Passive-aggressive approach fails to work for Blake

PARIS -- The iron door to the Court 1 media seats creaked open mid-point, and John Martin of The New York Times stepped through. Scowling, James Blake sauntered to the ad side of the court, just 20 feet away.

"You all set?" he asked sarcastically. "You all right?"

Martin, flustered, did not respond.

Two points later, Blake continued. "You know the changeover is every two games?"

"Sorry, Jim -- uh, James," Martin said, quite sincerely.

Clearly, Blake has remarkable peripheral vision. Apparently, his hearing is even more acute.

By now, Blake's all-in game is familiar to tennis fans. He hits the ball flat and hard. At its best, it can be glorious. At its worst … frivolous and infuriating.

Historically, critics have argued for a kinder, gentler game from Blake, suggesting a slightly-less-is-more philosophy would reap greater rewards.

On Thursday, against hard-hitting Latvian teenager Ernests Gulbis, Blake stepped out of character and took a little something off the ball, didn't go for the lines like he usually does. That didn't work, either.

It was Gulbis, ranked No. 80 in the world, who advanced to the third round of the French Open, 7-6 (2), 3-6, 7-5, 6-3. Blake, No. 8, ended another clay season in disappointment.

"He's got really heavy strokes, and he also can be pretty streaky," said Blake, arms crossed and somewhat dour. "So there are times when you feel like you should just get the ball in and he might self-destruct. When you do that, just get the ball in, he's going to hurt you. He did that enough times in big moments, and that's the difference, him going for big shots in the big moments and me maybe not going after it.

"I think I played the way too many commentators think I should play. A lot of people that talk about tennis don't play tennis, and they don't play me. It's funny that today was a perfect example of what not to do in my game."

Indeed, Blake's 29 winners and 16 unforced errors were efficient numbers well below his typical totals. But in the end, it was his unreliable first serve and an inability to deal with Gulbis' clever drop shots (there were a dozen) that did him in. That, and a blown forehand volley that would have erased a critical break point in the fourth set.

And so, the education of James Riley Blake continues. He is 28, old by the standards of professional tennis, but for better or worse, he always has done it his way.

He has dazzling athletic skills. He still is one of the fastest players in the game and has a big serve and forehand that carried him to a career-high ATP ranking of No. 4 in 2006. But for all his gifts, Blake has managed to reach only two Grand Slam quarterfinals, both at the U.S. Open, where the swift courts maximize his game. He has won 45 of his 70 Grand Slam singles matches, but the best he has ever done at the Euro Slams -- Roland Garros and Wimbledon -- is the third round.

U.S. Davis Cup captain Patrick McEnroe has been among those calling for a more passive-aggressive approach, something McEnroe said his coach at Stanford, Dick Gould, termed "aggressive with margin." For the record, Blake was 5-2 in singles matches last year as the United States won its first Davis Cup title since 1995.

"I think he's tempering his game -- not changing it," McEnroe said Thursday morning over a café crème in the basement at Suzanne Lenglen. "James does well attacking the second serve, takes it so early and hits it so hard. In Davis Cup, we say, 'James, you'll win just as many points hitting it back to the middle of the court.'

"Now, at 3-4, 30-all, with his opponent serving, instead of trying for a clean winner on the return, now he still hits it big but down the middle instead of the corner."

Still, McEnroe allowed, presciently, "Let's face it -- he's very streaky. James tends to have those matches that make guys like me scratch my head."

Blake, sporting a Houston Astros cap, didn't literally scratch his head after the match. He didn't have to.

"My game flows out of my forehand and my attacking game," he said. "Being able to attack and put pressure on him. I wasn't forcing points. I wasn't the one that was dictating all the time.

"The Americans, a lot of times, don't have the highest expectations on clay. But I really felt like this match today was a match I could have won."

Greg Garber is a senior writer for ESPN.com.