Got bogged down on Friday, so this mailbag fermented over the weekend.
To the notes.
Jason from the Bay Area writes: So having seen most of the Pac-10 this spring, what are your impressions?
Ted Miller: Obviously, we'll have more on this going forward with a spring wrapup, but here are some quick hits.
My top three remain: USC, Oregon and Oregon State.
Every team has significant questions. It doesn't seem like there's a national title contender.
USC's defensive line is going to be strong, and I think the Trojans will again rank among the nation's elite in defense in 2010.
That's why I favor the Trojans at present. That and QB Matt Barkley appearing ready to take a significant step forward.
Washington's offense is going to be very good if the O-line stays healthy.
UCLA's and Arizona State's offenses will be better.
Arizona is a top-25 team if it gets solid play at linebacker, but that's a significant "if."
Washington State is the clear choice for No. 10, but the Cougars will not be the patsies of 2008 and 2009.
You could throw Arizona, Arizona State, California, Stanford, UCLA and Washington into a hat and randomly pick their order and probably be as accurate as what you'll read among preseason predictions from publications and pundits.
At this point, 2010 looks to be a black-and-blue season. Hard to imagine the eventual champion going undefeated in league play. Things might end up like last year, when the conference had a lot of ranked teams, just none near the top of the polls.
Scott from Palo Alto writes: Let's put Andrew Luck in perspective to help jog readers' memories... very few turnovers... back-to-back victories over Oregon and USC. Did we mention he was a mere freshman? I think you have to be amazed by Luck overall and I'm sorry but Stanford vs. Oregon was not a game for the defensive-minded. We put the pedal to the medal and outscored them when they were considered the hottest team around.
Ted Miller: No question Luck looks like a budding star after leading the Pac-10 in passing efficiency as a redshirt freshman. He looks, at this point, like a future first-round NFL draft pick. Perhaps a top-10 pick. Or higher.
However -- you knew that was coming -- any quarterback will tell you having the nation's best running back vexing a defense makes it easier to throw the ball. Toby Gerhart rushed for 1,871 yards and 28 TDs last fall. Every defender Luck threw against was leaning forward on its toes thinking one thing: "Gerhart... hope he runs to the other side."
Luck is in luck that he's got almost his entire receiving corps back and the Cardinal offensive line should again be solid. There is no reason he can't be an elite QB in a conference loaded with elite QBs.
Still, don't take for granted a blockbuster season. It's possible that it will take time for the Cardinal offense to reinvent itself with Gerhart off the the NFL.
Nick from Washington D.C. writes: I have been a Duck fan for most of my life and growing up in Portland, it always felt like we were the dark horse... My question is this: Has Chip Kelly turned the corner? Even with all the haywire crazy that is the athletic department, are we now a legitimate year in year out contender?
Ted Miller: Oregon has won nine or more games six times over the past 10 seasons. And during that decade, it suffered only one losing season.
The Ducks are no longer darkhorses. They are perennial contenders, a second-tier power rating a step below programs such as Texas, USC, Florida and Ohio State.
If your question is will the Ducks make that next step and become an equal to those schools, my guess would be no, not on an annual basis.
Why? Start with population base. Those four schools have huge head starts in recruiting.
Moreover, what's the common denominator for nearly all BCS football champions? Big Stadiums. The only team that won a BCS title that doesn't play in front of home crowds of 80,000-plus is Miami, which is smack-dab in the middle of prime recruiting real estate.
That doesn't mean Oregon can't regularly beat the superpowers and contend for a national title every few years. They've proven they can.
The program's momentum under Kelly, despite the recent bad off-field news, is clearly positive. The distance between what the program was in the "old days" and present is significant.
So, yeah, Oregon has turned the corner. What benchmark challenges are ahead? Win a Rose Bowl in the modern era. Or a national title.
Bill from Oakland writes: Why is it that when an offense/defense performs well in a Spring Game all the talk is about how the other side of the ball struggled and not about how good the offense/defense may be? It happened with Cal and their defense performing well and with Oregon and their defense performing well too. Is it all about perspective and expectations? With both Cal and Oregon their offenses were thought to have some issues (Cal more than Oregon) so is it just everyone saying I knew that would be a problem, instead of looking at the possibility that maybe the defenses are good?
Ted Miller: Well, obviously when a team is scrimmaging against itself any success on one side of the ball means failure on the other.
Still, it's not that difficult to figure out if a unit is playing poorly or is simply getting beat by outstanding opposing talent.
For example on offense: penalties, missed receivers, unblocked defenders, fumbles, dropped passes, a QB with happy feet not seeing open receivers, etc. Those sorts of things indicate a poor offensive performance.
Same thing for defense: penalties, wide-open receivers, missed tackles, multiple explosion plays, huge holes through the line, etc. Those sorts of things indicate a poor defensive performance.
Moreover, a person can make distinctions. If Oregon State defensive tackle Stephen Paea whips an opposing offensive lineman one-on-one, you sort of go: "Well, Paea's a beast." But if you see a starting offensive tackle getting whipped by a junior what's-his-name defensive end, you might wonder how he'll do against, say, Ricky Elmore or Nick Perry.
Michael from Houston writes: I think that a lot of Oregon State fans are tired of reading about how dominant our defensive line looks. Last spring and fall, I constantly took in all the stories I could about how dominant the defensive line looked, yet we all know how poorly the sack total was for the defense last year. So here we are again with a new year, but with the same stories of dominance by the D-Line. At this point, I'm having a real hard time buying into this idea. I sorta feel like it's déjà vu all over again. Is it truly possible to get a good take on a position (O-Line, D-Line, Secondary, etc) from Spring reports?
Ted Miller: The Beavers defensive line looks like a bunch of petunias.
Well, see above for some explanation. Does a dominate D-line suggest a weak O-line during spring? Which comes first, the chicken or the egg? If a tree falls in the woods, will it leave?
My impression from my one day at Oregon State is both Beavers lines should be better in 2010 than 2009. Paea is the Pac-10's best defensive tackle and end Gabe Miller looks poised for a breakout. Obviously, the D-line would be better if end Matt LaGrone didn't quit and the O-line will look better when it gets some guys back who are sitting out spring with injuries, including tackle Michael Philipp and guard Grant Johnson.
It's possible, in fact, that the D-line looks so good because the O-line is beaten up.
But to your final question: You really don't know how good a team is until it plays a real game. And recent history has taught us that Oregon State often takes four or five games to find itself anyway.
Jacob from Myrtle Point, Ore., writes: Ted Miller, pardon my informality, but you are the man!! This blog has kept me sane throughout the offseason, especially as a Duck fan. One quick question for you: can you use your powers to talk either Oregon or Oregon State into putting its Spring Game later/earlier in the day on May 1!? I know that the UO game is scheduled on ESPN2, and I could TIVO it and go to the OS game, but it just isn't the same! I could go to the first part of the Beaver scrimmage then fly (no pun intended) up I-5 for the Duck game, but that really takes a hit on beverage choice. Miller, I ask your professional advice!! What should I do!?!?
Ted Miller: No, you're the man.
Couple of ideas. First, you could replicate yourself. Not only could you be in two places at one time, but you could make a third and force him to be the designated driver.
You could hire the Flash to carry you back and forth.
As for my professional take: It's my responsibility to recommend against seeing both games, particularly if you plan to wear Ducks colors at Reser Stadium.
But your obsessiveness is certainly admirable.