Print and Go Back ESPN.com: HorseRacing [Print without images]

Monday, February 26, 2001
Updated: March 7, 12:31 PM ET
Are the risks worth the rewards?

By Kenny Mayne
Special to ESPN.com

Before you think the system's in error and you've been sent by mistake to the NASCAR page, consider the link between the drivers who carried on after Dale Earnhardt's death and the jockeys who do the same after such calamity. In fact, the jockeys don't get a full week off.

All around Rockingham, N.C., where the Winston Cup drivers carried on with their chosen profession after Daytona, the question was repeated again and again. And the drivers -- sometimes the same driver -- offered opposing views depending on their frame of mind. From "Yes, it's good to be racing again. Dale would have wanted it that way" to " We'd be happy to sit out a week since no one really feels like racing."

They went ahead with the event -- a day late because of rain. No amount of recovery time was really going to provide a fix. If the decision is to continue in the sport, they may as well get on with it.

One difference in the two sports is that somehow the drivers are celebrated in comparison with their cars to a far greater degree than jockeys are in comparison with their horses. But the jockeys never get cheated out of facing similar risks.

More drivers will crash; more riders will fall. And the ones who make it through unscathed will give thanks they still have a choice to make. And most all of them will carry on. They already know well the dangers. An accident isn't really necessary to remind them. Those of us who don't drive 200 MPH and don't steer a horse through a hole on the rail won't ever fully understand the attraction, considering what's at stake.

Beating death can't be reason enough.