Updated: March 2, 2013, 3:03 AM ET

1. Special Dime: 2013 MIT Sloan Conference

By Beckley Mason | ESPN.com

BOSTON -- The Los Angeles Lakers are the only team that does not have a representative listed at to the 2013 MIT Sloan Sports Analytics conference. Many teams made it public that they sent five or more. But even as the conference has expanded to the mainstream event it is today, there has remained a sense of conflict between two worlds: that of the removed statistical analyst, and that of the coach or player who can actually implement that analysis in competition.

The 2013 opening panel, which was moderated by Moneyball author Michael Lewis and featured Dallas Mavericks owner Mark Cuban, Rockets GM Daryl Morey and 49ers COO Paraag Marathe, in addition to baseball and political sabermetrician Nate Silver, suggested that division is failing.

Titled "Revenge of the Nerds," the panel was something of a victory lap for those who longed to see sabermetricians in powerful roles within sports teams.

Mark Cuban
Jerome Miron/USA TODAY SportsMark Cuban is never too far away from his Mavs.

Morey and Marathe each framed their rise as an outsider narrative -- the super fan with a mind for statistics who gets a break and ends up with his dream job. No longer marginalized by traditional powers, people like Morey and Marathe have the power to execute on their stat-based findings. Mark Cuban owns the team. If he wants advanced analytics to be a part of their process, it doesn't matter how many old-school NBA types aren't on board. Statistics are being used at the highest level by the most successful organization -- there's no debate over the new world order.

When Lewis wrote Moneyball, he said he caught heat from baseball people because he "screwed with the status structure." Looking at the success of the panel, it's clear that, even if it hasn't spread to every team in every league, the hierarchy of decision-making in sports has irrevocably changed.

So instead of a discussion of some primordial conflict between stat geeks and those athletes and coaches "in the trenches," the panel turned its attention to an exploration of what's coming next.

According to the distinguished group on stage, the next front is something that can't be analyzed from afar; it's the interior profile of the athletes themselves. This includes better medical information and training, but also psychological profiling.

Unlike offensive rebounding and 3-point shooting rates, there are no public data sets that can mine the personal dynamics of individuals working together. Both Cuban and Morey emphasized the importance of learning as much as possible about their players' physical makeup, and enjoyed some playful sparring over the effectiveness of the Mavericks' sports psychologist, Don Kalkein, who travels with the team and sits behind the bench.

When Cuban touted that his team was one of few who would invest in Kalkein's expertise, Morey shot back, "Mark has no idea if his psychologist is good. He just thinks he's good."

No one quibbled about the value of dedicating resources to understanding the role of psychology in sports. Marathe explained that, at the highest levels, the "margin is so narrow on physical differences" that the real gains can only be made by quantifying the psychological.

This is a change of speed from how advanced analytics have been framed in the past. In fact, how difficult it is to know the psychological state of a player with any real certainty was one of the original battlegrounds of the statistical revolution. Give me real data, the stat geeks demanded, not platitudes about who wants it more.

But it wasn't that stat-driven analysts didn't think psychological issues were unimportant, rather they argued it is foolish to make decisions without hard data. Now, the geeks are trying to acquire and process reliable information about what makes players tick.

This process will inevitably bring former outsiders closer to the lives of players and the interpersonal dynamics of teams than ever.

Mark Cuban said he likes to sit down by the bench so he can see who is paying attention in huddles, who's muttering under his breath when the coach is talking, and to monitor whether players are getting along.

"It's hard to be a decision-maker and be removed," explained Cuban.

The panel also discussed the frontier of "on-court" analytics, and both Cuban and Morey suggested that the way the game is played will change as new analytics are introduced. That's already happened, to some degree, as coaches throughout the NBA embrace the value of efficiency and the number of teams willing to live and die by the 3-point shot expands.

Detractors of the influence of advanced and sometimes obscure statistics in sports analysis have argued that such methods ignore the emotional, personal elements of the game. The word out of Sloan is that the next big prize is understanding just that, and with definitive data.

The race is on to learn more about what's happening between the lines by figuring out what's going on between the ears.

Dimes past: Feb. 5 | 6 | 7 | 8-9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 17 | 20 | 21 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28

2. The Dwight Effect

By Jack Winter | ESPN.com/TrueHoop Network

Sanders
Sanders

BOSTON -- Milwaukee's Larry Sanders has an almost too-passionate following among the NBA blogosphere.

His everlasting length, size-defying quickness and penchant for highlight reel blocks are sights to behold, and have recently garnered him some national attention as one of the league's top defenders. With "The Dwight Effect: A New Ensemble of Interior Defense Analytics for the NBA," Kirk Goldsberry and Eric Weiss use SportVU innovations to identify Sanders as the game's preeminent paint protector. And with that, the NBA stat geeks in Boston showered the Bucks center with adoration.

There are several important broad takeaways in these findings. First, preventing shots close to the rim is more important than reducing the efficiency at which opponents make them. "The Dwight Effect" notes that 70 percent of short shots lead to a basket, free throws or an offensive rebound. And consequently, teams are forced into more inefficient attempts from mid-range when they're limited near the basket. By measuring the amount of those close shots taken when a specific defender is within five feet of the basket, Goldsberry and Weiss identify the NBA's closest thing to true basket-protectors. At the top of the list? The paper's namesake, of course, the Lakers' Dwight Howard.

Though Howard blocked shots at less than half the rate of Serge Ibaka over the sampled time frame, the former is the more impactful defender.

Why? L.A.'s big man allowed almost 26 percent fewer shots near the basket compared to his OKC counterpart. The collective eye roll of NBA analysts everywhere at Ibaka's runner-up finish in last year's Defensive Player of the Year voting, then, seems more appropriate than ever.

Howard may be the inspiration behind this research, but he's not its star. Indiana's Roy Hibbert rates favorably in most every compiled metric, too, but not as well as Sanders. Said Goldsberry during today's presentation, "Not only does [Sanders] lead the NBA in blocks, he reduces the efficiency of shots that aren't blocked. Which is markedly more significant than blocks because it happens a lot more frequently."

So in preventing close shots, reducing the efficiency of close shots and blocking shots at elite or near-elite levels, Sanders combines the finest attributes of Howard and Ibaka. Thus, the paper's climactic line: "Larry Sanders is the best interior defender in the NBA." After "The Dwight Effect," it's tough to argue otherwise.

3. Breaking Up Is Hard To Do

By Ethan Sherwood Strauss | ESPN.com/TrueHoop Network

BOSTON -- The "It's Not You, It's Me: Break-Ups In Sports" panel had a juicy topic and the perfect panelist in Stan Van Gundy. You'd have to be a quirky kind of sports fan to not want Van Gundy's take on his falling out with Dwight Howard.

SVG delivered the goods, retelling his fateful decision to out Dwight's coach-killing intentions.

"It was something I'd been thinking about for a couple weeks," Van Gundy said. "He was pissed at me for having broken it."

The crowd ate up the details of one of basketball's more tumultuous public relationships.

Toronto Maple Leafs advisor Brian Burke, who often veered off topic, added some poignant commentary on the difficulties of working in a competitive, high-turnover profession. Burke had to fire his best friend, former Maple Leafs coach Ron Wilson, and the ensuing awkwardness caused him to miss a wedding. Such choices are common in the pro sports business.

Former Indianapolis Colts executive Bill Polian spoke of the tearful embrace that came with his axing. Van Gundy spoke of how he thought "Dwight, quite honestly, got too much criticism for the stuff last year," even while reaffirming that Howard was aiming to fire him.

Sports is a surreal world where you fire a beloved confidant, hug the boss firing you or stick up for the guy who sought to take your livelihood. Perhaps that's why the conversation got derailed at times -- because these are difficult issues, issues that a conference devoted to analytics can't address just yet. Polian asserted that "there is a human element in sports that is not quantifiable," and, "the emotional part is really hard."

There is humanity within the insular sports sphere. Though their lives are public, their internal, emotional worlds are often shrouded, as fans and media obsess over the games. The outside interest is animated by whether or not the coach should be fired, and not how it feels to be fired, or how it feels to fire.

Co-owner of the Boston Celtics Steve Pagliuca discussed the decision to keep Doc Rivers amid a popular call for his ouster in 2007. Pagliuca said: "The biggest mistake owners make is if you let the parallel universe run your thinking."

4. THTV: Analytics With Brian Kopp