Committee seeks more transparency
INDIANAPOLIS -- The NCAA's attempt to be more transparent about its tournament selection process proved one thing Sunday: It's still subjective.
Some schools, such as Iona, apparently met the eye test this season. Others, such as Washington and Seton Hall, did not.
"In general they were a very, very good team during the course of the year," committee vice chairman Mike Bobinski said of Iona during an hour-long show on TruTV. "I saw them play a number of times myself, and I think they're going to hold up very well in the tourney."
The truth is Iona's RPI ranking (47) was better than Washington (70), Drexel (66) or the other five teams on the committee's list of those left out.
Sunday's show "Hardcore Brackets" was intended to give fans a more in-depth look into how the 10 committee members determine the 68-team bracket that will be filled out by millions of people over the next several days.
For the first time, the committee released the seeding, from 1 to 68. It also listed the first six teams left out: Drexel, Miami, Mississippi State, Nevada, Oral Roberts and Seton Hall.
All it really did, though, was raise more questions and create a larger debate as it always does.
Committee chairman Jeff Hathaway acknowledged yet again during the show that one key factor the committee uses is how teams schedule. Critics could look at Iona's schedule ranking of 161 and Washington's rank (97) and wonder how the committee could make such an argument.
But the rankings aren't the sole arbiter in this process.
"You have to be aggressive in the (nonconference) scheduling. People are doing that," Hathaway said. "You look at Michigan State and they are No. 1 in strength of schedule. A lot of people are reaching out and doing that. Keep in mind, coaches have to do what's best for their program given the talent they have."
It can hurt anyone. Hathaway noted that Missouri, the Big 12 tourney champ, was not in serious contention for a No. 1 seed because of a weaker nonconference schedule. Kansas, the regular-season league champ, was because it played teams like Duke, Kentucky and Ohio State before starting league play.
The easiest way to simplify the process might be establishing a standard protocol of what it takes to get in.
But even Hathaway noted it wouldn't eliminate the subjectivity of the evaluations.
"I wish it was that easy. As you know there's only 37 at-large slots and if we set that kind of criteria, a lot of people could do that and then we'd have to look at who did it the best," Hathaway said. "So I don't think it's quite that easy. It's not as cut-and-dry as that, and again, 10 people look at the data in 10 different ways and they're also watching all those games on TV and in person."
Information from The Associated Press was used in this report.
SPONSORED HEADLINES
MORE MEN'S COLLEGE BASKETBALL HEADLINES
- Report: Coach K considering Team USA return
- Washington's Wilcox undergoes foot surgery
- Ex-coach Alford, New Mexico agree on buyout
- Kansas St. adds former Hoyas forward Bolden
MOST SENT STORIES ON ESPN.COM
2012 NCAA TOURNAMENT

Sixty-eight teams have their sights set on New Orleans. Which ones will make it there?
Tournament home » Bracket » Challenge »
ELITE EIGHT
- O'Neil: Ohio State takes next step »
- Brennan: Louisville's comeback is familiar »
- Kentucky, Baylor will speed things up »
- King: Self helps fans move past Roy »
SWEET 16
- Woj: Bluegrass Heaven can't wait »
- Katz on South winners: UK » Baylor »
- Pickeral, King on Midwest: UNC » KU »
- O'Neil on East winners: Cuse » OSU »
- Brennan on West winners: UL » Florida »
- Woj: Crean-Calipari bond » | South blog »
- King: NC State belongs » | Midwest blog »
- O'Neil: Boeheim's rocky ride » | East blog »
- Brennan: MSU turnaround » | West blog »
- King: State of Ohio shines bright »
- Brennan: The ideal Final Four team »
- Medcalf: The evolving college big man »
- Pickeral: Handling adversity at UNC »
- Brennan: Most indispensable players »
- Experts: Answering burning questions

- King: Sweet 16 Power Rankings » | Yours »
- O'Neil: Is the Sweet 16 still a treat? »
- Katz: Sweet 16 pressure meter »
- Medcalf: Six bold predictions »
- Brennan and Gasaway: At the Watercooler »
- Gasaway: Don't count out the Tar Heels

- Brennan: First look at the field »
- Medcalf: If UK can't win this year ... »
- Podcast: Brennan, King on Sweet 16

- Podcast: Gottlieb, Katz break it down

- Bracket TV: Talking Sweet 16 and more
- Brennan: Marshall's availability crucial »
- Pickeral: Who would replace Marshall?
- SportsNation: Pick each region »
SECOND/THIRD ROUNDS
- Week 1: Final impressions from each site »
- Photo gallery: From 68 to 16 teams

- Site blogs: Columbus » Greensboro »
- Site blogs: Nashville » Omaha »
- Site blogs: Albuquerque » Louisville »
- Site blogs: Pittsburgh » Portland »
- Brennan: Survive and advance »
- Brennan: A Friday night for the ages »
- King: Spartans become Nor-folk heroes »
- Schlabach: McCollum carries Lehigh to win »
- Brennan: Hoping for some madness »
PREVIEW COLUMNS AND FEATURES
- O'Neil: Forcasting NCAA tourney fortunes »
- King: What to watch in the round of 64 »
- Analysis: East » Midwest » South » West »
- Medcalf: Fatal flaws of the No. 1 seeds »
- Katz: Davis' game makes UK the favorite »
- O'Neil: Madness makes March wonderful »
- Keown: Tournament truths revealed »
- Howard: On a tourney rant and roll »
- Brennan: On the road to New Orleans »
BRACKET REACTION
- Medcalf: 10 bold tourney predictions »
- King: If I Were King Of The Bracket »
- First Impressions: O'Neil » | Lunardi »
- Brennan: The case for, against "snubs" »
- Tournament trends »
- NCAA tourney facts & figures to know »
- SportsNation: Vote! » | Rank 'em »
SPECIAL SECTIONS
- Insider: How will two freshmen help Florida?
- Insider: Will Kentucky live up to the hype?
- Insider: Memphis a top-15 team in '13-14?
- Ford: Why Wiggins would go No. 1 in NBA draft
- Recruiting: Most impressive on AAU circuit?
