Chris Paul's first trip to Los Angeles might have been canceled, but it looks like he'll be headed there after all with just a simple change of address for his destination arena. The Clippers and Hornets are closing in on a deal that would send Paul to Los Angeles with no third team involved -- just a straight-up trade of a superstar in his prime for some rebuilding parts. The haul the Hornets would receive seems fair, but would they have gotten a better deal from the Lakers?


Which would have been a fairer trade?

The Lakers would have given the Hornets Lamar Odom & Co., but the league intervened. Is this deal better?

SportsNation

What would have been a better return on a Chris Paul trade?

  •  
    75%
  •  
    25%

Discuss (Total votes: 61,758)


Will the trade go through?

One Chris Paul trade has already fallen through. The potential inclusion of Eric Bledsoe could be a snag in this trade.

SportsNation

Which team will Chris Paul play for next season?

  •  
    34%
  •  
    21%
  •  
    46%

Discuss (Total votes: 163,684)


Better L.A. combo?

There's been talk of bringing Dwight Howard to the Lakers, but would a Howard-Bryant combo beat a Griffin-Paul duo?

SportsNation

Which would be a better combination next season?

  •  
    63%
  •  
    37%

Discuss (Total votes: 74,886)

Comment »

ESPN Conversations


You must be signed in to post a comment

Already have an account?