on every down." I think the Rams were wise to withhold the franchise designation from Amendola because the $10 million-plus price tag was too high. It's tough to envision another team paying more for Amendola than the Rams would be willing to pay for him, namely because Amendola has been injured lately. So, if the Rams can re-sign Amendola, draft another wideout and continue to develop their younger options, including Brian Quick, they can make progress at the position.
San Francisco 49ers
The playbook
What struck me: While there's broad consensus the 49ers will want to use the draft to supplement their defensive line, Horton and Yates see former Oakland and New England defensive lineman Richard Seymour as a good fit in free agency. Seymour is coming off a hamstring injury. That could lower his price on the market, which would be important. The 49ers already have $8 million in 2013 cap space committed to Justin Smith. How much could the team justify allocating to Seymour, possibly as a rotational player? Seymour had been playing better than 75 percent of the defensive snaps when healthy in recent seasons. He's 33 years old, same as Smith. The contract Seymour signed with Oakland is voiding, making him a free agent. His cap number was $8.8 million last season. It was scheduled to hit $19.1 million in 2013, but all parties had to know the Raiders would let the deal void before assuming that kind of charge.
Seattle Seahawks
The playbook
What struck me: Horton and Yates, while noting that Seattle plans to use multiple tight ends frequently, did not list tight end among team needs this offseason. While Zach Miller has played well for Seattle, I think the team could use a second tight end to use in tandem. I wouldn't be surprised if the Seahawks drafted for the position relatively early, even with the 25th, 56th or 87th choices. Adding weapons for quarterback Russell Wilson makes sense. Miller's production as a receiver in the playoffs -- 12 receptions for 190 yards and a touchdown -- reinforced his status as a player the team should feature as Wilson continues to grow. While Miller has a $6.8 million salary and $11 million cap figure for the 2013 season -- big numbers for a player with 75 catches over three seasons -- Seattle has the flexibility to carry those charges. Miller's contract, like the one for receiver Sidney Rice, becomes easier on the cap in 2014.
On guards: How early to draft best ones
February, 24, 2013
Feb 24
12:32
PM ET
By
Mike Sando | ESPN.com
General managers and coaches have been known to send figurative smoke screens from the NFL scouting combine regarding their draft intentions.
On the surface, at least, the rest of the NFC West has to hope Arizona general manager Steve Keim is serious when he says the Cardinals would consider drafting a guard with the seventh overall choice in the 2013 NFL draft.
No NFL team has taken a guard among the top seven overall choices since the Kansas City Chiefs used the seventh pick of the 1986 draft for West Virginia guard Brian Jozwiak. Jozwiak started three games in three seasons before suffering a career-ending hip injury.
Some of the tackles drafted among the top seven overall choices have transitioned to guard in the NFL. The Cardinals used the second pick of the 2001 draft for Leonard Davis, who had played tackle in college. They moved him to guard, with so-so results. Davis went to Pro Bowls years later with Dallas.
Michael Vick was the first overall choice in that 2001 draft. Justin Smith, LaDainian Tomlinson and Richard Seymour joined Davis among the top six overall choices. Each would have brought more value to the Cardinals than even a Pro Bowl-caliber guard, in my view. Steve Hutchinson, drafted 17th overall by Seattle, was the best guard in that 2001 class.
As the chart shows, teams rarely draft college guards among the top seven picks. That is because teams value other positions higher than they value guard. Teams figure even a great guard isn't going to help the team as much as a very good player at many other positions.
"If you think he is a Pro Bowl guard, how high is too high?" Keim said in explaining his reasoning. "If you're convinced that player is a Pro Bowl talent and an elite type player, you take him and don't look back. People say that's too high to take a guard or take a tight end. But I don’t subscribe to that theory."
The Cardinals have used free agency to target guards Daryn Colledge and Adam Snyder in recent offseasons.
Division-rival San Francisco used the sixth pick of the 2006 draft for tight end Vernon Davis, who has grown into a very good player. Arizona used the 10th pick that year for quarterback Matt Leinart. In that case, drafting a tight end would have made more sense than drafting a quarterback. I think that is one of the points Keim is addressing. He'd rather have a Pro Bowl guard than a disappointing player at a position of greater value.
That is a reasonable position to take. Still, all else equal, the Cardinals would be better off getting a good player at a position of greater value. Their NFC West rivals would have an easier time preparing to face a top guard than they would have preparing for a top player at most other positions.
On the surface, at least, the rest of the NFC West has to hope Arizona general manager Steve Keim is serious when he says the Cardinals would consider drafting a guard with the seventh overall choice in the 2013 NFL draft.
No NFL team has taken a guard among the top seven overall choices since the Kansas City Chiefs used the seventh pick of the 1986 draft for West Virginia guard Brian Jozwiak. Jozwiak started three games in three seasons before suffering a career-ending hip injury.
Some of the tackles drafted among the top seven overall choices have transitioned to guard in the NFL. The Cardinals used the second pick of the 2001 draft for Leonard Davis, who had played tackle in college. They moved him to guard, with so-so results. Davis went to Pro Bowls years later with Dallas.
Michael Vick was the first overall choice in that 2001 draft. Justin Smith, LaDainian Tomlinson and Richard Seymour joined Davis among the top six overall choices. Each would have brought more value to the Cardinals than even a Pro Bowl-caliber guard, in my view. Steve Hutchinson, drafted 17th overall by Seattle, was the best guard in that 2001 class.
As the chart shows, teams rarely draft college guards among the top seven picks. That is because teams value other positions higher than they value guard. Teams figure even a great guard isn't going to help the team as much as a very good player at many other positions.
"If you think he is a Pro Bowl guard, how high is too high?" Keim said in explaining his reasoning. "If you're convinced that player is a Pro Bowl talent and an elite type player, you take him and don't look back. People say that's too high to take a guard or take a tight end. But I don’t subscribe to that theory."
The Cardinals have used free agency to target guards Daryn Colledge and Adam Snyder in recent offseasons.
Division-rival San Francisco used the sixth pick of the 2006 draft for tight end Vernon Davis, who has grown into a very good player. Arizona used the 10th pick that year for quarterback Matt Leinart. In that case, drafting a tight end would have made more sense than drafting a quarterback. I think that is one of the points Keim is addressing. He'd rather have a Pro Bowl guard than a disappointing player at a position of greater value.
That is a reasonable position to take. Still, all else equal, the Cardinals would be better off getting a good player at a position of greater value. Their NFC West rivals would have an easier time preparing to face a top guard than they would have preparing for a top player at most other positions.
Change in store for Oakland's defensive line
February, 4, 2013
Feb 4
11:00
AM ET
By
Bill Williamson | ESPN.com
For the second straight year, as the new brass tries to rebuild, the Oakland Raiders will likely undergo major change this offseason.
A place where serious change could occur is on the defensive line as the team tries to get younger and cheaper all the while trying to get better. A couple of years ago, the Raiders had one of the most physical, fiercest defensive lines in the NFL. But in 2012, the unit got old, and it its overall production waned.
Thus, change is in store.
Defensive tackle Richard Seymour is a free agent and very likely will not return. Defensive tackle Tommy Kelly’s production fell as well in 2012, and he is a top candidate to be cut, because Oakland is currently over the salary cap for 2013. Kelly, 32, reportedly has a salary cap number of more than 11 million in 2013. He has two years remaining on his contract. The Raiders reportedly could save more than $7 million if they cut Kelly.
So, at this point, it would be surprised if he is kept.
The change on the line doesn’t just affect the inside players. Defensive end Matt Shaughnessy is a free agent. He was once considered a potential standout, but his play slipped in 2012 and he lost playing time to fellow free-agent Andre Carter, who was signed during the season.
Desmond Bryant is also a free agent. At times, he was one of Oakland’s best defensive linemen last season. Bryant could get interest on the open market.
Thus, Oakland might have to find a way to replenish a lot of positions on the line. Its anchor is Lamarr Houston, who, at times, looks like an upper-echelon lineman. Houston is versatile and can play across the line.
The Raiders will give 2012 draft choices Christo Bilukidi (defensive tackle) and Jack Crawford (defensive end) a chance to develop in 2013. They showed nice promise as rookies.
There is a strong chance Oakland will use the No. 3 overall pick on a defensive lineman. The top candidates are ends Damontre Moore (Texas A&M), Barkevious Mingo (LSU) and Bjoern Werner (Florida State), and defensive tackle Star Lotulelei (Utah).
Change is a theme in Oakland again, and it might start on the defensive line.
A place where serious change could occur is on the defensive line as the team tries to get younger and cheaper all the while trying to get better. A couple of years ago, the Raiders had one of the most physical, fiercest defensive lines in the NFL. But in 2012, the unit got old, and it its overall production waned.
Thus, change is in store.
Defensive tackle Richard Seymour is a free agent and very likely will not return. Defensive tackle Tommy Kelly’s production fell as well in 2012, and he is a top candidate to be cut, because Oakland is currently over the salary cap for 2013. Kelly, 32, reportedly has a salary cap number of more than 11 million in 2013. He has two years remaining on his contract. The Raiders reportedly could save more than $7 million if they cut Kelly.
So, at this point, it would be surprised if he is kept.
The change on the line doesn’t just affect the inside players. Defensive end Matt Shaughnessy is a free agent. He was once considered a potential standout, but his play slipped in 2012 and he lost playing time to fellow free-agent Andre Carter, who was signed during the season.
Desmond Bryant is also a free agent. At times, he was one of Oakland’s best defensive linemen last season. Bryant could get interest on the open market.
Thus, Oakland might have to find a way to replenish a lot of positions on the line. Its anchor is Lamarr Houston, who, at times, looks like an upper-echelon lineman. Houston is versatile and can play across the line.
The Raiders will give 2012 draft choices Christo Bilukidi (defensive tackle) and Jack Crawford (defensive end) a chance to develop in 2013. They showed nice promise as rookies.
There is a strong chance Oakland will use the No. 3 overall pick on a defensive lineman. The top candidates are ends Damontre Moore (Texas A&M), Barkevious Mingo (LSU) and Bjoern Werner (Florida State), and defensive tackle Star Lotulelei (Utah).
Change is a theme in Oakland again, and it might start on the defensive line.
