Debate: What's going on with bizarro Pens?

June, 6, 2014
Jun 6
4:26
PM ET
Scott Burnside and Craig Custance weigh in on the Penguins' hiring of Jim Rutherford as GM and the firing of coach Dan Bylsma.

BURNSIDE: Craig, big news out of Pittsburgh on Friday with the announcement that Jim Rutherford, the classy former GM of the Carolina Hurricanes, is taking over the post left vacant when the Penguins fired Ray Shero last month. The Pens also announced that they've fired coach Dan Bylsma. First, let me say I can’t think of a more shameful way to do business than how the Penguins have handled the makeover of their front office/coaching positions. I'm still not exactly sure what Shero did that warranted being fired, but fair enough. This is a team built for success and it has underachieved, losing to a lower seed in the last five playoff years following the Pens' Stanley Cup win in 2009. But what was the point of not firing Bylsma when Shero was fired? Didn’t ownership know then that it didn’t feel Bylsma was the man to get the team back to the promised land? Did they just figure it out? Why not do the decent thing and fire Bylsma right from the get-go? The whole thing smacks of a disconnect at the highest levels with a team that for many years has epitomized class and doing things the right way. For instance, had they acted quickly, they could have had a shot at Barry Trotz, arguably the best coach on the open market; he landed the Washington Capitals job. I have no doubt that Bylsma will find a job quickly. For my money, he’s the best coaching prospect available. As for Rutherford, he built a Cup winner in Carolina in 2006, but the Hurricanes haven’t made the playoffs since '09. He has lots to work with in Pittsburgh, starting with the world’s best player, Sidney Crosby, yet there is also lots of work to do -- and that will start with finding a new head coach.

CUSTANCE: The whole process was bizarre, from pinning the lack of success on one of the game's most respected general managers to retaining Bylsma when the expectation from everyone in the hockey world was that he was done in Pittsburgh. The way this was handled doesn't reflect particularly well on the Penguins' organization. On the bright side for Bylsma, he didn't miss out on too many openings and should immediately become the No. 1 candidate for the Florida Panthers, Carolina Hurricanes and Vancouver Canucks. If I'm him, I might wait it out and see if a better job opens. He'll have his choice when he's ready. Rutherford knows what he's doing, is a veteran executive with decades of experience, and has a Stanley Cup ring. The interesting thing is the promotion of Jason Botterill to associate GM. To me, that suggests the Penguins liked him as much as some of the other younger candidates on the list, such as the Tampa Bay Lightning's Julien BriseBois, but weren't ready to hand over the reins just yet. Now, Botterill can gain even more experience under Rutherford, and if things go well, you have to assume he's the GM-in-waiting for the Penguins. It's not ideal for Botterill, but it could have been worse. So who does Rutherford call first to replace Bylsma?

BURNSIDE: Well, it depends on whether you think Rutherford will need to hire an experienced coach as opposed to going to the minors and hiring someone such as a Willie Desjardins or even the Baby Penguins' coach, John Hynes, who’s done a terrific job with the Penguins’ American Hockey League affiliate. My gut tells me that the Penguins, who promoted Bylsma from their farm system in February 2009, will look for someone who has NHL experience. Why not Ron Wilson, whose name has surfaced for the opening in Florida? He’s had lots of time to decompress from his last outing in Toronto, and he has coached top-end players in the past and is a sharp, analytical coach. Rutherford hired Paul Maurice for a second time in Carolina, after Maurice had been fired in Toronto, saying coaching the Leafs for a couple of years was like having a Harvard education in hockey. Well, Wilson would have a veritable MBA given his time in Toronto. The guy I still think is destined for a head-coaching job is John Stevens, who’s part of the superlative Los Angeles Kings coaching staff. He should have gotten the Vancouver job last summer (and could yet get it) but he would also be the kind of guy who could have an impact in Pittsburgh. To answer this question, you also have to ask the question: What kind of coach do you need to get the maximum out of captain Sidney Crosby? It’s clear Crosby wasn’t himself in the playoffs this year as the Penguins blew a 3-1 series lead against the New York Rangers. Do you think that’s fair, and if so, who fits that bill?

CUSTANCE: I wrote about it in my Insider blog, but I agree with the guys you mentioned. Wilson deserves another shot at some point; time has been kind to his tenure in Toronto, considering the goaltending he had to deal with. He was masterful in guiding Team USA to the silver medal in the 2010 Winter Olympics. I'd also add Rangers assistant Ulf Samuelsson to the mix. I had a conversation with a few Rangers about Samuelsson during their series against the Penguins and they raved about him. "He's a smart coach," defenseman Marc Staal said then. "He's a good communicator. He wants to know what you're feeling ... that's a big part of him, being able to talk to him, knowing what they expect of you." Said Brian Boyle: "He's been awesome. ... He's a competitive guy. He brings a lot of enjoyment to the rink. He loves being here. He's a funny guy, very smart. Loves the game." There's a lot on Rutherford's plate and we haven't even talked about roster changes. Where would you start there?

BURNSIDE: Lots of work on that end as the Penguins have a lot of guys locked up and need to make pretty significant lineup moves. We’re assuming free-agent defenseman Brooks Orpik will be on the move. Can Rutherford find enough money/term to keep Matt Niskanen on board? He’s the best defenseman ready to hit free agency and we know he wants to stay in Pittsburgh, and he’s an important part of that dressing room. Up front, the team lacked scoring depth on the wings, and while Pascal Dupuis will be back from his knee injury, the team might need to move money in the form of James Neal to gain flexibility. Neal can be moved and should be attractive, given his goal-scoring ability. But he has proved to be a liability for the Penguins when he’s not scoring, often taking bad penalties and not contributing in other ways. And what to do about Marc-Andre Fleury? Is he really the goalie for the Penguins? He was good but not good enough in the playoffs. Does this team need to make a change? Did we mention there’s lots of work to do for Mr. Rutherford?

CUSTANCE: I don't think he needs to do anything dramatic. I agree, they need to bring Matt Niskanen back, and I believe he might take less to stay with the Penguins. If I'm Rutherford, my priority is building depth up front. If you have to trade Neal to bring in good, young forwards, that option should be on the table. Rutherford should also consider moving one of the young defensemen that Shero did well to collect for more help up front. But let's not forget, this team was one win away from beating the Eastern Conference champ. There have already been massive changes made in the front office and behind the bench; it might be prudent to see how those play out before doing anything too crazy to the roster.

SPONSORED HEADLINES

Comments

Use a Facebook account to add a comment, subject to Facebook's Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. Your Facebook name, photo & other personal information you make public on Facebook will appear with your comment, and may be used on ESPN's media platforms. Learn more.