Originally Published: April 6, 2014

Don't let UConn, Kentucky seeds fool you

By Eamonn Brennan | ESPN.com

ARLINGTON, Texas -- Texas-Colorado. New Mexico-Gonzaga. Oregon-Memphis.

Wait -- what?

That seemingly random list of imaginary matchups is, in fact, a sampling of the possible No. 7-versus-No. 8 national title matchups in the 2014 NCAA tournament bracket. They are, strictly based on tournament seeding, the equivalent of what we'll see in Monday night, when No. 7 UConn faces No. 8 Kentucky with the national title on the line.

That's where the similarities stop.

Save the seeds next to their names, absolutely nothing feels out of place about Monday night's season finale. Connecticut won the national title in 2011; Kentucky won it in 2012. Both programs are household names. Both teams have a wealth of talent. And both teams have outplayed -- not just upset, but genuinely outplayed -- respective handfuls of national title contenders. Kentucky worked through Wichita State, Louisville, Michigan and Wisconsin; UConn beat Villanova, Iowa State, Michigan State and Florida.

There were fair reasons why each team was seeded where it was at the tourney's outset. Kentucky lost 10 games and often looked lukewarm on the whole idea of college basketball in doing so. Louisville drilled UConn 81-48 in the final game of the regular season. Only now, with the benefit of hindsight, do those seeds look silly.

Either way, here we are: No. 7 UConn versus No. 8 Kentucky at 8:10 p.m. CT at AT&T Stadium on Monday night. It's simultaneously the strangest and the most fathomable national title matchup in years. It sounds weird and right at the same time. And it should be a lot of fun.

What stories are there to tell about this game? How do the two teams match up on the court? Here's our first look at Monday's national title game.

Colorado and Texas, eat your heart out.

STORYLINES

Kentucky Wildcats

In mid-October, John Calipari flew to Birmingham, Ala., for SEC media day, and when he took the mini-podium, he couldn't have been more confident. He said "three-quarters" of the Wildcats' practices were scrimmages, the implication being that his talented team's best chance of improving was to play against itself. He wanted them to "fail fast." He talked about his "dream" of coaching a 40-0 season, even if he didn't quite predict it.

You couldn't blame him: The master of the freshman-laden roster who won the 2011-12 national title with a team led by Anthony Davis and Michael Kidd-Gilchrist was bringing in a recruiting class widely reckoned as the best since Michigan's Fab Five. Many called it the best of all time.

And then the SEC season happened: Two overtime losses to Arkansas. An awful effort at LSU. A loss at South Carolina. A 19-point thrashing in the season finale at Florida. The Wildcats made all the preseason hype seem laughable. They made the quasi-moral arguments about one-and-done players seem trenchant.

Look at them now. The youngest team in the country -- one starting five freshmen and bringing two more (Marcus Lee, Dominique Hawkins) and a sophomore (Alex Poythress) off the bench -- is the first team in history to win four straight games in the NCAA tournament by five points or fewer. The Wildcats beat Wichita State, Louisville, Michigan and Wisconsin by a combined 11-point margin. They made all of the clutch plays. On Monday night, Calipari has a chance to validate his whole programmatic strategy. He has a chance to prove once and for all -- not only to his moralizing critics, but to those few skeptical Wildcats fans who lost the faith in February -- that his way works. Does it ever.

Connecticut Huskies

On Saturday night, just after the Huskies toppled No. 1-seeded Florida -- a team that had won 30 games since its first matchup with UConn in early December, by the way -- @UConnFanDotCom offered a handy primer of UConn-related pre-national title storylines:

National media outline for a UConn story: Left behind in realignment, APR ban, NCAA, Calhoun retires, Ollie seems nice. Press send.

That's a joke, we think, but it also pretty much sums things up. There really is a wealth of stories surrounding this unlikely UConn tourney run. In many ways, they can all be combined into one: anxiety about a cherished program's future, and relief at its continued success.

It's been a tough couple of years for UConn fans. Coming off the euphoria of the 2011 Kemba Walker-led national title, in 2012 the Huskies waved farewell to their beloved, legendary Jim Calhoun, the man who almost single-handedly took a minor Yankee Conference program and built it into a perennial Big East power. In 2012-13, Kevin Ollie's first season, UConn wasn't even eligible for the NCAA tournament. Ollie had to hold the whole thing together. Now the Huskies are back at the Final Four, led by the thrilling play of another brilliant scoring guard (Shabazz Napier) and getting the kind of timely contributions from secondary weapons (DeAndre Daniels, Niels Giffey) that Napier and Jeremy Lamb put forth in UConn's last title run.

Napier is at the center of it all. Indeed, he's the best story of UConn's run. Three years ago, Napier the sophomore openly lamented to the media that his teammates wouldn't listen to him, that they didn't respect him as a leader, that they openly ignored him in the middle of games. Now he is as respected and tenured as college basketball players get. And after it all, he is one game away from winning his second national title in four years -- one win away from bringing the Huskies full circle.

On The Floor

Offensive rebounding. If there is one thing to watch in Monday night's game, it's offensive rebounding.

More precisely: Kentucky's offensive rebounding. How do the Huskies keep UK off the glass? Can they? And if they don't, can they still win the game?

These are the crucial questions Ollie's staff must consider as it prepares for Monday night. Kentucky rebounded more of its misses than any team in the country this season. This has always been the case, even when the Wildcats were struggling through the SEC. They might have done everything else poorly. Heck, they often did. But because Julius Randle and the rest of the Wildcats created so many second chances -- many of them quick putbacks around the rim -- they always had a pretty high performance floor.

Now, of course, Kentucky is doing pretty much everything well on the offensive end. They're keeping things simple, they're creating good looks, they're penetrating and drawing fouls, they're moving the ball -- and they're borderline unstoppable because of it. But they're also still grabbing a ton of offensive rebounds and still gobbling up putbacks and tip-ins at an obscene rate.

Connecticut will walk into the gym Monday night allowing its opponents to grab 32.9 percent of their own misses -- 247th in the country. It's the only of the four factors for which UConn's top-10 defense isn't among the nation's best teams. It's ... disconcerting. That's probably putting it politely. Kentucky has manhandled two of the best defensive rebounding teams in the country (Wichita State, Wisconsin) en route to the final. Can UConn possibly hold the line?

If they can't, can they win the game? Can Napier do enough on the offensive end? Can Ryan Boatright break Kentucky's guards down off penetration enough to score at a comparable clip? Can the Huskies collapse the defense and create open shots? Can DeAndre Daniels bring his best breakout stuff against one of the tallest and most athletic teams in the country? And even if all of these things happen -- even if you go down the line and tease out every possible matchup and statistical factor at play in this game -- is there a good chance Kentucky will just overwhelm the Huskies on the boards and win the game anyway?

Offensive rebounding. Write it down. It is your official One Big Thing for Monday night: A seemingly minor slice of the game set to exert outsize influence on its outcome.

It will, more than any other, determine who ends this bonkers tournament -- and who emerges at last from this strangely surprising, and yet somehow totally expected, tournament.

This is the 2014 Final Four. One shining paradox.

Final Four Happenings

Comments

Use a Facebook account to add a comment, subject to Facebook's Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. Your Facebook name, photo & other personal information you make public on Facebook will appear with your comment, and may be used on ESPN's media platforms. Learn more.