Print and Go Back SweetSpot [Print without images]

Wednesday, May 6, 2009
Angels' weakness a strength?

Craig Calcaterra notes a surprising turn of events out west: The "little bit of news" is about John Lackey's super rehab start in the minors last night; looks like he'll be back soon. The story about Mike Butcher (the excerpt of which I snipped) is about him shepherding Shane Loux through bases-loaded jams in his last two starts. I looked up the stats, and it's true: Angel starters have combined for the best ERA in the American League.

So why (I wondered to myself) are the Angels 12-13? And how can they have a 4.85 team ERA that's just ninth-best in the league?

The answer is simple: as good as the Angels' starters have been, the Angels' relievers have been worse. Their starters are 11-5 with a 3.60 ERA; their relievers are 1-8 with a 7.44 ERA. When writing about Mike Butcher, then, would it be indelicate to mention that his magic with the starters doesn't seem to work with the relievers?

I don't really believe in magic. Anaheim's starters have averaged 4.5 strikeouts per nine innings. They've not walked many batters, which is admirable. But they've been lucky. Really lucky. Meanwhile, the Angels' two best relievers have combined for a 6.04 ERA despite striking out 31 in 22 innings. They've been unlucky. Really unlucky.

At the risk of seeming ... well, something, I have to suggest that the Angels teach us little except that just about anything can happen in 25 games.