After dropping Game 1 of the Western Conference semifinals 79-66 to the Seattle Storm, the Los Angeles Sparks now find themselves facing an elimination game on Saturday at Staples Center. What can they do to keep their season alive?
Despite being at home, the Sparks are heavy underdogs going into Game 2 of the best-of-three series. Seattle has compiled one of the best seasons in WNBA history and is statistically head and shoulders above the rest of the league in nearly every major category. The Sparks and Storm rivalry has played out this year like a lopsided prizefight, with the Storm taking six games in a row on the year. But if this is indeed a fight, it's important to remember that no matter what's happened in the earlier rounds, you always have a puncher's chance. Seattle is methodical on both ends of the court and would love nothing more than to run their offensive sets uninterrupted all evening long. If the Sparks can knock them off their track with a variety of different defensive looks and lots of pressure, they may be able to jump out to an early lead and get a much needed swing in momentum.
Most defensive schemes in the WNBA can work just fine with switching principles due to the general lack of size differential between the players. Unfortunately for the Sparks, that doesn't fly against the Storm because they employ three frontline players who are an absolute handful to guard in the post. In Game 1 the Sparks switched on a lot of off-ball screens which created easy interior looks for the Seattle bigs with the diminutive L.A. guards hopelessly trying to fend them off. The Sparks can trap, go zone, play straight up, collapse, double team and use everything else in the book defensively, but they just can't afford to switch on screens and let players like Swin Cash kill them, either with the ball or on the offensive boards. Finding an answer to slow down Cash may be one of the more difficult tasks Sparks head coach Jennifer Gillom is charged with. The forward has led Seattle in scoring the last four times these teams have met in the playoffs.
Fire with fire
The Sparks were suffocated by Seattle's halfcourt pressure defense in Game 1. There was minimal ball movement because Seattle's defense was rarely forced to help and recover and could instead focus on playing passing lanes. This presents an interesting dilemma. The Sparks' guards have to be more aggressive and take more chances in order to get the Seattle defense to scramble, which in turn should create better ball movement and better shot opportunities. However at the same time they must remain under control -- Seattle scored 19 points off Sparks turnovers in Game 1, including quite a few easy buckets in transition. The Sparks would be wise to follow the advice of John Wooden: "Be quick, but don't be in a hurry."
Seattle's centers and forwards scored 59 of the team's 79 points in their Game 1 victory. The Sparks face a personnel problem more than a strategic one – they just simply don't have the size to contest shots against one of the league's biggest and best frontcourts. Lauren Jackson is much taller and stronger than anyone the Sparks can throw at her, and she seems to be well aware of it. Once Jackson catches the ball in the post with deep position it's almost an automatic two points or a trip to the line. What the Sparks bigs will have to do is work much earlier in the clock defensively by keeping Jackson away from the block before the Storm initiate their halfcourt offense. Jackson has a nice turnaround jumper from mid-range. But if you're picking your poison, you'd much rather take your chances with her from 17 feet as opposed to the middle of the paint. To accomplish that, the Sparks will need to deny her space and push her away from the post as much as possible. It's a tall task, but working hard on the defensive end early could pay dividends.