Won't this year's Hall of Fame ceremony be grand? We can't wait to go and watch absolutely no one give a speech -- because the Baseball Writers' Association of America let no one in this time around. Only Craig Biggio and Jack Morris came close to the 75 percent threshold necessary to get one's face on a plaque in Cooperstown. Clearly, the issue of performance-enhancing drugs is tainting the process in some way; Roger Clemens and Barry Bonds would have been surefire first-time inductees had they not been connected to steroids. The spectacle of an empty induction year might force the Hall of Fame into making some sort of change.

Ballot: Which top vote-getters from this year's class will eventually make it in?

Vote: Will more worthy candidates create a Hall of Fame logjam?

A different process?

Some voters submitted blank ballots. Other voters picked single, strange candidates. Others didn't vote at all.


What do you make of the Baseball Hall of Fame's selection process?


Discuss (Total votes: 56,879)

A minimum requirement?

We could theoretically see a year in which there were no deserving candidates, but several exceptional players were on this ballot.


Should the Baseball Hall of Fame induct a player from the writers' ballot every year, even if the top vote-getter doesn't get 75 percent of the vote?


Discuss (Total votes: 46,288)

Destigmatize PEDs?

Mark McGwire was on 17 percent of ballots this year, but he won't be the last player connected to PEDs to be on the Hall of Fame list.


Will a known PED user ever be inducted into the Baseball Hall of Fame?


Discuss (Total votes: 176,762)

New definitions?

Voters have expressed some confusion over how to treat players with possible connections to PEDs, which may explain Roger Clemens and Barry Bonds' low numbers.


Should the Baseball Hall of Fame give voters more defined instructions on how to treat players from the ''steroids era''?


Discuss (Total votes: 26,504)

Comment »