On less meaningful receiving yards

March, 21, 2014
3/21/14
2:21
PM ET
No receiving yards are completely meaningless. They show up in the stats of the pass-catcher and the quarterback and they count in the game.

But if you’re trailing by four touchdowns late and the defense is in prevent and most concerned with keeping you in bounds and keeping the clock running, a long reception certainly means less than it does in a tight game against tight coverage.

Chase Stuart of footballperspective.com knows his formula for “meaningless receiving yards” is flawed, but it’s still something very interesting to consider.

Jacksonville’s Ace Sanders led the league in percentage of receiving yards that lacked great meaning with 57.5 and with a percentage of meaningless targets with 53.7.

The Titans figure prominently in the list of 31 here.

Of Chris Johnson's 345 receiving yards, 33.6 percent ranked as meaningless by Stuart’s formula. Delanie Walker was at 23.1 percent.

And four Titans were over 20 percent of meaningless receiving targets: Kendall Wright at 27.3, Walker at 26.7, Nate Washington at 25.7 and Johnson at 23.1.

The piece is worth a look.

Paul Kuharsky | email

ESPN Tennessee Titans reporter

SPONSORED HEADLINES

Comments

Use a Facebook account to add a comment, subject to Facebook's Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. Your Facebook name, photo & other personal information you make public on Facebook will appear with your comment, and may be used on ESPN's media platforms. Learn more.