Reggie Bush has, belatedly, returned his Heisman Trophy as a consequence of his role in a scandal that resulted in harsh penalties handed down to USC. Should he have had to give his hardware back?
dostoevsky23: " He was the most dominant player that year and deserves to keep the hardware."
schniebsj: "I would just have anothe rreplica made, and proudly place it in my home. They can strip it away but does not take away form fact that he won it. Its not like he was on the juice or anything to make him better he took a few bucks on his future income just like 99% of people would do to keep family going."
jeremy_cracker: "Lame. Who cares if he returned it. He shouldn't have won it in the first place."
FredFrimp: "It probably took him two years to remember where he left that worthless piece of junk."
K24Risk: "Big deal, he is giving the trophy back. When people do look back at history, they will see a vacany for that year, and will come to know Bush was the winner and an amazing college player. He is was unbelievable and was the best college player during that year. Giving back will not take that away from him."