- Greg Garber, Writer, Reporter
- 0 Shares
WIMBLEDON, England -- The story in the Times of London was blistering.
Is Wayne Odesnik -- who had his 2010 ban for transporting human growth hormone halved to one year -- a snitch?
"You want to make sure that people who are fined and suspended aren't let off because they are telling on other players," the Times quoted Andy Murray, the No. 1-ranked player from Great Britain as saying. "That is snitching."
The story, which made ample use of Andy Roddick's dated but sharp criticism of Odesnik, suggested that Odesnik had his two-year sentence reduced to a year for providing "substantial assistance," as described in the International Tennis Federation's drug policy.
On Wednesday, after losing a five-set match to Bjorn Phau, the 26-year-old American fired back.
"I heard today that there was a pretty harsh article that I think is a little bit unfair for the media to write something that is completely and utterly 100 percent false," Odesnik said when the subject was raised in his postmatch press conference. "I think one thing I would like each and every single one of you to jot this down in capital letters: I would 100 percent never say anything bad about a player or do something that I was a spy or something of that sort.
"That is utterly 100 percent false. I don't know where you guys started this rumor or where you heard it from, but I think that needs to be clarified."
So why was the sentence halved? What "substantial assistance" did he provide?
"I explained to them why I had the medication," Odesnik said. "I proved to them medical information of why I had it, and for that, I was 100 percent honest with them. I never tried to lie to them. I was completely honest with them, and therefore, they understood the reasoning why I had it and they reduced my sentence."
Odesnik said unequivocally that he had never furnished information on other players to the ITF.
The Times story essentially described Odesnik as a pariah.
"There is someone in the locker room, and we are not sure if he is here to play tennis or to watch over what everyone else is doing," said 85th-ranked Sergiy Stakhovsky, who is also on the ATP Player Council. "That makes us all feel uncomfortable."
Odesnik, however, said he has a cordial relationship with a lot of the players.
"They say hi to me," he said. "At night, I don't go and have dinner with them. I have never been that way. I'm trying to keep to myself the best that I can, be friendly with people if they're friendly with me. That's it.
"[The ITF] seemed fit to let me play. So what do you want from me? I'm here; I'm doing the best that I can; I'm playing; I'm proving that I belong here."
Odesnik pleaded guilty to importing HGH into Australia in 2009 after Australian customs officials found the performance-enhancing substance in his possession at the airport in Melbourne. His ban began the following year. After serving a year, Odesnik returned to tennis in 2011 and played Challenger Tour events almost exclusively and lost the only ATP World Tour-level match he played after qualifying in Washington, D.C. This year, he has played in eight Challenger tournaments and is now 0-3 on the ATP World Tour.
His ranking is currently No. 135 -- not terribly far from his career best (No. 77) but vastly improved from the No. 1,381 spot he was in when the ban ended. With his current ranking, Odesnik will gain direct entry into some of the smaller tournaments, and if he has more success in Challenger events, he could soon be playing regularly in the Grand Slam events.
He lost in qualifying at Wimbledon but slipped into the main draw as a "lucky loser" when Frenchman Gael Monfils pulled out with an injury.
"The fact that I started from absolutely zero with no ranking points, no wild card, nothing, and a year and a half later I'm already almost top 100, playing in a Grand Slam event," Odesnik said, "I think that shows my level is there and I belong here. I'm playing well and I still have a bright future ahead of me."
Wayne Odesnik has been called a pariah, a spy and a snitch after his two-year suspension was cut in half. But is fair?