A look at Pac-12 returning starters

December, 9, 2010
Obviously, we'll have plenty of time this offseason to consider what is coming back in the Pac-12 -- 12! -- in 2011.

But here's a quick look at returning starters. Note: We used season-ending depth charts, didn't spend much time fretting injury issues, and didn't factor in potential early NFL draft entrants (so, for example, welcome back Andrew Luck!).

An "*" means one of the returning starters on offense is the quarterback (but Cardinal fans, don't get your hopes up)

Arizona: 5 offense*, 6 defense, kicker
Comment: The offensive line needs to be completely rebuilt, but there's lots of skill back on offense. The defensive line also is an issue with three starters gone.

Arizona State: 10 offense*, 10 defense, no specialists
Comment: Meet your Pac-12 South front-runner. It's not just the number of returning starters: Much of the depth returns. But who is the quarterback?

California: 8 offense, 5 defense, 2 specialists
Comment: The front seven takes some big hits on defense. The offense's big question is at quarterback (and remember that we're counting running back Shane Vereen as a returning starter here).

Colorado: 8 offense*, 7 defense, punter
Comment: The Buffaloes might be Pac-12-ready on offense, particularly if quarterback Tyler Hansen takes a step forward after missing much of the year because of injury. The defense needs to improve, and it might considering four starters were freshmen or sophomores.

Oregon: 6 offense*, 5 defense, 2 specialists
Comment: Five of the defensive front seven and three offensive linemen must be replaced. Still, likely top-five in preseason.

Oregon State: 9 offense*, 5 defense, punter
Comment: First, the Beavers list 13 starters, so I eliminated fullback and tight end (one returning starter). Big questions for the defensive front seven.

Stanford: 5 offense*, 7 defense, punter
Comment: Now, keep in mind that this includes Luck as a returning starter. Even with him, the offense is rebuilding (though Luck is a heck of a cornerstone). The defense might have to carry the load, at least early.

UCLA: 7 offense*, 10 defense, punter
Comment: The defense has a chance to improve, even without linebacker Akeem Ayers and safet Rahim Moore -- likely early NFL entrants. The offensive line is questionable and the quarterback situation remains murky.

USC: 8 offense*, 8 defense, no specialists
Comment: The first order is whether offensive tackle Tyron Smith and defensive tackle Jurrell Casey return. The second order is depth. But when you look at what is coming back, it's not ridiculous to think the Trojans will win more than eight games in Lane Kiffin's second year.

Utah: 6 offense*, 7 defense, punter
Comment: The skill around quarterback Jordan Wynntakes some hits -- running back, wide receiver -- and three of the top-five defensive backs are gone, but there is a good foundation here for the Utes to be immediately competitive in the Pac-12 South.

Washington: 7 offense, 8 defense, 2 specialist
Comment: The post Jake Locker Era starts on offense. The skill is solid, but the line must improve. The defense loses its two best players -- linebacker Mason Foster and safety Nate Williams -- but has a chance to be better as youngsters mature.

Washington State: 8 offense*, 8 defense, no specialists
Comment: The offense takes a couple of hits on the offensive line and at running back, but it has a chance to be good with quarterback Jeff Tueland his top receivers back. The front seven takes three hits. Just enough here to make you go: Hmm.



You must be signed in to post a comment

Already have an account?