A sport is criticized because its champion only won once and the guy who won eight times was nowhere near the championship.
The sanctioning body of said sport then makes radical -- yes, NASCAR, radical -- changes to the way it crowns its champion.
Seems like a pretty clear cut cause and effect, right? Take a closer look.
Ryan Newman's failure to win the Cup title last year despite winning a series-high eight races was one bone of contention from NASCAR detractors. Whether everyone agreed that Newman should have been the champ -- and many people do not agree with that assessment, by the way -- most did agree that more weight needed to be placed on winning races.
To that specific issue, NASCAR responded by deciding to award race winners an additional five points this season.
Five points. Some bonus. That's a dropped lugnut on pit road.
Add 40 points to Newman's tally from 2003 and he leaps from a sixth-place finish to ... um ... OK, Newman still finishes sixth. So much for more importance being placed on winning.
Speaking of five points, in NASCAR's new "Chase" -- which is not a playoff, per se, but it sure does resemble one -- which will give the top 10 or so drivers after 26 races a shot at the championship, the championship leader will start with a five-point lead when the 10-race chase begins at New Hampshire International Speedway.
So NASCAR could end up shrinking a 200- or 300-point lead to just five with 10 races to go. This begs the question -- why do it at all? After all, a five-point lead? That's a missed shift in Turn 3. Either allow the points leader to start the 10-race shootout with a larger advantage or even the playing field completely.
But that's neither here nor there. Actually, it is here, there and everywhere in NASCARLand, but we've waxed -- poetic and not so much -- of many elements of the new plan and we'll continue to do so. For now, let's focus on the evolution and justification for the point system shakeup.
NASCAR's motivation for this new championship chase clearly is not to "correct" what some perceived to be a flawed system that saw Kenseth bull his way to a title with just one victory.
If that was the case, they would have added more points for race victories and called it a day.
What NASCAR instead chose to do was attempt to create late-season excitement at a time when the sport traditionally lags with football and baseball grabbing sports fans' attention.
Traditionalists are furious, we have plenty of e-mail evidence of that in our computers here at ESPN.com.
But the only thing that in the end will matter, and the France family knows this well, is this: Does the championship chase create buzz and excitement, or not?
If it does, and the ratings will not lie, then NASCAR will be vindicated in the end and fans will have proved they are good at saying one thing but doing another. We expect many fans who say they won't pay attention to NASCAR this season in fact will be glued to their tubes -- unable to ignore their favorite sport, riveted by the championship chase spectacle.
But we could be wrong. Hey, it's NASCAR's gamble, and ultimately, we'll know whether or not it paid off. If it doesn't play well to fans, Chip Ganassi's take on the subject will likely ring true.
"The good news is, if NASCAR feels that it's not working, I'm sure they're not afraid to go
back on the decision," Ganassi said. "It wouldn't be the first time."
Bingo.