Print and Go Back ESPN.com: SweetSpot [Print without images]

Tuesday, October 26, 2010
Do expanded playoffs mean shorter season?


Yeah, I'll believe this when it actually happens:
This is one of those times when I wish the inmates weren't co-running the asylum. Because, quite frankly, I couldn't care less about the players' feelings about these things.

But the players' feelings do matter, which is why the math never seems to work. If you play fewer games, you negatively impact revenues. Which hurts the players' feelings (and the owners', too). If you add another round to the postseason tournament without playing fewer regular-season games, now you're playing World Series games in the middle of November. Which nobody wants. Not until they start playing the Series in Hawaii or Florida or Southern California every year.

The "solution" here is incredibly simple, and everyone knows it ...

Doubleheaders.

If every team hosted just one day-night doubleheader per month, adding another series wouldn't push the postseason schedule any further into November.

Yes, all these doubleheaders would make the managers (and the general managers) lives a little harder. But they're already carrying 11 or 12 pitchers. Just make sure that one of them has the stamina to go five or six innings, and do some managing. In the old days, teams played dozens of doubleheaders every season, and got by with nine-man pitching staffs. I'm not saying it would be easy. But it could be done.

Which isn't to suggest I'm recommending these things. If they want to add another "round" of playoffs, I would prefer a one-gamer pitting two wild cards against one another, on the Tuesday after the season ends. Which wouldn't mean changing the schedule at all.

But if there's going to be a radical change in the postseason format, something somewhere else has to give. And since nobody wants to give up any revenue, that probably means the players have to give up some of their time. If not their precious off-days, then maybe some of their Saturday afternoons.