Pac-12: Washington Huskies

Mailbag: Can Utah go bowling?

October, 1, 2014
Oct 1
Welcome to the mailbag. Please give this to your car care professional and have an A1 day. If you feel so compelled, click here to follow me on Twitter.

JR in Salt Lake City writes: Of all the (many) bad losses Utah has had since it joined the PAC 12, WSU was, for me, the most puzzling and frustrating loss. I have been a big supporter of Coach Whit and his program, but my patience is starting to dwindle. Utah won the turnover battle, special teams and had a huge lead at home(!) -- the Utes can't lose that game. Assuming Utah continues to lose at the rate it’s been losing in conference play, and doesn't manage to get to six wins, is there any way Coach Whit keeps his job? I think that the answer is no, and I think that is why this loss is so depressing. I don't see three more wins on the schedule. I hope I am wrong.

Kevin Gemmell: First, you are correct. It was a bad loss. I’ve been making the radio rounds this week, including Salt Lake City, and what I’ve been saying is that there are no injury excuses to fall back on this time. You had a healthy quarterback and two opportunities at the end of the game to drive for the win.

On the first drive, which started with 4:51 left in the game, the Utes were only able to move from their 28 to their 49 before failing on fourth down. On the second drive, they moved from their 20 to their 38. There were some bad overthrows by Travis Wilson. But there was also one key drop by the normally sure-handed Dres Anderson.

After the Utes went up 21-0, a wise sportswriter sent out this tweet:

Now, do I think there are three wins out there for Utah? I do. Heck, I think there might even be four. Utah is going to win a game they aren’t supposed to. Because they are a good football team. The defense is stout, the special teams are as good as any in the country and they are getting better at running the football. I’ll be mildly surprised if the Utes don’t make a bowl game this year. I’m eye-balling the road games at Oregon State and at ASU as the two swing games.

And even if the Utes don’t make a bowl game, I don’t see Whittingham getting fired. I think he deserves at least one more year considering all he’s done for the program and having to adjust to life in a Power 5 conference. It doesn’t happen overnight. But if there isn’t more progress after five seasons, then I think we can have that discussion.

But no doubt about it. If Utah wants to be taken seriously, that was the sort of game it needed to win.

Trojan in Michigan in Ann Arbor writes: As someone who's access to Pac 12 games is somewhat limited (except for USC), was Hundley/UCLA's performance really that dominant? Or did ASU forget to pad up for this one? Reading the stat line is why I ask: almost half of Hundley's passing yards came off of 2 throws. There were five UCLA TDs of 80+ yards including the INT and KO returns - the Payton TD came on clearly broken defensive play, didn't see the other run and catch (were they broken too?). Take away those plays and does UCLA look efficient? The backup QB for ASU passed for 488 yards. It doesn't seem like defense was much of a factor here, on either side of the ball. In other words, I'm suspicious of games like these. But I'm also a nervous Trojan fan, fearing that both of these offenses are solid, while taking solace in some out-to-lunch type defenses.

Kevin Gemmell: The “take away” argument doesn’t really work for me. Because you can’t take it away. It happened. And thus it’s part of the game.

But OK, I’ll play along. Let’s take away the two 80-yard touchdowns to Eldridge Massington and Jordan Payton. What are we left with for Brett Hundley? 16-of-22 for 195 yards, two touchdowns, no interceptions and 72 rushing yards and a score. There’s not a coach in America who would say no to a 72 percent completion percentage, three scores and no turnovers out of his quarterback.

As for the rest of the game, UCLA dominated special teams and they dominated defense. Yards, schmards. You give an offense like ASU's extra possessions, of course they are going to get yards. But yards never won a football game. Keeping the other team off the scoreboard does.

I thought this was a very dominating performance by UCLA.

Brett in Madison, Wis., writes: Hello!We've got team power rankings, and QB power rankings from you all, but if you had to do phase power rankings (i.e. offense, defense, special teams), what would those be at this point in the season?

Kevin Gemmell: As of today? I’ll just hit the top five. Not going based of any rankings. Just my gut from what I’ve seen.

  1. Oregon
  2. Cal
  3. UCLA
  4. Arizona
  5. Washington State

Shouldn’t be too much debate here. All five of these teams are capable of big numbers.

  1. Stanford
  2. UCLA
  3. Washington
  4. USC
  5. Oregon

Stanford is clearly No. 1. UCLA is solid from front to back and Washington’s front seven is amazing. USC and Oregon aren’t perfect. But they have the athletes to make up very good units.

Special teams
  1. Utah
  2. UCLA
  3. Washington
  4. Arizona
  5. Stanford

These last two get a little tricky, because the Cardinal are very good at returns and coverage, but not so much in field goals. Arizona is very good at field goals, but not so much in returns. I think the top two are interchangeable and Washington is a slight notch below them.

Pac-12 morning links

October, 1, 2014
Oct 1
"It says here breakfast anytime?"
"That's right."
"I'll have the pancakes in the Age of Enlightenment please."

Leading off

It's depth-chart Wednesday. As we do every week, here are the links to the teams playing this week followed by any significant notes. Washington is on bye this week, so we'll update the Huskies next week. The other 11 teams are in action. UCLA is the only team that doesn't do a weekly depth chart. Enjoy! Notes
  • At Arizona, despite being listed the first four weeks as a potential starter at strong linebacker, Makani Kema-Kaleiwahea is officially off the depth chart after announcing his transfer. He didn't record a tackle in the first four games (depth charts are so awesome!).
  • At Cal, Y receiver Stephen Anderson has dropped the "or" next to his name with Darius Powe.
  • At Colorado, Jimmie Gilbert moves into the starting spot at right defensive end.
  • At Oregon, it looks like there are two scenarios for whether Jake Fisher returns this week. It's either Fisher at LT, or Tyrell Crosby. If Crosby moves, Matt Pierson moves from left to right tackle. In special teams, Thomas Tyner is listed as the first kick returner and Charles Nelson is listed first at punt returns.
  • At Oregon State, Siale Hautau moves in at left tackle for the injured Jalen Grimble (see story below). And it looks like Trevor Romaine is back to full-time kicking status.
  • At Washington State, Sulaiman Hameed moves up to start at strong safety, while Darius Lemora moves to free safety.
Heisman chatter

The Heisman Pundit has released its weekly straw poll. As always, it is made up of 10 anonymous Heisman voters. And despite a bye week, Oregon quarterback Marcus Mariota hasn't slipped a bit. Here are the results of this week's poll. Mariota received seven of the 10 first place votes.
  1. Marcus Mariota, QB, Oregon -- 23 (7)
  2. Todd Gurley, RB, Georgia -- 18 (3)
  3. Kenny Hill, QB, Texas A&M -- 7
  4. Amari Cooper, WR, Alabama -- 5
  5. Ameer Abdullah, RB, Nebraska -- 4
  6. Melvin Gordon, RB, Wisconsin -- 2
  7. Jameis Winston, QB, Florida State -- 1
Chip Patterson of CBS also weighs in on Mariota and notes that Brett Hundley climbed back into the conversation with his performance against ASU.

Tune in

Yours truly joined ESPN Radio 1080 The Fan in Portland last night if you're aching for some pod.

News/notes/team reports
Just for fun

USA Today wants to know which team has the best helmets? ASU and Oregon are in the discussion.

Speaking of the Ducks, their unis for this week.

Pac-12 by the numbers: Week 6

September, 30, 2014
Sep 30
Here's another look at random stats pertaining to the Pac-12.


Arizona at No. 2 Oregon
  • Oregon has scored 50 points off turnovers, the most in the Pac-12.
  • Oregon QB Marcus Mariota's 13 touchdowns without an interception are the most in the country. He went 10 games without a pick to start last season and had 25 touchdowns before finally throwing one ... against Arizona.
  • Arizona leads the Pac-12 and is sixth nationally averaging 593.8 yards per game.
  • Oregon ranks No. 1 in the nation in yards per play (8.14).
  • Arizona QB Anu Solomon's 1,454 passing yards in the second most among freshmen in the country.

No. 14 Stanford at No. 9 Notre Dame
  • Stanford ranks No. 1 in the country in scoring defense (6.5 points per game), total defense (198.o ypg) and passing defense (74 ypg). The Cardinal defense has allowed just two touchdowns in four games.
  • The Stanford defense's average starting field position (21.6-yard line) is the most advantageous in the country.
  • Stanford's Peter Kalambayi is the only player in the Pac-12 with more than two sacks and an interception.
California at Washington State
  • More penalties have been committed against WSU (41) than any other team in the Pac-12 -- 24 of those have come with the WSU defense on the field.
  • Cal ranks No. 5 in the country in scoring offense (47.5 ppg).
  • WSU QB Connor Halliday has attempted 60 more pass than anyone else in the country. He's also the national leader in completions (201), passing yards (2,318) and passing touchdowns (20).
  • Cal's Jared Goff isn't far behind Halliday. He's ninth in the country averaging 337 yards passing per game and his touchdown/interception ratio of 17 to 3 is among the best in the country.
  • Against FBS teams, Cal and WSU have combined to score 72.5 points per game and allow a total of 75.5 points per game.
Oregon State at Colorado
  • Oregon State ranks No. 16 in the country in total defense (306.5) and No. 2 in the Pac-12.
  • Oregon State (18) and Colorado (17) rank No. 1 and No. 2 in the country in total first downs received from opposing penalties.
  • Colorado's 138 first downs ranks No. 2 in the country behind only Texas A&M.
  • After catching 19 passes and three touchdowns against Cal, Colorado WR Nelson Spruce leads the country in receptions (56), receiving yards (697) and receiving touchdowns (10).
  • The 123 yards Oregon State QB Sean Mannion threw for against USC last week was the least he'd ever thrown for in a game he started.
Arizona State at No. 16 USC
  • USC's turnover margin (plus-seven) is sixth-best in the country; ASU (plus-one) is tied for No. 52.
  • ASU is the least-penalized team in the Pac-12 (5.5 per game).
  • USC QB Cody Kessler's 10 touchdowns without an interception are the second-most in the country behind only Mariota.
  • ASU WR Jaelen Strong has accounted for 33.3 percent of the Sun Devils' receptions, the second-most in the Pac-12.
  • ASU RB D.J. Foster averages 5.02 yards per carry before contact, which is the most among Pac-12 running backs.
Utah at No. 8 UCLA
  • Both defenses -- Utah (75.5 yards to goal) ranks No. 8 and UCLA (75.1) is No. 11 -- have an average starting field position that ranks among the country's best.
  • Utah's Kaelin Clay leads the nation with four return touchdowns -- only two other players have at least two.
  • Utah's Andy Phillips is one of two kickers in the country who has made at least five field goals from 40-plus yards.
  • With 47 tackles, three for loss, a pick-six and a forced fumble, UCLA LB Eric Kendricks is making a strong case for Pac-12 Defensive Player of the Year honors.
  • UCLA RB Paul Perkins has 214 yards rushing after contact, the second-most in the Pac-12 behind only ASU's D.J. Foster (224).
Past weeks
Week 1
Week 2
Week 3
Week 4
Week 5

Pac-12 morning links

September, 30, 2014
Sep 30
I spent four lonely days in a brown L.A. haze, and I just want you back by my side.

Leading off

It's time to take our weekly stroll through The Eliminator. Not that one. This one. (But kudos to you if you know the reference).

The good news is, no Pac-12 teams were officially "eliminated" this week, per our Mark Schlabach. But a few teams were relegated to the "on the fence" category. One-loss Stanford and USC were already dangling. This week they are joined by Arizona State, Oregon State, Utah and Washington -- all who dropped their first games of the season over the weekend.

Here's Schlabach's take on the Huskies:
After trailing Georgia State by 14 points at home two weeks ago and then mustering little offense in a 20-13 loss to Stanford on Saturday, we're guessing the Huskies won't be occupying this spot for very long. Washington coach Chris Petersen was so desperate to generate some sort of offense against the Cardinal that he tried a fake punt on fourth-and-9 at his team's 47-yard line midway through the fourth quarter. It was stuffed for no gain, and Stanford quarterback Kevin Hogan ran for the go-ahead touchdown five plays later.

Three Pac-12 teams officially remain in contention. That's Arizona, Oregon and UCLA. Of course, one of those teams won't be undefeated by the time Friday morning rolls around. The Ducks and Wildcats are set to square off Thursday night in Eugene.

More playoff projections

If you believe Yahoo's Pat Forde, then we're finally going to get to see the matchup we've dreamed about for years in the College Football Playoff: Oregon vs. Alabama. Forde projects the Ducks as the No. 2 seed and Alabama as No. 3 team. His take on the Ducks:
Oregon has won six straight Pac-12 home openers, and none of them has been close. Average score in routs of California (2013), Arizona (2012), Cal (2011), Stanford (2010), Cal (2009), and Washington (2008): 46-13. And three of those opponents were ranked at the time. Next: Sorry, Arizona, you’re the opening Pac-12 cannon fodder in Autzen Stadium on Thursday night.
Stewart Mandel of Fox Sports has the Ducks as the No. 3 seed facing No. 2 Auburn. There's also some good stuff on Notre Dame-Stanford.

Tune in

Yours truly joined Bill Riley and Sean O'Connell on ESPN700 in Salt Lake City yesterday if you're aching for some pod.

News/notes/team reports
Just for fun

It's been a long, long time since we've seen a Cal locker room celebration. This was awesome.

Warning: Bold Week 6 Pac-12 declarations

September, 29, 2014
Sep 29
Declarative sentences are dangerous heading into Week 6 of a college football season. History has taught us most things that appear ready to be tied neatly with a bow end up torn to shreds. But danger is the Pac-12 blog's middle name. (We just thought "Pac-12 Danger Blog" might scare some folks away and damage advertising revenue).


Oregon's visit to UCLA on Oct. 11 will be what we thought it would be in August

Sure, both/either the Bruins and Ducks could fall this week at home, going down to Utah and/or Arizona, and we'd pin that on the proverbial "look ahead." But the expectation is that won't happen. The Utes lost some gusto while surrendering a 21-0 lead at home to Washington State, and Arizona is more than a three-touchdown underdog in Autzen Stadium.

[+] EnlargeMarcus Mariota, Devon Allen
AP Photo/Dean HareMarcus Mariota and Oregon will try to avoid a letdown this week against Arizona.
While neither the Bruins nor Ducks have been consistently impressive, they have produced the loudest national statements in the conference thus far. UCLA posted a dominant road win at Arizona State, while Oregon overwhelmed Michigan State in the second half.

What's most notable about the Ducks-UCLA matchup is its potential for a rematch in the Pac-12 championship game, as both appear to be front-runners in their respective divisions. Not to look too far ahead, which we are clearly doing, but that could create a quandary for the College Football Playoff. It certainly would make it more difficult to get two Pac-12 teams into the playoff.

Of course, if both arrive at the game -- and that's obviously no guarantee at this early juncture -- with multiple losses, the issue is moot. But play out the various scenarios of zero, one and two losses for each in your head. What if they split close games? What if, say, Oregon is the nation's only unbeaten team but UCLA's only defeats are close losses to the Ducks?

It could get complicated. Good thing we can call such speculation "way premature" in order to avoid taxing our brains with the myriad possibilities.

The Pac-12 needs Stanford to beat Notre Dame

If Stanford wins at Notre Dame, the Cardinal will likely jump into or at least be very close to the Top 10, which could give the Pac-12 three Top 10 teams heading into Week 7. If the Cardinal lose, it will become a big hit for them and the Pac-12 as a whole.

While the Pac-12 is widely viewed as the nation's No. 2 conference, probably by a wide margin, and its 22-4 record versus FBS foes is impressive, there already have been substantial damaging defeats.

Most obviously, whatever USC accomplishes this year will be diminished by the loss at Boston College. If the Trojans had lost amid a flurry of turnovers and miscues, that's one thing. The problem is that defeat was all about getting whipped at the line of scrimmage on both sides of the ball. That rates as a physical issue, which is a very football-y thing.

Washington State's losses to Rutgers and Nevada also will hurt because the Pac-12 blog suspects the Cougars are going to give a lot of conference teams trouble this season, witness the so-close performance against Oregon and the huge comeback win at Utah. The Cougs are a solid team, much better than they showed against the Scarlet Knights and Nevada, which by the way are a combined 7-2. But that won't prevent pundits and rival fans from using the transitive property against the Pac-12 when the Cougs notch an upset or two.

Yet if Stanford beats Notre Dame and surges into its Nov. 1 date at Oregon with just one defeat, the Pac-12 might produce a second Top-10 matchup in less than a month. That's the sort of thing the SEC does, which inspires all that media gushing that so annoys many of you fine people.

Bottom line: A road win over No. 9 Notre Dame would provide a significant perception boost and a loss would do the same in a negative direction.

The middle stepped back instead of forward

Washington and Oregon State could have made big statements on Saturday. They didn't. Therefore that velvet rope that has separated both from the North Division VIP room, uncomfortably shared by Oregon and Stanford, is still there, still manned by a couple of beefy security guys.

You probably could say the same for Utah, which looked like a potential South contender before it completely collapsed against the Cougars. The jury is still out on Arizona State, which is dealing with an injury to QB Taylor Kelly and a not-ready-for-prime time defense. We'll see where Arizona stands Thursday at Oregon.

Despite many unanswered questions, the overall feeling about the challenging middle of the Pac-12 feels different than it did in August or even a few weeks ago. It doesn't appear as rugged. There seems to be some separation between Oregon, UCLA, Stanford and -- perhaps -- USC and the rest of the conference, though the Trojans could topple if they lose at home to the Sun Devils on Saturday.

Washington was a preseason Top 25 team, and Oregon State and Utah looked like threats to advance into the rankings. No longer. At least not at this point.

That is not to say teams can't get healthy, solve issues or simply grow up and then go on a run. In fact, it's reasonable to suspect that among the gaggle of Arizona, Utah, Washington and Oregon State, at least one will end the season in the Top 25.

At this point, however, there's little to suggest we will have an unexpected interloper breaking through in either division, challenging the consensus preseason favorites.

Pac-12 morning links

September, 29, 2014
Sep 29
I have watched you on the shore;
Standing by the ocean's roar.
Do you love me? Do you surfer girl?

Leading off

Two weeks in a row, two Hail Marys. Par for the course in the never-dull Pac-12. Lots of crazy action this past weekend (and last Thursday). Big special-teams moments, defensive touchdowns, and the Cougs and Bears won games with -- wait for it -- huge defensive plays at the end of their games. We have officially entered Bizarro World. And I don't want to go back.

Still offenses are what drives the Pac-12. So it seems timely that ESPN's Brett McMurphy, as part of his weekly survey, polled coaches on who is the best of the best when it comes to offensive X's and O's. Here are the top five:

Also receiving votes were Mike Leach, David Shaw, Mike Riley, Chris Petersen, Rich Rodriguez and Steve Sarkisian.

Through five weeks, here's how those top five coaches rank in scoring offense:
  • Briles (1)
  • Malzahn (15)
  • Sumlin (2)
  • Spurrier (55)
  • Helfrich (4)

Worth noting that there are five Pac-12 teams ranked in the top 20 nationally in scoring offense. Besides Oregon, Cal is fifth and Arizona, Utah and ASU are all tied for 17th with an average of 42 points per game. Obviously, conference play will scale down those numbers. But no offensive conversation is complete without injecting some Pac-12 flavor.

Rank 'em

The latest rankings are out and our Kyle Bonagura, as always, gives you the weekly impact on the Pac-12. You can see the complete rankings for both polls here. This is where the Pac-12 teams stand. As always, AP rank is listed first, followed by the coaches poll.
  • Oregon 2-4
  • UCLA 8-9
  • Stanford 14-13
  • USC 16-20
  • ASU RV-24

Also receiving votes in the AP poll, besides ASU which dropped from the top 25, were Arizona and Washington. Arizona is also receiving votes in the coaches poll.

Here's how a couple of writers who cover the league voted:
And here's a look at the top 10 of the ESPN Power Rankings:

News/notes/team reports
Just for fun

Decorum (and pesky copyright laws) prohibit me from posting vines of broadcast games. But please, do yourself a favor. Go to Andy Phillips' Twitter account and enjoy.

In case you missed it, second Hail Mary in as many weeks. Who doesn't get sick of watching these (OK, Cal and Oregon State fans, you're excused from answering).


Pac-12 bowl projections: Week 5

September, 28, 2014
Sep 28
Well, that was interesting.

Remember how we talked about Utah-Washington State being a swing game? If the Cougars can somehow rally to find four more wins and the Utes can't find three, we're going to look back at the Cougs' 28-27 come-from-behind win as a tipping point.

The same could be said for Cal, which pulled off a double-overtime win against a feisty Colorado team to pick up win No. 3.

Let's begin with the Utes, who once again started hot in nonconference play, only to see things fall apart once league competition started. Can't blame this one on injured quarterbacks, because Utah had two opportunities in the fourth quarter with its starter to make something happen. The Pac-12 blog still thinks there are three wins out there for Utah. Of its eight remaining games, three of them are against unranked teams. The rub is that all three are on the road.

Cal also has five ranked teams still on the schedule, and the three remaining against unranked teams -- Washington State, Washington and Oregon State -- are critical. Two of the three are on the road. We're adding Cal to the projections this week. We like its moxie.

As for the Beavers, boy, that offense didn't look good. Given OSU's three unimpressive wins and one very bad loss, we're going to drop them from the projections for now, but as always reserve the right to change our minds.

We're down to just three undefeated teams left: Oregon, Arizona and UCLA. And 10 teams are either halfway to a bowl game or beyond.

Here are the latest projections. As always, salt heavily.

College Football Playoff: Oregon
Fiesta Bowl: UCLA
Valero Alamo Bowl: Stanford
National University Holiday Bowl: USC
San Francisco Bowl: Arizona
Hyundai Sun Bowl: Washington
Royal Purple Las Vegas Bowl: Arizona State
Cactus Bowl: Utah
Heart of Dallas Bowl*: California

* at large

UCLA jumps to No. 8 in AP poll

September, 28, 2014
Sep 28
Resting at home for the weekend, Oregon still was able to inch closer to Florida State in the latest AP poll.

Oregon remains at No. 2, but picked up an additional two-first place votes (up to 13) this week after Florida State struggled defensively in a 56-41 win at NC State. However, this week’s poll also saw a rise from Alabama, which also received 13 first-place votes after receiving seven last week.

But enough about Oregon, this week was all about UCLA. The Bruins jumped three spots to No. 8 -- passing Notre Dame, Michigan State and Ole Miss -- after their impressive 62-27 win at Arizona State. The performance knocked the previously 15th-ranked Sun Devils from the poll all together; however, Arizona State is still ranked No. 24 in the coaches' poll.

Stanford improved two spots to No. 14 after its 20-13 win at Washington and USC is back to No. 16 after its impressive 35-10 win at home against Oregon State.

This week marks the first poll of the season in which the Pac-12 had just four teams ranked. Arizona State, Arizona and Washington all received votes.

The first set of rankings from the College Football Playoff Selection Committee will be released on Oct. 28 on ESPN.

What we learned in the Pac-12: Week 5

September, 28, 2014
Sep 28
Some things we learned about the Pac-12 in Week 5:

UCLA and QB Brett Hundley are what we thought they'd be: UCLA answered a variety of questions in its 62-27 win over Arizona State, starting with Hundley's health and continuing with whether this team was overrated in the preseason. While it wasn't a perfect performance -- the defense needs to play better -- it was a dominating one on the road against a ranked team. As for Hundley, he might return to the Heisman picture after completing 18 of 23 passes for 355 yards with four touchdowns, no interceptions and a 97.7 QBR. Perhaps its time to ease up on nitpicking the Bruins over their lack of style points. Is your team 4-0?

Arizona State's young defense is going to be a problem: The preseason story with the Sun Devils was veteran, explosive offense paired with a completely rebuilt defense. Sometimes preseason stories don't hold up as young players step up. Sometimes they do. This one did. The Sun Devils are likely to improve on defense this season, but they're likely going to win a bunch of shootouts to be a factor in the South Division. Against UCLA, they yielded 580 yards -- a stunning 10 yards per play -- and gave up eight plays of more than 20 yards.

[+] EnlargeStanford's Kevin Hogan
Steve Dykes/Getty ImagesKevin Hogan pulled out a victory for Stanford, but the Cardinal offense still has significant red-zone problems.
Stanford's defense has replaced key 2013 pieces; offense hasn't: Stanford again looks to have the Pac-12's best defense, despite losing stars such as LB Shayne Skov, OLB Trent Murphy and safety Ed Reynolds, among others. The Cardinal held Washington to 179 yards and 15 first downs in a 20-13 victory after similarly dominating USC (291 yards). Yet the offense, which has replaced four offensive linemen and RB Tyler Gaffney from the 2013 unit, has been sputtering, particularly in the red zone. Stanford scored one touchdown in five red zone trips against USC and scored two touchdowns in five red zone trips against the Huskies, including a late touchdown run from QB Kevin Hogan that proved to be the game-winner. The good news is the offensive problems, including missed field goals from veteran kicker Jordan Williamson, are solvable. Not to use a coaches' cliche, but it's purely a matter of execution.

Washington is not ready for prime time: Washington was inconsistent during a 4-0 run through a weak nonconference schedule. At times, the defense or offense looked good, but often not at the same time and certainly not for four quarters -- or even three. There was some thought everything might come together in front of a raucous crowd Saturday against Stanford. Nope. While the defense played well, pressured Hogan consistently and contained the Cardinal running game, the offense was abysmal. Yes, Stanford is good on defense, but the Huskies have one of the nation's most experienced offensive lines and a good corps of receivers. The Huskies had just one sustained drive and averaged 3.4 yards per pass and 2.1 yards per run. The Huskies' problem under Steve Sarkisian was getting past Stanford and Oregon in the Pac-12 North. It seems unlikely that will happen this year, either, in season one under Chris Petersen.

California has moved out of the Pac-12 basement: Cal and Colorado are both trying to move out of the bottom of the Pac-12 and become at least competitive. Last year, Cal didn't win a Pac-12 game, and Colorado's only conference win was over Cal. Both have looked much improved in the early going this season. But Cal's thrilling 59-56 win in double-overtime provides the Golden Bears a big boost. For one, the Bears, at 3-1, can legitimately entertain bowl hopes. In a game in which QBs Sefo Liufau and Jared Goff both threw for 449 yards and seven touchdowns, the Bears found a way to win, which is particularly meaningful after they suffered a heartbreaking loss at Arizona the week before via a Hail Mary. That might be enough, at the very least, to ensure they don't end up at the bottom of the conference by season's end.

Utah wilted; Washington State stepped up: Utah led 21-0 after one and 24-7 at halftime, but the Utes offense never got untracked -- one TD came from the defense, another from special teams -- while Washington State refused to yield on the road. The end result was a critical 28-27 victory for the Cougars, who couldn't afford to lose if they wanted to retain bowl hopes. It seemed as though the Utes tried to sit on the lead. That was a mistake. It might turn out to be meaningful that Cougars coach Mike Leach called a special first-quarter time out and gathered his team for a pep talk. Utah's Pac-12 woes continue, and the Cougs can hope this serves as a springboard for the rest of the season.

We were deceived by early USC, Oregon State results: USC's 35-10 win over Oregon State seemed to make two things clear: 1. The Beavers' 3-0 start against a weak nonconference schedule was meaningless in terms of projecting forward against good Pac-12 teams. 2. USC's shocking loss at Boston College was probably an anomaly. While it's premature to count Oregon State out of the North Division hunt, it's difficult not to see the defeat at USC as a bit of an exposure. And USC has enough on both sides of the ball to become a factor in the South race.
SEATTLE -- Stanford quarterback Kevin Hogan knows he's lucky.

Not because of anything specific in Saturday's 20-13 win at Washington -- it was the type of win the Cardinal has grown accustomed to over the past three years. Lucky, because the Stanford offense, thanks to its defense, plays by a different set of rules.

First to 20 points wins? Not even.

Through four games, the Stanford defense has allowed a grand total of two touchdowns. Forget limiting 300-yard passers; the Cardinal has allowed just one 100-yard passer and has now allowed fewer than 30 points in a nation-best 27 consecutive games. New defensive coordinator Lance Anderson's unit not only looks the part of the Pac-12's best defense, but is also playing as well as any in the country.

"It might be on us tonight [when the team returns to Palo Alto],” said Hogan, referring to how the offense can thank its counterpart.

[+] EnlargeStanford's Peter Kalambayi
AP Photo/Elaine ThompsonPeter Kalambayi (three sacks) and the Stanford defense held Washington to just 179 total yards.
Coming into the season, it was fair to question how good the Stanford defense could be. After losing six significant contributors and coordinator Derek Mason, it was only natural. But Shaw's decision to promote Anderson, the program's longest tenured staffer, and willingness to rotate in younger players over the past few years has paid off so far.

Not only has the Cardinal defense avoided taking the vaunted step back, but both the eye test and numbers say it has done the opposite. Playing on the road for the first time this year, Stanford limited Washington to 81 yards rushing and 98 yards passing and allowed the Huskies to enter the red zone just once.

Besides a 77-yard touchdown drive in the second quarter, Washington had the ball in Stanford territory on just two other occasions. The first came following an interception at the Stanford 39-yard line, and the second came after the Huskies started their final drive at their own 48.

"Congratulations to our defense. Once again, they won the game for us,” coach David Shaw said. "As for the rest of the team, if we can stop turning the ball over, stop having penalties that take points off the board and stop missing field goals, we have a chance to be really good. How good? I don't know. But we will never reach our potential if we keep going backwards.”

Stanford's problems on offense weren't as costly as they were in the Week 2 loss to USC -- when a lack of red zone production changed the outcome -- but it's hard not to see the what-could-have-been parallels. This time, it was because of turnovers.

Two lost fumbles -- one ripped out and returned 32 yards for a touchdown by Shaq Thompson and another at the Washington 11 -- completely changed the complexion of the game.

"Without the turnovers, I don't know if this is a one-score game,” Shaw said.

Stanford's defense, for just the third time in the past 43 games, didn't force a turnover. Before Saturday, FBS teams that were minus-three in turnovers were just 5-14 this season.

Shaw's right that it probably should have been more than a one-score game, but there's also the other side of things to consider: Washington has one of the most talented defenses around. Marcus Peters, who intercepted Hogan, and Thompson, who forced both fumbles, are both potential first-round NFL draft picks. And up front, tackle Danny Shelton and pass rusher Hau'oli Kikaha are also among the nation's best at what they do.

"We certainly did enough [defensively] to win, and I am proud of those guys for that,” said Washington coach Chris Petersen, who lost for the first time at his new school. "If we keep working, those guys will get there. They held a good offense to 20 points, and that should be good enough to get some things done.”

As for the offense, Petersen had no answers.

"We have to go back to the drawing board,” he said. "We have to get our quarterback some answers for sure. We need to be able to run the ball better and figure out how we're going to throw the ball down field better. There were some protection things, and our run game was nonexistent in the second half.”

The Huskies will have some time off to get those things cleaned up before a much different test Oct. 11 at Cal.

Stanford doesn't have the same luxury. The Cardinal travels next week to No. 8 Notre Dame, where it lost in 2012 -- a game that might have cost Cardinal a chance to play for the national championship.

It hasn't forgotten.

A monstrous Stanford defensive performance overcame offensive struggles, and the Cardinal escaped Seattle with a 20-13 win.

How the game was won: The Cardinal delivered one of the best defensive performances of the Jim Harbaugh-David Shaw era. They limited the Huskies to 179 total yards and a measly 2.6 yards per play. Redshirt freshman Peter Kalambayi was one of the unit's biggest stars, sacking Washington quarterback Cyler Miles three times. This rock-solid performance on the defensive side of the ball helped Stanford overcome three turnovers and more offensive struggles in scoring range.

Game ball goes to: Kalambayi, Zach Hoffpauir, James Vaughters and nose tackle David Parry will have to share this one, though the entire Stanford defense probably deserves a piece after that smothering effort. Hoffpauir broke up a pair of critical passes and also snuffed out a fake punt, Vaughters led the team with nine rugged tackles (including two for loss), and Parry maintained his rigid, block-consuming presence in the middle. In 16 quarters of play this season, Stanford's defense has allowed only two touchdowns.

What it means: After losing in Week 2, No. 16 Stanford desperately needed this win to stay on track in its pursuit of a College Football Playoff berth. It's now clear that the Cardinal and Oregon are again the two teams to beat in the Pac-12 North. Stanford delivered a championship-caliber defensive performance; now, it needs the offense to follow suit. Washington, meanwhile, must pick up the offensive pieces. Its secondary showed marked improvement today, but the running game just wasn't there for the Huskies in the second half. Miles struggled as a result.

Best play: Ty Montgomery bowled over several Washington defenders during his 17-yard touchdown catch in the second quarter. Somehow he was able to bulldoze his way into the end zone without stepping out of bounds. A guy who's one of the speediest wide receivers in the country is not supposed to have the strength of a fullback, but Montgomery does (that looked like a Toby Gerhart run). NFL scouts are salivating.

What's next: This is widely considered the most brutal part of the Cardinal's schedule, and now they've secured a win during the first leg of a two-game road trip. A visit to Notre Dame is next. This is the first loss of Washington's season. The Huskies now enter a bye week. They have a chance to right the ship at Cal on Oct. 11 before visiting Oregon the following week.

Pac-12 viewer's guide: Week 5

September, 27, 2014
Sep 27
A look at Saturday's schedule in the Pac-12. All times ET.

4 p.m.

Colorado at California, Pac-12 Networks: Raise your hand if you expected Cal to be the Pac-12's biggest weekend favorite at some point this year. Well, that's the position the Bears (minus-14) find themselves in after having their hearts ripped out at Arizona last weekend. The general public certainly expects Sonny Dykes' team to bounce back, but be mindful of the explosive capability that Colorado's Nelson Spruce brings to the table. Oh, and Cal has outscored teams by 77 points in the first half before being outscored by 33 in the second half, the biggest differential (110 points!) in college football this season.

[+] EnlargeChris Petersen
Otto Greule Jr/Getty ImagesAfter a 4-0 start in nonconference play, Washington's Chris Petersen will coach his first Pac-12 game at home against Stanford.
No. 16 Stanford at Washington, Fox: Every year, Washington seems to have an early, massive measuring-stick game, and this is certainly one that will gauge the Huskies' ability to contend in the Pac-12 North. This contest might feature the best two defensive front sevens in the conference. But Washington's young secondary has struggled so far this season (475 passing yards and more than 10 yards per attempt given up to Eastern Washington). Can this unit contain Stanford's big, talented group of receivers? That is likely to be the critical question on what's expected to be a pristine afternoon in Seattle.

8 p.m.

Washington State at Utah, Pac-12 Networks: After seeing the scare that Washington State put into Oregon last week, Utah might not want to get too far ahead of itself against the Cougars. But it must be noted that this is a golden opportunity for the Utes: Win and they'll be undefeated heading into a litmus-test showdown with 4-0 UCLA at the Rose Bowl next week. Wazzu, though, desperately needs this game. Connor Halliday's numbers can make your head spin, but high-scoring losses are no longer enough for a team that has stumbled out of the gate at 1-3. There's some explosive playmaking ability on both sides of this one, so expect an entertaining game in Salt Lake City.

Oregon State at No. 18 USC, ESPN: USC has had two weeks to think about an abysmal defensive performance in which Boston College racked up 452 rushing yards. The Trojans' defense resembled a sieve while the Eagles' read-option rushing attack poured the water. USC returns to the comforts of the Coliseum but will face a different, yet equally dangerous, offensive threat. Oregon State quarterback Sean Mannion is less than 1,000 yards away from the Pac-12 all-time passing record, set by former Trojans quarterback Matt Barkley. Mannion's sharp performance last week against San Diego State should have USC's defense on alert to get its act together Saturday night.

Happy Friday -- even you, Arizona State. World didn't end Thursday.

You can follow me on Twitter here.

To the notes.

Jockston from SEC country writes: UCLA is good on offense, but it can't play defense, so it can't win a championship because defense wins championships. When does Pac-12 figure this out?

Ted Miller: Wait. Defense wins championships? Why didn't anybody ever mention that before?

UCLA didn't distinguish itself defensively against Arizona State, a very good offensive team, but its defense wasn't as bad -- and, yes, it feels strange typing this -- as 626 yards surrendered suggests.

It was a strange game. UCLA scored so fast that Arizona State got a lot more possessions than is normal. The Bruins nearly scored a point (62) per play (58), while the Sun Devils scored 27 points in 105 plays. The Bruins averaged 10 yards per play, which is good, while the Sun Devils averaged 6.0 yards per play, which is middling.

Middling? Well, for example, Alabama yielded 5.7 yards per play in a 33-23 win over West Virginia. Against that same Mountaineers offense, Oklahoma yielded 6.3 yards per play in a 45-33 victory.

How strange was the UCLA-ASU game? The Bruins scored a decisive 21 points in the third quarter while losing the time-of-possession "battle" 11:51 to 2:57.

As for the defense, scoring is what matters most, and UCLA pretty much held the Sun Devils to just 10 points over the final three quarters (ASU scored a touchdown 26 seconds into the second quarter). If you had told Jim Mora before the game that the Sun Devils would score 27 points, I'm pretty sure he would have given you a high five. Or maybe hit the floor to do the famous Mora breakdance "windmill" he likes to do when he's really happy.

What do we know? from Tatooine writes: Was the UCLA offense really good or was the ASU D really bad? ASU may have been slightly better with [QB Taylor Kelly] ... but not much (minus-14 points?). ASU hasn't really played anyone until now and they barely beat Colorado.

Ted Miller: We can't know how Arizona State would have done against UCLA with Taylor Kelly at QB because of this pesky thing called the "space-time continuum."

As for "Was the UCLA offense really good or was the ASU D really bad?" it's a little of both. Before the season, we thought the Bruins offense would be pretty darn good, and it's trending that way after some early struggles as the O-line improves. And, before the season, we thought the Sun Devils defense would struggle to replace nine quality starters.

It also is true that Arizona State fans probably got caught up in their preseason optimism, which often refuses to acknowledge obvious weaknesses. When the Pac-12 blog wrote about the Sun Devils' defensive questions, the mailbag was glutted with angry missives such as, "Do some research -- we've got loads of quality young players!" or "We've got these great JC transfers!" or "You hate Arizona State."

The obvious preseason question for Arizona State is likely to continue as the obvious season issue: Can the high-powered offense outscore foes because the defense is going to struggle?

Understand: Arizona State isn't going to be an easy out. The UCLA game was, to use Todd Graham's descriptive term, a "catastrophe." I don't think we'll another one of those this season.

Thomas from Charlston, N.C., writes: Last week's Cal vs. Arizona amazing game ended at nearly 2 a.m. on the East Coast. Last night's UCLA vs. ASU game ended after 1 a.m. East Coast time. It is no wonder that the Pac-12 gets no respect as its teams are playing when only the Pacific states are watching. I thought Larry Scott was going to have Pac-12 kick off times earlier this season, and going forward? It appears the commish didn't do anything. Could you shine light on this?

Ted Miller: See, Apollo, the narcissist, leads his chariot across the sky from east to west, meaning the sun comes up earlier in the east and sets later in the west. That causes it to be 9 a.m. in Bristol, Connecticut, when it's an ungodly 6 a.m. in north Scottsdale, at which point my bosses -- sunny and caffeinated -- are calling to tell me to do stuff with a complete lack of concern about where Apollo and his chariot might be in the western sky.

The UCLA-ASU game Thursday wasn't going to be scheduled for 4 p.m. PT so it could be a nice prime-time event for fans in Atlanta or Miami. Why? Largely because the game was being played on the West Coast, where a 4 p.m. kickoff would have taken place just as Lumbergh would have stopped by Joe Bruins' or Sandy Sun Devils' desk and noted they'd forgotten to put the new cover sheet on the TPS reports, and that they'd have to redo, like, 3,454 of them. Now.

The Pac-12 signed a $3 billion TV contract with ESPN and Fox, which means the TV times are typically going to be what is optimal for the networks.

That said, there has been an effort to reduce the late kickoffs. This weekend, the only 7:30 PT kick is Oregon State at USC, which figures to get plenty of eyeballs -- East and West -- on ESPN.

Frank from Tucson writes: I saw some criticism from various folks on Twitter, both prior to and following ASU's defeat yesterday, of Todd Graham's declaration that his team was of a "championship caliber." What is the Pac-12 blog's opinion of coaches such as Graham who willingly place high expectations on their teams, vs. others such as Rich Rod, who avoid stating expectations in favor of "just trying to figure out how to get a first down."

Ted Miller: I love this question, for this is very real.

You have coaches who believe in unmitigated, relentless optimism, which looks like irrational exuberance if actual play doesn't match preseason effervescing. Yes, Graham is that sort of coach. In the spring, he worked me over pretty good telling me he didn't expect much drop-off from his defense.

Then you have the grumps. Instead of pumping their team up, they work them over, telling them they're no good. Yes, Arizona's Rich Rodriguez is that sort of coach. He'll tell you he wants his guys to be "comfortable being uncomfortable." He also worked me over pretty good this summer trying to convince me his receivers actually weren't as talented as folks were writing -- "I haven't seen it!" he kept saying.

Does that mean Rich Rod is a player-hating ogre? No. See this video. It's just his management style, which has worked pretty darn well throughout his career.

And does this mean Graham is a soft pollyanna? Heck no. I've seen -- heard -- Graham get crusty, and he can let the spittle fly with every bit the fervency of Rodriguez.

By the way, there's also a third type: The straight-shooter. Utah's Kyle Whittingham pretty much tells you what he thinks of his depth chart -- "We're good here; we're questionable here; we're young but talented here; and we're really searching here" -- and his analysis, in my experience, tends to hold up when games begin.

My view is it's the media's job to know who they are dealing with and to keep in perspective what that coach is saying.

Kenny from Portland writes: Oregon State hasn't had dominating final scores, but they have dominated in three key statistical categories for their success: time of possession (average nearly 14 mins more than opponents), total yards (average 195 more yards per game than opponents), defensive third-down conversion (25 percent). These are old school, pre-2009 OSU football numbers. Grind out the games, boring offense, stout D. USC got shellacked by Boston College. And Stanford beat Stanford more than USC beat Stanford. I know OSU hasn't played any world-beaters yet, but aside from USC's starters, the depth isn't there for them, and I'm having a real hard time seeing OSU not coming out of L.A. with a win. Win the turnover battle and the game is ours. Am I being a crazy Beavers fan? This is as confident as I've been about a conference game in a long time.

Ted Miller: Oh, no, Kenny. You're not crazy. I can't understand why every Oregon State fan wouldn't be as confident. I mean, I remember back in 1960 when you guys last beat USC in Los Angeles. ... wait, I wasn't alive. So, no, don't remember that at all. But a 22-game losing streak against the Trojans in L.A. shouldn't rock your confidence.

We kid!

I liked the Beavers' chances better before wide receiver Victor Bolden got hurt, but this is definitely an intriguing matchup. We don't yet know either team. We don't know the Beavers because they haven't played anybody, and we don't know the Trojans because they've been a bit schizophrenic.

I like how the Beavers' defense matches up with the USC offense, but the bigger question might be how well the Beavers run the ball. If they can run the ball, life is going to be much easier for quarterback Sean Mannion.

Joel from San Francisco writes: I've noticed that the last three days of Pac-12 morning links include links to USC stories that require paid subscriptions (in these cases, the L.A. Times). Is it possible to link to free stories or pay my L.A. Times subscription fee?

Ted Miller: We try to link to good stories. Sometimes, those stories are behind a pay wall. What you should do is subscribe to newspapers that have stories in them you want to read.

I know everyone loves free stuff and the free info on the Internet. And many, for whatever reason, perversely seem to enjoy the demise of newspapers.

But I will tell you this: Without traditional newspapers, which attempt to provide quality, objective journalism, you will end up with just agenda observers -- folks with various types of filters and biases who don't aspire to be true journalists -- monopolizing the flow of information.

While fan sites and even in-house team coverage have their place, a real newspaper beat writer who aggressively covers the good and bad and holds programs accountable is irreplaceable.

I just hope you don't learn that when they are all gone.

Pac-12 morning links

September, 26, 2014
Sep 26
Happy Friday!

Leading off

It looked like we were going to get another ASU-UCLA thriller last night. The Sun Devils were poised for at least a field goal to tie things up at 20-20 at the half. And then Ishmael Adams went all Ishmael Adamsy. A 95-yard pick-six in the closing seconds of the half, a 100-yard kick return and an all-out second-half flogging by the rest of the Bruins led to UCLA's 62-27 victory in Tempe.

The teams combined for 1,206 yards of offense. Brett Hundley was 18-of-23 for 355 yards with four passing touchdowns and one on the ground. Mike Bercovici, filling in for the injured Taylor Kelly, was 42-of-68 for 488 yards with three touchdowns, but two interceptions.

This sort of sums it up:

Here's a recap of the game from Yahoo! Sports.

And another from the Arizona Republic.

And some running commentary from the L.A. Times so you can relive all of the thrills and chills.

Picks are in

Fridays are a good time to round up some picks from across the conference. The Pac-12 blog released its picks on Thursday morning (KG and CJ are off to a nice start). You can check those out here. Here's what some other folks are writing about Week 5 in the conference. No weakness? Know weakness

Your team is perfect, right? All is right with the world. Whatever perceived imperfection is simply a concoction of the media/Pac-12 blog and you will defend your team tooth and nail. Buuuuutttt ... in the event there is something wrong, Jack Follman of Pacific Takes is going to remind you of it.

Follman broke down the weakness of every Pac-12 team. Picking a team totally at random, here's what he had to say about USC:
I went against straight up saying USC can't stop the run, before they bottled up Stanford fairly well and I think their colossally bad run defense performance against Boston College had more to do with their lack of depth than straight up run defense.

It's one thing to have preseason question marks. But when those questions are still being asked in Week 5, it's officially a weakness.

News/notes/team reports
Just for fun


The UCLA football twitter account was bringing the funny last night.

Shaw, Petersen share mentoring role

September, 25, 2014
Sep 25
When Stanford and Washington kick things off Saturday afternoon, Mike Sanford will be nearly 1,400 miles away in Colorado Springs. Boise State’s new offensive coordinator will be going through the Broncos’ final preparations for their game with Air Force, but there’ll also be a part of him wondering what’s going on in Seattle.

Without the two head coaches opposing each other at Husky Stadium -- Stanford’s David Shaw and Washington’s Chris Petersen -- Sanford wouldn’t be where he is today. Not from a philosophical coaching standpoint, nor from a literal one.

As Stanford’s quarterbacks coach and recruiting coordinator last year, Sanford was preparing for the Rose Bowl when it was announced that Steve Sarkisian was leaving Washington to return to USC. The potential domino effect immediately piqued his interest.

[+] EnlargeDavid Shaw
AP Photo/Matt YorkBoth coaches in Saturday's Stanford-Washington tilt, David Shaw (pictured) and Chris Petersen, had a profound effect on Boise State offensive coordinator Mike Sanford's career.
“I always thought that Coach Pete would be a good fit [at Washington],” said Sanford, a former Boise State quarterback who had Petersen as a position coach for four years. “And if he went to Washington that probably meant there would be a whole new staff at Boise State.”

Since spending time as a graduate assistant at UNLV in 2005-06 under his father, Mike Sanford Sr., Sanford made it abundantly clear to those he worked with that he could eventually return to Boise. Until being hired onto David Shaw’s first staff at Stanford in 2011, he made every attempt to make that happen.

“Anytime [Petersen] had an assistant coach opening on staff, he knew he could expect a text or a phone call from me,” Sanford joked this week. “Him and Coach Shaw both received plenty of text messages from me over the years about jobs.”

However, it wasn’t until Petersen officially left Boise and was replaced by Bryan Harsin, also a former Boise State quarterback, did Sanford see a real possibility for a return. Nearly a year earlier, on Christmas Day 2012, shortly after he accepted the head coaching job at Arkansas State, Harsin reached out to Sanford about becoming the Red Wolves’ offensive coordinator.

“I really thought about it, but I didn’t want to leave Stanford after just two years,” Sanford said. “'At some point,’ I told him, ‘I think this might happen for me to work with you.’ Sure enough, when he got hired at Boise State, I texted him and asked if had time to talk.”

Harsin didn’t need any convincing. Sanford, widely considered one of the brightest young coaches and recruiters in the country, was a big coup for the first post-Petersen staff at Boise State.

But before he pursued it fully, Sanford first went to Shaw.

“I was really quite nervous having that conversation with Coach Shaw about this job,” he said. “I went in there asking him for advice, more so than saying, ‘I’m going to do this.’ I asked him what he’d do in my situation and he was great.

“He told me, ‘There’s nothing like coaching at your alma mater, if anyone knows that, it’s me. You got to take this job; it’s a great opportunity for you. You love that place.'”

That sealed it.

“Mike was really instrumental in our success here,” Shaw said. “And if there was one place he loved as much or maybe slightly more than Palo Alto, it was Boise. Being a Boise State alum ... he and his wife always loved it there. They talked about retiring there and that’s where they wanted to live and raise their children. So when the opportunity came up for him, it was too good to pass up.”

Support like that part of why Sanford credits Shaw as one of the three most influential coaches he’s ever been around, with the other two being his father, who is now the head coach at Indiana State, and Petersen.

"Playing for Coach Petersen I just respected everything about him as a coach," Sanford said. "The biggest thing about him was the unbelievable standard he had for himself, the offense, the quarterback position. You wanted to strive, strive, strive to put forth a performance that what worthy of meeting the standard he set out there."

For Petersen, Sanford’s rise in the coaching ranks has come as no surprise.

“I’ve really enjoyed watching his career progress and climb and all of that and I had no doubt that he would do some good things and get to where he wanted to be one day,” Petersen said. “Once he got through the process of playing and all those things and sat down and figured out what he wanted to do, he put his sights on the bullseye and was charging hard.”

And thanks to an assist from Petersen, he's back where he wanted to be.



Thursday, 10/2
Saturday, 10/4