TrueHoop: Royce Young

TrueHoop TV Live

December, 17, 2014
Dec 17
Strauss By Ethan Sherwood Strauss
Join the yuletide fun at 3 p.m. ET.

TrueHoop TV Live

December, 12, 2014
Dec 12
Elhassan By Amin Elhassan
It's Friday. See you at 2 p.m. ET!

TrueHoop TV Live

November, 12, 2014
Nov 12
Strauss By Ethan Sherwood Strauss
Join the fun at 2 p.m. ET.

Thunder trouble?

October, 29, 2014
Oct 29
Haberstroh By Tom Haberstroh
Tom Haberstroh checks in with Royce Young on the laundry list of issues in Oklahoma City ahead of the season opener.

Let the Month of Westbrook begin

October, 29, 2014
Oct 29
Young By Royce Young

Nothing in sports is more unpredictable than Russell Westbrook. I don’t even mean on a game-to-game basis. I mean on a play-to-play basis. We know he’s a fantastic player. We know he has outrageous talent. We know he can lose control and self-destruct. We know he can take your breath away while simultaneously taking over a game.

What we don’t know, though, is how or when those things will happen, especially for the next month or so. That’s what makes watching him so addicting.

The Thunder’s previously consistent infrastructure has been shaken by a flurry of injuries, most notably to the league’s reigning MVP. Subtracting Kevin Durant is bad, but to make it way worse, the Thunder will travel with only nine healthy players for an opening back-to-back road trip against the Trail Blazers and Clippers. Here’s the Thunder’s complete bench for their first two games: Nick Collison, Kendrick Perkins, Sebastian Telfair and Lance Thomas, who only recently made the team off a training camp invite. That’s it.

Westbrook already had an incredible burden on him to carry a contender for a month without Durant. Now, at least to start the season, he has to do it relying on the likes of Andre Roberson and Perry Jones.

Durant took full advantage of a similar situation last season when Westbrook was out, putting together a historic January that catapulted him to his first MVP trophy. The way Durant went to another level while lifting his teammates to a higher place was downright religious. So there’s a natural expectation that Westbrook will take his turn and showcase his leadership chops.

But Westbrook’s situation is not at all equal to the one Durant was placed in last season. First, there is no sensible backup to slot into Durant’s role. When Westbrook was absent for 36 games, Reggie Jackson was able to somewhat mimic the All-Star point guard, at least to the degree the Thunder didn’t have to completely reinvent themselves. Second, Westbrook is going to start the season not just without Durant, but without Jackson, Jeremy Lamb and Anthony Morrow. So outside of Serge Ibaka his next top offensive threat is Collison, who averaged 4.2 points per game last season.

Undoubtedly, there will be a rush to judgment after the Thunder’s first game. If Westbrook struggles, the narrative will be ready to roll off the assembly line, pinning the blame on him and the fact he was unable to play the alpha role he presumptively has always wanted. That the pecking order between Westbrook and Durant has officially been established and emblematic ownership of the team cemented.

What’s important to remember, though, is this is just October. The games are no less important in a pure statistical manner, but with a wider lens, there’s plenty of time to recover. Durant will return and, assuming good future health, the Thunder will resume their place in the top tier of Western contenders. Regardless of how the Thunder fare in this short window, the Westbrook-Durant relationship is already on a solid foundation. There won’t be any hierarchical questions popping up.

In the meantime we’re going to watch an uncaged Westbrook, released on the court with instructions to only survive. He’s going to have to battle his own competitive instincts to assume all responsibility and attempt to score 80 of the team’s 90 points each night. At his core, Westbrook is a basketball Rambo, a maverick loner fully willing to go rogue when necessary. He relishes being told he can’t. It’s never about asking why; it’s always about asking why not. He’s said all the right things so far about playing as a team and just sticking to his job, but Westbrook is pretty good about saying things and doing other things. It’s not that he’s intent on ball-hogging for 38 minutes and ignoring teammates. It’s that his domineering gravitational pull can sometimes make it seem that way.

“It’s not about me. It’s about our team. I can’t win games by myself. I can’t do anything by myself,” Westbrook said. “I kind of want to take the attention off me and put it more on the team. Everybody keeps asking what I’m going to do and how I’m going to change. I think it’s more about our team and what we can do.”

The Thunder have spent the summer and training camp attempting to install a more socialistic offense, with increased movement, passing and spacing. All good things in theory, but let’s see what happens if Westbrook spends three quarters swinging passes around as the Thunder slip behind by double-digits. As if Westbrook isn’t going to bulldoze his way to the rim with straight-line drives the next 16 possessions.

That’s what we’re in for over the next four to six weeks as Durant recovers. Westbrook may put up five triple-doubles and average 28-8-8. Or he may shoot 34 percent from the field and turn it over six times a game. Or he may do both. He's a maniac with tunnel vision only for winning at all costs. With him backed into a corner, his survival instincts are about to kick into overdrive.

The Thunder are bound to struggle as they muddle their way through this rash of injuries. They’ve managed these kinds of situations before and have a system in place to persevere. They say this is just about an opportunity to get better, for others to develop and grow. But forget that. It’s about the full-on unfiltered Russell Westbrook Experience. It will be exciting, it will be terrifying, it will be thrilling, it will be horrifying, it will be exhilarating.

This is the Month of Westbrook. Embrace the chaos.

Preparing for life without Kevin Durant

October, 17, 2014
Oct 17
Young By Royce Young
Kevin DurantAP Photo/Brett Deering, FileIt's hard to picture the Thunder without Kevin Durant, but the team is prepared for the possibility.
Scattered last year along the three interstates that surround downtown Oklahoma City were billboards featuring different duos of Thunder players. Reggie Jackson with Serge Ibaka. Russell Westbrook with Thabo Sefolosha. Kevin Durant with Nick Collison. Never, though, would you see one with Westbrook and Durant, the faces of the franchise, together. And you definitely wouldn’t see Durant, the soon-to-be league MVP, by himself.

On the surface it seems like innocuous, inclusive marketing. But it was all very intentional and very purposeful. The moment the franchise loaded the trucks and relocated from Seattle to Oklahoma City, sporting a new name and new colors, there was a plan in place for when Durant left -- whether it happens in 2016 or 2026 or 2036.

Operating in such a small market, the Oklahoma City Thunder organization has a vision to remain an entity unto itself. The team still sells its electric superstars to keep the ticket booths busy, but there has been a clear effort to keep the city aware that the Thunder aren’t just Kevin Durant’s team. They’re Oklahoma City’s team.

The reasoning is simple: players come and go, but the franchise is forever. Spend years presenting the team as the Oklahoma City Durants and you’re left without any identity when he retires, or, gasp (!), leaves. And in a place like Oklahoma City, hardly the glitziest or most glamorous NBA destination, it’s a sound and necessary strategy.

In just six seasons, the Thunder have etched themselves into the fabric of the city and state. One of the main motivations for the city approving tax after tax to entice an NBA team to relocate here was so when you Googled “Oklahoma City” the browser would autofill with something other than “bombing.” In less than a decade, the franchise has not only overcome the SEO robots, but it's also loosened the stranglehold the state’s two biggest colleges have had the past century. Durant, Westbrook and the Thunder draw equal amounts of attention and adoration as any Heisman Trophy winner or legendary college football coach. Which, around here, was once unthinkable.

But although the franchise is certainly enjoying the spoils of Durant’s rise on the court, it’s created a potential problem off of it: He’s become so popular that he has outgrown even the Thunder’s best efforts to redirect focus toward the organization.

Durant is reaching Peyton Manning-level commercial exposure. Jay Z is (sort of) his agent. He was honored with the league’s highest individual award last season and pulled in the second most All-Star fan votes. He had his own movie, is on the cover of basketball’s biggest video game and has an HBO reality special coming this fall. At this point, he may be worth more than the franchise itself -- Clay Bennett and his ownership group purchased the SuperSonics in 2006 for $350 million; Durant signed a 10-year deal with Nike in September that will pay him upward of $300 million.

Given how identifiable Durant has become with the Thunder, it’s hard not to wonder what would happen to the franchise if he did indeed leave. The intricate plan of general manager Sam Presti, the bond with the Oklahoma City community, the endless sellouts and profit margins -- does any of that stuff continue without No. 35? Heck, even the team’s name and logo seem decent because of Durant and how cool he is. What would the Thunder be without the guy who, for all intents and purposes, is the Thunder?

For six to eight weeks, they’re going to find out. A “Jones fracture” in Durant’s right foot will sideline the Thunder star for at least the first month of the season. The injury marks the first time Durant will miss double-digit games in his seven seasons in the league, giving Oklahoma City its first look at life without KD.

The Thunder, of course, have options to fill the void. While no player can recreate what they’ll lose from Durant, the succession plan in OKC is a well-established and important one to the team's long-view approach. Instead of making big splashes in free agency, Presti has put his faith in drafting and development, sometimes to the chagrin of fans. While that has meant missing out on the likes of Pau Gasol, despite Durant’s best efforts, it has allowed the small-market franchise to prepare in advance for the potential departures of its own players. Sefolosha, a long-time starter, signed in Atlanta this offseason, but the Thunder drafted a similar player in Andre Roberson in 2013. Mitch McGary was drafted in this year’s first round as a potential replacement for Collison, who is 33 and in the final year of his contract.

[+] EnlargeKevin Durant
AP Photo/Eric GayKevin Durant's broken foot will give Oklahoma City its first look at life without its superstar.
But replacing an MVP in his prime for good simply can’t be done. And while the pending free agency of their superstar in 2016 is already exhausting, recent comments -- both by Durant and others -- have made the possibility of him bolting to a franchise other than the one that drafted him No. 2 overall in 2007 a very real one.

A summer of speculation has split the fan base into those in denial that Durant would ever actually leave and one beset with crippling fear that it might happen. Presti, on the other hand, said this past summer that he’s “looking forward” to the star’s free agency. He sees it as an opportunity to lock up a foundational player long-term.

“We know it’s there, and we are looking forward to it -- the opportunity to re-sign a legacy player -- especially when you consider where our team could be at that point, with two more years of experience and cohesion and taking that into account,” Presti told USA Today. “We have to honor the season in front of us, because we have a tremendous opportunity to win right now and continue to build the tradition of the Thunder. We are fortunate to be in this position, and we want to capture and respect this moment. We have to put that anticipation in its place for now and not allow ourselves to get distracted from the present, regardless of what the future could look like for Kevin and the organization he has built with us, brick by brick.”

Presti’s perspective is admirable, and given Durant’s history -- specifically his history of success -- with the team, it seems as though the Thunder will be able to make the best case to him. But the shadow cast by that decision will only grow larger as we get closer to 2016. And any injury is a piercing reminder of just how fragile title windows can be.

But it's more than the wins and losses. Durant's hasn't only evolved into a brand maybe bigger than the Thunder itself, but he’s essentially become Oklahoma’s global ambassador. He's been in the community about as much as he’s been on the court, ready to step up in the state’s weakest moments. He's been the face of change, turning a place known for tragedy and turning it into something of a burgeoning destination of young business types.

The fan base has had it pretty good in the franchise’s short tenure in Oklahoma City. The Thunder have made the playoffs five times in their six seasons of existence, and they’ve advanced past the first round in four of those postseason appearances. The one season of bad basketball Oklahoma City did watch came in the Thunder’s inaugural season, when simply having a team was more than enough.

What would happen if Durant did leave and the franchise was forced to endure several more like it?

The Thunder have been preparing for that possibility since the beginning.

Royce Young covers the Thunder for Follow him, @royceyoung.

Extension deadline deja vu for Thunder sub

October, 2, 2014
Oct 2
Young By Royce Young
Reggie Jackson, Scott BrooksAP Photo/Eric GayWith the Oct. 31 deadline fast approaching, Reggie Jackson has made his desire to start very clear.
As Reggie Jackson sat at the podium addressing reporters at the Oklahoma City Thunder media day, some soft chatter could be heard in the hallway outside of the interview room. Nothing too loud, just some casual conversation, but enough for one reporter to ask the speakers to stop. It was getting hard to hear.

It wouldn’t have been a problem for any other player, but Jackson talks in a low, sleepy monotone. You could forget he’s speaking sometimes, even if he was right in front of you. Which is a shame, because what he has to say is usually worth hearing. He’s candid. He’s honest. He’s insightful.

That was certainly the case on Monday. With an opening at shooting guard following the summer departure of Thabo Sefolosha, Jackson declared that he wants to start. Badly.

“I want it,” he said. “I feel strong about it. I want to be the starter.”

Jackson is entering his fourth season, which makes him eligible for a contract extension. If both he and the Thunder can’t agree to a new deal by the Oct. 31 deadline, they will, general manager Sam Presti said last week, table the talks and resume next summer, with Jackson then a restricted free agent. Trading him hasn’t been “considered,” according Presti.

[+] EnlargeRussell Westbrook, Reggie Jackson
Layne Murdoch/NBAE/Getty ImagesRussell Westbrook and Reggie Jackson play well side by side, but should they start together, too?
The Thunder, of course, have been down this road before. Three days before the 2011-12 season, the reigning Western Conference champs traded James Harden to Houston, giving a young franchise and its fan base a crash course on the business end of professional basketball. In many ways, the deal still lingers over their six years in Oklahoma.

Jackson is a different player. Sure, both he and Harden rose to prominence in the same electrifying sixth-man role, but Harden was a more accomplished player (21.1 PER vs. 15.4 in their third seasons) with a better pedigree (Harden was drafted No. 3 overall, Jackson No. 24) and a higher price tag (he received the max soon after landing in Houston).

But they do have one big thing in common: Both guys want to be starters.

“What I have always grown up just believing, I want a majority of my time to be spent playing against other starters,” Jackson said. “Growing up I felt it was a cop-out. I want to play against the best, I want to play against Chris Paul, I want to play against Kyrie Irving, I want to be mentioned on the highest of levels.”

Jackson has actually done plenty of that. He checked Paul in much of the Thunder’s second-round playoff series win over the Los Angeles Clippers. He guarded Tony Parker of the San Antonio Spurs in the Western Conference finals. But those matchups are still billed as Russell Westbrook bouts. Westbrook vs. Paul. Westbrook vs. Parker.

Though he has said all the right things about his future with the Thunder -- that he loves Oklahoma City, that he prefers to stay, that he hopes something gets worked out -- what Jackson really wants is a spot on the marquee. But there are a few problems with that.

Officially, Jackson plays the same position as Westbrook. Playing the point guards together works really well -- OKC scored 116.8 points per 100 possessions and allowed 99.0 in 395 minutes with Jackson and Westbrook together -- but starting them together is a different story. Matchups usually dictate when Scott Brooks plays the duo side by side. It was Brooks’ curveball, something he could throw at opponents to knock them off balance. Starting them would take away that option.

It also limits Jackson’s opportunities to find his own rhythm running the second-unit show, not to mention reduces the overall depth of the roster and clogs the floor a bit for Westbrook, Kevin Durant and Serge Ibaka. Jackson is a player who operates with the ball, not typically off it. Closing games, not starting them, is where he makes the most sense.

So, then, what’s the big deal about starting?

“I feel like there’s only three players every generation that make it out to the next class, a guy where you grew up watching him,” Jackson said. “I grew up watching [Michael] Jordan. If I have kids, Jordan is still going to be remembered. I just want to be great. Just want a chance to be great.”

It may be as simple as it’s a self-motivation tactic for Jackson. Maybe he’s the kind of guy who wakes up every morning, looks in the mirror and tells himself he’s good enough, he’s smart enough and doggone it, he should be a starter.

Or it could be that he knows he’ll never be satisfied in OKC, that he’ll always wonder if he could’ve carved out a spot on the NBA’s Mount Rushmore.

“A lot of guys can't or won't do these things because they don't see the value in it,” Nick Collison wrote for GQ a few years ago, on the art of surviving in the NBA as a role player. “Some people look at it as sacrificing your own game for the greater good. This is true to an extent, but you don't just play this way because you are a nice guy and you are willing to let other guys shine. You do it because you want to win, to be a part of a championship team, and you do it because you want to create value for yourself.”

Which kind of player is Jackson?

Harden made his choice three years ago, and because of it, a sense of trepidation lingers over Jackson’s negotiations among the Thunder's fan base. The wounds still haven’t healed.

But Presti isn’t one to talk out of both sides of his mouth. The Thunder are rigid when it comes to their core values; even in the face of heavy criticism following the Harden trade, they never wavered. No splurges in free agency, no panic trades, no overcompensating. Presti never said he wouldn’t trade Harden before the extension deadline, but that’s because no one thought it was possible and therefore never asked.

Instead, the team has relied on developing its own, which is partly what’s landed Jackson at the negotiation table today, with a big payday in front of him.

Will it come from the Thunder, or will another OKC sixth man be cashing a big check from another team yet again?

Ten of the best games in 2014-15

August, 13, 2014
Aug 13
Abbott By Henry Abbott

Henry Abbott and Royce Young look ahead to what could be ten of the best games in upcoming 2014-15 NBA season.

Durant unlikely to follow LeBron's lead

July, 30, 2014
Jul 30
Young By Royce Young
videoKevin Durant is in Las Vegas preparing for the 2014 FIBA World Cup, and all anyone wants to ask him about is 2016.

Durant is saying all the right things, as you might expect, lauding LeBron James' "classy" return to Cleveland, saying he loves Oklahoma City while doing his best to keep the door slightly open for a potential exit. But the questions will only multiply from here. Especially now that James’ homecoming has, in the eyes of some, laid the groundwork for Durant to make a similar move to his hometown of Washington, D.C. In an interview with Darren Rovell, Durant said the speculation has forced him to delete the Twitter app from his phone.

But now, two years away from when Durant will actually be an unrestricted free agent for the first time in his career, plenty of assumptions are being made about the Thunder forward and his future.

Two things about that:

1) Unlike LeBron, who drew all sorts of ire for his Miami move, Durant's approval rating hasn’t wavered. He doesn't need a homecoming to change public perception or increase his branding potential.

2) Durant wants to define his career himself, not be the guy to do what LeBron did. The two are friendly rivals, playing with immense mutual respect, but Durant's pending decision will be his alone. He alluded to as much in his MVP speech:

"When they told me I was going to win this prestigious award, the first thing I did was go to YouTube, and I looked at what LeBron James said a few years ago and what Derrick Rose said,” Durant said. “And I just tried to change it up a little bit. I wanted to come here and hit everybody in the face with what I said so they could feel it. I wanted to leave my mark.”

Durant does love his hometown. In that same speech, he mentioned growing up in Prince George "P.G." County. He has "Maryland" tattooed in giant letters across the top of his back. He has the Washington Nationals logo tattooed above his belly button. He wears a snakeskin-billed Redskins hat after most games. He knows where he's from. He loves where he's from.

But that doesn't necessarily mean he wants to play basketball there. When Durant picked a college in 2007, he didn't stay close to home at Georgetown, or Maryland or Virginia, or even North Carolina. He chose Texas, some 1,500 miles away. He may not be a boisterous leader, but he’s also not one to follow.

“I’m going to do what’s best for me,” Durant told reporters in Vegas. “It’s hard to talk about that right now when I’ve got two years left in Oklahoma City. I’m just going to focus on that. I’m not going to make a decision based on what anybody else does.”

Durant's top priority has always been winning, and with the Thunder, he's done an incredible amount of it. In the past four seasons, he's won about 75 percent of his games, been to the Western Conference finals three times and made one trip to the NBA Finals. Basketball is what drives Durant most. He’s a junkie who can't keep himself off a court. While other Team USA stars have bowed out of the World Cup, Durant is, predictably, ready to go. His decision will likely come down to where he can win next, not where he has won, but the Thunder have two years to prove that their franchise offers the best opportunity to do just that.

You can’t dismiss the emotional connection Durant has built in Oklahoma City, either. D.C. may be home, but Durant has spent his first seven NBA seasons with the Thunder, growing up from a skinny kid who couldn't bench 185 pounds to the league's MVP. Durant often references the team's 3-29 start to the 2008-09 season, a touchstone for him and the franchise, and those kinds of moments are something only the Thunder have had with him.

Over the next two years, the variables leading to Durant's choice will pile up. The bulk of the factors that will influence his decision most haven't even happened yet. Things will change, and so will he. Durant recently told reporters that the reason he signed a five-year max deal with no opt-out in the final year was because he was young and didn't know any better. He's a different person now than he was then.

He'll be a different one in 2016. A man with different goals, different motivations, different desires.

But winning will still be most important to him. The basketball will be the only thing that he follows.

Josh Huestis, first stashed domestic pick?

July, 23, 2014
Jul 23
Young By Royce Young
Josh HuestisMike Stobe/Getty ImagesWhen the Thunder selected Josh Huestis in the first round, they had an innovative plan in mind.
Nobody saw it coming when the Oklahoma City Thunder selected Stanford forward Josh Huestis with the 29th overall pick in last month's draft.

Except, apparently, Josh Huestis.

As noted by Zach Lowe, Huestis and his agent, Mitchell Butler, had a prearranged agreement with the Thunder before the draft. The Thunder would take him with the No. 29 pick in the 2014 draft, but Huestis wouldn't sign his guaranteed rookie contract.

Darnell Mayberry of The Oklahoman laid out the parameters of the innovative agreement last week. Projected by all accounts to be a second-round pick, Huestis elected to become a bit of a draft pioneer, the NBA's first domestic draft-and-stash player. He would leave his rookie contract unsigned, a deal that would pay him somewhere between $750,000 and $900,000, to sign with the Thunder's D-League affiliate instead. Then in a year or two Huestis would, presumably, sign his rookie deal.

It was a clever idea by one of the most forward-thinking front offices in the league. Huestis isn't exactly NBA-ready, but he could potentially be a future replacement for Thabo Sefolosha, who signed with the Atlanta Hawks this offseason. By not signing him immediately, the Thunder aren't clogging a roster spot with a player they won't use and aren't eating up almost a million bucks of cap space on him. And better yet, it stops the clock on Huestis' rookie deal, which would have been only a year behind the one signed by Andre Roberson, a player with similar skills, last season.

Smart, right? The real question is this: Was all this legal, or is Sam Presti the NBA's Wolf of Wall Street?

A pre-draft arrangement like this isn't against the rules, as there are ample amounts of gray area within which to operate. But it's certainly against the spirit of the draft, as Tom Ziller of SB Nation notes. And because of it, one would think the National Basketball Players Association has some interest in this situation. On the surface of this is a first-round pick willingly giving up his guaranteed first-round rookie-scale deal, which locks him into roughly almost $2 million over the next two years and up to $5 million over the next five, for a $25,000 D-League contract.

Why would Huestis agree to this? Because of the potential guarantee of an NBA contract, and thereby bigger overall earnings. By all accounts, it was extremely unlikely that Huestis would be picked in the first round and find himself with a guaranteed deal. He was headed for the second round and was probably going to the D-League regardless. So instead of having to work himself into a future NBA deal, he's simply delaying it. In a roundabout way, it gave him control to pick the team he wanted, and presents him with something he likely wouldn't have otherwise had -- an actual NBA deal. Per his agent, Huestis had interest in doing this only with either the Thunder or Spurs. So think of it like a college grad who really wants to work at Google deciding to take an unpaid internship out of college, turning down a more lucrative offer with a company he didn't think he'd fit as well with.

Now, there are ample amounts of risk in this move for Huestis. What if he blows out his knee or has some kind of medical issue that derails his career? But there was also risk going the other way, getting picked by the wrong team in the second round and watching his career slip away for a shot at a $500,000 nonguaranteed contract.

[+] EnlargeJosh Huestis
Fernando Medina/NBAE via Getty Josh Huestis suited up for OKC in the Orlando Summer League. Is the D-League his next stop?
It's a complicated situation that might be a win-win for both the Thunder and Huestis, but there should be concern with the precedent it could set. Front offices are prone to deception. They promise players they'll select them in the first round if they leave college early. They tell them not to work out for other teams. They tell them they're going to take them no matter what, and then don't. With the way the Thunder operate, regardless of what happens, they're likely to uphold the agreement with Huestis. But would all 29 other teams? At some point, some prospect is sure to get burned.

This isn't the first time Presti persuaded a late first-round pick to work with him. Roberson, the 26th overall pick, signed his rookie deal at 80 percent of its worth last season, reducing the cap hit by a couple hundred thousand dollars. Again, savvy stuff from the Thunder, who are pinching every penny possible in order to avoid the luxury tax for as long as possible. But there's also the unseemly aspect of an organization pulling in almost $30 million in profit strong-arming prospects to take less money.

The obvious question: Why not just take Huestis in the second round if this was the plan? The Thunder didn't have a second-round pick until they bought No. 55 and selected Semaj Christon. Huestis was a surprise pick at 29 to start with, so unless there was a major concern of the Spurs snatching him at 30, why not trade that 29th pick to drop to 31 or 32 and snag Huestis at a spot where his contract wasn't guaranteed? That's what the Thunder did with Grant Jerrett last season and now he has a multiyear deal signed with the team. Problem is, the Thunder would've been rolling the dice on losing a player they liked to someone else. Second-round picks have their own value because the contracts aren't guaranteed. We can assume a team at 31-35 would've bit to move up to 29, but those teams may not have wanted a guaranteed rookie deal on their books either.

Plenty of first-round picks have opted not to sign their first-round deals. In all of those cases, though, they were international draft-and-stash moves, like Serge Ibaka, who stayed an extra season in Spain after being taken 24th overall. The difference between those type of moves and Huestis is that an international player is still making a hefty salary, certainly more than a D-Leaguer's $25,000 a year.

The real issue here isn't with the Thunder or Huestis, it's with the D-League-NBA relationship. The league desperately wants to grow its developmental ground, but with a lot of teams not owning their own affiliates outright and having a one-to-one relationship, there's not enough synergy or continuity. The Thunder have been on the forefront of utilizing their D-League team, but with backward roster restrictions in place, it creates the need to get creative.

The fixes are obvious. One, as Ziller pointed out, is to make a provisional 16th roster spot, one that doesn't count against your cap. Another is more complicated, but probably necessary anyway: Raise D-League wages. If the NBA wants the D-League to become more of a true minor league system, with teams utilizing it as an actual developmental tool, players would need to be able to earn legitimate money there. Probably never to the extent international guys do for CSKA Moscow or Besiktas or whoever, but at least provide a decent financial alternative.

The arrangement between the Thunder and Huestis is not breaking the rules, per se, and it's certainly an advantageous move for the Thunder to pull, and really, good for Huestis. Potentially.

But it could set a poor precedent and open a slippery slope as front offices try to manipulate the cap as much as possible, thereby hurting impressionable players desperate for an NBA contract. Remember: Chandler Parsons was a second-round pick, and after making a couple million dollars, just signed with the Mavericks for $46 million over three years. What the Thunder and Huestis have engineered all works in theory, so long as owners and front offices follow through. But nothing is guaranteed when it comes to this stuff. Well, except for first-round contracts. Or at least they were supposed to be.

What KD can learn from LeBron's decision

July, 16, 2014
Jul 16
Young By Royce Young
Kevin Durant and LeBron JamesIssac Baldizon/NBAE/Getty ImagesKevin Durant faces his own decision in 2016 when he is slated to become a free agent.
Back in 2010, as LeBron James readied to shake the basketball world with Decision 1.0, Kevin Durant had already made and announced his via a simple typo'd tweet.

Durant was cast as a protagonist for the digital age, a star displaying the "right way" to announce a career choice, while James found himself somewhere between He Who Must Not Be Named and King Joffrey on the likability scale.

It was inevitable to compare and contrast. James left; Durant stayed. James took his talents somewhere on television; Durant stayed put in 140 characters or less. There was a certain charm to the misspelling -- "extension" as "exstension" -- that illustrated how little premeditation Durant had seemed to invest, while James had everything meticulously orchestrated for his one-hour special.

What was lost, though, is that Durant actually made the same choice James did some four years earlier. Durant was coming off his rookie scale deal and did what virtually every player in his position does: take a maximum extension. Nobody turns down that money at that time.

Still, there was one big difference between the two extensions. James signed his in 2006 for three years, a strategic financial move that would make him a free agent after seven seasons, which allowed him to get a max at 30 percent rather than 25. Durant, on the other hand, specifically requested there be no early opt-out. This locked him in for the full five years.

Yet even with the gesture -- and all of the nice things he has said about the team and Oklahoma City -- as soon as Durant hit "send" on that tweet, the clock started ticking toward his next decision, the actual decision, the one he makes in 2016 as an unrestricted free agent.

James spent his first seven seasons in Cleveland, falling short of a championship seven times. Durant will spend his first nine seasons with the Thunder franchise and thus far has failed seven times to reach the ultimate goal. Should the Thunder fall short the next two seasons, the assumption is Durant will depart as James did, even if the optics are different.

But there's something for Durant to learn from Decision 2.0. James' choice was painted primarily as a homecoming story, the prodigal son returning to right his wrongs. All true, no doubt. Except there's another, more practical reason he picked Cleveland: sustainability.

In some ways, his departure is what put the Cavaliers in the position to bring him back, meaning they got so bad that they piled up young talent and assets. When James turns 34, Kyrie Irving, the No. 1 overall draft pick in 2011, will be 26. Andrew Wiggins, the 2014 No. 1 overall draft pick, will be just 23. The Cavs provide an opportunity for James to chase a championship for his hometown, and do it over and over again for the next decade. In a lot of ways, James found his Thunder.

Oklahoma City's buzzword from day one has been sustainability, and for the past four years, it has sustained one hell of a run. A winning percentage near .750, three trips to the Western Conference finals, and one to the Finals. In James' final four seasons in Cleveland, the Cavs won 68 percent of their games, made two conference finals appearances, and one in the NBA Finals. For both, there is a common, painful denominator: no championship.

For Durant, when the time comes to make his choice in 2016, it's not going to be about if he won a championship. It's about where he can win his next championship. We can't be entirely sure that had the Cavs won a title with James before 2010 that he would've stayed. We can assume, but we can't know.

That roster, with Antawn Jamison and Mo Williams and Delonte West and Shaquille O'Neal, wasn't built to contend for a decade. It was built to try to appease James on a year-by-year basis. Durant will be 27 when he signs his next contract somewhere, and that decision will be informed by the future, not the past.

Teams are already clearing space to have their pitch lined up for Durant. The Knicks have about $30 million in committed salary for 2016-17, the Nets $6.3 million. The Wizards owe $34.8 million, enough room to fit a max for Durant. The Lakers don’t have a single penny committed. The Thunder have $30.1 million committed, but that’s also their advantage -- because it’s for Russell Westbrook and Serge Ibaka.

The likely market for 2016 doesn’t include a Chris Bosh or Dwyane Wade out there for Durant to team with. Unless Durant wants to play with James, or Kevin Love exercises his player option, the best available free agents in summer 2016 are Dwight Howard (who will be 30), Deron Williams (who will be 32) and Al Horford (who will be 30).

Westbrook will be just 27; Ibaka will be 26.

There is the fact Durant plays in one of the league’s smallest markets and the financial realities that come with that. The Thunder have actively resisted dipping into the luxury tax, which reaffirms the perception that ownership is cheap and unwilling to spend for a contender (this is where you bring up the James Harden trade).

The reality is the team is planning for the future, avoiding years of the luxury tax that would place them as repeat offenders in 2016 and 2017, when they have to re-sign their core. Over-extending for the present is dangerous, and as the Thunder have harshly been forced to learn the past two postseasons with injuries to key players, there are no guarantees. “Going for it” can often only complicate your future.

Maybe Durant will be drawn back home like James, or maybe he'll want the big lights and big pressure of bringing a championship to New York. But what he'll really want is the best possible chance to win. And as long as the Thunder can provide that better than anyone else, his next decision will be just as simple as his first.

Patience is a virtue for young Thunder

June, 19, 2014
Jun 19
Young By Royce Young
Tim Duncan, Kevin DurantNathaniel S. Butler/NBAE/Getty ImagesKevin Durant may not have a title, but the Spurs have shown that the long game is the one to play.

After the Oklahoma City Thunder were eliminated a few weeks ago, you could hear whispers of closing windows and ticking clocks. Another year gone by, another empty season. Is it possible the Thunder were starting to run out of chances? With this much talent, it's title-or-bust, right?

Fans are fickle, fans are frustrated and, above all, fans are impatient. But the Thunder need to be the opposite.

"What clock? There's no clock," Russell Westbrook said at the Thunder's exit interviews on June 1. "I don't believe in saying the time is closing. We have a lot of guys on this team capable of making things happen and our organization has done a great job of putting us in the position to be able win the championship every season. And once it gets to that point, it's on us to make it happen."

Look at the landscape. The Spurs just roared to an incredible championship, but don't forget: The Thunder have had that team's number for a while. They were never able to recover from Serge Ibaka missing the opening two games of the series, but the Thunder were effectively one Manu Ginobili miss away from a Game 7 in the Western Conference finals. The idea that a breakthrough will never come, or that the gap between the Spurs and Thunder is widening, is misguided.

Theoretically, San Antonio will at some point ride off into the sunset. It's not going to be this summer, as the Spurs' principals have all indicated they're ready to come back next season. Then there's Miami, which had every blemish exposed over the past couple of weeks. The Heat won 54 games in the regular season and struggled with consistency issues that we all excused as coasting (in hindsight, they were signal flares).

Even assuming their big three returns, the Heat's future looks iffy. They'll have LeBron James, which is the best possible start you can have to building a contender. But we can all see the hologram dragging around that looks like Dwyane Wade. And Chris Bosh, while absolutely elite, isn't enough on his own to compensate for an aging roster of spare parts.

The Heat could rebuild in a hurry, though, as each of its three stars has an opt-out clause he can exercise this summer. There's talk of Carmelo Anthony, but if the big three were willing to take those pay cuts, the better plan is to use that $14 million or so on two or three good players. That's a reloaded roster. Then again, the market is a bit watered down in terms of impact players to fill out eight or nine spots. The Heat don't have youth, and they don't have many affordable assets.

Tim Duncan and the Spurs have always played the long game, putting a top-tier contender on the floor year in and year out. Build the fortune methodically with a good base and smart investments. Some seasons they finished on top. Others they didn't. But over thepast 15 seasons, that window has constantly remained wide open. The Heat's, though, is in danger of slamming shut.

If you're the Thunder, which blueprint would you rather follow? Sustained excellence, or a flourish of potentially abbreviated prominence?

"There was not one season since I'm in the NBA that I really didn't truly believe that we could have won it," Ginobili said after the Spurs' Finals win in Game 5. "Every year we were up there. You know, sometimes we were No. 1 and we lost in the first round. Some other times we were seventh and we had a shot at winning it. But playing with the teammates I've always played, coached by the guy that is coaching us, I always felt that we had a shot, and I truly never believed it was the last shot. Even last year, after that tough blow and that tough series, Game 6 especially, I always believed that we had a shot coming back at this stage."

The Thunder have already enjoyed an incredible run of success. Over the past five seasons, they've won almost 70 percent of their games, grabbed four consecutive division titles, been in three of the past four Western Conference finals and made one NBA Finals trip. Four of their past five postseason exits were at the hands of the eventual champs, with the outlier being Westbrook's injury in 2013. The Thunder are playing the odds. Stay the course, stick to the plan and, eventually, you'll collect on those investments.

"The last four years, three trips to the Western Conference finals, a trip to the NBA Finals, and a year where Russell Westbrook got hurt and didn't even have a chance," Derek Fisher said of the Thunder during exit interviews. "In comparison to the Miami Heat, who have gone to four straight Finals and won two championships, and in comparison to the San Antonio Spurs, who have been one of the most consistent and well-run basketball teams and organizations in the last 15 or 20 years, nobody else is in that class, or even close to it, but this team."

This isn't some missive about running to stand still. While internal development is always the priority, two first-round draft picks plus some money to spend presents the Thunder an opportunity to improve. Patience is prudence, but that's meant for the future. Because, come October, the Thunder will be among a handful of teams that has a realistic chance to win the 2015 title.

[+] EnlargeKevin Durant
Tom Pennington/Getty ImagesKevin Durant has a big decision to make in 2016 if the Thunder can't break through the next two years.
As we all know, though, the shadow of 2016 hangs above the team like a menacing wall cloud over the prairie. There's no guarantee that Kevin Durant will buy into this patient approach or see the bigger picture. There's an assumption that Durant might follow LeBron's path and search out a better situation if the Thunder don't present a championship in the next two seasons. There's a distinct contrast between San Antonio's' sustained success and Miami's title starter kit approach. When 2016 comes for Durant, that will effectively be his decision: Does he try to replicate the Spurs' way, or the Heat's way? And after watching the events of the past two weeks, isn't the Duncan path more appealing?

You can be sure that Durant will pay attention to that. Who knows what happens over the next two seasons, but come 2016, there won't be a team that can realistically offer Durant a core better than Westbrook and Ibaka (and they'll all still be 27 or younger). The Nets and Knicks will have mostly empty rosters in the summer of 2016, but outside the bright lights of the big city, what can they give Durant? Less money, for starters, and the free agent class that summer doesn't present any combination of players that will be anywhere near the class of Durant's running mates in OKC.

Though the Thunder have modeled themselves in the image of the Spurs, they've been forced into a few detours. Falling in the 2012 Finals was the first, then dealing James Harden was the second. Westbrook's injury came next, then Ibaka's. The Spurs' archetype has worked, because it has worked. Worked five times, in fact. The Thunder's blueprint has built a perennial contender, just one that hasn't paid anything off.

"This is the team that is scratching on the surface of the best in all of basketball in recent years and in the history of the game," said Fisher, now the New York Knicks coach. "It's not as far off as it seems in terms of how bad it hurts, but to get across that finish line, it's still a long stride there at the end."

That's the Thunder's plan, summarized. Presti wants a roster that can enter training camp every single season with a belief that it can win it all. You need breaks, you need some luck (like not having one of your best players getting hurt). But the only way you're going to hit the target is to keep having bullets to fire.

Duncan won his first championship at age 22. But his first title as the true alpha was in 2003, as David Robinson was playing the role Duncan is now. His age: 26 years old. Durant will turn 26 before next season.

There are other teams coming, no doubt. The Clippers should be better. So should the Warriors. The Rockets are aiming to add pieces. Someone is probably going to land Kevin Love. The Trail Blazers are building. And the Spurs still have an assigned seat at the table until they decide otherwise.

But the Thunder are where they need to be. In some ways, it's just about outlasting the phase, and letting the natural course of eras play out. The NBA has always been about taking turns, and while it's presumptuous to assume something as big as a championship is an inevitable prize for sticking around, the Thunder can spend the next decade-plus chasing a title year after year after year if everyone just continues to buy in. The Thunder have wanted to be the Spurs, and still can be -- so long as a few someones are willing to play the role of Duncan, Parker and Ginobili.

Welcome Royce Young and Ethan Sherwood Strauss

May, 27, 2014
May 27
Abbott By Henry Abbott
You probably already know their names, but now they're becoming key parts of our NBA team; has enhanced its NBA coverage with the addition of Royce Young and Ethan Sherwood Strauss. Both have deep roots in the TrueHoop Network and will continue to be locally based to cover two key NBA markets.
  • Ethan Sherwood Strauss, in writing on and TrueHoop Network over the last four years, has established a unique and independent voice. He weighs in on some of the most sensitive issues of the NBA and the Golden State Warriors. Based in Oakland, Strauss will continue to cover the Warriors and the league for Prior to ESPN, he covered politics for and worked for the NBA. Strauss graduated from the University of California, Berkeley.
  • Royce Young is the founder and editor of the TrueHoop Network's charter member: He has been a leading voice covering the Thunder since the team arrived in 2008, and now will continue covering the team for Most recently, Young spent the last three years covering the NBA for and had previously written for The New York Times and SLAM Magazine. He graduated from the University of Oklahoma.


Thunder playing a two-man game

May, 19, 2014
May 19
Young By Royce Young
Kevin Durant, Russell WestbrookRichard Rowe/NBAE/Getty ImagesThe Thunder will need Kevin Durant and Russell Westbrook now more than ever.
Kevin Durant paused for just a brief moment to consider the question.

Is there anything you learned from Russell Westbrook's injury last postseason that you can apply to losing Serge Ibaka this postseason?

"Nah," he said. "It's two different monsters."

Durant meant the two situations aren't comparable, but Westbrook and Ibaka are indeed both on-court monsters in their own ways.

"Well, Russ is a top-five player in the world, for one. He's our point guard," Durant said. "Serge is a guy that brings so much to our team. A defensive wiz that comes in and knocks down that jump shot and blocks shot. But we have bigs to come in and try to make up for it, a few of them. But we ran a lot of our offense with Russell, so it's different."

A promising postseason run seemingly sabotaged by an untimely injury. Durant and the Oklahoma City Thunder have been here before. Last year, it was Westbrook, whose right knee injury in 2013's Round 1 ultimately led to the Thunder's dismissal from the playoffs in Round 2. The lesson from that one was simple: Despite Durant's brilliance, he needs the helping hand of Westbrook.

That fact was obscured some during the regular season, in which Westbrook missed 36 games because of lingering issues with his surgically repaired meniscus. With Westbrook out, Durant became the Slim Reaper, setting fire to opposing defenses like a dragon hunting goats in an open field, and he developed an incredible two-man chemistry with his sweet-shooting power forward. On the season, Durant assisted on Ibaka's baskets more than double the amount of times of any other Thunder player.

Once Westbrook returned, the Thunder tried to restore more balance to their offense. They have run fewer isolated pick-and-rolls with Ibaka and Durant. And in the postseason, Ibaka's usage percentage has dipped to 14.2, down from 19.6 in the regular season, per Ibaka is scoring less (12.2 points, down from 15.1) and taking fewer shots (8.6, down from 12.1).

Westbrook and Durant have been almost exclusively running the show. The duo is using more than 65 percent of the Thunder's total postseason possessions. They're taking 54.4 percent of the Thunder's total postseason shot attempts. In the fourth quarter, it's 68.7 percent of the possessions and 57.5 percent of the shots. In 10 games this postseason, Ibaka is taking just 1.6 shots a game in the fourth.

The Thunder have often turned to Ibaka to be the third scoring option they’ve needed since trading James Harden. Some nights, he's absolutely been it. But for the most part this postseason, he's been mostly complementary.

The lack of a balanced offense has been a glaring issue for the Thunder over the past five seasons. But while they’re at their best when the whole roster is in sync and contributing, the Thunder are at heart the two-man show of Westbrook and Durant, and they can win on the talents of those two alone.

When the Thunder dealt Harden to the Rockets, it made a lot of statements, but the biggest one was also the most obvious: This was now Westbrook and Durant's team. Ibaka could round out a big three of sorts some nights, but they would win on the strength of their offensive dynamos. They know it, too. In his moving MVP speech, Durant saved Westbrook for last. Those two have built a kinship forged through the fires of criticism and scrutiny, finding a common bond in wanting to win at all costs.

The relationship has really only survived because of Durant’s insistence to back Westbrook, offering his unwavering public support at all times. A lesser leader might’ve succumbed to the urge to throw such a bullish player such as Westbrook under the bus. Westbrook takes shots from Durant -- that’s a fact. But Durant doesn’t balk at it. He accepts it. He encourages it. He understands it.

[+] Enlarge Serge Ibaka, Kevin Durant, Russell Westbrook
Richard Rowe/NBAE/Getty ImagesThe Thunder will miss Serge Ibaka against the Spurs, but OKC has always been a "Big Two" at heart.
"A lot of people put unfair criticism on you as a player," Durant said of Westbrook in his MVP speech. "And I’m the first to have your back, man, through it all. Just stay the person you are, man. Everyone loves you here. I love you. I thank you so much, man. You made me better. Your work ethic; I always wanted to compete with you, I always wanted to pull up in the parking lot of the arena or the practice facility, and if you beat me there I was always upset. I always wanted to outwork you. And you set the bar, you set the tone. Thank you so much, man. Thank you. You got a big piece of this [trophy]. You’re an MVP-caliber player and it’s a blessing to play with you."

The Thunder are going to miss Ibaka. There are stats on stats on stats that suggest they're in big trouble against the Spurs in the Western Conference finals without him. (For instance, in the four games between the teams this season, all Thunder wins, the Spurs scored just 93.0 points per 100 possessions with Ibaka on the floor, and 120.8 with him off.) They can't simply replace his shot-blocking, his post defense, his energy, his intensity, his rebounding or his jump-shooting.

Still, as the Thunder players filed in one by one Saturday to answer questions about coping with the loss of Ibaka, there was a distinctly different feel from when they were answering the similar ones about Westbrook a year ago.

It's not that Ibaka is some unimportant bit piece. It's just that the Thunder have always been about Westbrook and Durant. They were only ever going to go as far as they could take them. Ibaka's injury clouds the picture significantly, but against the Spurs, the Thunder are still going to feature the two best players in the series. More than ever, this is a matchup of team and system against talent and individuality.

The Durant-Westbrook tandem has been tested and constantly questioned, with plenty of skeptics unconvinced they’re actually good for each other. The West finals is their chance to prove a point, to put debates about their cohesiveness to bed for good.

Really, it’s their only option.

Royce Young covers the Thunder and the NBA for Follow him, @RoyceYoung.

Can OKC brave the storm without Ibaka?

May, 17, 2014
May 17
Young By Royce Young
The Oklahoma City Thunder’s 2014 playoff run has been mostly about all the things that have gone perfectly right.

The four-point plays, Reggie Jackson’s Game 4 in Memphis, Russell Westbrook’s wild steal to force overtime in Game 5, Zach Randolph’s suspension, Kevin Durant’s inspiring MVP speech, the impossible comeback against the Clippers -- the Thunder have piled more season-defining moments into one postseason than most teams do in five.

But all it takes for a seemingly charmed season to be completely derailed is one thing to go perfectly wrong.

When Serge Ibaka limped off the court early in the third quarter of the Thunder’s closeout Game 6 against the Los Angeles Clippers, there wasn’t too much initial concern. Ibaka is an ironman, having missed only three games in his five-year career due to injury. He’s carved out of granite, a physical specimen seemingly created in an NBA power forwards lab.

Apparently though, even statues can get hurt. Ibaka is likely done for the remainder of the postseason because of a Grade 2 calf strain. The Thunder taunted the unseen forces that rule basketball one too many times, and now they have had their vengeance.

Obviously this isn’t the first postseason blow the Thunder have been dealt. Westbrook was lost in the first round in 2013 against the Houston Rockets because of a torn meniscus. Ibaka’s injury is less severe, and isn’t something that’s likely to linger into next season like Westbrook’s did. But it all but eliminates the Thunder’s defensive backstop from this postseason, leaving a contender without its third-best player.

Ibaka’s not as impactful as Westbrook, as least not directly. Ibaka averaged 15.1 points and 8.8 rebounds on the season with a quality PER of 19.66, and finished second in the league in blocks. He’s not a consistent focal point of the offense, nor is he someone the Thunder are constantly relying upon for game-to-game production. The Thunder can win without Ibaka scoring or rebounding.

Where Ibaka’s absence will be felt is on the defensive interior, where he’s been a huge presence. It’s not always about the shots Ibaka sends careening into the second row. It’s often about the ones he doesn’t, because they get released a little too quickly, or a little too high, and thereby have zero chance of finding the bottom of the net. Ibaka changes an opposing offense simply by becoming a mental obstacle. Consider what Austin Rivers said after Ibaka sent back eight Pelican shots in April:

"When you have a 7-foot guy who can jump, running on a fast break on defense, it's hard to get to the basket,” Rivers said. “Their defense is all on him. Without Ibaka, this is a whole different team."

The Thunder’s title contention plan has been built around an idea of sustainable success, meaning the ability to be among a handful of elite teams with a real chance for a championship every season. After dispatching the Clippers in six games, the Thunder made it three trips to the Western finals in four years, further affirming the plan. There hasn’t been a final payoff yet, but that was starting to feel more and more inevitable as Durant edges closer to legendary status.

Except, the plan has been delayed once again. Or at least apparently so. Internally, the Thunder will try and approach this with a positive mindset, seeing it as part of the continual process, a pebble in the shoe of a long-winding journey.

"We have had this group together for a while, and they've been through some ups and downs, and this is just another one that hopefully is only going to make us better," Thunder general manager Sam Presti said on a conference call Friday.

It’s a nice sentiment, but the NBA is about the here and now, about what happened last.

Grantland's Bill Simmons inadvertently foreshadowed this kind of thing just recently when discussing title windows, saying “Unfortunately, you never know when ‘The Rains of Castamere’ will start playing.”

You can’t plan for injuries and you sure can’t predict them. All you can do is assemble a competitive team, cross your fingers and hope for the best. Injuries have swung championships almost as much as great plays or great players. It’s just part of sports.

Winning a championship is often about the breaks, either good or bad. All of them had been going good for OKC, so it's almost as if some galactic balance needed to be restored. It can't all go that right for a team, can it?

And that’s sort of both the brilliance, and the simultaneously the problem, with such a well-crafted plan. There’s a certain fragility in contending, knowing that one tweaked ankle, one torn meniscus, one sprained calf can blow everything to pieces. The Thunder want to give themselves as many possible cracks as they can at that trophy, to present a team capable of winning the championship every single year.

The more darts you throw, the more chances you have of hitting your target. Though on the other side, the Plan B to it is just to wait for next season and try all over again and hope for better luck.

Westbrook’s injury seemed to strengthen the bond of the team, forcing Durant to understand that he desperately needs his running mate if he wants to claw through the postseason. Any nonsensical noise that the team was better without the mercurial point guard was mostly put to bed in the five-game elimination to the Grizzlies in 2013.

And despite a brief renewed debate during Durant’s “Slim Reaper Era” in January, the way Westbrook has performed this postseason seems to have put it all to bed. In the long term, the Thunder may be better for Westbrook’s absence. That’s the spin the Thunder are going to want to put on this, that they’re well-equipped for the adversity and abide in resiliency.

"For us, we as an organization have been in some situations in the past, and how we respond to those has always been the measure of the teams that we've had in Oklahoma City," Presti said. "Our expectation going forward is that we'll respond admirably."

But we’re talking about a team missing its third-best player. That’s not just something you can overcome with a positive outlook. Ibaka’s impact isn’t as direct as Westbrook's or Durant's, but Ibaka is a perfect offensive pressure release with his pick-and-pop game at the elbows and his ability to catch and finish in traffic.

He’s an anchor on the defensive end, allowing Thunder perimeter defenders to pressure pick-and-rolls and close out on shooters aggressively, knowing there’s insurance waiting at the rim.

So, the question is: Can the Thunder still beat the Spurs?

It was a maybe before, and it remains as such, although now it’s much flimsier. Durant has been on a warpath and might just use this to summon the Reaper again. Westbrook is a nightmare for the Spurs to handle because of his power, strength and size. The Thunder have found a rookie revelation in Steven Adams and have a savvy veteran in Nick Collison to fill in. There’s reason to believe, reason to give them a decent chance.

But if the Thunder’s season ends in failure, it will carry along another caveat. Last season it was about Westbrook; a playoff exit this season would be about Ibaka.

We’ve all been asking when with this team -- when will the process have its payoff?

Eventually bad luck injuries aren’t going to be good excuses anymore.