Stricker proves he's world class at Riviera
Super Bowl Sunday was also Dilemma Day for golf fans.
Raise your hand if you had plans to attend a bash for the big game but didn't want to miss any action from The Riv. That left a few unenviable options: Monopolize the big TV and pull others from their beloved pregame programming; elect for voluntary solitary confinement by sitting next to all the winter coats in someone's bedroom; become a social outcast and constantly refresh the leaderboard on your phone; skip the football festivities; or -- gasp! -- fail to keep tabs on the Northern Trust Open altogether.
This week's tournaments
So where are the world's best golfers teeing it up this week?
• PGA Tour: AT&T Pebble Beach National Pro-Am; Feb. 11-14; Multiple courses; Pebble Beach, Calif.
• European Tour: Avantha Masters; Feb. 11-14; DLF Golf and Country Club; New Delhi, India
• Champions Tour: The ACE Group Classic; Feb. 12-14; The Quarry; Naples, Fla.
Instead, Steve Stricker provided a final, previously implausible option: He romped through the field, leaving the afternoon free of any major drama.
Stricker was hotter than your party's oversauced nuclear wings, taking a 6-stroke advantage into the final round and never letting it get closer than 2, which was the final margin in his eighth career PGA Tour victory.
Of course, it was nice of the NFL to hold its kickoff until after the tournament was over. Such flexibility!
When it was all done, Stricker had reached greater heights than the guy who won your annual squares pool. The Weekly 18 begins with the idea that his win symbolizes more than just another triumph by a very good player.
1. Stricken with success
If the golf world wasn't turned completely upside down Nov. 27, when No. 1-ranked Tiger Woods was involved in a single-car accident that set off a string of developments leading to his indefinite leave of absence, then the metamorphosis concluded Sunday with Steve Stricker's victory at the Northern Trust Open and ensuing rise to the top-ranked currently active golfer.

Not that there's anything wrong with Stricker. In fact, everything is quite right with the Wisconsin native, who might now serve in Woods' former role but is very much the antithesis of his friend.
Think about it: Woods was a phenom from the time he could walk; Stricker struggled so much with the game that he nearly quit a few years ago. Woods could barely show his face in public without being besieged by fans even before this scandal; Stricker attended a Los Angeles Lakers game this past week and was recognized by one person. Woods has gone into hiding in recent months; Stricker now is front and center as the face of the game.
At the risk of turning this into a commentary more on Woods than Stricker, with the former out of action, it was believed the sport needed its No. 2 man to step up and take command. Enter Phil Mickelson, right? Well, not exactly. Certainly, the season is still young and there's plenty of time for "Lefty" to make his mark, but in two tournaments, he has shown early flashes of brilliance only to fade like a pushed tee shot on the weekend.
Instead, it's Stricker who has taken early command. Yes, he's the same guy who finished 189th on the PGA Tour money list just seven years ago, then followed with two more consecutive seasons outside the top 150.
He admittedly is boring, a guy who enjoys hunting and still spends his winters in Madison, hitting golf balls out of a heated trailer. All of which makes him the perfect candidate to shine in this post-Woods era, however long it may last.
After all, considering the state of affairs that led to Woods' absence, isn't it OK to root for the boring guy for a while?
"We all know who the best player in the world is," said Stricker, who has finished in the top 10 in all three starts this season. "I'll just continue to do what I do, and that's practice hard and work at it and try to improve."
The contrasting styles of the two Presidents Cup partners don't end with those aforementioned tales. While Woods always played with a never-let-'em-see-you-sweat mentality, Stricker admitted to "playing scared" Sunday, relinquishing 4 strokes to his closest pursuer over the first five holes. He hung on for the victory, but it was a flawed final-round performance, the type only a world-class player can get away with and still come out on top.
Perhaps the most fitting part of Stricker's day was that it happened in conjunction with the Super Bowl, leaving the victory well off the radar screen on the sports landscape. You get the feeling he prefers it that way.
Three up
2. Alex Prugh
First things first: His last name is pronounced "PRU." It rhymes with "Who?" -- a question many fans have been asking when noticing his name on so many recent leaderboards. And with "true," as this rookie appears to be the next true talent on the PGA Tour.
Follow Sobel on Twitter
Want to know what ESPN.com golf writer and blogger Jason Sobel is up to? Sign up now to track him on Twitter.
Follow him
• Follow ESPN_Golf on Twitter
Learn it, memorize it, get used to it. For those who were prepared to call the PGA Tour's rookie of the year race a two-man battle between Rory McIlroy and Rickie Fowler before the year started, Prugh already is making a strong case for his inclusion in any early-season discussions.
After pulling an MDF in his debut as a fully exempt PGA Tour player at the Sony Open, Prugh hit the California swing running. He finished fifth at both the Bob Hope Classic and Farmers Insurance Open, then followed with a T-10 at the Northern Trust Open on Sunday, becoming the only player to pull top-10 results at each of the first three Cali events.
His stats show a propensity for doing everything well; he currently is fourth in the tour's all-around ranking and is in the top half in every major category. A bomber who is averaging more than 294 yards per drive, Prugh has converted that strength into birdies. His par-5 scoring average of 4.36 is best among his peers.
Following a season in which no rookie earned a title and Marc Leishman took ROY honors by scoring as many top-10s as Prugh has by the first week of February, expect the current crop of freshmen to find more success. That might not be surprising, but it will be if Prugh is the one who enjoys more of it than anyone else.
3. Dan Quinn
Not many people are lucky enough to have a really cool career. Quinn is working on his third.
If the name sounds familiar, that's because Quinn played for eight teams during a 14-year NHL career, most notably the Pittsburgh Penguins, for whom he scored a personal-best 40 goals in the 1987-88 season. Upon his retirement in 1997, he quickly started making his mark as one of the most successful competitors on the celebrity golf circuit.

And now? Much like a modern-day sports-specific version of Forrest Gump, Quinn is working as a part-time caddie for Ernie Els.
The two men met during Els' victorious run at the Honda Classic two years ago and became fast friends, often teeing it up together in Florida while their families bonded off the course. They first discussed working together last summer and finally teamed up for late-season events in Singapore and China, with Els claiming a second-place finish at the latter event.
Those results earned Quinn a part-time spot on the bag this season, as he'll split time with Els' longtime looper Ricci Roberts, who will make his 2010 debut at Doral. With his new man caddying in each of his first three starts, the Big Easy already has a trio of solid results, including a T-12 at the Sony Open, T-5 at the Farmers Insurance Open and T-10 at the Northern Trust Open.
"I'm enjoying the heck out of it," Quinn told me after a rain-soaked second round at Riviera. "I love golf, and it's not like there are other things jumping out there in this economy. It's a great opportunity to get outside, get out of the house and work with a great guy and a great player."
Even though he's on the bag of an experienced three-time major champion, Quinn sees the role as more than simply carrying the bag and offering yardages.
"We get along well enough that for the most part I'm just trying to keep his spirits moving forward and get in the right frame of mind," said Quinn, who will caddie at the Masters and PGA Championship while Roberts takes the other two majors. "If he needs a push, sure, but he's pretty hard on himself, as well. He's impressed me so much, the way he manages his game. He really loves golf and he still has the drive. From that standpoint, it's a treat to be inside the ropes with him."
As for his own game, the former puckster will compete in a handful of celeb events this year, but isn't too optimistic about ever becoming a full-time pay-for-play golfer.
"I'll be 45 in June," he said. "Do I want to play some form of senior golf at some point? I don't know. Being out here with these guys, you realize how good they are. There's a big difference between the people who think they can play and those who actually can play."
One thing is for certain: For as well as Els has played recently, Quinn doesn't want any part of the credit.
"I'll take zero," he said with a laugh. "I'm just trying not to be a 2-stroke penalty every day."
4. Miguel Angel Jimenez
People hang on his every word, even the prepositions. He could disarm you with his looks or his hands -- either way. He can speak French ... in Russian.
Miguel Angel Jimenez is ... The Most Interesting Man In The World!
In case you can't tell, it's been waaay too long since I produced a version of the Live Blog, wherein the Mechanic's propensity toward fine wine and finer cigars has served as motivation for that Dos Equis-inspired nickname.
(True story: One fellow scribe once witnessed Jimenez working on the treadmill at a hotel gym ... only to find him puffing on a cigar outside just a few minutes later.)
Lost among all the interestingness of Jimenez, however, is the fact that he's been perhaps the world's most underrated player for more than a decade. With a playoff victory over Lee Westwood at the Dubai Desert Classic, Jimenez claimed his 16th career European Tour title -- and no, it didn't take long for him to light up a victory cigar.
While he might be best known for his discerning tastes and ponytailed Spafro, the 46-year-old Spaniard also tends to play his best golf when the pressure is on. He made the cut in all four majors a year ago and has cashed a check in 12 of 15 such starts since the 2006 season, including a half-dozen top-20 results.
Though he was playing a higher-ranked and -- let's face it -- more talented competitor in overtime on Sunday, Jimenez appeared to be the cooler customer, holing out from 12 feet on the second extra hole to extend the proceedings, then making a slippery 4-footer to clinch the win.
"Like a good wine, with age, I get better and better," he said after the victory. "I feel comfortable on the golf course -- that is key. I am not 25 or 30. I have just turned 46 but I'm still healthy and still strong. Not like I was when I was 25, but still strong and I can still play the ball. And if I feel happy and can focus, then you can win."
That's pretty interesting.
Three wishes
5. I wish it wasn't such a big deal that Corey Pavin named four assistants to help captain his Ryder Cup team.
I'll admit it: Up until recently -- like a majority of you reading this right now -- I believed that a quartet of assistants served as too many cooks in the kitchen. Maybe three too many, to be precise.
When Pavin announced his cabinet of Davis Love III, Tom Lehman, Jeff Sluman and Paul Goydos on Wednesday, already the mental image was akin to a basketball team with more guys on the bench in ties than uniforms.
Do the math and you'll find that with the captain included, that's one "coach" for every 2.4 team members. (And really, how do you instruct four-tenths of a player anyway?) It's also more than one captain/assistant for every match on the course during the opening four sessions, although Pavin said he envisions sending out one assistant with each twosome as he floats between the matches.
It's especially true when considering that other than pairing players and placing them in a specific order, the role of the captains and assistants is about as important as the position of cheerleader to an NFL team. Actually, the analogy I've most often made in the past is that these men are more like first-base coaches, giving their guys a pat on the butt and a heads up when necessary, but insignificant to the final result.
That changed two years ago, when Paul Azinger divided his dozen men into three "pods" of four players each, utilizing his power within the position to actually affect the overall outcome. Of course, that still doesn't change the reasoning behind having multiple assistants.
So why have I come around to seeing it Pavin's way? The answer is simple, and it has little to do with strategy. The reason he should employ multiple assistants is ... because he can.
Think about it: This is the one time in his life Pavin will be in charge of the Ryder Cup team, without a doubt one of the highlights of his lengthy career. He should share this time with as many friends and confidants as possible, without worrying about whether they will step on each other's toes. If one or two of 'em have little role other than hanging out in the team room and serving as another pair of experienced eyes and ears, so be it.
Sure, it's true that no team ever won one of these competitions because of its third or fourth assistant captain, but the truth is, none ever lost because of one of these men, either. Pavin should enjoy the company of his four buddies and the rest of us shouldn't worry too much about whether their overabundance will disrupt team chemistry.
And hey, there's always another way of looking at things. As one tweeter suggested to me, at least Pavin has four friends in the golf world to lean on. That might be more than can be said for his opposing captain, Colin Montgomerie.
6. I wish I knew when and where Tiger Woods will return.
Because if I knew, I'd tell you. Really. Hey, we're friends, right? And since you're interested in such information, I'd love to provide it. Ah, if it were only that easy ...
The truth is, I don't know when Woods will return to the competitive arena -- and neither does anyone else.
Like many of you, I've kept a keen eye on the recent "reports" that he would make his long-awaited comeback at the upcoming WGC-Accenture Match Play Championship next week. I put that word in quotes because these were less breaking news stories than pure speculation.
Nothing wrong with guessing, of course. In fact, allow me to do it right now: Having already prefaced this by saying that I don't know when Tiger will return, if I had to wager money on such a thing, I'd go with the 2010 Chevron World Challenge. That is Woods' own event in December, where he could control the media, the interview schedule and everything else -- and yes, it would mean he wouldn't play a single round on the PGA Tour this season.
I'm hardly working on any sort of inside knowledge here, but I've got to believe that golf is pretty low on the priority scale for Tiger right now. As a guy who has always reveled in the limelight of competition, he must want to remain as far from it as possible for the time being.
That's just my take. Please don't take it as fact -- or even rumor -- since it's purely a guess.
The problem, however, with the "reports" -- there are those quotes again -- is that they are being treated as fact. That said, I have yet to see anything that qualifies as more than gossip. No sources. No hints. No circumstantial evidence. Nothing to provide further insight into the story other than an unsourced rumor that someone from Camp Woods asked the PGA Tour about potential security for their client at the WGC event. Again, it's all pure speculation.
Don't believe me? Take the word of Tiger's caddie, Steve Williams, who told the New Zealand Herald, "All that I will say is the story circulating out of a Melbourne newspaper has no fabric to it at all."
Not to be outdone, TMZ.com is "reporting" that Woods will return for next month's Tavistock Cup -- a competition between Tiger's Isleworth community and the neighboring subdivision of Lake Nona -- to be followed two weeks later by an appearance at the Masters.
Forgive my apathy on the matter, but maybe that's because this isn't the first time such news has been out there. Prior to the Farmers Insurance Open at Torrey Pines, the rumormongers were abuzz about Woods' possible return to the site of his 2008 U.S. Open victory. It didn't happen then and I don't think it will happen at the Match Play, either.
But you know what? Just a few weeks later is the WGC-CA Championship, followed by the Arnold Palmer Invitational and then, of course, the Masters. I fully expect some form of this gossip to be "reported" before each and every usual Woods-attended event until the day when his name actually does show up on an entry list.
If I hear anything before then, though, you'll be the first to know.
7. I wish talk-show producers would find a new gimmick for golfers.
PGA Tour players were featured on two popular talk shows this past week, as Anthony Kim met with Jay Leno on Monday and Bubba Watson hung out with Ellen DeGeneres two days later.
Cool stuff in both circumstances. As I wrote a few weeks ago in regard to a handful of pro golfers being featured on "CSI," it is of great benefit for the game to showcase its stars in avenues outside of the golf course.
That doesn't mean show producers can't be a little more creative.
In each instance this week, players were greeted on their respective shows with a mini putt-putt course. You know, that idea was pretty interesting when we first witnessed it in October 1978, as a 2-year-old Tiger Woods rolled in a few putts on "The Mike Douglas Show." In 32 years, they haven't come up with anything better? Really?
That's not to say that each segment wasn't entertaining. It should be noted that AK's first stroke of the season in the U.S. occurred on Leno's set while accompanied by the alluring Jessica Alba. Meanwhile, Bubba contributed to society in a much different way, raising $15,000 for a Haiti relief fund.
Again, it's great that players such as these are getting the chances to immerse themselves within non-golf crowds, but it shouldn't be too much to ask for more creative segments in the future.
Three down
8. Lee Westwood
He missed a putt on the final hole at Torrey Pines that would have placed him in a playoff with Tiger Woods and Rocco Mediate at the 2008 U.S. Open. He missed another one on the final hole at Turnberry that would have placed him in a playoff with Stewart Cink and Tom Watson at the 2009 Open Championship.
So maybe it shouldn't come as such a surprise that Westwood failed to convert a 5-foot par attempt on the third extra hole against Miguel Angel Jimenez that would have extended the action in Dubai.
Even so, as the fourth-ranked player in the world and the reigning champion of the inaugural Race to Dubai, it remains mystifying that a man of his talents can continually allow such genuine chances to slip from his grasp.
"Any time I'm in contention, that gets me buzzing and excited," Westwood said prior to the final round. "That's why you practice. ... You put the hard work to try to get into contention and win tournaments and prove yourself under pressure."
It's difficult to find much fault with a guy who has finished in the top 10 in 13 of his last 16 appearances, except to recall that his career -- much like the finish in Dubai -- would be so much better if he could prove himself under pressure more often.
9. Rory McIlroy
I'm about to make a corollary that will be wholly unpopular, but stick with it and keep an open mind.
For years, Michelle Wie and everyone else around her -- parents, agents, sponsors, instructors, etc. -- were criticized for the way she was brought into professional golf. The common refrain: Since she skipped much of her junior golf career, Wie never learned how to win.
Now with one LPGA victory and a successful rookie season under her belt, it can be argued that Wie's people knew what was best for her after all. For the sake of this discussion, though, that's not the point. No, what I'd like to prove is that if you believe she never properly learned how to win, then you must feel similarly about young Rory McIlroy, as well.
Whereas Wie turned pro at age 16 and at times competed in PGA Tour events, which raised the ire of the masses, McIlroy took an approach that may have seemed more conventional in theory, but really wasn't all that different. After a sterling amateur career (during which he won more often than Wie), he went professional at age 18 -- not an uncommon practice for top international players.
Now you'd be hard-pressed to find anyone who thinks McIlroy made a poor decision -- and for good reason. He is ranked within the top 10 in the world and appears to be a future star in the making. Perhaps my favorite description of young Rory's game came from Ian Poulter last year, who said, "He hits it high, he hits it long, he putts well, and he's got a good head on his shoulders." The game sounds pretty easy when you break it down like that, doesn't it?
With a pair of strong finishes in his first two Euro Tour starts this season -- third in Abu Dhabi and T-6 in Dubai this past week -- McIlroy's star continues to soar. Still, the question remains: Has he properly learned how to win?
Despite certainly winning more often than Wie as an amateur and for all of his early success, McIlroy owns just one victory in 58 appearances on the European Tour since turning pro. That came at last year's Dubai Desert Classic, when he led by 5 on the final nine holes, but needed to scramble for par on the last in order to hang onto a single-stroke advantage.
Don't get me wrong: If someone was selling stock in the kid from Holywood, I'm buying. With an eye-popping 15 top-5s already in those 58 starts, he not only has a bright future, but a pretty impressive present, too.
While these solid finishes have been looked at with a glass half-full mentality, it should be noted that he has hardly proven he can win on the grand stage. Those who criticized Wie for similar shortcomings should also take a long look at McIlroy's results.
10. Ping Eye2 controversy
Ever get a song stuck in your head and you just can't get it out? That happened to me this past week, only it was a whole bunch of songs, not just one.
It started with the classic "Feelin' Groovy" (Simon and Garfunkel). Then switched to a couple of benign oldies, "Groovin'" (Young Rascals) and "Shake Your Groove Thing" (Peaches and Herb). From there, it meandered into a few unbearably lame ones, "Into the Groove" (Madonna) and "Groove is in the Heart" (Deee-Lite) and "A Groovy Kind of Love" (the Phil Collins version). Then it just got weird, as I kept humming some I didn't even know that well, "Groove On" (Timati/Snoop) and "The Groove" (Muse). And finally, there were a couple of personal faves, "Weekapaug Groove" (Phish) and "New York Groove" (KISS).
My conclusion? I think I've been working too much lately.
The grooves rule was front and center recently -- and it had nothing to do with too many songs of similar titles.
This was an intriguing topic when three players first used the 20-year-old wedges at the Sony Open. It became downright juicy two weeks later, when Phil Mickelson used one of these clubs at Torrey Pines and was accused of "cheating" -- but not being a "cheater," of course -- by Scott McCarron.
Now, though, the dust has settled. Mickelson, having made his point by bringing the issue to the forefront, removed the club from his bag at Riviera at this week's Northern Trust Open. McCarron apologized to him for those prior comments. Even Ping chairman and CEO John Solheim has agreed to discuss the situation with PGA Tour commissioner Tim Finchem in hopes of finding a solution.
What does it all mean? It's time to hit the snooze button on this one.
Let's face it: For 99 percent of the general public, the meat of this controversy began and ended with Mickelson using one of these wedges and being called out by a fellow competitor. Since then, it's devolved into something so technical -- and rightly so -- that you'd have to be both an attorney specializing in policy and a clubmaker to grasp all the details surrounding this controversy.
And really, it's not even much of a factor right now. As Finchem stated prior to the Northern Trust Open, of the 218 players to compete in any of the first four events of the season, only five employed the Ping clubs in question. And of the 132 players at Riviera, just two -- Hunter Mahan and Fred Couples -- went that route.
A compromise will be reached sometime in the future, whether that's one month from now, three months or not until the end of the year. Let's hope it's sooner rather than later. Wake me up when it becomes official.
11. Quote of the week
"I'd obviously like to play well this year and at least have a shot. I think the closest I've gotten is probably 112th on the points list. But hey, you never know."
-- U.S. Ryder Cup assistant captain Paul Goydos, on his chances of qualifying for this year's team as a player.
I'm sure I speak for my golf writing brethren when I ask: Can we petition to ensure Goydos serves as the official team spokesman during this year's competition?
If you're unfamiliar with the wit and wisdom of the man ironically nicknamed Sunshine for his dour disposition, you've been missing out. Goydos is the best quote in the game today. Considering his main competition might come from the man captaining the European team, an interview room that includes both Monty and Goydos could be downright entertaining all week.
In fact, it's already started. When named to the assistant position by Corey Pavin on Tuesday, Goydos provided a few other gems, too.
On last year's Presidents Cup assistant: "All due respect, I don't get the Michael Jordan thing. I don't get it. He's a nice guy, but I don't know what he has to do with golf other than he's tall."
On his Ryder Cup experience: "I have as much as Michael Jordan."
On being named to the position: "It came down to me and Brett Favre."
Forget the pairings and the wardrobes and everything else. If Pavin wants to get things started off on the right foot, he'll let Goydos do plenty of the talking.
Jason Sobel is a golf writer for ESPN.com. He can be reached at Jason.Sobel@espn3.com.
12. A Pebble sneak peek
13. Stat of the week
In five career chances at a threepeat, Phil Mickelson has never even finished in the top 10.
With victories at each of the last two editions of the Northern Trust Open and coming off a solid season debut at Torrey Pines a week earlier, Mickelson was the prohibitive favorite to claim a third straight title at Riviera.
Instead, we should have seen his disappointing finish coming.
On five different occasions throughout his career, Mickelson has won a tourney in back-to-back years. Never has he triumphed for three in a row, though -- or even come close.
• 1997 Tucson Open -- T-13
• 2002 Farmers Insurance Open -- MC
• 2003 Travelers Championship -- T-58
• 2007 AT&T Classic -- DNS
• 2010 Northern Trust Open -- T-45
It all fell apart early for Lefty this past week. After opening 3-under-par through his first 11 holes on Thursday, he played the final seven in 4-over. One day later, he slogged his way to a soggy 66, but appeared to be spinning his wheels in the mud all weekend, posting scores of 71-73 to finish T-45.
Then again, he shouldn't feel too bad about the final result. Macdonald Smith, Ben Hogan, Paul Harney, Arnold Palmer, Corey Pavin and Mike Weir are the others to successfully defend a title in L.A., but like Mickelson, none were able to capture three in a row.
14. The List
Many professionals can't stand playing in competitive pro-ams, the thought of six-hour rounds while paired with a 22-handicap enough to keep 'em on the couch rather than in the field.
Others revel in the atmosphere, posing for photo ops with celebrities and exchanging business cards with CEOs while actually playing a little golf, too.
Whether you know it by its first full name (Bing Crosby Professional-Amateur), its long-standing nickname (The Clambake) or its current official title (AT&T Pebble Beach National Pro-Am), the tournament that has been contested since 1937, pairing pros with not-so-average Joes, will take place once again this week on the Monterey Peninsula.
After perusing the entire field of amateurs, this week's edition of The List looks at the five people included in the event with whom I would most like to be paired if I were a PGA Tour pro. With apologies to Michael Bolton and Kenny G, here they are:
5. Brandi Chastain. Hey, there's always a chance that the former soccer star will celebrate a long birdie putt by ripping off her golf shirt, right?
4. Charles Schwab. Pros make a lot of money. This guy knows what to do with it. In fact, I would bring a notebook just so I didn't miss anything.
3. Bill Murray. Sure, the whole dance-with-an-old-lady-and-throw-her-in-the-bunker thing is getting old, but let's not forget: This guy is Carl Freakin' Spackler!
2. Tom Brady. Well, yes, in fact, I am a New England Patriots fan. Why do you ask?
1. Billy Payne. Never a bad idea to suck up to the Augusta National chairman. They do offer special invitations to the Masters, you know.
15. Swing thoughts
• I once interviewed Drew Brees for a "Sunday NFL Countdown" television feature. Without prompting, he recited the entire Dalai Lama speech from "Caddyshack" word for word. Now that's a guy worth rooting for.
• Four months after Fred Couples employed Michael Jordan as a de facto assistant captain at the Presidents Cup, I was pretty sure Corey Pavin would tab Larry Bird, Magic Johnson, Kareem Abdul-Jabbar and Dr. J.
Instead, Pavin picked four guys who can't dunk. Bor-ing! Although I've heard Jeff Sluman has a pretty sick crossover dribble.
• Speaking of hoops, Dustin Johnson's hole-in-one Friday lost "SportsCenter" top-play honors to some alley-oop. Whatever. I'd like to see that guy dunk from 500 feet away.
• I see that the current club controversy has been referred to in various publications as "Groovesgate." Really? Hasn't the statute of limitations on the "gate" suffix officially passed? If not, let's get Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein over to the Groovesgate Hotel to figure this whole thing out.
• The bad news from Tuesday's player meeting about the use of Ping Eye2 wedges? Nothing was resolved. The good news? The PGA Tour provided free soft drinks for all players.
• Wait a second: Is caffeine on the do-not-take list for the tour's drug testing policy? Let's see ... Vicks VapoRub ... pregnancy hormone pills ... nope, looks like caffeine is legal. Drink up, fellas.
• More unbelievable: 60-year-old Tom Watson finishing T-8 in Dubai or my 60-year-old dad getting carded buying beer this past weekend? (True story.)
• Paul Azinger will make his Champions Tour debut this week. He might not dominate the senior circuit, but I'll be willing to bet he has a blast trying.
• Sorry, but I can't read the name of the Nationwide Tour's Moonah Classic without hearing it in my mind being said by a couple of guys from South Boston or Dorchester.
• I'm not sure which is more surprising -- Atiwit Janewattananond becoming the youngest player to make a cut on the Asian Tour at age 14 years, 71 days, or the fact that my spellchecker had absolutely no problem with his name.
• Cool write-up about our beloved game in the current issue of Consumer Reports: "A nice ride, crisp handling and solid feel make any Golf a good choice." OK, so maybe the writer was talking about a car, but any press is good press, right?
16. On The Hot Seat
Joe Ogilvie has long made his post-career wishes known: He would like to serve as PGA Tour commissioner someday.
In a way, the 11-year veteran has been training for the job all along. Ogilvie currently serves on the Player Advisory Committee and is well versed on the various forms of tour policy.
He recently sat down on the Hot Seat to discuss the grooves rule controversy and where it currently ranks among the most important issues facing the circuit.
Q: You've been pretty outspoken about everything that is taking place surrounding the new grooves rule. Give me your take on the situation right now.
A: I think that a lot of players and a lot of people in the industry said that not only was this sort of a bad rule, but the USGA and the PGA Tour weren't ready for it, frankly. In 1997, John Solheim sent a letter to the USGA and the PGA Tour saying, "Look, I just wanted to bring to your attention that these pre-1990 era grooves are going to be legal. So whatever you do, these grooves are still going to be legal."
So, a lot of us were like, No. 1, why do you want to bifurcate the Rules of Golf for the first time in history? In other words, the amateur rules are now different than the pro rules, what clubs they can use.
No. 2, why do you want to [put] the onus and the cost on manufacturers when they're in the middle of the worst economic slump since the 1930s?
No. 3, why do you want to make golf harder when golf's numbers are declining? It just doesn't really make any sense. The way we've done it and the way this has come about is that the PGA Tour knew this was going to happen. The players knew this was going to happen and yet, we're caught flat-footed.
That being said, I mean, let's be honest: A little controversy is a good thing. We're on the front page of ESPN's "SportsCenter," which is good. It's kind of embarrassing at the end of the day, though.
Q: In your opinion, who is most at fault here? Is it the PGA Tour, the USGA or some combination of the two?
A: The PGA Tour had a chance to tell the USGA, "Look, we're not going to adopt this rule. We're going to wait a few years, make sure we get it right." And the USGA would have acquiesced and they wouldn't have invoked it. If the PGA Tour says, "We're not going to invoke the rule," the USGA is kind of in a box; they really can't do anything. I think they're equally to blame and I hope they're equally going to get it right. But I think the USGA has really cornered themselves into a box. They're almost a laughingstock, to be honest.
Q: How do they solve this? What's the next step in correcting everything?
A: Well, I think you get with John Solheim; that's the most important thing. And you get with manufacturers. It's a wedge rule; the other irons, pitching wedge down to 3-iron, it really doesn't affect golf. It probably makes it, on the margin, a little bit easier. But I think a lot of these manufacturers haven't produced many of these U-groove wedges, certainly, so I think you get with them and say, "Look, let's talk about what the USGA wants to do." It's good for all parties. I think the industry leaders have to sit down with the PGA Tour and the USGA and the manufacturers and say, "How are we going to play this game again?" Innovation has never hurt a sport.
Q: You talk about how all of the manufacturers have lost millions of dollars because of this. Explain that to me.
A: They have to retool their machines for different grooves. They've got to get literally thousands of golf clubs in players' hands and they're not selling these clubs. Well, maybe they have started selling some, but from retooling to shafts to grips to transportation costs, I mean, literally Titleist alone had to get about 12,000 clubs into players' hands before this went into play. That's a lot of money. Multiply that out over the entire golf community and you've got probably 10, 15, 20 million dollars.
Q: I think a lot of the casual fans out there really have very little clue as to what's going on, but many have heard the stigma of either "cheater" or "someone who is cheating" attached to some of the players who are using these Ping Eye2 wedges. Would you go that far? Do you think it's cheating if someone uses one of these clubs?
A: No, I think quite contrary. This is a smart thing to do. I think the rule should have been stated in a way that didn't let these remain legal. We could have figured out something. It's like if you hired a tax attorney and he said, "Well, the tax code was written this way and by being a Chapter S instead of an LLC, it's going to make you pay $50,000 less in taxes, but I don't think that's really in the spirit of the tax code," I think you'd probably find a new tax attorney.
Golf is kind of the same way in that if you've got clubs that are legal and if they're inherently better, don't you owe it to your sponsors, don't you owe it to your family, don't you owe it to yourself to play clubs that perform better? I get Scott McCarron's thing and I talked to Scott about it, but I'm more concerned about the legislation that the USGA kind of implemented without a lot of player help or industry help. That's what I'm concerned about. But I don't think in any way it's cheating and I kind of dismiss that. I understand what the players are saying who say that, but I don't see it in any way, shape or form.
Q: You talked about how you would fix this, but do you see the governing bodies coming up with a solution? Or is this just something that's going to linger for a while?
A: I think the governing bodies have passed their useful shelf life, to be honest. When you say governing bodies, it's really just the R&A and USGA; the PGA Tour doesn't really have anything to do with it. We play tournaments for a living and we're under these guidelines week in and week out. I think that's a difficult thing for a player to get their arms around.
It would be like if me, you and somebody else started making rules for the NFL. We're football fans, but I think they have a better idea since they're the NFL. And I realize that kind of goes against history, but the rules that have made the game great have really not changed in 140 years. The game of golf is all about playing the ball as it lies, being kind and gentlemanly to your opponent, call penalties on yourself and don't be an a------ on the golf course.
That's basically the foundation of golf. Integrity is key and the rest of the rules are like window dressing. But from a fundamental standpoint, if you follow those rules, you're going to be OK on the golf course. Like anything else, organizations kind of have to make themselves relevant. I think the USGA has probably been a little too aggressive in making themselves relevant.
Q: You've made no secret about wanting to someday be PGA Tour commissioner after your playing career is over. Does something like this take away from that or does it increase your desire to be in charge and legislate?
A: Look, they've ratcheted back the driver and now they've ratcheted back the grooves. From a legislative standpoint, there's really not much to legislate. I think certainly having a player's perspective helps; it would certainly give a unique perspective on what tour players are looking for and our decision making and how it would affect a majority of golfers. But I think that no, it wouldn't affect me in the least. And Tim [Finchem] has done, relatively speaking, a pretty fantastic job in his tenure. I mean, he hasn't had many hiccups.
Q: I know the grooves rule is the biggest hot-button issue today, but is this the biggest issue facing the PGA Tour right now or are there much bigger things that need to be dealt with?
A: I think this is probably in the top 75. Maybe not in the top 60, but definitely in the top 75.
Q: What are the top three?
A: No. 1 would be that the tour has to get its arms around getting the best players to play more often on our tour. No. 2, I think the tour has to take a hard look at ownership of the Ryder Cup and possibly rights fees for the major championships. I mean, we provide all the fields for the major championships and we don't benefit economically at all. And No. 3, I think the tour has to look at continually making sure that we provide the best corporate sponsorship experience in sports. Right now, we're very good and we have a very good charitable aspect, but I don't think we provide the best. That's something we have to get better at. So as far as the grooves thing, this isn't even in the top 60. It gets good press, but it's not in the top 60.
17. From the Inbox
In last week's W18, I wrote that the conclusion of the Farmers Insurance Open was one of the strangest I'd ever seen, as winner Ben Crane tapped in for par on the final hole, then consulted his caddie and playing partners to find out how he had fared.
It's one thing to not pay attention to leaderboards; it's quite another for a player to go out of his way to avoid them in hopes of not knowing where he stood.
Turns out, I wasn't the only one who found this a bit unnerving, as the inbox filled up with fans who couldn't believe Crane's decision to remain in the dark. This one comes from Rory McGuire in Braintree, Mass.:
It seems to me the concept of not watching the scoreboard flies in the face of any athletic/sporting instincts. I can't think of any other situation where an athlete would not only want to, but be able to get away with not knowing the time/score equivalent at all times. I know tour pros are playing "the course" and not each other, but when tournaments hit the back nine on Sunday, it is often essentially a match play situation.
Would Michael Phelps swim the final lap of a race with his eyes closed? Would Mariano Rivera not be told the score when brought in during the ninth inning and just instructed to "pitch like you know how"? No wonder many people have a hard time calling golf a sport and its players "athletes" when what is a seemingly incomprehensible athletic mindset can actually lead to winning. (Although can you imagine how slow Sunday's round would have been if Ben Crane was worrying about leaderboards?!?)
I tried to think of other instances in which athletes wouldn't know where they stand during competitions and the only ones I could come up with were pursuits decided by judges in which there are no in-progress scores, like boxing or figure skating.
While it might not affect a competitor's decision to land a roundhouse to the face or attempt a triple salchow, this could certainly alter the strategy of a golfer. At Torrey Pines, Crane led by a single stroke heading to the par-5 final hole. His tee shot left him in a position from which he was forced to lay up, then he reached the green in 3 and 2-putted for par and the win.
"I had no idea really what was going on. I'm thankful that I didn't," Crane later said. "Someone said, '1-shot lead' when we were going to the last hole, so I thought he might be right."
At some point, this scenario may be reversed. Crane could be trailing by 1 with a chance to play aggressively down the stretch, either forcing a playoff or even going for the win. He won't be able to factor that into his decision-making process, though, if he doesn't know where he stands.
Last week, he avoided any criticism of the strategy by finishing atop the leaderboard, but expect plenty of second-guessing and conjecture if the situation is ever reversed, especially in a major championship.
18. And the winner is ...
It should come as little surprise that players who don't normally come to the Monterey Peninsula this time of year -- notably Padraig Harrington, Retief Goosen, Sergio Garcia and Adam Scott -- will be teeing it up there this week.
With Pebble Beach hosting the U.S. Open for the first time in 10 years, many elite pros want to get an advanced scouting report of the course, even if it won't completely resemble the same one set up by the USGA four months from now.
That might serve them well come Open week, but as far as the AT&T Pebble Beach National Pro-Am is concerned, stick with the guys who are accustomed to the suspect weather patterns and interminable rounds.
No one knows about this more than Mike Weir, who has done everything but win the event over the past 10 years. Since 2000, he owns two second-place finishes, two thirds, a fourth, a seventh and an eighth, while missing the cut only once. The little Canadian has established himself as one of the game's pre-eminent mudders, his second-round 77 in drenched conditions at Riviera this past week notwithstanding.
Besides, there's a pattern. His last win came in 2007. Before that one, it was 2004. Here's guessing the three-year itch could strike Weir at Pebble. While others are working on their reconnaissance missions for the U.S. Open, he'll be finding his way back to the winner's circle.
You must be signed in to post a comment