Cross Checks: John Carlson
NEW YORK -- Of the many memorable hours leading up to the epic gold-medal game at the Vancouver Olympics in 2010 between Canada and the United States, this is one that has stayed with us.
It was a conversation with then-U.S. associate GM David Poile the day before that game.
He had spoken earlier in the process about the importance of the Olympics, specifically the impact a strong showing might have on future generations of U.S. players. About how the 1980 Miracle on Ice team became a beacon for a generation or more of American players as well as -- to a lesser degree -- the U.S. team that defeated Canada in the 1996 World Cup of Hockey championship.
As the gold-medal game approached, it was hard not to be swept up in the emotion of what lay ahead.
“I don't think anybody knew how good we'd be. We didn't know how good we'd be,” Poile said that Saturday. “Let's call it like it is.”
The Americans would be denied a shot at Olympic immortality by the slimmest of margins, a Sidney Crosby goal in overtime, from a bad angle at that.
We were reminded of the legacy -- or at least the potential legacy -- of that team Saturday, when we were swept up once again in the quest for Olympic glory as Poile was formally announced as GM of the U.S. team for the 2014 Olympics in Sochi, Russia.
Part of the charm of the Vancouver team was the fact it was the youngest team in the tournament. As GM, Brian Burke was fond of repeating that no one gave the Americans a spit of a chance to earn a medal, let alone battle for gold.
No question the dynamics will be dramatically different in Sochi on a host of fronts.
“In Vancouver, we were turning the page,” Poile told ESPN.com on Saturday.
That team was the first that didn’t hearken to the glory days of Brian Leetch, Chris Chelios and Keith Tkachuk et al. The idea was that if the team had any success at all, it would provide a good base on which to build for 2014.
The Americans’ run to the silver (going 5-1 in the tournament) means they will not sneak up on anyone in Sochi. Not with the past two Conn Smythe Trophy winners on the roster in Patrick Kane and Jonathan Quick. Throw in top-end talent like Ryan Suter, who in our book was the hands-down best defenseman in the NHL this season (finished second to P.K. Subban in Norris Trophy voting), Minnesota Wild teammate Zach Parise, David Backes, Joe Pavelski, Phil Kessel and Dustin Brown and there will be a strong core returning from the Vancouver squad.
Still, trying to handicap Olympic contenders based on results from a tournament four years in the past is a mug’s game. Yes, some continuity is important. Understanding the routines of an Olympic tournament, the media, the schedule and the ebbs and flows of a short, high-drama competition is critical to how a team comes together.
But each tournament represents a different world, and that is where the management structure and coaching staff are so critical to a team’s success.
USA Hockey neatly sidestepped a potential public relations problem early on by structuring its management team in the manner it did. Poile moved up the ladder and will be joined by Pittsburgh Penguins GM Ray Shero, who will act as associate. The two worked together for the Nashville Predators and were part of the U.S. management committee that helped put together the 2010 team.
But Burke, the architect of that team, has been kept in the fold as director of player personnel. He will accompany the team to Sochi.
It was Burke who came up with the idea of opening the process of selecting teams for international competition to American GMs. He invited colleagues like Paul Holmgren (Philadelphia Flyers), Dean Lombardi (Los Angeles Kings), Stan Bowman (Chicago Blackhawks), Dale Tallon (Florida Panthers) and former Atlanta Thrashers GM Don Waddell to join in the process.
The openness and inclusiveness established by Burke was universally praised by those involved, and as Poile pointed out Saturday, the validation of the process was in the result -- a silver medal.
That Burke, dismissed from his post as GM and president of the Toronto Maple Leafs on the eve of the lockout-shortened regular season in January, continues to have a strong voice in the building of the 2014 team is an important nod to what he’s accomplished. To have marginalized him would have sent a disappointing message.
“He will have a big part in the formation of this team in 2014,” Poile said.
But a nod to the past is also being balanced by a nod to the future, which is critical given that neither Canada nor the U.S. medaled in the two Olympics held away from North American soil since the NHL began participation in 1998 in Nagano. (2006 in Torino was the other.)
A bigger ice surface, time issues and different cultures will conspire to make life in Sochi exponentially more difficult than it was in Vancouver and, before that, Salt Lake City in 2002, when Canada defeated the U.S. for the gold medal.
The committee, which represents 150 years of NHL GM experience and six Stanley Cup championships, will have to keep all those things in mind, Poile said, when making selections, just as it did in choosing the Pens’ Dan Bylsma as head coach.
Burke built a team that could play an NHL-style game with a blend of hard-nosed forechecking, strong defense and goaltending mixed with opportunistic scoring, but the style of play in Sochi may make some of those qualities less important.
Clearly, skating and puck movement will be at a premium on the big ice surface, which suggests players like Keith Yandle, Kevin Shattenkirk and perhaps Matt Carle or John Carlson may be more attractive than other, more physical defensemen.
What about a speedy, skilled forward like Alex Galchenyuk, who had a strong rookie campaign for the Montreal Canadiens?
“Our philosophy is going to be a little bit different because this is in Europe,” Poile said. “We have to tune up our thinking a little bit.”
One thing Poile made clear is that, while a résumé of strong play has historically been a factor in inclusion on the final roster handed in late in December, getting off to a good start next fall will be key in the committee’s final decisions.
In introducing the management team Saturday in New York, president of USA Hockey Ron DeGregorio suggested that an American team is no longer the stuff of miracles but rather the stuff of expectations.
A fine sentiment, and after Vancouver, it would seem it is true. Now it’s up to Poile and the rest to meet those heady expectations.
“This is the ultimate honor and challenge,” Poile said.
WASHINGTON -- The walking wounded were nowhere to be seen Saturday but whether any of the injured Tampa Bay Lightning or Washington Capitals players will be available for Game 2 Sunday night remains unknown.
"I think the option of being prepared is having Option A, B and C. So, I guess we'll prepare D the rest of the day. We have to prepare for different scenarios because they are really different scenarios that are possible. It's not clear cut at all," Boucher said Saturday.
Boucher said one of the players was feeling better than the other in terms of his spirits, although he wouldn't elaborate.
"One better than the other one, but pretty good," Boucher said.
If Kubina is unable to play, look for Randy Jones to see his first action of the playoffs. He has not played since early March because of an ankle injury.
"We'll see tomorrow. I haven't decided yet. If Kubina can't go, Jones will be coming in. He's ready to go. He knows exactly what to do. He was playing against some top lines before he got injured," Boucher said.
It's not clear who would take Gagne's place in the lineup if the veteran winger is unable to go.
Meanwhile, Washington defenseman John Carlson, who did not play in the third period of Game 1, didn't skate Saturday during the team's optional practice. But coach Bruce Boudreau was hopeful that Carlson would be able to return to action Sunday.
"I think [there's a] pretty good chance that he'll play tomorrow. But I'm not 100 percent sure," Boudreau said.
Carlson did play one shift in the third period of the Capitals' 4-2 loss to Tampa but was too sore to continue.
"Yesterday he was sore. Because if we could have used him we would have used him," Boudreau said.
Defensive partner and close friend Karl Alzner was likewise cautiously optimistic that Carlson would return.
"It's tough to say. I mean I didn't talk to him a whole lot, I just saw him getting treatment, that's about it. I think that most guys are optimistic about him," Alzner said.
The effect of Carlson's absence was felt in a number of different areas including the amount of ice time Mike Green had to log.
"The challenge is, quite frankly, when you're down a goal you need his offense," Boudreau said. "I don't think it's any secret when you look at our team, Mike Green and John Carlson are our offensive defensemen, and the other guys are the stay at home defenders. When you look at Mike Green's minutes being 27 minutes, it's too high. He had a great series against New York and he's playing 18, 19, 20 minutes. Those are the minutes we have to get back to."
Caps' power-play woes
Much discussion Saturday about the 0-for-5 effort on the power play for the Caps in Game 1. At its most basic, it appears the unit's inability or refusal to get pucks on net is a key to turning around their play with the man advantage. That and getting to more loose pucks.
"Well, it's the only way you get success. The natural instinct is 'Oh, we've got a man up, it's a goal-scoring opportunity.' But the whole thing of it is if the penalty killing works harder than the power play that usually nullifies your man advantage," Boudreau said.
The Capitals had just five shots total in the third period.
"That's not enough when you're down a goal," Boudreau said.