NFL Nation: The Big Question NFC 61510

NFC Big Question: East | West | North | South AFC: East | West | North | South

Will the New Orleans Saints be better in 2010 than they were in 2009?

[+] EnlargeGregg Williams
Scott Halleran/Getty ImagesIf Gregg Williams' defense improves, the Saints could have a repeat of last season's success.
We actually need to give credit to New Orleans defensive coordinator Gregg Williams for creating that question. While driving over the weekend, I caught a quick clip of Williams on Sirius NFL Radio and he was talking about how the Saints could be better this year.

He’s got a point. Yeah, recent history hasn’t been kind to Super Bowl champions as they head into the next season. We’ve already addressed many times how the Saints are going to be the big target on every opponents’ schedule and about how things like legal issues and Jeremy Shockey fainting spells can be distractions. Those are all very valid points. Things like that have been the downfall for other teams and it could turn out the same way for the Saints.

But, for a change, let’s play on Williams’ statement and wonder why the Saints actually could be better. It’s hard to repeat as a Super Bowl champion, but the way the Saints are set up, I don’t think it’s impossible. With Drew Brees in his prime, the offense isn’t going to get any worse. In fact, I think the return of a healthy Heath Evans at fullback and positive contract resolutions with Pierre Thomas and Jammal Brown, the offense could be better.

The special teams already are very good. That brings us to the defense, which was the biggest question entering last season. All the Saints really lost on defense was linebacker Scott Fujita. He was a nice player, but the Saints have a lot of young legs to replace him.

With Alex Brown and Jimmy Wilkerson, they probably have upgraded on Charles Grant at defensive end. Their collection of defensive backs is as talented as any in the league. Williams knows this defense better than anyone else.

If he’s saying the Saints could be better, it might be because he sees his defense getting even better.
NFC Big Question: East | West | North | South AFC: East | West | North | South

What did Pete Carroll's videotaped denial of NCAA charges against USC reveal about the Seattle Seahawks' first-year head coach?

This subject spurred debate along predictable lines when Carroll made available the video denial last week.

[+] EnlargePete Carroll
Otto Greule Jr/Getty ImagesPete Carroll posted a 97-19 record as the head coach at USC.
Some Seahawks fans downplayed Carroll's potential role in inviting harsh sanctions announced against a Trojans program Carroll led from 2001 through last season. Some fans of other teams called Carroll a phony who bolted USC while the house was burning.

My initial reaction was that Carroll got across his point firmly and succeeded in avoiding the tough questions while the story was hot. Deft move on his part. I didn't see much correlation between what happened at USC and what might happen in the NFL, where NCAA rules do not apply. But harsh criticisms from two people following the USC fallout much more closely -- ESPN.com's Pat Forde and the Los Angeles Times' Bill Plaschke -- provided context for a more analytical look at Carroll's response.
Forde: "And don't think Carroll didn't foster the atmosphere that created the (Reggie) Bush fiasco. His best USC players got Hollywood star treatment, with celebrities circulating freely within the program. The practice field, the locker room, the sidelines during games -- they were open to stars and opportunists alike."

Plaschke: "Simply competing was never enough for these Trojans. They had to follow Carroll's motto by always competing, everywhere, in everything, even if that meant cheating."

In replaying the Carroll video, I noticed he never accepted responsibility for the USC scandal on any level. He never expressed regret that he hadn't done more to head off trouble. He could have done both without admitting guilt. Instead, Carroll blamed overzealous NCAA investigators. He blamed outside forces that compromised Bush. He called upon the NCAA and universities in general, not USC in particular, to raise awareness for an issue already familiar to anyone following college athletics.

What happened at USC might not affect the job Carroll does leading the Seahawks. His reaction in a time of crisis could still be instructive. It's a point of reference for the way he handles future challenges, at least.
NFC Big Question: East | West | North | South AFC: East | West | North | South

Will the recent run of off-field news impact the Green Bay Packers and/or Minnesota Vikings?

If you judge teams based on their headlines, it hasn't been the greatest few weeks for our presumed NFC North front-runners.

[+] EnlargeUnderwood
AP Photo/Mike RoemerCornerback Brandon Underwood apologized to his teammates for creating a distraction and dragging them into it.
The Packers dealt with allegations of sexual assault against cornerback Brandon Underwood. The story came three months after tight end Spencer Havner crashed his motorcycle, fractured his scapula and was arrested on suspicion of drunken driving. Defensive end Johnny Jolly's felony drug possession case also has been hanging over the team.

In Minnesota, All-Pro tailback Adrian Peterson skipped the Vikings' mandatory minicamp to attend a hometown parade in his honor. His absence generated larger questions about the state of a veteran roster and whether exceptions made for quarterback Brett Favre have created an untenable double standard.

The big question is the extent to which any of these events matter. How much should we make of off-field news? Will the Packers' won-loss record be impacted by potential charges against a player who might be their dime back? Should the plight of a third-string tight end play any role in the NFC North title? And do we really think Peterson's minicamp absence will limit the Vikings' offensive firepower this season?

In Green Bay, the impact will be limited but not unfelt. Coach Mike McCarthy addressed the pattern in a team meeting last week and said later that "poor judgment was used." McCarthy added that players have been "in the paper way too much with things other than football." A few might need to watch themselves, but it would be difficult to suggest the Packers have been set back in a substantive way.

In Minnesota, it's not as if Peterson will have much to catch up on when he reports to training camp. (For now, I'm not taking into consideration the possibility that his absence was contract-related and could lead to a training-camp absence.) The impact of his absence, as we discussed Monday, is the legitimate question it raised. Namely: No one knows what, if anything, Peterson has done to remedy his career-long fumbling problem.

If he's unable to reverse that trend in 2010, it will be an ample hindrance to competing with the Packers for the division title. For the most part, however, the significant of these off-field news strands will be limited to where they occurred -- off the field.

Big Question: Eagles happy with O-line?

June, 15, 2010
6/15/10
1:00
PM ET
NFC Big Question: East | West | North | South AFC: East | West | North | South

Should the Eagles have done more to fortify their offensive line?

Somewhat surprisingly, despite a wealth of draft picks, Philadelphia didn’t make any major additions to its offensive line. The Eagles must feel quite comfortable with what they have despite Jamaal Jackson’s injury situation and the release of Shawn Andrews. So, let’s examine this situation more closely.

[+] EnlargeJason Peters
Walter G. Arce/Icon SMIWhile he's received some criticism since joining the Eagles, Jason Peters remains one of the better left tackles in the NFL.
Jackson is the best option at center, but he just recently started running and it wouldn’t be a shock if his knee injury landed him on the physically unable to perform list to start the season. Jackson was on the verge of establishing himself as one of the better centers in this league, particularly as a run-blocker, but this looks like Nick Cole’s job for the time being. Mike McGlynn has the ability to play center as well, but his best fit is at guard. Cole moves well and is good in protection, but isn’t nearly the pile-mover that Jackson is in the run game. But as backup centers go, you could do much worse than Cole until Jackson returns.

Stacy Andrews has been tough to count on of late, but if healthy, he will start at right guard. He also could move to right tackle if Winston Justice struggles at the position where Andrews’ brother Shawn used to play. Even if Andrews can’t be counted on, the guard depth is pretty strong with McGlynn and Max Jean-Gilles backing up Andrews and left guard Todd Herremans. Herremans is another player who, in a pinch, could slide over to right tackle, but he is quite sound at left guard. McGlynn is a potential up-and-comer who could surprise this year if needed.

Like Cole at center, Justice is better in protection than as a run-blocker. But that isn’t much of a problem in this pass-happy offense and overall, Justice was impressive in 2009. As noted above, there are backup plans in place if Justice struggles, but I fully expect him to hold down the fort at right tackle.

At left tackle, Jason Peters has caught a lot of heat since his arrival in Philadelphia, but I think he is still one of the very best tackles in the business. He has taken too many penalties and does have to be more consistent, but doing battle with the blindside edge-rushers in this division is no easy task. I have no concerns about Peters.

So, all in all, I am in the Eagles’ corner with their decision not to dedicate heavy resources to adding to their offensive line. There are some questions, but there are also some fallback options. I think this group will be fine.

SPONSORED HEADLINES

Insider

NFL SCOREBOARD

Thursday, 8/21
Friday, 8/22
Saturday, 8/23
Sunday, 8/24
WEEKLY LEADERS